Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Will the Supreme Court rule that a President has "limited" immunity?
Because all they need to do is give Trump an inch and he will take a mile.
How can we forget how the Mueller Report gave him "full exoneration" and Mueller had to come out and say that was not the case?
The wording of the Supreme Court ruling will be very important.
Will they give Trump just enough "immunity" so he can spin it any way he wants?
| 21 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
| They will rule that a President or former President does not have "absolute immunity". | |
0 (0%) |
|
| They will say that presidents have "limited" immunity. | |
2 (10%) |
|
| They will not rule on it at all and will let the Appeals Court decision stand as is. | |
8 (38%) |
|
| They will give Trump a win on the Colorado ballot issue and a loss on the immunity question. | |
7 (33%) |
|
| They will rule that the Appeals Court was wrong and that Trump does have absolute immunity. | |
0 (0%) |
|
| They will say that no one is above the law and let the ruling stand. | |
1 (5%) |
|
| They will delay their decision until after the election. | |
2 (10%) |
|
| None of the above. | |
0 (0%) |
|
| Other? | |
1 (5%) |
|
| 0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
| Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
|
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
