General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInteresting article on how polls became "polluted" in October 2022 and how media fell for it
I stumbled across this article today when researching what polls were predicting in 2022, the whole red wave that never came.
Its interesting that the polls started becoming polluted with partisan polls around October of 2022, just as they are now. Apparently one of the motivations for making a race seem tighter than it is, is to get your opposition to panic and spend money in races that are actually comfortable wins and not spend money in races that are tighter but winnable.
I think were seeing some of the same pollution. (As a preemptive strike against the inevitable dont get complacent! warnings, no one is getting complacentjust found this article enlightening)
https://www.nwprogressive.org/weblog/2022/12/nyt-admits-its-midterms-coverage-was-wrongly-wedded-to-a-red-wave-narrative.html
Lovie777
(14,427 posts)SWBTATTReg
(23,891 posts)noticeably.
As more and more media outlets obtain their news feeds from others, and don't have their own news crews gathering the news anymore, this source is bound to become tainted, and soiled w/ overly broad contamination by one party or the other trying to inadvertently contaminate reporting.
Maybe all polling, etc. should be done by independent agencies in total, w/o the taint of outside money contaminating the whole data gathering arena. Politics, especially by djt and his thugs, has become soiled and dirty.
sheshe2
(86,651 posts)I dont pay attention to polls. Never have.
Thank you 😊
crimycarny
(1,549 posts)In the article I posted there is a screenshot of FiveThirtyEight's polling for the Washington Senate race between Patty Murray and Tiffany Smiley. FiveThirtyEight polls showed the race as essentially a tie from October to November (right before the election). Murray won by 14 points!
It's all a way to try and rig the game. Journalists have become so lazy (and more interested in a horse race) that polls are completely unreliable these days.
CrispyQ
(37,878 posts)I totally believe there are bad players who skew their poll audience for the results they want.
Cha
(303,936 posts)TY
Quiet Em
(532 posts)and a few others like Arizona. That Emerson Arizona poll was odd. It showed Trump winning women. I found that very odd considering Arizona wants to take women back to the 1800s.
TwilightZone
(27,238 posts)Here's the full poll data, including crosstabs:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FVfn-1oaLtOObkwACgt_Imsvf7jgVEdo/edit?gid=591937521#gid=591937521
Harris is ahead 238-226 with women in AZ. Row 22, Column HG, on the AZ crosstabs tab.
Quiet Em
(532 posts)I must have misread the article this morning. It was a Newsweek article so I suppose they could have been wrong as well.
Quiet Em
(532 posts)https://emersoncollegepolling.com/october-2024-state-polls-mixed-movement-across-swing-states-shows-dead-heat/
TwilightZone
(27,238 posts)50/47 is the correct ratio, but it should be for Harris and not Trump.
Looks like a typo on their summary.
To your point, even 50/47 is still way too close for comfort.
Fiendish Thingy
(17,779 posts)I am not convinced by Emersons numbers.
Fiendish Thingy
(17,779 posts)kerry-is-my-prez
(8,897 posts)That is a very real thing.
crimycarny
(1,549 posts)Simon Rosenberg, mentioned in the article I posted as calling out FiveThirtyEight in 2022, posted today that of the last 15 general election polls released for PA, 12 have been from right/GOP affiliations.
Link to tweet
Frustrating how the GOP continues to skew and distort and the MSM helps them do it.