General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeople on Facebook are posting that Mark Zuckerberg is a pedophile
Sounds true to me.
Beachnutt
(8,930 posts)from another planet.
William Seger
(12,500 posts)... possibly controlled by a little alien inside.
Trueblue1968
(19,293 posts)Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)durablend
(9,322 posts)William Seger
(12,500 posts)Attilatheblond
(9,089 posts)He can have a big ol cup of the sour medicine he is handing out. FAFO time for the zuckerclucker.
stopdiggin
(15,581 posts)Attilatheblond
(9,089 posts)My filters are failing fast these days, and I have developed a hair trigger keyboard.
Baitball Blogger
(52,560 posts)We're going to go into the era of Someone said it, people repeated it, no one denied it, so it must be true.
spapeggy
(130 posts)And thats verifiable
Big Tech and the Online Child Sexual Exploitation Crisis
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/committee-activity/hearings/big-tech-and-the-online-child-sexual-exploitation-crisis
atreides1
(16,799 posts)I also stated that he had a thing for sheep.
Attilatheblond
(9,089 posts)or woolly lap dances?
reACTIONary
(7,233 posts)
newdeal2
(5,521 posts)Zucks going to run out friends.
gab13by13
(32,543 posts)JoseBalow
(9,627 posts)
spapeggy
(130 posts)GreenWave
(12,721 posts)
Notice the beginning resemblance?
spapeggy
(130 posts)David Ferrie
bamagal62
(4,521 posts)niyad
(133,362 posts)milestogo
(23,148 posts)Heard it on DU.
SocialDemocrat61
(7,800 posts)But did read he has sex with goats and eats aborted fetuses for breakfast 😉
leftieNanner
(16,162 posts)TBF
(36,943 posts)I can fact check perfectly from here in Houston!
WestMichRad
(3,330 posts)
is being a pedophile still considered abhorrent?
Seriously
. Im not sure what if any behavior is still regarded as taboo. In any case, it seems that anything goes, if
in other words, IOKIYAR.
mgardener
(2,383 posts)For Republicans.
The party of Family values has taken on a different meaning...
ShazzieB
(22,751 posts)But there are definitely still some behaviors the GOP find extremely repellent, such as being gay or trans, not maintaining a traditional masculine or feminine gender presentation that is congruent with one's genetic makeup, or having an abortion.
I think Republicans are allowed to fuck anybody they want, as long as long as their targets have the right set of chromosomes and no resulting pregnancies are aborted.
.
haele
(15,498 posts)In early Abrahamaic cultures, the earliest oral traditions written down indicate that the God(s)of the land that tribes in that area believed in was not so concerned about the sex as the power of the social hierarchy. Those in a position of power - or representing the head of a family, tribe, or religious elder, could not take a massive or receiving role in sex.
A head of the household - or his heirs - could have sex with any person considered of age (as young as 8) that is socially below him and not be unclean so long as he was the one doing the penetration.
A person in a leadership position who allowed himself to be penetrated became unclean, and his uncleanliness would end up polluting the land itself, thereby cursing the tribe and the land if sufficient atonement was not made.
That turned into "No homosexuality" later on after the Romans went Xtian for political power purposes. Not only that, but early Christians thought Jesus would return within a couple decades of his Crucifixion, and both Peter and Paul preached "Why have kids if we're all going to God anyway? You won't need them to keep your name or take care of anyone. Just be Chaste so you can be pure when God takes you Home."
I'm pretty sure (though McClellan doesn't say this) that this was "change" in sexual policy from "don't get penetrated" to "heterosexual Missionary Only" was and still is known and understood to be the basis for why the clerics and nobles in Judaism, Christianity and Islam get away with homosexuality and pedophilia in their communities and people with little to no power literally get screwed if they try to enjoy the company of those they love.
Just a couple thoughts on the background to those perverted jerks.
edbermac
(16,477 posts)If it happens to be true.
3825-87867
(1,989 posts)it may be a fact that even tho' Zuck wife was supposedlly born in America, did he "buy her?"
And does she feel she's HIS PROPERTY?
Better yet, can he sell her?
usonian
(26,077 posts)

Nobody beats the wiz.

usonian
(26,077 posts)

xmas74
(30,076 posts)A rat penis transplant.
Kid Berwyn
(24,789 posts)Fox = 10
Dog = 0
Zuckerberg = Perv
spapeggy
(130 posts)RockRaven
(19,612 posts)After all, who is to say if it is true or not? Everyone do your own research!
Or, rather, don't. Gross.
Jim__
(15,250 posts)Xipe Totec
(44,570 posts)that people on Facebook are posting.