Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbabe

(4,448 posts)
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 12:20 PM Nov 20

Project 2025 calls for massive changes to Hanford nuclear cleanup

https://www.cascadepbs.org/politics/2024/11/project-2025-calls-massive-changes-hanford-nuclear-cleanup

Project 2025 calls for massive changes to Hanford nuclear cleanup
The Heritage Foundation's blueprint proposes reclassifying radioactive waste as something less dangerous so it can be disposed of more cheaply.

by John Stang / November 20, 2024

Will the next presidential administration tinker with the Hanford nuclear reservation’s complicated cleanup of radioactive wastes?

Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation’s conservative blueprint for the future, offers some strong hints that cleanup plans for the nation’s most polluted nuclear site might change with or without the approval of the Washington Department of Ecology.

One Project 2025 idea recommends reclassifying highly radioactive wastes into something less dangerous so cheaper methods can be used to dispose of them. Another proposal is to speed up the cleanup by rerouting money to Hanford from a couple of huge Biden-era appropriations for jobs and infrastructure programs elsewhere. The third Hanford-related idea in Project 2025 posits that the state of Washington and the legally negotiated cleanup deadlines and standards are obstacles to completing the cleanup faster.

Gov. Jay Inslee’s office, the Washington Attorney General’s Office and the state Ecology Department all declined to comment on Project 2025’s plans for Hanford. However, Attorney General and Gov.-elect Bob Ferguson and Attorney General-elect Nick Brown recently held a press conference to announce the AG’s office and have spent months reviewing Project 2025 in preparation for possible litigation with the Trump administration. Ferguson and Brown said the ball is in the Trump administration’s court on whether it will provoke legal battles with Washington.

… more …

(Cheaper methods. Insane.)
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Johnny2X2X

(22,055 posts)
1. Here's what I say
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 12:23 PM
Nov 20

Sign up 500 trump voters who did their nuclear research on Youtuibe and give them the cleanup contract.

maxsolomon

(35,556 posts)
6. There's probably 500 Trump voters who work at Hanford doing cleanup already.
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 01:03 PM
Nov 20

It is Eastern WA...

Freethinker65

(11,168 posts)
2. How about require any for profit real estate development with cost over $500k/unit to use the waste as backfill?
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 12:41 PM
Nov 20

Project 2025 deems the radioactive waste "safe" using their new criteria, so there should be no objections from developers nor their future tenants.

Irish_Dem

(61,924 posts)
3. Deregulation means more money for the billionaires and corrupt politicians.
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 12:50 PM
Nov 20

They don't care if more people die or are injured.

The concepts of public service and common good are only for suckers and losers.

sakabatou

(43,616 posts)
5. Yeah, who cares if a needed water supply gets irradiated
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 12:58 PM
Nov 20

We need cheaper, and less effective methods!

keithbvadu2

(40,915 posts)
9. Declare it safe and use it as fill for Mar a Lago and his other golf courses and vineyards.
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 02:22 PM
Nov 20

Sewa

(1,368 posts)
11. When the layoffs start at Hanford I'll
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 06:17 PM
Nov 20

Tell my coworkers, this is what you voted for ASSHOLE.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Project 2025 calls for ma...