... wouldn't not have done anything different?

Thx in advance

Do better next time.

I just stay on topic.

Some important factual information about the illegal activity that occurred with our votes in the recent election.
1. VP Kamala Harris Votes Thrown in the trash by Poll Worker:

from Iran's Revolutionary Guard.

These are well-documented.

I don’t understand his fandom or haters. Also, the actual villains were already identified, the problem is with no upper level convictions I’m afraid no one will be afraid to enable Trump’s illegal activities. I grow so fatigued reading what seems like position papers rather than actual analyses of missteps and ways to move forward. Blaming John Roberts probably won’t do it.

Because that was the best rebuttal I could have imagined. I actually appreciate the initial post without the condescending postscript. I mistakenly thought it might be to engage over the content, but obviously it was to win some sort of unsubstantiated wisdom contes. Do better. I believe with the benefit of hindsight things may have ended differently with different decisions. If so, this might be informative moving forward. But if you know it’s best not to review the DOJ, FBI, and AG’s actions, I’ll think about abiding your know doubt specialized and access and analysis of the facts. You should take the time to list all the real truths you know, so we only have fiendish thingy approved thought and ideas that come from fiendish thingy approved sources. It would either save us a lot of time or give you more threads to get into this “is so” level of argumentation.

You were one of the cheer leaders.

I’m on team reality, not team Garland.

losing our patience and wanting a traitor brought to justice.

The labels apply not because of wanting Justice done (we all share that desire), but from deciding, largely based on the absence of public information or an incomplete understanding of what information is public, that Garland is the scapegoat to blame.

It is his fault.

How did I miss that?

Here, all this time I though he was the AG, subject to the delays and rulings of SCOTUS, but now you’re telling me that Garland, not Roberts, was in charge of the court the entire time?!?

Now it all makes sense…

Without a shared reality based on verifiable truths, we are easy pickings for the fascists.

We continue to do no introspection and refuse to change anything. This "it's always someone else's fault" reasoning will not win us any votes.
I don't care anymore. I have no power to change it.
I'm just me and I can't change anything.
Have it your way. Good luck.

I know...I know, Hunter Biden is a big ole' fuck up and needed some law brought down on him. I've heard that over and over. But Trump...nah.

He was AG for Pete sake. Nothing happened and he was in charge. He’s not completely blameless.

Lots of information to enhance your understanding.

He should have appointed Jack Smith LONG before he did.

There didn't have to be a special prosecutor. If he had, we all saw trump incite a riot and tell the crowd to go to the Capitol or they wouldn't have a country anymore. Then he watched it on TV hoping it would succeed.

That was a violation of his oath to defend the nation and the Constitution. Watching it unfold was also dereliction of duty to do the above.

trump was guilty, we all saw it. If Garland has began the prosecution of that guilty traitor immediately, he would've been tried, convicted and jailed way before the Supreme court got involved, and way before their immunity ruling BS.

End of story. This whole OP is also bs.

👍

The article makes the evidence based case that Garland is not the scapegoat for Trump’s re-election. If anyone is to blame for enabling Trump’s re-election, it is Roberts and the MAGA court.

which was just enough.

It wasn’t Garland, as the public record detailed in the emptywheel article clearly shows.

Just say'n.

Boo hoo.

And the focal point of the topic isn’t about people being “mean”, it’s about people being wrong about Garland.

Who can’t stop crying about how mean people are to him.

That’s not my problem, and certainly not Garland’s, however, when emotional filtering of information prevents us from existing within a shared reality, that becomes everyone’s problem, as it weakens our ability to resist fascism and fight back.

But I agree.

In this age, fighting against propaganda to support a shared reality based on verifiable facts is a messy business.

Was he the top dog at the DOJ or not, seems Joe entrusted him to be the to dog, but ?

45 months and counting.

Others are focused on the challenging reality that lies ahead.

I’m not sure how the helps with the road ahead.

I think that is the longest post I’ve ever seen you write.

who moved as quickly as could.

Which was the appropriate trigger for appointing a Special Counsel.

Special Counsels aren’t faster, more aggressive or more powerful than regular prosecutors, they merely have an administrative insulation against legal and ethical conflicts.

That’s it.

Also, I wasn't suggesting that Smith could move faster or not, just that he did what he could, but it was too late.

