Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The New York Times today with a full page fold out editorial that calls on Americans to 'Vote to End the Trump Era.' (Original Post) demmiblue Nov 3 OP
Could it be that the Times keeps fronting its Siena poll to motivate Democrats to vote? lees1975 Nov 3 #1
Am I correct that the editorial doesn't mention voting FOR Harris even once? nt Fiendish Thingy Nov 3 #2
It should have :-( . But at least the digital version's link on "better" spooky3 Nov 3 #4
How generous of them Fiendish Thingy Nov 3 #5
They did endorse her earlier. Nt spooky3 Nov 3 #6
They endorsed her at the end of September and the final link in that digital version goes to their endorsement BumRushDaShow Nov 3 #9
Last week, NYT had an excellent endorsement Tweedy Nov 3 #32
Mahalo for that.. "Keep Calm-ala and carry on-ala"... Cha Nov 4 #50
Me too Tweedy Nov 4 #57
Well, they don't want to appear biased after all Montauk6 Nov 3 #45
Gift link (the digital version contains lots of links) spooky3 Nov 3 #3
Their last link goes to their actual endorsement BumRushDaShow Nov 3 #8
Thank you, BumRushDaShow Hekate Nov 3 #19
Thank you, spooky3 Hekate Nov 3 #18
TY! demmiblue Nov 3 #33
Weird Farmer-Rick Nov 3 #7
They endorsed her back on September 30, 2024 BumRushDaShow Nov 3 #11
Thank you Hekate Nov 3 #20
The nyt is "in" again on DU? I must have missed those posts. Think. Again. Nov 3 #27
Some were even trending on the DU front page the past week BumRushDaShow Nov 3 #34
Certainly couldn't tell that from the posts on THIS thread. Think. Again. Nov 3 #35
Because some people still have those memories of BumRushDaShow Nov 3 #36
And most people just see the nyt for the rightwing rag it is. Think. Again. Nov 3 #37
Well some BumRushDaShow Nov 3 #39
Yeah. Most see it for the rightwing rag it is. Think. Again. Nov 3 #40
That doesn't discount the other viewpoints BumRushDaShow Nov 3 #42
Yeah, but some people think the nyt is a rightwing rag. Think. Again. Nov 3 #43
Ten years of his.. Cherrycheeks Nov 3 #10
I guess they see the writing on the wall. F*ckers. Joinfortmill Nov 3 #12
Of course, we wouldn't be here without all the Times' sane washing the idiotic senile criminal for decades. NNadir Nov 3 #13
Maybe their editorial staff got a visit from the Ghost of Elections Future? Attilatheblond Nov 3 #14
Or, in a somewhat more prosaic fashion, they realized how many subscriptions were canceled. I... NNadir Nov 3 #15
Or they noticed how many canceled the Wash Post in like an hour - TBF Nov 3 #22
Good point. VERY good point. calimary Nov 3 #23
This is an excellent and true comment! jrthin Nov 3 #30
Bingo, well said and spot on. c-rational Nov 3 #31
I don't trust NYT. I don't trust WaPo either. 634-5789 Nov 3 #16
Same here, debm55 Nov 3 #17
Thank you, demmiblue Hekate Nov 3 #21
Screw the NYT angrychair Nov 3 #24
Hedging their bets orthoclad Nov 3 #25
NYT........................... Lovie777 Nov 3 #26
The NY Times can take their editorial and shove it up their ass sideways. Tarc Nov 3 #28
F*ck the NY Times. awesomerwb1 Nov 3 #29
Finally. But 50k have already voted! lindysalsagal Nov 3 #38
That was good . . . but definitely not great. The NYT can't write better than THAT? Can't make a stronger case than THAT hawkeye21 Nov 3 #41
Thanks for posting!! ailsagirl Nov 3 #44
Take that WaPo and LA Times! dlk Nov 3 #46
And USA Today. What I was thinking.. TY Cha Nov 4 #49
Vote to end the Trump era. elleng Nov 4 #47
The trump Error.. TY & The NYT!🕊️🕯️💙🌊🌊🌊💙🇺🇸🌈 Cha Nov 4 #48
Finally. A newspaper that refuses to be controlled stollen Nov 4 #51
They should fire Maggie Haberman wolfie001 Nov 4 #52
Credit where due, even if too late. Unquiet Ash Nov 4 #53
Welcome back. marble falls Nov 4 #54
Hi! Unquiet Ash Nov 4 #55
I look forward to it. marble falls Nov 4 #56

lees1975

(6,101 posts)
1. Could it be that the Times keeps fronting its Siena poll to motivate Democrats to vote?
Sun Nov 3, 2024, 10:06 AM
Nov 3

I mean, they've been all over the place, as Stephanie Miller calls it, the Polliecoaster. Hard to believe it is that up and down and inconsistent, and bent on making the same mistakes they made in 2022.

spooky3

(36,413 posts)
4. It should have :-( . But at least the digital version's link on "better"
Sun Nov 3, 2024, 10:15 AM
Nov 3

Goes to a photo of VP Harris.

