General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould the United States implement an immediate arms embargo on Israel?
Just wondering how we all feel about this issue.
51 votes, 3 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes | |
22 (43%) |
|
No | |
29 (57%) |
|
3 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
pat_k
(10,883 posts)Last edited Thu Aug 22, 2024, 05:37 PM - Edit history (1)
Like the failed amendment co-sponsored by Sens. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Tim Kaine (D-VA), and Brian Schatz (D-HI) and joined by Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Peter Welch (D-VT), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Tom Carper (D-DE), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), and Ed Markey (D-MA).
The amendment, which would apply to all countries receiving weapons as part of the supplemental bill, would require the president to report to Congress within 30 days whether countries receiving military aid through the package are fully cooperating with U.S. efforts and U.S.-supported international efforts to provide humanitarian assistance to civilians.
https://www.merkley.senate.gov/senate-democrats-push-new-amendment-to-condition-us-military-aid-to-israel/
lees1975
(6,163 posts)But I really don't like what's happening to Gaza. That should be as unacceptable to us as Americans as the Russian missile bombardment of Ukraine.
LexVegas
(6,615 posts)Fichefinder
(263 posts)ColinC
(11,061 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(14,548 posts)'nuff said.
TomSlick
(11,988 posts)tritsofme
(18,736 posts)speak easy
(10,863 posts)onandup
(701 posts)All States must ensure respect for international humanitarian law by parties to an armed conflict, as required by 1949 Geneva Conventions and customary international law, the experts said. States must accordingly refrain from transferring any weapon or ammunition or parts for them if it is expected, given the facts or past patterns of behaviour, that they would be used to violate international law.
Such transfers are prohibited even if the exporting State does not intend the arms to be used in violation of the law or does not know with certainty that they would be used in such a way as long as there is a clear risk, they said.
The experts welcomed the decision of a Dutch appeals court on 12 February 2024 ordering the Netherlands to halt the export of F-35 fighter jet parts to Israel. The court found that there was a clear risk that the parts would be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law, as there are many indications that Israel has violated the humanitarian law of war in a not insignificant number of cases.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/02/arms-exports-israel-must-stop-immediately-un-experts
tritsofme
(18,736 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(14,548 posts)You know what's missing in that UN statement?
They don't say anything about Iran sending weapons and money to HAMAs, Hizbollah or the Houthis.
Think there's some antisemitism there?
Sewa
(1,357 posts)💀