And would have continued to move forward even if Smith hadn’t been appointed, and would have faced the same obstacles that Smith did.

Last edited Wed Nov 13, 2024, 03:30 PM - Edit history (1)

...but you're missing my point.

I've had much less inflammatory posts hidden for exactly that reason.

The cheerleaders could have saved a lot of hassle if they'd just agreed outright that Trump would never face any real consequences for his real crimes, but I suppose that it made the cheerleaders feel smart and special to bash and ridicule fellow DUers along the way.

I don’t see it that way.

And confirms exactly what I've perceived about you over the years.

Thanks for removing any doubt, at least.

No matter how spicy the sauce.

My invitation was for the inevitable flaming that I have expected and endured for years when discussing Garland.

The cheerleaders allow only their own interpretations, their own expertise, their own conclusions (or those of an anointed few like-minded off-site cheerleaders). Everyone else, and every other opinion, is mocked and belittled at every opportunity. As if the cheerleaders are anything more than anonymous self-appointed experts pushing their favored agenda.

And you haven't so much been "discussing Garland" as "relentlessly ridiculing and condescending to fellow DUers," but I guess you're going to call it whatever gratifies your sense of self-importance.

Only the verifiable truth stands, regardless of opinions or the messenger.

It is not about blaming Garland for failing to block Trump from the presidency, which is the topic of this thread.

Thamks for the chuckle

never gets old. Condemnation prior to investigation has never been my thing...and since, I can not possibly investigate the facts that are not in evidence I can not join in. Don't know if someone else could have done things differently and gotten different results. Just don't know. Poor me....such a sap.

after waiting patiently for justice four years is in itself flame based.

Garland was never any good and should never have been chosen to do the job...

He screwed up the Oklahoma bombing case by getting the death penalty for Timothy Mcveigh (sp?) and so we didn't get to hear anything about who else was involved (except that one other guy)...

Nobody ever says anything about that anymore...

At first he agreed with Bill Barr that an official duty of the president is to defame people. He was prepared to defend Trump (the 0ffice) until the courts disagreed about that, and stated it was not an official duty.

Mueller did not indict Trump because he was a sitting president, but he set Garland up to prosecute Trump after he left office.
Individual one - Garland passed Alvin Bragg took it.
Obstruction of justice - Garland passed.
Bill Barr heavily redacted anything negative about Trump in the Mueller report - Garland has failed to release the unredacted report, but he did release the Hur report that claimed that President Biden was old and feeble and forgetful.

I guarantee that when Jack Smith releases his report Garland will not release it unredacted.

Garland got criminal referrals from the J6 committee for Ken Chesebro and Mark Meadows, he shit canned them.
Garland got a criminal referral from Dana Nessel, she waited 1 year for Garland to act and then she prosecuted her fake electors herself.

The SOS from Colorado went on TV and cried for help from DOJ over the threats being made to election officials. She stated that since 2021 DOJ has prosecuted 10 cases.

Garland gave Trump forever to return the classified documents he stole, when the FBI found those boxes of documents at Mar-el- Loco an arrest warrant should have been issued for Trump. Many people died because trump abused those classified documents.

These are for starters.

Maybe Trump will keep Garland on, 20 Magat Senators voted to confirm him.

You took actual events, then applied your subjective options and perspective to them, ascribing feelings and motivations to Garlabd that are not supported by the evidence.

is a toy to be played with.

We who don't have very far to fall see right through this shit as much as ever. Even more so now.

...perhaps there can be more than just one bad guy at a time?

in appointing special counsels for Joe and Hunter Biden.

Garland's greatest prosecution will be prosecuting Hunter Biden for tax fraud that is rarely ever prosecuted, and Hunter paid back all that he owed. On the other hand, TSF claimed a 461 million dollar tax deduction on his Chicago tower, formed a holding company and double dipped on the deduction. Tax experts claim that TSF stole at least 100 million dollars in bogus deductions and Garland never did a peep, he prosecuted Hunter who paid back what he owed.

Hunter was being investigated before Biden was president.

Hunter was investigated for 5 years, it was a bogus, made up Russian conspiracy, led by Rudy Giuliani. Garland allowed the bogus investigation to continue until Weiss finally found a gun violation. Weiss also found a tax crime and he had to ask Garland to make him a special prosecutor so that he could prosecute Hunter in California, and Garland obliged.

