General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow to Harden Our Defenses Against an Authoritarian President
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/how-harden-our-defenses-against-authoritarian-presidentIt is late afternoon on Inauguration Day 2025. Protesters fill the downtowns of American cities, enraging the newly sworn president. Send in the military, he demands. Invoke the Insurrection Act. Federalize the National Guard in all 50 states. Tell the troops to use all the force they need to clear the streets.
So began one of five tabletop exercises I co-led in May and June, along with former Defense Department official Rosa Brooks and historian Nils Gilman. We based the starting scenarios on the election of former president Donald Trump to a second term, and we asked participants playing the president, all of them Republicans or former Republicans, to base their gameplay on Trumps publicly stated promises.
As a nonpartisan think tank, my employer, the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, takes no position on how Americans should cast their votes. Nor do we predict who will win in November. Some of my colleagues are doing scenario planning for a Democratic victory, too.
The role-playing exercises were designed to test how well checks and balances, broadly understood, might restrain a president from abusing his power. The results were not encouraging: The games demonstrated repeatedly that an authoritarian in control of the executive branch, with little concern for legal limits, holds a structural advantage over any lawful effort to restrain him.
*snip*
Arne
(3,411 posts)Deuxcents
(18,463 posts)About a Madame President Harris as of yet.
Wicked Blue
(6,447 posts)More from the article:
My boldface
"Defenders of democracy can deter the presidents enablers from breaking the law by holding them at risk of legal action, loss of future employment and professional sanctions. And yet many participants said in debriefings that the Blue teams leaned too heavily on lawsuits. Courts may help restrain abuses of power, as they did in Trumps first term, but other tools may prove more potent.
The most pressing legal question raised in our games was what to do if an authoritarian president defied a court order. Nobody had a good answer, but the rule of law demands one.
Democratic self-defense may rest, in the end, on the demonstrated will of the American people expressed, if necessary, in persistent, large-scale protest to reject authoritarian rule.Agents provocateurs and deepfake videos will attempt to discredit orderly and lawful expressions of dissent, and peaceful protest might be met with authoritarian violence. Americans have overcome that before and might have to again.
It will not be a roll of the dice, as it was in the games, that decides the ultimate outcome. Friends of our constitutional republic may need to defend it implacably, by every lawful means."