Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocrats aren't alone in slamming Kash Patel's prospective FBI nomination
Some prominent Trump administration voices, including some who worked with Kash Patel directly, are balking at the idea that he should lead the FBI.
https://bsky.app/profile/stevebenen.com/post/3ld2ozdqiy22c
Sure, Democrats have raised all kinds of reality-based objections to Kash Patel leading the FBI, but have you noticed the number of former Trump administration officials who've publicly slammed him, too?
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/democrats-arent-alone-slamming-kash-patels-prospective-fbi-nomination-rcna183754
Bolton, who worked directly with Patel during his tenure, argued that the prospective FBI leader placed obedience to Mr. Trump above other, higher considerations most important, loyalty to the Constitution.
If Bolton were alone, his concerns might be easier to put aside, but hes not.
Charles Kupperman, Patels supervisor in the first Trump administration, also told The Wall Street Journal, in reference to the prospective FBI chief, Hes absolutely unqualified for this job. Hes untrustworthy. ... Its an absolute disgrace to American citizens to even consider an individual of this nature.
Former Attorney General William Barr, meanwhile, wrote in his memoir that Trump had considered making Patel the deputy director of the FBI in his first term, though Barr said he told the White House that would happen over my dead body.......
Former Defense Secretary Mark Esper has also raised concerns about the likelihood of Patel politicizing federal law enforcement.
As Boltons op-ed added, Olivia Troye, who served as counterterrorism adviser to Vice President Mike Pence, accused Patel of making things up on operations.
To be sure, Patel has pushed back against his critics, and his lawyer sent a threatening letter to Troye about her accusations.
The bottom line, however, remains the same: There are some prominent voices from the Trump administration, including some who worked with Patel directly, raising some serious red flags about his upcoming nomination to lead the FBI which seems like the sort of thing that senators should take seriously.
To resolve questions over his integrity and fitness, a full-field FBI investigation, as prior nominees have undergone, is warranted. With more facts available and less rhetoric, the result will be clear. I regret I didnt fully discern Mr. Patels threat immediately. But we are now all fairly warned. Senators wont escape historys judgment if they vote to confirm him.
If Bolton were alone, his concerns might be easier to put aside, but hes not.
Charles Kupperman, Patels supervisor in the first Trump administration, also told The Wall Street Journal, in reference to the prospective FBI chief, Hes absolutely unqualified for this job. Hes untrustworthy. ... Its an absolute disgrace to American citizens to even consider an individual of this nature.
Former Attorney General William Barr, meanwhile, wrote in his memoir that Trump had considered making Patel the deputy director of the FBI in his first term, though Barr said he told the White House that would happen over my dead body.......
Former Defense Secretary Mark Esper has also raised concerns about the likelihood of Patel politicizing federal law enforcement.
As Boltons op-ed added, Olivia Troye, who served as counterterrorism adviser to Vice President Mike Pence, accused Patel of making things up on operations.
To be sure, Patel has pushed back against his critics, and his lawyer sent a threatening letter to Troye about her accusations.
The bottom line, however, remains the same: There are some prominent voices from the Trump administration, including some who worked with Patel directly, raising some serious red flags about his upcoming nomination to lead the FBI which seems like the sort of thing that senators should take seriously.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats aren't alone in slamming Kash Patel's prospective FBI nomination (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Thursday
OP
maxsolomon
(35,298 posts)1. "Former Trump Admin Officials" have as much influence over GOP Senators
as I do. None. Their opinions mean nothing.
Will the remaining "Institutionalist" GOP Senators have the nerve to vote against Patel? It will take 4, right?
I'd like to think Patel is a bridge too far for McConnell, Murkowski, Collins, but at this point, I wouldn't be surprised if Fetterman voted yes.
Buns_of_Fire
(17,922 posts)2. Considering that his major qualification is how much suction
he's applied to *rump's rump, perhaps it's appropriate to see if Barney Fife is available.