Farmer-Rick

(11,538 posts)
7. Weird
Sun Nov 3, 2024, 10:55 AM
Nov 3

It looks like an advertisement to me.

I can't make out the fine print under the paragraph. Even at full magnification, I can't read it......ok I went to the link in the comments and was able to read it.

I don't trust NYT. Seems fishy to me. I think they realize Kamala will win and are trying, in their both sideism but really right wing way, to court favor with her and her administration.

BumRushDaShow

(144,199 posts)
34. Some were even trending on the DU front page the past week
Sun Nov 3, 2024, 01:35 PM
Nov 3

I suppose it was a "counter" to the WaPo mess.

Just do a search on "NYT" and enjoy.

BumRushDaShow

(144,199 posts)
39. Well some
Sun Nov 3, 2024, 02:59 PM
Nov 3

go with the credos "My enemy's enemy is my friend" -OR- "There are no 'permanent enemies' or 'permanent' friends, just 'permanent interests'".

BumRushDaShow

(144,199 posts)
42. That doesn't discount the other viewpoints
Sun Nov 3, 2024, 03:15 PM
Nov 3

Some even like Nicolle Wallace's hubby Michael Schmidt (NYT journalist).

NNadir

(34,841 posts)
13. Of course, we wouldn't be here without all the Times' sane washing the idiotic senile criminal for decades.
Sun Nov 3, 2024, 11:24 AM
Nov 3

Let's put this under the rubric of "far too late, far too little."

We'll win with or without them. They've worked hard to become irrelevant.

NNadir

(34,841 posts)
15. Or, in a somewhat more prosaic fashion, they realized how many subscriptions were canceled. I...
Sun Nov 3, 2024, 12:15 PM
Nov 3

...made sure I let them know, when I canceled, that I was doing so because they had published an article - not an opinion piece - saying how tall and handsome Trump was and how decrepit Biden looked.

I felt very much that the person on the other end of the phone when I called my cancellation in, kind of agreed with me, an employee, not an editor.

TBF

(34,748 posts)
22. Or they noticed how many canceled the Wash Post in like an hour -
Sun Nov 3, 2024, 12:30 PM
Nov 3

and decided that was all fresh meat for them to try to attract. Wouldn't put it past them.

angrychair

(9,889 posts)
24. Screw the NYT
Sun Nov 3, 2024, 12:35 PM
Nov 3

This kind of stuff is easier to do once it's become clear, especially to those that are in the know like them, to NOW come out in favor of VP Harris now that it's safe to do so because you know he will not actually become president.
Fair weather friends but will ditch you the moment times get tough.

Tarc

(10,579 posts)
28. The NY Times can take their editorial and shove it up their ass sideways.
Sun Nov 3, 2024, 12:46 PM
Nov 3

They have been complicit in propping up Trump over the last 8 years, more interested in selling drama than reporting on a fascist honestly.

hawkeye21

(284 posts)
41. That was good . . . but definitely not great. The NYT can't write better than THAT? Can't make a stronger case than THAT
Sun Nov 3, 2024, 03:13 PM
Nov 3

And can't outright say we can save democracy and support decency by voting FOR Kamala and Tim?

The NYT, and every other news outlet, should post side-by-side resumes of the MAGA man and Kamala, showing both personal and professional traits and accomplishments. And the last line would be: "Any questions? The only and obvious answer: Vote Harris/Walz."

wolfie001

(3,844 posts)
52. They should fire Maggie Haberman
Mon Nov 4, 2024, 05:28 AM
Nov 4

I'm sure there are some more sane-washers but she's by far the most prominent. She can go write for The Washington Times and cover the next foul smelling rising star of the repuke Party.

Unquiet Ash

(9 posts)
53. Credit where due, even if too late.
Mon Nov 4, 2024, 09:40 AM
Nov 4

I've already voted to end the Trump era (much as I would regard that as rather a misnomer - Trump is the manifestation of the problem rather than its root). I really wish I could vote to end the New York Times era as well.

Thanks for sharing this, demmiblue.

Unquiet Ash

(9 posts)
55. Hi!
Mon Nov 4, 2024, 10:26 AM
Nov 4

Thank you. I signed up and haven't posted in a while. I'm normally active on DKos and thought I would try to engage more here. Seems like a bustling, generally happy community. Hope I can contribute!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The New York Times today ...