Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew allegations about Kavanaugh's FBI probe spark awkward questions
Last edited Sun Oct 13, 2024, 06:11 PM - Edit history (1)
In 2018, Susan Collins said the FBI background check into Brett Kavanaugh appeared to be a very thorough investigation. New evidence suggests otherwise.
Link to tweet
Exactly six years ago this week, Susan Collins was impressed with the FBI's background check into Brett Kavanaugh. "It appears to be a very thorough investigation," the Republican said.
Yeah, about that...
Yeah, about that...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/new-allegations-kavanaughs-fbi-probe-spark-awkward-questions-rcna174652
Just two days before the Senates confirmation vote, with the FBI review ostensibly complete, Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine said it appeared to be a very thorough investigation.
That was exactly six years ago this week. Collins assessment seemed badly flawed at the time, but it looks considerably worse now. As my MSNBC colleague Clarissa-Jan Lim explained:
In 2018, at the height of the controversy, the late-Sen. Dianne Feinstein at the time, the Senate Judiciary Committees ranking member said that the FBIs report on Kavanaugh looks to be a product of an incomplete investigation that was limited perhaps by the White House.....
That, of course, was what the then-president had to say in public. In private, according to Whitehouses findings, the Trump administration not only kneecap[ed] FBI investigators ability to adequately investigate those allegations, but the lack of transparency misled the Senate and the public about the investigations thoroughness.
Kavanaugh and the FBI declined to comment, and the Trump campaign called the findings an attempt to delegitimize the Supreme Court (which, incidentally, the former president has tried to delegitimize.)
Speaking of the GOP candidate, the year after Trump left the White House, he said, in reference to Kavanaugh, I saved his life. He wouldnt even be in a law firm. Who would have had him? Nobody. Totally disgraced. Only I saved him. ... I saved his life, and I saved his career.
It was a curious quote, which is now seen in a new light.
That was exactly six years ago this week. Collins assessment seemed badly flawed at the time, but it looks considerably worse now. As my MSNBC colleague Clarissa-Jan Lim explained:
The Trump administration did not allow the FBI to conduct a full-scale investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh that threatened his Supreme Court confirmation, according to a new report, disputing then-President Donald Trumps public claims at the time.
In 2018, at the height of the controversy, the late-Sen. Dianne Feinstein at the time, the Senate Judiciary Committees ranking member said that the FBIs report on Kavanaugh looks to be a product of an incomplete investigation that was limited perhaps by the White House.....
That, of course, was what the then-president had to say in public. In private, according to Whitehouses findings, the Trump administration not only kneecap[ed] FBI investigators ability to adequately investigate those allegations, but the lack of transparency misled the Senate and the public about the investigations thoroughness.
Kavanaugh and the FBI declined to comment, and the Trump campaign called the findings an attempt to delegitimize the Supreme Court (which, incidentally, the former president has tried to delegitimize.)
Speaking of the GOP candidate, the year after Trump left the White House, he said, in reference to Kavanaugh, I saved his life. He wouldnt even be in a law firm. Who would have had him? Nobody. Totally disgraced. Only I saved him. ... I saved his life, and I saved his career.
It was a curious quote, which is now seen in a new light.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 745 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New allegations about Kavanaugh's FBI probe spark awkward questions (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Oct 10
OP
Some of the most reprehensible people are on that court. It started with Clarence Thomas.
kerry-is-my-prez
Sunday
#4
Susan Collins said the FBI background check into Brett Kavanaugh appeared to be "a very thorough investigation."
republianmushroom
Sunday
#5
Bristlecone
(10,423 posts)1. Nobody loves a compromised stooge like Trump
Its all about leverage.
While we are at it, who paid off that guys debts, Country Club membership, etc.?
Blue Owl
(54,162 posts)2. Don't make Lindsey Graham weep again....
On second thought, please make Lindsey Graham weep again!
LetMyPeopleVote
(153,232 posts)3. Thank you Senator Whitehouse
kerry-is-my-prez
(8,897 posts)4. Some of the most reprehensible people are on that court. It started with Clarence Thomas.
Since then, it seems like anything goes. Who cares if theyre an abuser/rapist or an undereducated person like Thomas. Reportedly, he is not very bright.
republianmushroom
(16,970 posts)5. Susan Collins said the FBI background check into Brett Kavanaugh appeared to be "a very thorough investigation."
Susan Collins lies one hell of a lot.