Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(46,154 posts)
Tue Jul 23, 2024, 06:43 AM Jul 23

Reality bites: the incursion of the real into post-politics



The crisis of neoliberalism and war in Europe have left all that was solid melting into air.

https://www.socialeurope.eu/reality-bites-the-incursion-of-the-real-into-post-politics



During the decades of neoliberal hegemony, the possibility of changing the world through political action was deliberately obscured. The status quo was naturalised (as the ‘end of history’), the state was neutralised and citizens were reduced to consumers. Instead of collectively striving for a better society, neoliberal individuals satisfy their need for meaning through self-improvement. Thus, they optimise what goes into their bodies (organic versus non-organic food, veganism), what they consume (authenticity, experiences, sustainability) and what they abstain from. Bodies are toned (fitness) and altered (plastic surgery), gender redefined (non-binary) or changed (trans). The concepts and language of psychotherapy dominate individuals’ self-perception (anxiety, trauma) and public discourse (safe spaces, non-violent communication). On the battlefields of post-political society, debates rage over whether these self-optimising lifestyles should be permissible or even obligatory.

At the progressive fringe of the political spectrum, traditional left-wing critiques of the system and its imperialist practices have been radicalised into anti-national and anti-rational stances. Western critics felt that progressive activists demonised the ‘white’ demographic, while hopes for a better world were uncritically projected onto the ‘Other’, even when these recipients contradicted our own values (Islamists). The emphasis on reason in the enlightenment is undercut by the primacy of emotions. It seems what matters is no longer what objectively happens, but how it is experienced. The potential for reform—the essence of politics—is replaced by mystical symbolism. Through magical utterances, gender identities are altered, social hierarchies among identity groups rearranged and the fight against the right supposedly won. The idea of progress towards a better life—the centuries-old guiding star of progressive movements—is now seen as a misguided path leading to climate apocalypse. Even the thinking of the political apparatus and commentariat rarely extends beyond morally charged symbolism and magical incantations. ‘Clear stance against the right, clear edge against Putin, clear stance against anti-Semitism’ replace internal structural reforms and repositioning in a changed geopolitical environment.

Groupthink illusions

With the return of war to Europe, reality now intrudes into this post-political order, shattering illusions of groupthink. High inflation has forced central banks to abandon low-interest policies. The magic potion against economic downturns and debt crises is no longer available. Instead, decades of underinvestment have exposed the structural weaknesses of European economies. Fierce geo-economic competition also closes off the opportunity to export one’s way out of the crisis. In an increasingly protectionist world, securing the European home market becomes essential. Therefore, the taboo of transfer payments to stabilise southern-European debtor states will likely waver in the medium term. Despite the rhetoric of value-driven foreign and climate policies, expensive fossil fuels from authoritarian regimes are imported to reduce dependence on cheap Russian energy. To prevent expensive energy from undermining competitiveness, energy prices are subsidised. Suddenly, the two holy cows of green policy in Germany—the wisdom of nuclear phase-out and the technical feasibility of the energy transition—are up for debate.

To remain competitive, Europeans must counter American industrial subsidies (the Inflation Reduction Act) and Chinese overcapacity. The return of the primacy of national security has led not only to a renaissance of industrial policy but more generally revoked the neoliberal ban on state intervention in the economy. Confidence in the efficiency of market forces is replaced by state-managed derisking to strengthen resilience. The irresistible pressures of geopolitical competition turn free traders overnight into protectionists. After the collapse of the hope of ‘peace through interdependence’ with China and Russia, supply chains are shortened (near-shoring) and relocated to friendly states (friend-shoring). The neoliberal phase of globalisation is thus over. To finance the restoration of the deterrence capability of the western alliance, the maintenance of dilapidated infrastructure, the competitiveness of European industry and the climate and energy transition, investments will be necessary that exceed anything in recent memory. In Germany, a new consensus is emerging that the sacred cow of ordoliberalism—the debt brake—must be slaughtered. But cuts in social transfer payments will also return to the agenda. The skirmishes over who will bear the costs of these mega-investments is disrupting political-party systems across Europe.

snip
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reality bites: the incursion of the real into post-politics (Original Post) Celerity Jul 23 OP
I'm always down for a little neo-Marxist cant Prairie Gates Jul 23 #1

Prairie Gates

(2,133 posts)
1. I'm always down for a little neo-Marxist cant
Tue Jul 23, 2024, 09:42 AM
Jul 23

This one's really interesting for a few reasons, but the description of the neoliberal subject is really at the top of it. We'd usually see this kind of description taking up the so-called homo economicus of Foucault's analysis, with the understanding that the care of the self stuff is of course related to the entrepreneurial self, the subject as an (self)investment vehicle. So, that analysis will often go by way of showing how the subject of liberalism has disappeared in favor of the neoliberal, entrepreneurial subject, with the added notion that much of what we see (fitness tracking, authentic consumption, diet, helicopter parenting, etc.) is an aspect of the subject as investment, the entrepreneur of the self.

What's less common, and what's notable in Saxon's analysis, is the addition of gender fluidity to that mix, and the complete erasure of entrepreneurialism as the driving force of those subjective transformations. It's like Saxon picked out all the things liberals/lefties might like about neoliberal subjectivity, and decided to critique just those. The addition of gender transformations to the list of (bad!) neoliberal subjectivity together with Saxon's usual spiel about "realism," makes the whole thing somewhat troubling, I have to say. It sounds like what the Putinist "philosophers" would take from the analysis of neoliberalism (i.e., the neoliberal subject gave us the "unreal" trans phenomenon).

I'm going to be a thumbs down on this one.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reality bites: the incurs...