General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA young teen gives birth. Idaho's parental consent law snags her care.
https://wapo.st/4hflJjqThe patient, 36 weeks pregnant, was having mild but frequent contractions. She had come to the emergency room in this small lakeside town because she was new to the area and had no doctor. In most cases, physician Caitlin Gustafson would have begun a pelvic exam to determine whether labor had started. This time, she called the hospitals lawyers.
Mom-to-be Aleah was only 13 years old. And under a new Idaho law requiring parental consent for nearly all minors health care, Gustafson could be sued for treating her because the girl had been brought in by her great-aunt.
What followed were more than two frantic hours of trying to contact Aleahs mother, who was living in a car, and her grandmother, who was the teens legal guardian. The grandmother finally gave verbal consent for the exam from the Boise-area jail where she was incarcerated on drug charges.
I was freaking out, said Anna Karren, the relative who had taken Aleah into her home just days before. What if the hospital couldnt reach the right person? They want guardianship papers, and I dont have them.
The nerve-racking scene reflected the consequences of a law that physicians, therapists, adolescent advocates, school officials and some law enforcement authorities call misguided and dangerous, another attempt to legislate health care in a state where one of the nations strictest abortion bans already has doctors on edge.
Critics say the law which also grants parents access to minors health records, doing away with confidentiality that providers and teen advocates call crucial ignores the reality that parents arent always present or trustworthy. Three months after its implementation, they contend it is hindering adolescents ability to access counseling, limiting evidence-collection in sexual assault cases and causing schools to seek parental permission to treat scrapes with ice packs and Band-Aids.
This is beyond stupid. First of all, why is a 13 year old pregnant? Her family dysfunction reflects a lot of that. See the article for her comment about changing diapers as a toddler. This law is dangerous as well as stupid in the extreme.
Walleye
(34,680 posts)cab67
(3,197 posts)But the issue you raise is an important one.
lindysalsagal
(22,243 posts)Legal notifications and health dangers. Since they think they know better what should be done .
Walleye
(34,680 posts)cab67
(3,197 posts)Depending on his age, he'd likely be guilty of statutory rape. He obviously has to be held accountable.
Actually, a lot of people should be held accountable, starting with whoever crafted this asinine law.
Johonny
(21,794 posts)They shouldn't have to worry about jail to fo their job.
I assume many doctors will move and health care quality will decline.
Jilly_in_VA
(10,752 posts)My brother is a doctor in western Montana and had worked in Idaho some time back. Although he is largely retired, he keeps tabs on things. As of last May, he said that 4 of the 5 perinatologists (those docs who care for preemies) had left the state. The one remaining was in Boise and was considering leaving. Many of the state's OB units had closed and women were having to drive to neighboring states for OB care, or depend on lay midwives. They've returned to the 1850s in many respects.
Note to women: stay the hell out of Idaho. To men: not a smart place to be either!
evolves
(5,581 posts)They manage medically complicated pregnancies. The Neonatologists care for newborns.
The damage these laws do to the medical profession lead directly to poor outcomes for patients and their babies, as there may soon be no physicians in the area qualified to handle complex pregnancies and deliveries (or ANY pregnancies and deliveries). It is frightening and unconscionable.
HOWEVER-- the GOP zealots don't GAF. It means nothing to them when women and their babies die, as long as they can keep women under their boots.
BadgerMom
(2,928 posts)It took years to create the illusion for voters that this is a political issue. It is not and never has been. They have created a pool of voters for whom this is the only issue that draws them to the polls and causes them to vote for Republicans. The voters consider this a righteous issue in part because politicians joined with religious fanatics to do so. Yes, they want women under the boot, but they will do anything to get votes-kill women, keep eligible voters from casting their vote, collude with foreign powers. I cant believe people have blinders on about any of this.
Lars39
(26,211 posts)but we had an extended family member decide to go to Montana 3 weeks before her due date with first baby.
They were going to stay 2 weeks in an RV for husbands work.
Knocked me speechless.
cab67
(3,197 posts)I would only do this with an escape plan, up to and including a refundable plane ticket out of Montana.
Lars39
(26,211 posts)His mother was so concerned that she went with them.
cab67
(3,197 posts)Jilly_in_VA
(10,752 posts)It depends on where you are. It's IDAHO that's a fucking disaster area and reverting to the 1850s. If theyr'e within an hour of a city of any size in Montana (Helena, Bozeman, Missoula, for example) they'll be fine.
Lars39
(26,211 posts)I figured out in the sticks with the oil wells.
Delphinus
(12,094 posts)about depending on lay midwives took me immediately to "Educated" by Tara Westover.
What has happened in regard to our bodies is chilling.
patphil
(6,837 posts)It's bad enough this 13 year old girl in an obviously dis-functional family was pregnant, but the state of Idaho has created a nightmare scenario that makes it hard for her to get the health care she needs at this point in her pregnancy.
Health care professionals should not have to worry about whether or not they will be arrested if they treat a young girl who is probably going into labor.
IzzaNuDay
(494 posts)and currently in juvenile detention.
