Just so many facts.

Not what the caller wants to hear (eg re reparations) she’s able to include several specific policy proposals that will be received well by most people.

Well prepared and comfortable in her own skin
And he and the other questioners are asking more sensible questions than most of the journalists at M$Greedia

This is excellent. She is answering questions from lots of different constituencies.
Meanwhile the CONvicted felon is refusing interviews.
Nice response to the Covid checks with Trump’s name.

Please tell, how do you know that?

Please tell us you're kidding with that post.
If you're not, you should rethink your posting strategy.

The other person made a claim and I’m asking how they know it.

This is a discussion forum. Every opinion is not required to be based in specific, detailed fact.
It was obviously an opinion.
I don't think people come to DU to be lectured at.

It was stated as if it were a fact. And I just asked a simple question for clarification.

Of course context matters too, so it's not always the case, but those are exceptions. One might want to begin from the premise that such a claim is opinion by default, and augment expectation based on context.

Anyway, while a poster might indeed have supporting evidence for such claims, demanding that such evidence be brought forth typically invites consideration as landing somewhere on the challenge-rudeness spectrum, as well as being a waste of time. Fortunately this forum tends toward the factual, and people who present ideas are often forthcoming with supporting evidence and details.

Rather than demanding evidence, I'd suggest a gentler approach to inquiry: e.g., "what led you to that idea?"

I don’t understand why everyone is getting so defensive about it.

Actually, upon reviewing this sub-thread, you could consider it a compliment that people are so interested in engaging with you substantively, rather than simply flagging your post for moderation and/or ignoring it. Clearly, you are regarded as someone with potential to become a strong contributor to future conversations. This is, oddly enough, a Good Thing (although it might not seem that way to you now).

I, too, have made posts on various forums which resulted in what seemed at the time to be over-the-top responses, in which I received a disproportionate level of ... shall we say ... "corrective feedback". I strongly recommend paying attention to it, or at least noting that it occurred and what preceded it.

If I type something in the white box, it’s my opinion. This is the 6th time you’ve asked me! “How do you know” just like my lady friend’s 4 year-old.

And I never claimed that I knew what she wants to say or not. I never make any claim about what other people think. I speak for myself and no one else.

For example, you stated:

Is that so hard?

So it’s clear your stating an opinion, especially when you’re claiming what other people think or know or want to yell.

It’s very good

That's outstanding! I'm amazed at how long they've been broadcasting this without cutting away, even for ads.

I’m listening on iHeart Radio but see that they’re running it without breaks. This is brilliant. Rather than interpreting it she gets to speak for herself.

She's already getting rave reviews, too!

it about him) with Bloomberg. I was annoyed he was up for so long on CNN. Now I see what they did. They got to do a whole hour of Kamala Harris and Charlemagne The God. It was great.

I do see the value in showing him as he is in real time. The more people see of that mess completely unfiltered, the better for us.

Just a great way for her to get a clear message across.

She is so impressive.

but it sounded like a damn good interview.