Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Once a media ho', always a media ho' (Original Post) AverageOldGuy 6 hrs ago OP
Who is sorry now? rich7862 6 hrs ago #1
All's I can say is....... Montauk6 4 hrs ago #26
Mika is a total disappointment rich7862 6 hrs ago #2
Frivolous lawsuits, IRS audits, investigations for starters. FoxNewsSucks 6 hrs ago #4
You've gotta be kidding soandso 6 hrs ago #6
So all of that is license to use that pic Docreed2003 5 hrs ago #16
It's an official promo pic, and FoxNewsSucks 5 hrs ago #24
Can we not make this same point Docreed2003 6 hrs ago #3
Maybe she shouldn't have posed for that provocative promo pic then. FoxNewsSucks 6 hrs ago #5
Exactly. milestogo 6 hrs ago #8
Using that photo puts the focus on her Docreed2003 5 hrs ago #10
Why did she strike a provocative pose during a promo shoot? milestogo 5 hrs ago #12
So the pose and the photo shoot that was completely unrelated Docreed2003 5 hrs ago #14
No, I disagree with calling her a whore. milestogo 5 hrs ago #15
Like I said above Docreed2003 5 hrs ago #18
I disagree soandso 6 hrs ago #7
"She was dressed provocatively so that makes it ok"?? Docreed2003 5 hrs ago #11
Who are you quoting? soandso 5 hrs ago #13
There are better ways for our side to make a point Docreed2003 5 hrs ago #20
Media whores for money soandso 5 hrs ago #22
the pic is from a 2012 Vanity Fair article Celerity 5 hrs ago #17
I didn't know that was still married then, too soandso 5 hrs ago #21
multiple names dropped in the article are now dead, tempus fugit Celerity 5 hrs ago #23
Indeed they are soandso 4 hrs ago #25
I wonder if their bosses wanted them to do this radius777 6 hrs ago #9
Business decision soandso 5 hrs ago #19

rich7862

(194 posts)
1. Who is sorry now?
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 09:13 PM
6 hrs ago

"The Trump Vote Regret Factor " is coming of age!
People in Unions are seeing the Unions failing and are upset.
Along with a criminal cabinet of rapists and thieves. trump voters are already questioning their vote.
No wonder trump wants the military from day one to deport immigrants.
He needs to control the army to keep his power as people see the truth about this monstrous dictator and his side kicks Musk and Vance.

Wait til the cost of food and housing goes up due to tariffs!

rich7862

(194 posts)
2. Mika is a total disappointment
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 09:16 PM
6 hrs ago

I thought she had more character than to take a knee to trump and beg forgiveness.

With Mika’s fame and money what the hell is she afraid of?

soandso

(1,153 posts)
6. You've gotta be kidding
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 09:38 PM
6 hrs ago

She fawned all over Trump when he ran the first time and I mean even fussing with his hair. And, that photo in the OP? It's years old and was taken when she was married to the father of her children. She and Scarborough used to openly flirt on air while she was married.

Docreed2003

(17,800 posts)
16. So all of that is license to use that pic
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:11 PM
5 hrs ago

And equate her with being a whore?

Sorry, I don't agree. Like I said, I support calling out Joe and Mika but there are ways to do that which aren't misogynistic.

FoxNewsSucks

(10,787 posts)
24. It's an official promo pic, and
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:49 PM
5 hrs ago

the term "media-whore" isn't the same as an actual sex worker. Neither is the term "political-whore". Men fit those two terms, probably more often than women.

Docreed2003

(17,800 posts)
3. Can we not make this same point
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 09:28 PM
6 hrs ago

Without using a provocative picture of Mika? I get the point of the post but it reeks of misogyny

Docreed2003

(17,800 posts)
10. Using that photo puts the focus on her
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 09:54 PM
5 hrs ago

Using the term "whore" and that photo is misogynistic. They could have used any other picture of them but they chose that one to make the point and in doing so, they are using typical misogynistic tropes.

There were other ways of calling them "media whores" but they intentionally chose a provocative pic of Mika.

milestogo

(17,786 posts)
12. Why did she strike a provocative pose during a promo shoot?
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:00 PM
5 hrs ago

Nobody forced her to show off her legs.

Its a pose that says "Look at me". Its not a pose that says "I have intelligent commentary".

Docreed2003

(17,800 posts)
14. So the pose and the photo shoot that was completely unrelated
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:09 PM
5 hrs ago

Is license to call her a whore?

