General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Dead Heat in the Battleground States
A Dead Heat in the Battleground States
October 21, 2024 at 7:47 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 74 Comments
https://politicalwire.com/2024/10/21/a-dead-heat-in-the-battleground-states/
"SNIP........
A Washington Post-Schar School poll in the seven battleground states finds Kamala Harris and Donald Trump deadlocked among registered voters at 47% to 47%.
Among likely voters, 49% support Harris and 48% back Trump.
Heres how the states break down:
Arizona: Trump 49%, Harris 46%
Georgia: Harris 51%, Trump 47%
Michigan: Harris 49%, Trump 47%
Nevada: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
North Carolina: Trump 50%, Harris 47%
Pennsylvania: Harris 49%, Trump 47%
Wisconsin: Harris 50%, Trump 47%
.........SNIP"
Fiendish Thingy
(17,832 posts)Rendering the polls useless.
Self Esteem
(1,345 posts)September 30 feels like a lifetime ago. Not quite a month but any sample period that exceeds a week shouldn't be taken too seriously.
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,920 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,424 posts)Look at all the Republicans who have declared for Harris. The signage, especially stories of Trump signs coming down, sometimes replaced by Harris/Walz signs.
I know, signs don't vote but the polling is way off.
applegrove
(122,373 posts)2016 and 2020 the pollsters are overcorrecting?
Wounded Bear
(60,354 posts)People are screwing with the numbers.
Think. Again.
(16,783 posts)"Estimating" and/or "correcting".
Think. Again.
(16,783 posts)...and if they're "correcting" anything, it's no longer a poll, which has no "correct" or "incorrect" aspect, just a count.
applegrove
(122,373 posts)especially if they think their sample size is incorrect.
Think. Again.
(16,783 posts)TwilightZone
(27,362 posts)No polling organization can get a random sample that exactly matches demographics, political affiliation, and so on, so they adjust so that the results are representative.
Here's a primer on weighting and why it's necessary:
https://analythical.com/blog/weighting-data-explained
Think. Again.
(16,783 posts)Ocelot II
(119,787 posts)PSPS
(14,078 posts)The reference post is actually this: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219589585
It's Bannon's "flood the zone with shit" method in action.
"The zone" is flooded with right-leaning or intentionally-slanted polls to make it look so close that, when trump loses, he can pull out his usual "any election I lose is rigged" shtick. "See how all the polls showed me winning? Even the failing NYT and WP!!11!!1!1!!2!@Q12"
And the media promotes it because they get their horse race so the can sell ads. In fact, they're likely hoping for "turmoil" after the election so they will get months or years more of lucrative clickbait with the never-ending freak show.
Think. Again.
(16,783 posts)DeepWinter
(327 posts)That is tight. Even with MOE, which can swing either way... too tight.
Ocelot II
(119,787 posts)See above - so many polls have been commissioned or created by Trump-supporting entities that we can't rely on polling any more (if we ever could).
Self Esteem
(1,345 posts)It's bananas to discount this poll because some right-leaning pollsters have flooded the averages with bad polls.
Demsrule86
(70,795 posts)Demsrule86
(70,795 posts)I think she may win on election day.
https://democraticunderground.com/100219589309
Response to applegrove (Original post)
Post removed
catbyte
(35,566 posts)Bayard
(23,918 posts)Read on here the other day that there are currently 12 rethuglican, "polls," getting attention. They're bullshit.
Think. Again.
(16,783 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 21, 2024, 12:54 PM - Edit history (2)
....what do these numbers add up to in electoral votes?
Edit to add:
Arizona: Trump 49%, Harris 46% = trump 11
Georgia: Harris 51%, Trump 47% = n Harris 16
Michigan: Harris 49%, Trump 47% = Harris 15
Nevada: Harris 48%, Trump 48% = (tie for 6)
North Carolina: Trump 50%, Harris 47% = trump 16
Pennsylvania: Harris 49%, Trump 47% = Harris 19
Wisconsin: Harris 50%, Trump 47% = Harris 10
trump 27 Harris 60
Doesn't look like a "deadheat" to me.
lees1975
(5,550 posts)Pick a poll, take your choice.
If we were writing a news story, we could line polls up to create any illusion we wanted. From Bloomberg, whose polls show her leading in 6 battlegrounds and tied in Georgia, to local news polls in each state showing her leading by anywhere from fractions of a percentage up to 8.
We'll know Tuesday, November 5th, maybe not until Wednesday or Thursday.
FWIW, my guess is nationally, she wins by 6%. She carries Wisconsin by 1, Michigan by 3 and Pennsylvania by 2. She carries North Carolina and Georgia by 1, Arizona by about 50,000 votes, or under half a percent, and Nevada by 2. She picks up Florida by 30,000 votes.
W_HAMILTON
(8,285 posts)But can't have it not be a horserace, so let's average everything out to make it seem like Kamala wouldn't easily win the presidency if these polls mirrored the actual results.
Butterflylady
(3,919 posts)Blaukraut
(5,861 posts)No matter the margins, that is good news.
Wanderlust988
(562 posts)If GA was a lost cause, they wouldn't have been there so much lately. Their internals must show that Georgia is for the taking.
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,920 posts)Basically only AZ and possibly NV flip from 2020, which isn't enough for Trump.
kwolf68
(7,694 posts)The commercials for the Orange shitstain far outnumber Kamala commercials. I am SO SICK of the commercials where Kamala wants prisoners to get sex changes, the other one how shes killing them without killing them, radical liberal, bla bla bla bla.
applegrove
(122,373 posts)usregimechange
(18,428 posts)GenThePerservering
(2,420 posts)All so that some news outlet can proclaim A Dead Heat.
B.See
(3,125 posts)walk, run, fly and even CRAWL to the polls and VOTE (if we haven't already.) Bring a carload with us. Because we know damn well the MAGATS will.
GOTV!!!!!