General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe House of Representatives will be 220R-215D
Most likely.
Or is is it 219-215 since Gaetz is gone. Or really 218-215 because of Waltz (R) being in Trumps cabinet. Well no... 217-215 if you add in Elise Stefanik as another vacant seat in January. 🤔
cally
(21,715 posts)The two in California are winnable. I dont know about the third.
ColinC
(10,917 posts)Steel hasn't won a single report since election day and is behind 600 votes.
The other is tight as a tick but the remaining areas where the last 2000 votes remain are heavily blue college towns.
Celerity
(46,801 posts)ColinC
(10,917 posts)a kennedy
(32,295 posts)newdeal2
(1,121 posts)Celerity
(46,801 posts)Of course the contrarian US, starting in 2000 (modern era) had to do the opposite.
https://edition.cnn.com/style/why-republicans-red-democrats-blue/index.html
snip
The idea that Republicans are red and Democrats are blue may, today, feel embedded in the symbolism, branding and vernacular think blue states and red states of US politics. But the current configuration has only been cemented in the public imagination since the 2000 US presidential race between George W. Bush and Al Gore.
Until the turn of the millennium, the colors were often the other way around. But which you saw depended on where you got your news and when, given that outlets sometimes switched their color-coding between elections. On that night in 1980, for instance, ABC was the outlier, showing Republicans as red, having used yellow for the party four years earlier. During the networks 1984 election coverage, Brinkley, by then at ABC, offered a seemingly arbitrary on-air explanation for the decision: Red, R, Reagan thats why we chose red.
Colorful history
The GOPs links to blue are far older than those to red. Its an association that arguably dates to the American Civil War, when Abraham Lincolns Union Army was often identified by its dark blue uniforms, versus the gray traditionally worn by the Confederates military. The shade was also actively employed by the party in the 20th century. Since the 1970s, as campaign branding became more sophisticated, the Republicans logos have largely been blue (though so, too, have the majority of the Democrats logos). At an election night event at Republican headquarters in Washington DC in 1984, a huge map was erected on the back wall, where organizers ripped away green covers from each state to reveal sparkly blue fabric for the 49 states that announced for Reagan.
Internationally, blue is often linked with wealth and conservatism, having historically been the most expensive color to produce. Red, meanwhile, has long been associated with radicalism. Like the blood of workers rising against their oppressors, red features on the flags, logos and ensigns of left-leaning political organizations, from radical communists (think Red China) to the social democratic parties of Western Europe, Canada and Australia. As such, some of the earliest electoral maps, like Scribners 1883 Statistical Atlas of the United States, used a red-for-Democrat, blue-for-Republican scheme that would have been familiar to political observers outside the US.
snip
GoYouPackersGo
(146 posts)every goddamned piece of sports-related clothing I own is either Packer green and gold (that's fine) or RED! Christ, every time I wear a badger hat I feel the need to keep saying "IT'S NOT A MAGA HAT!" to passers by.
a kennedy
(32,295 posts)and fawk em ..when theyre about to smile at your hat, say, oh ya got me all wrong, this here is a Kamala and Badger hat then see what the fawkers do.
Sogo
(5,840 posts)I think someone should come up with a more accurate representation of the actual popular vote. It's because of this misrepresentation of the facts that TSF will be spouting about historical levels of victory, landslides, and overwhelming mandates, all of which he did not achieve....
Celerity
(46,801 posts)6 million.
I posted that here as a warning many times over the past 2 years.
Same for what I could see was a massive gender gap brewing, especially with Gen Z (who so many here falsely assumed would vote Dem at rates even higher than Millennials did when we were Gen Z's 2024 ages.
Same for the slamming to the right by Gen X (who are now the 'Trumpiest Gen' along with Gen Jones, ie the youngest Boomers)
Same for the explosion in evangelical latinos (starting posting on that in 2021) and how they likely would also slide to the right.
But people here so often either ignored me or tried (it doesn't work on me) to scold me.