Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDesperate for 'despotism.' LA fire fuels NYT writer's authoritarian fantasy (Gil Duran)
https://www.theframelab.org/amy-chozick-los-angeles-fires-despot-nyt/Hot for Strict Father morality?
Yesterday, the New York Times opinion page ran a bizarre op-ed in which Amy Chozick, a former NYT reporter, made a stunningly forthright argument for authoritarian leadership. Her essay used tortured logic to promote strongman leadership as an answer to natural disasters.
Chozick, a Los Angeles resident whose house remains standing, wrote that the city's unprecedented fire disaster makes her pine for the authority of a man with a "dollop of despotism." She said the tragedy lacks a clear "protagonist," which she defines as a strong male hero who can swoop in and magically save the day.
-snip-
Since Chozick covered politics for the New York Times, I assume she wrote exactly what she meant to say. When you isolate the basic arguments, it's hard not to see her piece as an endorsement of authoritarian rule, since the entire world is currently beset by crises. In her piece, she takes the role of a helpless child hoping to be rescued by a strict father with all the answers and little regard for niceties.
"I am not calling for a bully, but successful leaders through epic disasters have a dollop of despot," she writes.
-snip-
Yesterday, the New York Times opinion page ran a bizarre op-ed in which Amy Chozick, a former NYT reporter, made a stunningly forthright argument for authoritarian leadership. Her essay used tortured logic to promote strongman leadership as an answer to natural disasters.
Chozick, a Los Angeles resident whose house remains standing, wrote that the city's unprecedented fire disaster makes her pine for the authority of a man with a "dollop of despotism." She said the tragedy lacks a clear "protagonist," which she defines as a strong male hero who can swoop in and magically save the day.
-snip-
Since Chozick covered politics for the New York Times, I assume she wrote exactly what she meant to say. When you isolate the basic arguments, it's hard not to see her piece as an endorsement of authoritarian rule, since the entire world is currently beset by crises. In her piece, she takes the role of a helpless child hoping to be rescued by a strict father with all the answers and little regard for niceties.
"I am not calling for a bully, but successful leaders through epic disasters have a dollop of despot," she writes.
-snip-
Much more at the link.
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Desperate for 'despotism.' LA fire fuels NYT writer's authoritarian fantasy (Gil Duran) (Original Post)
highplainsdem
Jan 14
OP
tanyev
(45,185 posts)1. Well, Amy's about to get what she wants.
I dont think it will work out very well for her, though.
Intractable
(798 posts)2. What she calls a dollop would be much more of a wallop.
highplainsdem
(53,575 posts)5. I agree.
thebigidea
(13,448 posts)3. some writer doesn't like the press conferences. shrug
Kid Berwyn
(18,984 posts)4. NYT misleading America to a hideous future.