Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ColinC

(10,917 posts)
Tue Nov 26, 2024, 07:43 PM Nov 26

The House of Representatives will be 220R-215D

Most likely.


Or is is it 219-215 since Gaetz is gone. Or really 218-215 because of Waltz (R) being in Trumps cabinet. Well no... 217-215 if you add in Elise Stefanik as another vacant seat in January. 🤔

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

cally

(21,715 posts)
1. I'm not sure how you can count the three races that are not called yet
Tue Nov 26, 2024, 08:13 PM
Nov 26

The two in California are winnable. I don’t know about the third.

ColinC

(10,917 posts)
2. There are only 2 uncalled races. One the writing has been on the wall for ages
Tue Nov 26, 2024, 08:25 PM
Nov 26

Steel hasn't won a single report since election day and is behind 600 votes.

The other is tight as a tick but the remaining areas where the last 2000 votes remain are heavily blue college towns.

Celerity

(46,801 posts)
7. Outside of the US, the 'good' parties are far more often red than blue, at least in the western advanced world.
Tue Nov 26, 2024, 08:50 PM
Nov 26

Of course the contrarian US, starting in 2000 (modern era) had to do the opposite.

https://edition.cnn.com/style/why-republicans-red-democrats-blue/index.html

snip

The idea that Republicans are red and Democrats are blue may, today, feel embedded in the symbolism, branding and vernacular — think “blue” states and “red” states — of US politics. But the current configuration has only been cemented in the public imagination since the 2000 US presidential race between George W. Bush and Al Gore.

Until the turn of the millennium, the colors were often the “other” way around. But which you saw depended on where you got your news — and when, given that outlets sometimes switched their color-coding between elections. On that night in 1980, for instance, ABC was the outlier, showing Republicans as red, having used yellow for the party four years earlier. During the network’s 1984 election coverage, Brinkley, by then at ABC, offered a seemingly arbitrary on-air explanation for the decision: “Red, R, Reagan — that’s why we chose red.”

Colorful history

The GOP’s links to blue are far older than those to red. It’s an association that arguably dates to the American Civil War, when Abraham Lincoln’s Union Army was often identified by its dark blue uniforms, versus the gray traditionally worn by the Confederate’s military. The shade was also actively employed by the party in the 20th century. Since the 1970s, as campaign branding became more sophisticated, the Republicans’ logos have largely been blue (though so, too, have the majority of the Democrats’ logos). At an election night event at Republican headquarters in Washington DC in 1984, a huge map was erected on the back wall, where organizers ripped away green covers from each state to reveal sparkly blue fabric for the 49 states that announced for Reagan.

Internationally, blue is often linked with wealth and conservatism, having historically been the most expensive color to produce. Red, meanwhile, has long been associated with radicalism. Like the blood of workers rising against their oppressors, red features on the flags, logos and ensigns of left-leaning political organizations, from radical communists (think “Red China”) to the social democratic parties of Western Europe, Canada and Australia. As such, some of the earliest electoral maps, like Scribner’s 1883 Statistical Atlas of the United States, used a red-for-Democrat, blue-for-Republican scheme that would have been familiar to political observers outside the US.

snip

GoYouPackersGo

(146 posts)
8. Try being a Wisconsin Badger alumnus and fan...
Tue Nov 26, 2024, 08:53 PM
Nov 26

every goddamned piece of sports-related clothing I own is either Packer green and gold (that's fine) or RED! Christ, every time I wear a badger hat I feel the need to keep saying "IT'S NOT A MAGA HAT!" to passers by.

a kennedy

(32,295 posts)
10. Badgers, Brewers, Bucks and Pack.......love Badger Red.
Tue Nov 26, 2024, 09:02 PM
Nov 26

and fawk em…..when they’re about to smile at your hat, say, oh ya got me all wrong, this here is a Kamala and Badger hat… then see what the fawkers do.

Sogo

(5,840 posts)
9. This map is so misleading.
Tue Nov 26, 2024, 08:57 PM
Nov 26

I think someone should come up with a more accurate representation of the actual popular vote. It's because of this misrepresentation of the facts that TSF will be spouting about historical levels of victory, landslides, and overwhelming mandates, all of which he did not achieve....

Celerity

(46,801 posts)
11. In 2022 (post Roe being overturned) we lost the national House vote by over 3 million, and if you removed CA, by around
Tue Nov 26, 2024, 09:07 PM
Nov 26

6 million.

I posted that here as a warning many times over the past 2 years.

Same for what I could see was a massive gender gap brewing, especially with Gen Z (who so many here falsely assumed would vote Dem at rates even higher than Millennials did when we were Gen Z's 2024 ages.

Same for the slamming to the right by Gen X (who are now the 'Trumpiest Gen' along with Gen Jones, ie the youngest Boomers)

Same for the explosion in evangelical latinos (starting posting on that in 2021) and how they likely would also slide to the right.

But people here so often either ignored me or tried (it doesn't work on me) to scold me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The House of Representati...