General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLooks like Elon Musk suffered a failure with his rocket with Trump standing by his side.
The rocket was supposed to come down at the launchpad, I think in Texas, and instead it had to be diverted to the ocean where it exploded and went up in flames.
SallyHemmings
(1,880 posts)The Madcap
(374 posts)he wasn't on it.
eShirl
(18,791 posts)for Musk
Baitball Blogger
(48,022 posts)GoCubsGo
(33,005 posts)riversedge
(73,118 posts)mzmolly
(51,593 posts)from the universe?
Autumn
(46,280 posts)peregrinus
(188 posts)magicarpet
(16,501 posts)What was on this rocket for the payload ? Where is/was it going ?
WarGamer
(15,402 posts)soandso
(1,155 posts)I heard on NPR that it was as tall or taller than the Empire State Building.
Baitball Blogger
(48,022 posts)But it was the engine tube.
ForgedCrank
(2,190 posts)no payload at all. This was just another test launch as they keep making design improvements, then they launch to see what happens.
Nothing crashed. They have parameters that must be all met regarding safety, and one or more of those conditions were outside the acceptable envelope for landing in the catch arms. It's a set of guidelines agreed on with the FAA and others to ensure public safety. I don't think anyone knows the exact reason right now why they chose no-go for the catch. Both the booster and the starship vehicle made programmed soft landings in the water as designed.
The starship vehicle did explode after it landed in the water though, which happens when you do that to a rocket on purpose. Last I saw, the first stage booster was actually still floating on it's own so they are going to have to either sink it, or pluck it out of the water somehow.
WarGamer
(15,402 posts)SpaceXs latest test flight of its Starship vehicle on Tuesday got off to a sobering start as the company was unable to recover the enormous booster stage of the rocket, the most powerful ever built. But about an hour later, the vehicles upper stage was more successful as it completed a daring maneuver to splash down in the Indian Ocean.
Its not unusual for a test launch to be unable to achieve all of its goals. But after a successful test flight last month, SpaceXs most recent attempt experienced a partial setback that suggests the company has some work left to do as it pursues rapid reusability of the vehicle. That is a prerequisite for the pipe dream of the companys founder, Elon Musk, of sending people to Mars in the years ahead.
Development testing, by definition, is unpredictable, said Jessica Anderson, a manufacturing engineering manager at SpaceX and one host of the live broadcast. But that is exactly why we test.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/19/science/spacex-launch-starship.html
Solly Mack
(92,750 posts)Solly Mack
(92,750 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,973 posts)misanthrope
(8,223 posts)**
Snarkoleptic
(6,027 posts)n/t
Kablooie
(18,768 posts)malaise
(278,041 posts)hoped it would get them both 😀
Blue Owl
(54,726 posts)BannonsLiver
(17,967 posts)But Melmo doesn't seem interested in going up on a Space X rocket. I guess he's too chicken shit. I would be too, but I'm not peacocking around trying to make the case for masculinity, either.
Beck23
(190 posts)Wiz Imp
(1,788 posts)orwell
(7,955 posts)...for the Rapist.
Two pant loads, one toilet...
ultralite001
(1,136 posts)Will these failures be catching???
"This was their moment to show their prowess in efficiency, reusability, the 'fail-fast efficiency' that Donald Trump really wants his presidency to embody.
"Donald Trump isn't somebody who wants to be associated with things that don't look brilliant or work amazingly."
https://news.sky.com/story/spacex-launch-latest-starship-rocket-takes-off-from-spacexs-launch-pad-as-trump-and-musk-watch-on-13256294]
LeftInTX
(29,996 posts)I'm sure the booster is much larger this time.
speak easy
(10,503 posts)Batter add NASA to RFK jr's responsibilities.
Scrivener7
(52,724 posts)a kennedy
(32,066 posts)Absolutely love it .tRump talked about that first catch the rocket thing every time he had a rally. Hope thats a sign of things to come, blow ups with every damn department of his gawd damn presidency.
riversedge
(73,118 posts)TomSlick
(11,885 posts)I really shouldn't.
2naSalit
(92,663 posts)LeftInTX
(29,996 posts)his first booster. Salvaging boosters comes in real handy for satellite launches. (Unmanned. Use them over and over) The was a super heavy booster with a rocketship payload. The rocketship's trip was successful.
Joinfortmill
(16,377 posts)Baron2024
(196 posts)The federal government has paid SpaceX some $20 billion since 2008. The largest awards were for taking astronauts to and from the International Space Station, and resupplying the ISS. SpaceX has also won contracts to build a lunar-landing vehicle, and provide launch services to the Defense Department, among others.
Now this guy is going to come in and start slashing government programs, probably a lot of programs that provide support to children, the elderly, the sick, the disabled, and the poor. So it is not government waste when Musk makes billions off of the backs of tax payers, but it is government waste when you want to feed a kid or help out a poor or elderly person. Musk should give all of his government money back to the taxpayer then.
Baitball Blogger
(48,022 posts)It's not a good deal for the taxpayer when they transfer the jobs to private companies that produce Oligarchs, and then they turn around and take over our government.
Orrex
(64,101 posts)PortTack
(34,642 posts)Jit423
(276 posts)Skittles
(159,240 posts)coming soon to America