This was intentionally designed to evoke a response and it's clearly misogynistic. We can't scream about misogyny costing us an election if we selectively support misogyny, sorry.

Docreed2003

(17,800 posts)
18. Like I said above
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:13 PM
5 hrs ago

I think there are better ways for our side to call out their weakness and bullshit, that's all I was saying

Docreed2003

(17,800 posts)
11. "She was dressed provocatively so that makes it ok"??
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 09:56 PM
5 hrs ago

Seriously?

It's misogynistic, whether the picture was out there already or not. The pic was chosen specifically to drive home the "whore" message.

There are better ways of calling out their bullshit than using imagery like this

soandso

(1,153 posts)
13. Who are you quoting?
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:06 PM
5 hrs ago

I didn't say anything about how she was dressed. In fact, I think she looks damn good. I wish I looked that good. She's an adult and knew exactly what she was doing, as did her at-the-time lover and co-host. Those two played up the sexual tension between them and it was open secret that everyone knew. They were selling that in that photo.

Docreed2003

(17,800 posts)
20. There are better ways for our side to make a point
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:17 PM
5 hrs ago

Using this photo and using the term "whore" or "Ho" is not a good look, that's my point. I'm not saying they shouldn't be called out for their absolute cowardice, I'm saying using this pic in that way is misogynistic.

soandso

(1,153 posts)
22. Media whores for money
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:29 PM
5 hrs ago

That's all that was meant and it's true. A month ago they hated Trump's guts and now they're out to mend fences because money.

Celerity

(46,176 posts)
17. the pic is from a 2012 Vanity Fair article
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:12 PM
5 hrs ago


https://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2012/10/joe-scarborough-mika-presidential-run



Five years ago this month, Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski began co-hosting MSNBC’s savvy, caffeinated Morning Joe, their daily brew of news, chat, and political opinion. And even though they are both married, with children, their on-air chemistry can come across as charged, even flirtatious, the cable equivalent of Nick and Nora Charles. Recently, they’ve been flirting all over the map. First, Joe flirted with the idea of running against Barack Obama.

An ex–Florida congressman and a moderate Republican, he conferred with fellow centrists just before the primaries, occasionally shuttling around with his friend Mike Bloomberg. (From time to time, Mika’s father, Zbigniew, Jimmy Carter’s national-security adviser, weighed in with sage advice, as did a handful of George W. alumni.) Next, Joe and Mika flirted with CBS about taking over the network’s perennially laggard morning slot. (After protracted negotiations, CBS went with Charlie Rose, Gayle King—and Erica Hill, since departed as co-host.)

Now the pair are flirting with none other than Roger Ailes, the man whose Fox News they battle every morning. To be exact: they have started a film-and-TV production company and the first proj­ect they’re developing and peddling is a TV drama about the life and times of their volatile competitor. Philip Seymour Hoffman has been mentioned for the Ailes character; James Gandolfini’s name has come up to portray Ailes’s pal Governor Chris Christie.

And just to raise the temperature a tad? After the presidential inauguration in January, Joe (no fan of Mitt Romney’s—”I’ve been very critical”) plans on publishing a memoir that will serve—no joke—as a vehicle to test the waters for a presidential run in 2016. Take that, Mr. Romney.

soandso

(1,153 posts)
21. I didn't know that was still married then, too
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:21 PM
5 hrs ago

I thought he was divorced. Double shitty of them to have done that to their spouses.

So, yeah, notice how titillating the copy is using the word "hot".

Celerity

(46,176 posts)
23. multiple names dropped in the article are now dead, tempus fugit
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:32 PM
5 hrs ago

Zbigniew Brzezinski

Roger Ailes

James Gandolfini

Philip Seymour Hoffman

soandso

(1,153 posts)
25. Indeed they are
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:53 PM
4 hrs ago

I didn't even think about that when reading your clip, other than I really miss Philip Seymour Hoffman.

radius777

(3,813 posts)
9. I wonder if their bosses wanted them to do this
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 09:45 PM
6 hrs ago

to take MSNBC out of the crosshairs, which obviously the RW hates and wants to sue, censor etc. Maybe they think by personally appealing to Trump he'd call off the dogs, so to speak. Or maybe it's just what its seems, that Mika and Joe are selling out because Trump is going to be president again and they want access.

soandso

(1,153 posts)
19. Business decision
Wed Nov 20, 2024, 10:14 PM
5 hrs ago

Since he came down that escalator in 2015, Trump has driven up ratings which = more income and Joe and Mika make HUGE money. It's a simple calculation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Once a media ho', always ...