General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew York Times Editorial Board Calls for Biden to Step Aside
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/opinion/biden-election-debate-trump.htmlNever seen that before.
Think. Again.
(15,404 posts)CurtEastPoint
(19,026 posts)Prairie Gates
(2,178 posts)kelly1mm
(5,006 posts)him would be a (slight) exaggeration.
a kennedy
(31,373 posts)tman
(1,109 posts)Prairie Gates
(2,178 posts)tman
(1,109 posts)I assume they have called for Trump to step aside in light of his recent convictions?
PatSeg
(49,533 posts)That should have been their response to his 34 convictions. Damn, this really sucks.
NoRethugFriends
(2,753 posts)They would ask me asking Biden to drop out because they don't want Trump to win. Asking Trump to drop out it's just a meaningless thing to posit.
PatSeg
(49,533 posts)Trump was convicted on 34 counts on May 30th. In the past four weeks, how many journalists, pundits, and editorial boards have asked Trump, a convicted felon, to step aside?
I understand that many of them don't want Trump to win, but they sure haven't been terribly helpful for the most part. Meanwhile, I don't think a last minute replacement for Biden at this point would be very helpful.
NoRethugFriends
(2,753 posts)CTyankee
(64,510 posts)I'm sure some of its editorial writers must being taking tranquilizers right about now. I hope they fought like hell for this not to happen!
My son, who lives in NYC, tells me he is not surprised. I'll see him later and have a long conversation about it with him. He's a good Dem and a smart guy, but I need to find out why he is "not surprised."
PatSeg
(49,533 posts)Actually, I was surprised at some of the voices calling for Biden to redraw. I really expected better from people like Paul Krugman and Jonathan Alter. They should have taken those tranquilizers BEFORE they wrote their opinions. Talk about kneejerk reactions.
I don't know. Maybe some of them have always felt this way and the poor debate performance was a good excuse to say it out loud.
artemisia1
(764 posts)changing candidates is a legitimate discussion at this point. No disrespect to President Biden who is a thousand times that man that Trump is.
choie
(4,382 posts)This was ONE debate!! A poor performance I. One debate doesnt signify that Biden is unfit to be president! How ridiculous is that!
And many of these journalists have been around for a long time. They of all people should have known better.
PatSeg
(49,533 posts)to prop up another candidate. It takes a long time and a lot of money and planning to put together a presidential run.
Meanwhile, it was understandable that journalists would write about Biden's poor debate performance and express legitimate concern, but they could have waited a day or two before declaring en masse that Biden should redraw. The stark contrast between Biden on that debate stage and Biden in North Carolina the next day tells a different story than the ones they were writing.
TBF
(33,324 posts)because he does not get to be in charge of Joe's schedule.
Maybe you're right, but the New York Times saying it carries some weight.
TBF
(33,324 posts)"carries some weight"?
But you've neglected to address the subject of the other candidate with the 34 felonies. Care to tell us how you feel about that? Does that "carry weight" with you?
Prairie Gates
(2,178 posts)Now you know how I feel. I still think that the NY Times still functions as a paper opf record in the US, and that its editorial board opinion is a big deal, even if we disagree with its substance. The NY Times editorial board calling for a sitting President to step aside from his reelection bid is a big deal, even if you don't think so.
TBF
(33,324 posts)I've been reading it for years. I'm in Texas now, but I spent 15 years on the East Coast, working and living in Wash DC and NYC.
I had a lot of respect for both papers then. Now the Wash Post is owned by Bezos and the current family member running the NYTimes has a problem with Joe Biden.
You've told me how you feel about Trump, and that's fine - but you still didn't answer the question. Don't you feel like someone with 34 felonies should be questioned? Shouldn't Arthur question how Trump can be the nominee for the republicans?
Prairie Gates
(2,178 posts)There is actually quite a bit of questioning of Trump in the editorial.
I don't know why you're making this about my opinion.
TBF
(33,324 posts)and you did write the OP so folks will respond ...
Stock market is down 10 points today so maybe we're both a little correct. Investors aren't feeling too happy either way. Hopefully the work President Biden has done the past 4 years will be enough to convince them (and independents) that throwing it back in the hands of Trump is not the best thing for the future of this country.
Prairie Gates
(2,178 posts)Biophilic
(4,414 posts)They have dug their own grave.
orange jar
(767 posts)Do most people nowadays decide something based on a newspaper editorial board's opinions? This isn't the twentieth century anymore.