That young woman has been failed by her parents, and now the state. No 13 year old should be pregnant or parenting an infant . Shes lost her teenage years, and vulnerable to poverty unless she decides otherwise.
calimary
(83,812 posts)What YOU said, my friend. NO 13-year-old should be pregnant OR having to parent an infant! NOT A SINGLE ONE.
IbogaProject
(3,446 posts)Societies are better when the average of first birth is over 19 years old. The body is still growing and maturing through the teens.
cab67
(3,197 posts)Getting out of it's going to be a real challenge unless she gets a massive amount of help.
evolves
(5,581 posts)when girls and women are saddled with children they dont want and cant afford, they are kept in poverty and without a voice. They have no way to participate in civic life, allowing the PTB to continue to stay in power.
Blue Full Moon
(748 posts)lindysalsagal
(22,243 posts)Don't let them leave until the child is treated. They want to run people's lives to remain in office, so be it.
moonshinegnomie
(2,871 posts)If a woman dies due to these laws arrest every legislator who voted for them on murder charges
Maru Kitteh
(28,895 posts)Walleye
(34,680 posts)surfered
(2,414 posts)birdographer
(2,438 posts)calimary
(83,812 posts)Beaverhausen
(24,553 posts)If I was a doctor I would treat that poor girl and ask questions later. Jesus Christ!
evolves
(5,581 posts)physicians can be charged with a felony if they do so, effectively ending their careers.
The choice then becomes felony vs malpractice. It is unconscionable.
Beaverhausen
(24,553 posts)drmeow
(5,223 posts)It could also still cost them their job.
evolves
(5,581 posts)harming a patient and losing my career. Whether a jury would find in my favor or not, the thought of purposefully harming a patient by withholding care that could send me to prison is unconscionable.
jfz9580m
(14,857 posts)Good god they really have set progress back a 100 years..
LisaM
(28,395 posts)She could have become pregnant at age 12, and the fact that they aren't searching for a potential criminal who could have impregnated a minor is appalling. (Though for all we know, it could have been a 13-year old boy).
jfz9580m
(14,857 posts)If its a 13 yo boy/consensual makes you wonder if Idaho has abstinence only type of sex ed. I have no idea what kind of sex ed they have and how early it starts, but clearly not early enough (if it is not rape by an older adult but consensual sex with another child).
valleyrogue
(843 posts)push their kids into dating and relationships when they should be focusing on their studies instead?
Kids don't even KNOW the concept of "consent." They don't have the capability to make rational decisions. Besides coercion, including rape, can happen with teens.
jfz9580m
(14,857 posts)I shouldnt have used the word consensual. At 13, they dont really know wth they are doing even without force or rape. Which is all the more reason why comprehensive sex ed would help.
iluvtennis
(20,656 posts)policies so she can be declared an emancipated minor (=act as an adult) to make her own medical decisions.
markodochartaigh
(1,857 posts)until it is small enough to fit into the womb.
Nasruddin
(813 posts)until it's tight when it fits around your neck
calimary
(83,812 posts)calimary
(83,812 posts)Ping Tung
(1,165 posts)determination to control women.
Shoonra
(550 posts)from the Washington Post article:
As for her babys teen dad, he now was in juvenile detention. The pair hadnt thought about contraception, Aleah conceded, and she never considered an abortion, which would have required a trip to another state anyway.
So, the girl's mother is living in a car (presumably with drug problems), the girl's grandmother (her legal guardian) is in jail (for a drug offense), the girl's father did a vanishing act years ago, the girl's boyfriend (who got her pregnant) is in juvie jail. The girl's great-aunt was taking care of her but lacks the legal authority to permit doctors to treat the girl (and, according to the Post article, the great-aunt has been recently evicted).
All in all, a family portrait worthy of Norman Rockwell.
Walleye
(34,680 posts)Blue Full Moon
(748 posts)Lamenting that teen births were down. Abstinence isn't going to work. Teenage hormones raging and no thoughts past now. I lived in republican controlled area. Went to a strict evangelical church and not one of the teens in the Bible study was a virgin.
orleans
(34,739 posts)with the caption:
Oaklie holds her mother Aleah's finger shortly after the two came home from the hospital. Because of Idaho's new parental consent law, the teen can make decisions about her newborn's health care but not her own. (Rachel Woolf for The Washington Post)
Jilly_in_VA
(10,752 posts)it's absolutely terrible.
Fiddlelady11
(35 posts)Gaias revenge.
cab67
(3,197 posts)There's so much wrong with this girl's environment. She doesn't appear to have had a stable home at any point in her life. Those responsible for her are evidently unable to provide anything.
And it doesn't look like CPS, or whatever it's equivalent in Idaho, has done much to help her.
I hope her larger community is able to rally around her. She needs it.
Joinfortmill
(16,119 posts)Botany
(72,155 posts)MineralMan
(147,253 posts)don't live in a situation where there is good, close parental supervision get pregnant. What we should do is be appalled that there is no support for youngsters who find themselves in that situation. That is where we are failing that girl. Getting pregnant is easy. Dealing with it is hard.
Plus, even kids with good, close parental supervision get pregnant sometimes. We need to deal with realities and help kids who need help. Wringing our hands over them getting pregnant isn't helping. They need real help with dealing with what is actually happening.