But that’s about it.

She's wasted my time for almost a decade now.

All that Mueller hullabaloo, with all her preening footnotes about contributing to the investigation on every article.

All that Garland puffery and breathless LexisNexising without a legal degree or any kind of practical experience...

All those predictions, all those harsh putdowns of any diverging opinions... all came to goddamn nothing. She's a waste of time.

I'll file her with her former compatriot Greenwald.

She insinuated that the political climate wasn't right for Garland to prosecute Trump. one of her reasons.

And bmaz-who is an actual attorney who would attempt to correct her mistakes-seems to be no longer welcome there.

I regret every post I ever made here using her "reasoning"

There's nothing "happy" about being forced to have this discussion.

And there's nothing to debate: A guy who tried to overthrow our country was not prosecuted in a timely fashion. His anti-American movement was allowed to grow and now he's about to lead the country, like none of it ever happened. None of that is debatable. It happened.

Garland didn't keep us safe. He failed.

With trump and his cabinet of clowns at the helm, every American is in danger. If any type of crisis occurs, we're fucked!

As decided by the current SCOTUS, Nothing other than a conviction for insurrection would have disqualified Trump from running for or holding office.

Neither Garland nor Smith thought there was sufficient evidence to get a conviction on insurrection, and so they didn’t seek an indictment from the grand jury on that charge.

If Trump had been convicted of every single federal charge against him and incarcerated, he still could have run and served as president.

Sorry but that logic doesn't work for me. And it wouldn't work for a person of color who committed the same crimes. They would be locked up right now. 100%.

Also, the scotus (mis)ruling came in 2024, so it doesn't apply to what Garland knew in 2021.

Before he was tried or convicted.

he'd have gotten out ahead of Roberts and the corrupt court before Trump could have filed a brief.

And the legal experts have been saying this for most of the past year that he has frittered the time away. So good luck pushing your theory. Hope you get some hangers on.

Nothing, other than a conviction for insurrection, could have prevented Trump from holding the office of president.

That’s a fact, as established by the current SCOTUS, rightly or wrongly.

Last edited Wed Nov 13, 2024, 10:06 PM - Edit history (1)

he took office.

There didn't have to be a special prosecutor. If he had, without waiting tow years to finally appoint a Special Counsel, we all saw trump incite a riot and tell the crowd to go to the Capitol or they wouldn't have a country anymore. Then he watched it on TV hoping it would succeed.

That was a violation of his oath to defend the nation and the Constitution. Watching it unfold was also dereliction of duty to do the above.

trump was/is guilty, we all saw it. If Garland had begun the prosecution of that guilty traitor immediately, he would've been tried, convicted and jailed (as he was of the 34 felonies in NY, at least tried and convicted) way before the Supreme court got involved, and way before their immunity ruling BS.

So again, give it a rest. Federalist Society member Garland is the worst AG of our lifetime, and maybe a republican mole, judging from his slow-moving, ineffectual tenure that failed to convict treason the whole nation witnessed.

End of story. This whole OP is also bs.

According to the current SCOTUS, only a conviction for insurrection could have disqualified Trump from holding office. Trump was not charged with insurrection.

Even if he was convicted of all other charges and incarcerated, he could still serve as president.

His first order of business should've been to convict that fucking traitor we all watched on TV.

Garland is the worst ever AG in it's right in our faces.

And you completely ignore the delays caused by SCOTUS.

You don't know that but keep believing it.

Garland is the worse ever.

besides Nikki Haley wouldn't have pursued the rethug nod if Garland had tried, convicted and jailed trump months before the corrupt Supreme Court had their equally corrupt immunity hearing. The rethug party itself would've made a jailed felon didn't get the nomination.

trump would've been in prison and forgotten instead of tapping fellow Russina asset Tulsi Garbbard as National Intel Chief, and fellow pedophile Matt Gaetz for AG.

Garland, worst ever AG.

Biddle botched the prosecution of Nazi collaborators in congress during WWII (see Rachel Maddow’s book Prequel/podcast Ultra).

Garland isn’t even worse than Eric Holder.

Careful with that hyperbole.

the govenment, which led to the MFer not being jailed, in fact totally escaped any punishment, and is now the president again and wannabe fasxist...he ranks very high of the list of worse AGs ever.

And that's no hyperbole.

..--. --.