Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(53,985 posts)
Tue Oct 29, 2024, 12:00 AM Oct 2024

L.A. Times Editorial Board member who resigned gives a very strong message to voters.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/10/27/opinion/los-angeles-times-endorsement-kamala-harris-soon-shiong/

*snip*

I don’t expect we will ever get an honest answer to what motivated the owners of these two papers to kill the Harris endorsements (the conflicting and disingenuous excuses later issued by Soon-Shiong and his daughter aside). I fear that it comes down to money. I have served on editorial boards for more than 20 years and, in my experience, when publishers intervene in endorsements it is usually for financial reasons. And both have substantial business interests that could suffer under a vengeful Trump administration.

Many newspapers have opted to stop making presidential endorsements, usually in fear of losing readers. That’s fine; there’s a case to be made that endorsements and editorial boards are anachronisms. But making that change just days before the election isn’t an honest move toward neutrality. It is a statement in itself.

If there’s any bright side to this shameful moment, it’s that the owners of these two newspapers inadvertently illustrated the perils of a second Trump term in stronger terms than we could have done in any endorsement (or the five-part series we planned to complement the Harris endorsement, which was also spiked).

If two of the wealthiest men in the world are so cowed by a Trump presidency that they would muzzle their journalists and damage two storied news organizations rather than use their considerable resources to prevent it, every voter should rush in horror to the nearest polling center on Nov. 5.

* * * *
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
L.A. Times Editorial Board member who resigned gives a very strong message to voters. (Original Post) Nevilledog Oct 2024 OP
This!!!!! Mme. Defarge Oct 2024 #1
I certainly hope so ... n/t wackadoo wabbit Oct 2024 #3
Cowardice is a self-fulfilling prophecy. usonian Oct 2024 #2
When a newspaper doesn't publish something because dobleremolque Oct 2024 #4
What I am finding interesting about the WaPo situation is that they are publishing multiple anti-Trump/ LauraInLA Oct 2024 #5
Perhaps cowardice was not the motivator, but rather the chance to get closer to a pure oligarchy for themselves. Hermit-The-Prog Oct 2024 #6
Agree. tanyev Oct 2024 #7

Mme. Defarge

(8,686 posts)
1. This!!!!!
Tue Oct 29, 2024, 12:32 AM
Oct 2024
If there’s any bright side to this shameful moment, it’s that the owners of these two newspapers inadvertently illustrated the perils of a second Trump term in stronger terms than we could have done in any endorsement (or the five-part series we planned to complement the Harris endorsement, which was also spiked).

usonian

(16,994 posts)
2. Cowardice is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Tue Oct 29, 2024, 01:14 AM
Oct 2024


Cowards would gladly trade the lives, health, wealth and safety from persecution of many for a fucking "tax cut for billionaires"

May they join their Lord Shitler in hell.

dobleremolque

(993 posts)
4. When a newspaper doesn't publish something because
Tue Oct 29, 2024, 01:32 AM
Oct 2024

its billionaire owner says not to, it ceases to be a newspaper and becomes a propaganda outlet.

LauraInLA

(1,773 posts)
5. What I am finding interesting about the WaPo situation is that they are publishing multiple anti-Trump/
Tue Oct 29, 2024, 01:56 AM
Oct 2024

pro-Harris “endorsements” by individual op-ed contributors. Even the WaPo humor columnist and YouTube channel have gotten into it. So the paper is endorsing without endorsing.

Hermit-The-Prog

(36,631 posts)
6. Perhaps cowardice was not the motivator, but rather the chance to get closer to a pure oligarchy for themselves.
Tue Oct 29, 2024, 02:36 AM
Oct 2024

tanyev

(46,037 posts)
7. Agree.
Tue Oct 29, 2024, 08:12 AM
Oct 2024

The polls are moving in Harris’s favor—why would they assume that Trump will win? Conciliatory moves after a Trump win would be cowardice. Doing so now is an attempt to help him win.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»L.A. Times Editorial Boar...