Prairie Gates
(2,178 posts)It's an information point, but one that carries some weight. Still does.
orange jar
(767 posts)but more so that people nowadays don't trust/hold news agencies in as high of a regard as they used to. We'll see what happens, I guess, but I don't expect Biden or his allies to listen to the NYT on this (nor should he, imo)
Prairie Gates
(2,178 posts)They'll decide based on polls and fundraising. The problem is that those may be affected by newspaper of record opinions. Just think of the high regard with which some of the (self-professedly) richest most vocal fundraisers around here hold the NY Times opinon. If polls crater and the fundraisers put pressure, Biden won't make it to the convention. The NY Times is a canary in a coal mine on that. We'll see, sure, but real soon.
NoRethugFriends
(2,753 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 28, 2024, 11:33 PM - Edit history (1)
They have drifted significantly right
Prairie Gates
(2,178 posts)Keep telling yourself that.
Response to Prairie Gates (Reply #9)
orange jar This message was self-deleted by its author.
Raven123
(5,814 posts)XanaDUer2
(12,678 posts)I'm assuming they've had similar op eds about Trump
malaise
(275,217 posts)OK then
Silent3
(15,909 posts)...and that this suggestion that Biden step down is about realpolitik, about accounting for (not the NYT's words) the stupid way the American public makes voting decisions.
They clearly state that they consider a Trump win a huge threat to the country.
Not calling on Trump to resign is simply knowing Trump, nor the Republican party, have a good side to appeal to for dropping out for the good of the country.
It would of course be better if they skipped over the expectations game and flat out called on Trump to resign too, just to make things more clear and definitive, but I think we all know that would be a futile gesture. Republicans would glory in being told Trump should withdraw by the NYT, so saying Trump should quit the race would be nothing more than preaching to the choir.
Silent Type
(5,495 posts)Good to know - I avoid the NYT
Blue Owl
(53,720 posts)Remember every other sentence out of his anus mouth used to be the failing New York Times
These NYT reporters are a bunch of sorry fucks suffering from some kind of bizarre Stockholm Syndrome abuse
.
mcar
(43,185 posts)Fck them. They are fascists.
For the NYT Ttolls!🤮😈
Sgent
(5,858 posts)which they are ok with, since they want Trump to lose.
bigtree
(88,782 posts)...not even after his conviction on election fraud.
The NYT is a criminal enabling enterprise.
LiberalFighter
(53,112 posts)Without lubrication.
JoseBalow
(4,384 posts)deminks
(11,201 posts)Seems to be spearheaded by the New Zork Times.
How did that work out for you, Jonathan Swan, today when Joe didn't drop out? I saw you drooling on Xitter before he spoke. You thought you got him. How do you splain that one to the 🍊 anus, or Uncle Pootey Poot, Maggie and Jonathan? You kiss up to a sexual predator, fraud, and convicted felon cause he might win?
IMHO.
Frank D. Lincoln
(358 posts)nt.
Eliot Rosewater
(32,139 posts)SouthBayDem
(32,414 posts)Rhiannon12866
(216,726 posts)While he was in office!
Azathoth
(4,677 posts)senseandsensibility
(19,499 posts)by the "paper of records' " board. Double standard doesn't even begin to cover it.
DinahMoeHum
(22,278 posts)orange jar
(767 posts)Sanity Claws
(21,967 posts)but the NY Times never called him to step aside.
That editorial came to me via email. I hit unsubscribe. No more of their shit.
BootinUp
(48,314 posts)Also they love a horse race. They love the money that comes with a horse race. They love hyping the horse race to bring in the money from the horse race.
FelineOverlord
(3,703 posts)Biden wont give us an interview because we want Trump back in office so badly.
So he needs to go
Heil Trumpenfuhrer!
LetMyPeopleVote
(151,829 posts)I am so glad that I cancelled my subscription back in 2015. The NYT is in the tank for TFG with people like Haberman
oldsoftie
(13,352 posts)yes, it was a bad night. But look at his speech today.
Ocelot II
(119,188 posts)marble falls
(60,139 posts)... where did the rumor of the NYT being a "liberal" paper come from, anyways?
FloridaBlues
(4,303 posts)In couple months time. Even if VP Harris steps in she will have to choose a running mate who people wont know that well. You piss off 1/2 of dem voters and the other voters sit out and trump walks in the WH.
Takket
(22,356 posts)Prairie Gates
(2,178 posts)swimboy
(7,302 posts)Thats what I say.
flamingdem
(39,782 posts)Fuck the NYT!
One bad performance and they're all in with Cheato.
Just because Biden didn't kiss their collective nasty asses.
Ms. Toad
(35,173 posts). . .
If the race comes down to a choice between Mr. Trump and Mr. Biden, the sitting president would be this boards unequivocal pick. That is how much of a danger Mr. Trump poses.
moondust
(20,298 posts)get elected the first time by not reporting on his long history of corruption based in their city?
triron
(22,240 posts)ananda
(29,931 posts)Put that in your smipe and poke it
Cha
(302,627 posts)Matter 🤮😈
valleyrogue
(706 posts)The media are really weird this way. They did this to the Clintons when they arrived in the White House in 1993, and they never let up. The reason: Hillary wouldn't kiss the backside of Sally Quinn. It really was that stupid and that petty.
