Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(187,107 posts)
Tue Dec 10, 2024, 12:40 PM Dec 10

Looks like Trump's DOJ was doing some Deep Stating

Long article here

Trump’s DOJ secretly obtained records of his FBI pick Kash Patel, lawmakers, staffers and media in leak investigations

https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/10/politics/justice-department-spying-congress-patel-trump-ig-report/index.html

For example, prosecutors did not have to inform Justice Department leadership that the records they sought were those of members of Congress – and Bill Barr, who was the attorney general at the time, has said he was “not aware of any congressman’s records being sought in a leak case.” Barr declined to be interviewed as part of the inspector general review of the matter.

The report also notes the Justice Department obtained non-disclosure orders in 40 of the congressional cases, meaning that members and their staff were not aware their communications records had been seized. In seeking those orders, prosecutors were not required to say with any specificity whose records they were going after.

In one leak investigation, prosecutors did not obtain the required certification from the Director of National Intelligence, the inspector general said. In another, they obtained the required certification, but it is not clear whether it was ever provided to Barr.

Prosecutors also failed to obtain Barr’s approval, which was a required step in the process to get non-disclosure orders that stopped reporters from learning that their records had been seized.


4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Looks like Trump's DOJ was doing some Deep Stating (Original Post) underpants Dec 10 OP
K&R Solly Mack Dec 10 #1
If K$h Patel gets to be FBI Director,... magicarpet Dec 10 #2
They have been simply sharpening their pencils... ultralite001 Dec 10 #3
K & R malaise Dec 10 #4

magicarpet

(16,849 posts)
2. If K$h Patel gets to be FBI Director,...
Tue Dec 10, 2024, 01:10 PM
Dec 10

.... just imagine the chicanery he will permit inorder to circumvent privacy laws.

Patel is so blindly loyal to djt and couple that fact with Pam Bondi being over at the US Atty Gens Office - the DOJ will become a weaponized bomb/missile djt can launch down anyone's chimney he does not like for one reason or another.

It is good to be King/Fuhrer at the head of the round table where all your Nazi Knights will fuck up your perceived enemies at your whims, becks, and calls.

ultralite001

(1,174 posts)
3. They have been simply sharpening their pencils...
Tue Dec 10, 2024, 02:35 PM
Dec 10

before F47's return to the White House...

How do we who uphold the Rule of Law expect to overcome these scofflaws when they've had more than a 4-year head start??? Passivity is no protection... We need more folks like Marc Elias, Ruth Ben Ghiat, Tim Snyder et al to help us devise a pro-active game plan to head these mofos off at the pass... $$$ helps, but it's not the answer...

Is there no work we can do each + every day to halt this madness???

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Looks like Trump's DOJ wa...