General Discussion

babylonsister

(171,675 posts) Sat Dec 21, 2024, 08:05 AM 13 hrs ago

'Pretty Damn Good': Why Biden's Goal to 'Trump-Proof' the Courts Has Been Deemed a Success

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/carl-gibson/112477/pretty-damn-good-why-biden-s-goal-to-trump-proof-the-courts-has-been-deemed-a-success

‘Pretty Damn Good’: Why Biden’s Goal to ‘Trump-Proof’ the Courts Has Been Deemed a Success
by Carl Gibson | December 21, 2024 - 6:35am

— from Alternet

President Joe Biden communicated his intent to confirm as many federal judges as possible before leaving office, in order to deny his successor the ability to pack the judiciary with far-right activists. That plan seems to have borne fruit, according to a new report.

In a Friday article, Politico's Anthony Adragna wrote that Democrats' "fight to Trump-proof the federal judiciary" has been an overwhelming success. On Friday night, the Democratic-run U.S. Senate confirmed Biden's 235th judicial appointment, officially putting him past President-elect Donald Trump's 234 judges with a month left to go before Biden leaves the White House.

According to NBC, among those 235 judges include one Supreme Court justice in Ketanji Brown Jackson (who replaced Justice Stephen Breyer after he retired), along with 45 powerful U.S. Court of Appeals judges, 187 U.S. District Court judges and two judges on the U.S. Court of International Trade. All federal judges serve lifelong terms, meaning many of Biden's 235 judicial appointments — roughly one-quarter of the entire federal judiciary — will likely be on the bench for decades to come.

snip//

“Two years, we’ve had a tied Senate and a tied committee, [and] we reported out almost 100 judges,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) told Politico. “Pretty good, huh? You can’t say yes, but I’ll say it for you: Pretty damn good.”

When the new Republican Senate majority is sworn in next month, Durbin will hand over the reins of the Judiciary Committee to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa). He has so far said he would keep the tradition of "blue slips" under his chairmanship, in which a U.S. District Court judge's nomination won't move forward unless both senators from that judge's respective state sign off on their nomination.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Pretty Damn Good': Why Biden's Goal to 'Trump-Proof' the Courts Has Been Deemed a Success (Original Post) babylonsister 13 hrs ago OP

Fantasy land FBaggins 13 hrs ago #1

Hopefully you'll babylonsister 12 hrs ago #3

I wouldn't expect a change related to this last batch FBaggins 12 hrs ago #4

'...but the judiciary is hardly "Trump proof"' J_William_Ryan 13 hrs ago #2

FBaggins

(27,796 posts)

1. Fantasy land

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Sat Dec 21, 2024, 08:21 AM

13 hrs ago

The Senate did a great job over the last four years… but the judiciary is hardly “Trump proof” (nor does the last batch after losing the election make much of a difference)

The judiciary still bears the stain of his first term and now he can lock in the SCOTUS majority by replacing the older republicans (effectively “democrats proofing” the judiciary.

babylonsister

(171,675 posts)

3. Hopefully you'll

Reply to FBaggins (Reply #1)

Sat Dec 21, 2024, 09:05 AM

12 hrs ago

be more grateful once these liberal judges start ruling.

FBaggins

(27,796 posts)

4. I wouldn't expect a change related to this last batch

Reply to babylonsister (Reply #3)

Sat Dec 21, 2024, 09:38 AM

12 hrs ago

They are likely to be almost exclusively liberal judges replacing retiring liberal judges.

Not that that's really relevant. If you reread my response, I'm not objecting to celebrating the large number of confirmed judges in this term. What I objected to was the ridiculous notion that the federal judiciary had in any sense been "trump-proofed".

As one easy counter-example - The JUDGES Act just passed the House with 29 democratic votes (after already passing the Senate unanimously). It creates 66 new federal judicial vacancies (roughly half right away). There's no way to "trump proof" those new seats.

J_William_Ryan

(2,251 posts)

2. '...but the judiciary is hardly "Trump proof"'

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Sat Dec 21, 2024, 08:45 AM

13 hrs ago

Perhaps not.

But history gives us a template; the glacial pace of the courts that benefited Trump as a private citizen will hobble him as president.

Details are in the link below.

In essence, when Congress refused to fund Trump’s ‘border wall,’ Trump had a hissy fit and declared a ‘national emergency.’

Sound familiar, doesn’t it.

Trump issued a proclamation diverting funds earmarked for defense spending to build his ‘wall’ of racism, bigotry, and hate. Trump’s ‘emergency’ declaration was challenged in court where it dragged on until the end of his term.

President Biden terminated Trump’s ‘emergency’ declaration.

There’s no reason why this won’t work the second time around.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Emergency_Concerning_the_Southern_Border_of_the_United_States

Reply to this discussion