We are seeing the same thing being played out here with the "Newspaper of Record."
pinkstarburst
(1,535 posts)lpbk2713
(43,089 posts)Fuck the NYT Editorial Board.
AllyCat
(16,774 posts)I wont take ANYTHING they say seriously.
Phoenix61
(17,343 posts)Mossfern
(2,916 posts)"They're nothing but a deck of cards."
I need a tutorial on linking images.
Hekate
(93,494 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(112,631 posts)Are they worried the Rupert Murdoch NY Post is out selling them?
Duncanpup
(13,515 posts)LeftInTX
(28,997 posts)"It doesn't get any worse than that! When the NY Times doesn't want you, it's bad. It's real bad".
How stupid. Keep your thoughts to yourself NYT!!!
It's one thing for Koffee Klatches to say this. It's another thing for the NYT to blast it. How moronic!!!
kimbutgar
(22,456 posts)They are so pro corporate I am dubious on their opinions!
MustLoveBeagles
(12,296 posts)A bad debate performance is beyond the pale but being a 34 time convicted felon and rapist is just fine.
ARandomPerson
(2,474 posts)oasis
(51,282 posts)Baitball Blogger
(47,470 posts)0rganism
(24,373 posts)It's not necessarily going to be easier for another candidate to beat TSF in the November elections, so we're supposed to give up Biden's incumbency for a different "reckless gamble".
On the other hand the NYT probably does employ many people who will need to flee the country immediately if TSF wins, so I can understand why they might be jumpy...
Bluethroughu
(5,583 posts)BigDemVoter
(4,461 posts)What do they have to say about a criminal convicted of 34 felonies, not to mention someone who fomented an attempted coup d'etat against our country? Again, FUCK THEM.
texasfiddler
(2,145 posts)I dropped my NY times subscription on inauguration day in 2021. They were more concerned with Biden wearing a rolex during inauguration than the insurrection that had just happened. That is bullshit. Posting just so the title of the article proves my point. It is not worth reading. Don't fucking subscribe to this piece of shit paper. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/22/fashion/mens-style/rolex-biden.html
Dem4life1234
(411 posts)They can go fuck off.
Tell the lying rapist felon to step down.
A sane country would be calling the felon to step down.
Azathoth
(4,677 posts)That's the problem. Neither of these guys are getting nominated by a "sane country", but rather by a heavily engineered primary system that only reflects the will of 10% of the country.
johnp3907
(3,814 posts)Iris
(15,928 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Prairie Gates
(2,178 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)I'd say if the Times is trying to get Trump elected, they're doing a lousy job,
Prairie Gates
(2,178 posts)...in your usual manner.
OK, then, buddy. So a lot of the other responses are conspiracy theories debunked by your selections? Is that your brilliant point?
SocialDemocrat61
(2,244 posts)Unfortunately some forget this is Democratic Underground and think its Corporate Media Underground.
mountain grammy
(27,008 posts)They could have given Biden the benefit of the doubt, that he wasn't up to par, that he was obviously under the weather. That trump did nothing but lie and Biden was prepared to debate but there wasn't a debate. He was blindsided. Thought you guys behind the scenes were supposed to not let that happen.
Honestly, I think any Democrat would have been blindsided, Biden was not at his best for sure but that was enough said, step down? Bullshit.
For our news media, it's all about ratings and trump delivers. why don't they pick apart everything that came out of the lying mouth of trump. That's what every editorial should be about. "I know Putins' dreams" not a whisper about that.
This was NOT a debate.
orangecrush
(21,016 posts)Bite me.
duckworth969
(965 posts)Catherine Vincent
(34,525 posts)That's all I have to say.
Skittles
(156,946 posts)ALRIGHTY THEN
spanone
(137,223 posts)SamKnause
(13,562 posts)It is an absolute tragedy that trump is the republican nominee.
If he killed someone on 5th Avenue you wouldn't be calling for him to step down.
Fuck you.
You are a big part of the problem.
You helped cause this disaster.
You could have fought hard to stop trump, but you didn't.
You helped spread his lies.
You helped to "normalize" trump.
Just fuck off.
If Joe were just a head in a box he would get my vote.
Fuck you for aiding and abetting trump.
BoRaGard
(2,139 posts)They have pissed all their cred away long ago
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,496 posts)raccoon
(31,351 posts)About Trump's mental and emotional deficiencies?
CTyankee
(64,510 posts)guidelines. I am so glad to finally see it posted.
I am aghast, as a NYT daily subscriber. But as an East Coast liberal in one of the country's most liberal cities, I felt it was better to have someone else post it. So thank you Prairie Gates, for posting!