Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHealth insurers limit coverage of prosthetic limbs, questioning their medical necessity
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/health-insurance-coverage-prosthetic-joint-replacement/When Michael Adams was researching health insurance options last year, he had one very specific requirement: coverage for prosthetic limbs.
Adams, 51, lost his right leg to cancer 40 years ago, and he has worn out more legs than he can count. He picked a gold plan on the Colorado health insurance marketplace that covered prosthetics, including microprocessor-controlled knees like the one he has used for many years. That function adds stability and helps prevent falls.
But when his leg needed replacing in January after about five years of everyday use, his new marketplace health plan wouldn't authorize it. The roughly $50,000 leg with the electronically controlled knee wasn't medically necessary, the insurer said, even though Colorado law leaves that determination up to the patient's doctor, and his has prescribed a version of that leg for many years, starting when he had employer-sponsored coverage.
"The electronic prosthetic knee is life-changing," said Adams, who lives in Lafayette, Colorado, with his wife and two kids. Without it, "it would be like going back to having a wooden leg like I did when I was a kid." The microprocessor in the knee responds to different surfaces and inclines, stiffening up if it detects movement that indicates its user is falling.
*snip*
17 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Health insurers limit coverage of prosthetic limbs, questioning their medical necessity (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Yesterday
OP
lenders have repossessed wheelchairs or prostheses.... if people cant repay loan
IcyPeas
Yesterday
#2
Would it be too much to have at least one leg of every C-Suite member to have a limb amputation?
sakabatou
Yesterday
#3
Fortunately there is some good news. Medicare on September 1, 2024 expanded coverage on micro-p prosthetic legs.
Silent Type
23 hrs ago
#8
News articles that won't name names of corporations screwing people over!!!
lostnfound
23 hrs ago
#11
SheltieLover
(60,129 posts)1. United Healthcare again?
Skittles
(160,236 posts)5. why pick on just them?
THEY ALL DO IT, it's just a matter of degree
TBF
(34,704 posts)12. Because UH has the most denials.
SheltieLover
(60,129 posts)17. Just curious
IcyPeas
(22,714 posts)2. lenders have repossessed wheelchairs or prostheses.... if people cant repay loan
... Repossessed.wheelchairs !!!!!!!!!
The federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has proposed a rule that would prohibit lenders from repossessing medical devices such as wheelchairs and prosthetic limbs if people can't repay their loans.
"It is a replacement limb," said White, whose organization has heard of several cases in which lenders have repossessed wheelchairs or prostheses. Repossession is "literally a punishment to the individual."
"It is a replacement limb," said White, whose organization has heard of several cases in which lenders have repossessed wheelchairs or prostheses. Repossession is "literally a punishment to the individual."
It sounds like a Monty Python skit.
Diamond_Dog
(35,118 posts)7. I know .... Taking away a person's wheelchair???
Unbelievable!
ReRe
(10,887 posts)13. Seriously!
sakabatou
(43,225 posts)3. Would it be too much to have at least one leg of every C-Suite member to have a limb amputation?
Let's see if they think prosthetic limbs are... unnecessary.
Solly Mack
(93,185 posts)4. Damn
WestMichRad
(1,876 posts)6. What other parts will they decide patients don't need?
Yeah, no, you dont need that liver transplant, sucker.
That corporate executives are deciding our healthcare options for us is just wrong.
Silent Type
(7,303 posts)8. Fortunately there is some good news. Medicare on September 1, 2024 expanded coverage on micro-p prosthetic legs.
Many insurers follow Medicare coverage rules on these type of medical needs.
moonscape
(5,402 posts)10. The bad news is
New President/Musk/DOGE
Meowmee
(6,059 posts)9. 😣
Appeal it and sue/ get a lawyer. Maybe change the plan if possible.
lostnfound
(16,708 posts)11. News articles that won't name names of corporations screwing people over!!!
Protecting corporate miscreants at all costs.
Orrex
(64,284 posts)14. The obvious answer is to rip off the limbs of a few health insurance CEOs
AllyCat
(17,203 posts)16. This IS the obvious answer.
Klarkashton
(2,283 posts)15. Insurance is a for-profit business. Things like this
Should be no surprise. The insurance company bets on the risk that you will pay in more than you use. Medical care is incompatible with this system.