General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPolls underestimating Trump's support
Political pundits often claim that Trumps poll numbers are underestimated and that it's tough to accurately capture the "Trump voter." While this might be true for Midwestern battleground states like Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, the opposite has been the case in the Sun Belt. In 2020, Arizona and Georgia werent even widely considered battlegroundsit was almost assumed they'd go to Trump based on the polls. Yet, they ended up flipping blue. Even in states Trump won, like Texas and North Carolina, the results were much closer than the polls had predicted.
SWBTATTReg
(24,011 posts)they can do about it, being that tRUMP is doing it all to himself, inflicting by far the most wounds by badmouthing America, our vets, and just about everybody else in-between.
Dennis Donovan
(24,728 posts)I'm going by what Professor Alan Lichtman predicts - he uses a set of "keys" instead of polling. He's been 10 for 10 in the last 10 races (yeah, yeah, I know Bush ultimately won FL but that was due to SCOTUS stopping the legitimate counting of votes - Prof Lichtman had Gore winning and after-the fact examination of the vote counting by independent sources showed Gore would've won FL had the counting been allowed to continue).
Prof Lichtman says VP Harris will win the 2024 Presidential Election.
Wiz Imp
(1,597 posts)Democrats have consistently (and often significantly) out performed the polls in every significant election since 2020. (This includes the 2022 "red wave" that polls predicted but didn't happen). Abortion related ballot initiatives have significantly outperformed the polls as well.
Grown2Hate
(2,160 posts)races, but I watch every special election and I remember a handful in that timeframe being SIGNIFICANTLY off the polls in our favor (10-15% points; maybe one in NY?). So I'm optimistic!
Still... GOTV! 🥰
getagrip_already
(17,392 posts)When he was able to mobilize infrequent voters who liked the racist/mysoginistic/change issues.
Those voters have either moved on or are already baked in.
Who isnt being counted?
Likely voters are usually defined as those that have voted in the past 4 years. That excludes young voters, and women who havent been motivated to vote for various reasons. It also invludes vets who, for various reasons, have had other things going on in their lives that pushed voting down on their list of important issues. All pols supported vets and protected vet benefits.
Not so much anymore. Millions of women are mobilized by the roe wave, vets are offended by the disrespect, and the youth are lining up in large numbers.
The brain worm has turned. Its dems that are being undercounted.