Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTom Nichols / The Atlantic - Tulsi Gabbard's Nomination Is a National-Security Risk (Gift Article)
Tom Nichols / The Atlantic - Tulsi Gabbards Nomination Is a National-Security Risk (Gift Article)
The Senate can stop her.
By Tom Nichols
President-elect Donald Trump has nominated former Representative Tulsi Gabbard as the director of national intelligence. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence was created after 9/11 to remedy what American policy makers believed was a lack of coordination among the various national-intelligence agencies, and the DNI sits atop all of Americas intelligence services, including the CIA.
Gabbard is stunningly unqualified for almost any Cabinet post (as are some of Trumps other picks), but especially for ODNI. She has no qualifications as an intelligence professionalliterally none. (She is a reserve lieutenant colonel who previously served in the Hawaii Army National Guard, with assignments in medical, police, and civil-affairs-support positions. She has won some local elections and also represented Hawaii in Congress.) She has no significant experience directing or managing much of anything.
But leave aside for the moment that she is manifestly unprepared to run any kind of agency. Americans usually accept that presidents reward loyalists with jobs, and Trump has the right to stash Gabbard at some make-work office in the bureaucracy if he feels he owes her. Its not a pretty tradition, but its not unprecedented, either.
To make Tulsi Gabbard the DNI, however, is not merely handing a bouquet to a political gadfly. Her appointment would be a threat to the security of the United States.
Gabbard ran for president as a Democrat in 2020, attempting to position herself as something like a peace candidate. But shes no peacemaker: Shes been an apologist for both the Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad and Russias Vladimir Putin. Her politics, which are otherwise incoherent, tend to be sympathetic to these two strongmen, painting America as the problem and the dictators as misunderstood. Hawaii voters have long been perplexed by the way shes positioned herself politically. But Gabbard is a classic case of horseshoe politics: Her views can seem both extremely left and extremely right, which is probably why people such as Tucker Carlsona conservative who has turned into whatever pro-Russia right-wingers are called nowhave taken a liking to the former Democrat (who was previously a Republican and is now again a member of the GOP).
/snip
The Senate can stop her.
By Tom Nichols
President-elect Donald Trump has nominated former Representative Tulsi Gabbard as the director of national intelligence. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence was created after 9/11 to remedy what American policy makers believed was a lack of coordination among the various national-intelligence agencies, and the DNI sits atop all of Americas intelligence services, including the CIA.
Gabbard is stunningly unqualified for almost any Cabinet post (as are some of Trumps other picks), but especially for ODNI. She has no qualifications as an intelligence professionalliterally none. (She is a reserve lieutenant colonel who previously served in the Hawaii Army National Guard, with assignments in medical, police, and civil-affairs-support positions. She has won some local elections and also represented Hawaii in Congress.) She has no significant experience directing or managing much of anything.
But leave aside for the moment that she is manifestly unprepared to run any kind of agency. Americans usually accept that presidents reward loyalists with jobs, and Trump has the right to stash Gabbard at some make-work office in the bureaucracy if he feels he owes her. Its not a pretty tradition, but its not unprecedented, either.
To make Tulsi Gabbard the DNI, however, is not merely handing a bouquet to a political gadfly. Her appointment would be a threat to the security of the United States.
Gabbard ran for president as a Democrat in 2020, attempting to position herself as something like a peace candidate. But shes no peacemaker: Shes been an apologist for both the Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad and Russias Vladimir Putin. Her politics, which are otherwise incoherent, tend to be sympathetic to these two strongmen, painting America as the problem and the dictators as misunderstood. Hawaii voters have long been perplexed by the way shes positioned herself politically. But Gabbard is a classic case of horseshoe politics: Her views can seem both extremely left and extremely right, which is probably why people such as Tucker Carlsona conservative who has turned into whatever pro-Russia right-wingers are called nowhave taken a liking to the former Democrat (who was previously a Republican and is now again a member of the GOP).
/snip
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 363 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tom Nichols / The Atlantic - Tulsi Gabbard's Nomination Is a National-Security Risk (Gift Article) (Original Post)
Dennis Donovan
Nov 14
OP
LisaL
(46,649 posts)1. Hey, what is good enough for Russian national security, is good enough for Trump.
NT
Walleye
(35,891 posts)2. She lied when she said she was a Democrat, just wanted to get elected in Hawaii
harumph
(2,339 posts)3. File this under water is wet.