General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsReality bites: the incursion of the real into post-politics
![](https://i.gyazo.com/0f5563fcd951cbbe23224ff9f1f4fcb6.png)
The crisis of neoliberalism and war in Europe have left all that was solid melting into air.
https://www.socialeurope.eu/reality-bites-the-incursion-of-the-real-into-post-politics
![](https://i.imgur.com/IARstFZ.jpeg)
During the decades of neoliberal hegemony, the possibility of changing the world through political action was deliberately obscured. The status quo was naturalised (as the end of history), the state was neutralised and citizens were reduced to consumers. Instead of collectively striving for a better society, neoliberal individuals satisfy their need for meaning through self-improvement. Thus, they optimise what goes into their bodies (organic versus non-organic food, veganism), what they consume (authenticity, experiences, sustainability) and what they abstain from. Bodies are toned (fitness) and altered (plastic surgery), gender redefined (non-binary) or changed (trans). The concepts and language of psychotherapy dominate individuals self-perception (anxiety, trauma) and public discourse (safe spaces, non-violent communication). On the battlefields of post-political society, debates rage over whether these self-optimising lifestyles should be permissible or even obligatory.
At the progressive fringe of the political spectrum, traditional left-wing critiques of the system and its imperialist practices have been radicalised into anti-national and anti-rational stances. Western critics felt that progressive activists demonised the white demographic, while hopes for a better world were uncritically projected onto the Other, even when these recipients contradicted our own values (Islamists). The emphasis on reason in the enlightenment is undercut by the primacy of emotions. It seems what matters is no longer what objectively happens, but how it is experienced. The potential for reformthe essence of politicsis replaced by mystical symbolism. Through magical utterances, gender identities are altered, social hierarchies among identity groups rearranged and the fight against the right supposedly won. The idea of progress towards a better lifethe centuries-old guiding star of progressive movementsis now seen as a misguided path leading to climate apocalypse. Even the thinking of the political apparatus and commentariat rarely extends beyond morally charged symbolism and magical incantations. Clear stance against the right, clear edge against Putin, clear stance against anti-Semitism replace internal structural reforms and repositioning in a changed geopolitical environment.
Groupthink illusions
With the return of war to Europe, reality now intrudes into this post-political order, shattering illusions of groupthink. High inflation has forced central banks to abandon low-interest policies. The magic potion against economic downturns and debt crises is no longer available. Instead, decades of underinvestment have exposed the structural weaknesses of European economies. Fierce geo-economic competition also closes off the opportunity to export ones way out of the crisis. In an increasingly protectionist world, securing the European home market becomes essential. Therefore, the taboo of transfer payments to stabilise southern-European debtor states will likely waver in the medium term. Despite the rhetoric of value-driven foreign and climate policies, expensive fossil fuels from authoritarian regimes are imported to reduce dependence on cheap Russian energy. To prevent expensive energy from undermining competitiveness, energy prices are subsidised. Suddenly, the two holy cows of green policy in Germanythe wisdom of nuclear phase-out and the technical feasibility of the energy transitionare up for debate.
To remain competitive, Europeans must counter American industrial subsidies (the Inflation Reduction Act) and Chinese overcapacity. The return of the primacy of national security has led not only to a renaissance of industrial policy but more generally revoked the neoliberal ban on state intervention in the economy. Confidence in the efficiency of market forces is replaced by state-managed derisking to strengthen resilience. The irresistible pressures of geopolitical competition turn free traders overnight into protectionists. After the collapse of the hope of peace through interdependence with China and Russia, supply chains are shortened (near-shoring) and relocated to friendly states (friend-shoring). The neoliberal phase of globalisation is thus over. To finance the restoration of the deterrence capability of the western alliance, the maintenance of dilapidated infrastructure, the competitiveness of European industry and the climate and energy transition, investments will be necessary that exceed anything in recent memory. In Germany, a new consensus is emerging that the sacred cow of ordoliberalismthe debt brakemust be slaughtered. But cuts in social transfer payments will also return to the agenda. The skirmishes over who will bear the costs of these mega-investments is disrupting political-party systems across Europe.
snip
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Prairie Gates
(2,133 posts)This one's really interesting for a few reasons, but the description of the neoliberal subject is really at the top of it. We'd usually see this kind of description taking up the so-called homo economicus of Foucault's analysis, with the understanding that the care of the self stuff is of course related to the entrepreneurial self, the subject as an (self)investment vehicle. So, that analysis will often go by way of showing how the subject of liberalism has disappeared in favor of the neoliberal, entrepreneurial subject, with the added notion that much of what we see (fitness tracking, authentic consumption, diet, helicopter parenting, etc.) is an aspect of the subject as investment, the entrepreneur of the self.
What's less common, and what's notable in Saxon's analysis, is the addition of gender fluidity to that mix, and the complete erasure of entrepreneurialism as the driving force of those subjective transformations. It's like Saxon picked out all the things liberals/lefties might like about neoliberal subjectivity, and decided to critique just those. The addition of gender transformations to the list of (bad!) neoliberal subjectivity together with Saxon's usual spiel about "realism," makes the whole thing somewhat troubling, I have to say. It sounds like what the Putinist "philosophers" would take from the analysis of neoliberalism (i.e., the neoliberal subject gave us the "unreal" trans phenomenon).
I'm going to be a thumbs down on this one.