General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVirginia House of Delegates Passes Constitutional Amendment Guaranteeing "the fundamental right to reproductive freedom"
A few minutes ago, the Virginia House of Delegates passed on a party-line vote, not surprisingly HJ1, a constitutional amendment which Provides that every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom and that the right to make and effectuate ones own decisions about all matters related to ones pregnancy cannot be denied, burdened, or otherwise infringed upon by the Commonwealth, unless justified by a compelling state interest and achieved by the least restrictive means. Note that Gov. Glenn Youngkin has no role in the amendment process, which means that its up to the General Assembly and, ultimately, voters (to decide in November 2026, assuming that HJ1 passes this year and again next year).
As for the arguments by Democrats and Republicans today, there wasnt really anything surprising, although it was quite refreshing to listen to Del. Candi Mundon-King call out House Republicans for their hypoocrisy, extremism and ignorance on this issue. Of course, far-right-extremist delegates like Nick Freitas talked about the rarest, most unusual cases, in the most gruesome manner possible, despite the fact that they *know* the VAST majority of abortions occur in the first trimester, with late-term abortions both very rare and also being carried out only in cases of severe fetal abnormalities, serious risks to the life/health of the mother, etc.
In the end, of course, the arguments made on the House of Delegates floor werent ever going to persuade anyone to change their minds on this issue. Also, note that polling shows 71% support abortion in all or most cases in Virginia. And, importantly, when amendments like the one being proposed in Virginia are put in front of voters, they almost always win, often by wide margins, including in red states like Kansas. So assuming that HJ1 is put before the voters in November 2026, its highly likely to pass (House Republicans must know that, which is why they dont want the amendment to be put before voters!).
P.S. See below for a statement by likely 2025 Virginia gubernatorial nominee Abigail Spanberger, who says: Virginians deserve the certainty of knowing that their rights are protected in the Virginia Constitution. Our Commonwealth needs to be a place where Virginians right to choose, right to privacy, right to access IVF, and right to contraception are guaranteed.
https://bluevirginia.us/2025/01/133427
no_hypocrisy
(49,910 posts)At the moment, I won't discuss the implied "Right To Life" policy inherent in this bill.
I want to talk about how it was in Virginia 100 years ago that in the small court house in Amherst County, an impoverished young woman, who gave birth to an illegitimate baby girl, the product of rape by the nephew of her foster parents, was adjudicated as "feebleminded" -- and therefore could be legally forced to be sterilized by the state of Virginia. THAT was and still is a "compelling state interest. If you were poor White Trash, you could be rounded up, put in a state institute for the mentally challenged, and put on a list for surgery that cut your Fallopian Tubes. Of course, they wouldn't tell you that they sterilized you. You were told it was an appendectomy.
This case, Buck v. Bell, (https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/buck-v-bell-1927/) went up to the USSC, where no other than Associate Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Chief Justice, wrote the famous line, "Three generations of imbeciles is enough." The government-mandated sterilizations were based on the "popular" and faulty scientific theories of Eugenics. Some people should be allowed to breed; others, not at all. And this was decades before Hitler in Germany.
Once legitimized by the USSC, sterilization by the state spread to other states. There's an American Experience program on the history of eugenics and sterilization.
While Virginia has revoked the original law for sterilization and has apologized, the original USSC decision is still viable, though not utilized (at least publicly acknowledged).
Look at the verbiage in the Bill. You can see that this opens the door to returning to Virginia being allowed to find a "compelling" reason to not allow certain residents to reproduce. As for "least restrictive means," I doubt that means a prescription for birth control and/or abortion pills.
Provides that every individual has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom and that the right to make and effectuate ones own decisions about all matters related to ones pregnancy cannot be denied, burdened, or otherwise infringed upon by the Commonwealth, unless justified by a compelling state interest and achieved by the least restrictive means.
If someone wants to continue the discussion of this Bill, seemingly giving "reproductive freedom" to women, look again. Define the group of "individuals". Is it women and girls exclusively? Or do men have an equal right to "reproductive freedom"? Or is Virginia going to bestow zygotes, embryos, and fetuses the status of "individuals"?
spooky3
(36,833 posts)Response to RandySF (Original post)
wolfie001 This message was self-deleted by its author.