Life is uncertain , democracy is too important not to plan for

You’ll have to find the extract sufficient.

The article could have been generously gifted as many DUers do.

However we will just have to find the extract sufficient.

We should dutifully give them our money and never point out their lies.” 😉

enough to be in posession of extensive resources, but, thank you for your statement of principle. . . I support what media and sites I can, which does not include those actively supporting, coddling, and enabling the threats to our democracy. You may have different criteria and access to resources and information, and good for you. I must work within the limitations, and with the resources, available to me.

In the meantime, I will just have to be content with what extractions I can get.

If one can pay, they should.
If not, well, information sometimes wants to be shared.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240729010741/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/28/kamala-harris-control-democratic-party/

Namaste, Niyad

So much going on behind the scenes, such teamwork. As the article states, the Harris team turned the battleship on a dime.

Thank you again.

21 years at DU and I thoroughly enjoyed this post, Niyad.

What a disrespectful and callous response to those who aren't fortunate enough to afford subscriptions with every media outlet out there.

I guess I'll be the one to provide a no paywall link:

https://archive.md/24Mxa

Think POTUS Biden faced more challenges and with more success than would have thought possible considering the circumstances. POTUS Biden is a hero of our times. Glad that VP Harris was ready to fill the spot and relieved that a squabble over a Biden replacement failed to ignite.

There is a great need to take most of the money out of elective politics in the USA. There is a great need to reboot the court and legal system to hold accountable pols; their staff and consultants; and donors.

Citizens deserve more say in the selection of candidates. Have been Democratic voter in every election for over 50 years. Would have preferred a slate of potential Democratic candidates more to my preference just to vote on in the primary. Party leaders and donor should pay more respect to rank and file voters for starters.

Feel fortunate that Kamala Harris et al are off to a stunningly effective start to her campaign.

But where would the death threats and harassment be coming from? Not sure what the implication is there. And “national party bosses” has a negative connotation to it, in my opinion. Maybe “Democratic Leadership” or “ “Leaders in the Democratic Party” would have been better. Just my thoughts.

Thank you