General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOcasio-Cortez leads poll of Democrats on which leader 'best reflects' party's 'core values'
In a CNN survey released Sunday, Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents were asked to name one person when thinking about Democratic leaders today who best reflects the core values of the Democratic Party.
The open-ended question yielded a range of responses: 10 percent pointed to Ocasio-Cortez, 9 percent said former Vice President Kamala Harris, 8 percent said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and 6 percent said House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.).
Former President Obama and Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) each were named by 4 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independent respondents, while Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.), California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) were named by 2 percent of respondents.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ocasio-cortez-leads-poll-democrats-145717114.html
LuvLoogie
(8,512 posts)No fear, no quit in that one.
H2O Man
(78,610 posts)A lot of us recognize AOC gives voice to our values.
Wanderlust988
(729 posts)None of her "ideas" are tolerable to the majority of the country, like the Green New Deal. And she was the big proponent of saying "LatinX" which hurts us amongst the broader Hispanic population. She speaks well and articulates her views well, but that doesn't mea she should be the leader of the entire Democratic Party.
SunImp
(2,608 posts)Five years since the Green New Deals introduction, new polling from Data for Progress finds Americans are taking climate change increasingly seriously. Nearly half (49%) of voters view climate change as more serious now than they did in the past, followed by 33% whose views of climate , view climate change as less serious than they did in the past.
A majority (57%) of voters see climate change and extreme weather events as kitchen table issues, with 22% considering them often and 35% considering them sometimes in discussions at home. Whats more, strong majorities of voters are at least somewhat concerned about the impacts of climate change (63%), air and water pollution (74%), and extreme weather events (68%) on their community.
https://www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2024/2/6/five-years-after-its-introduction-the-green-new-deal-is-still-incredibly-popular
And she was the big proponent of saying "LatinX" which hurts us amongst the broader Hispanic population.
Based on their analysis of a set of population surveys conducted in recent years, Marcel Roman, an assistant professor of government at Harvard, and Amanda Sahar dUrso, an assistant professor of government at Georgetown University, say Latinos are less likely to support a politician who uses the term Latinx in their appeal to voters.
They say the move away from Democratic candidates using the term appears to be driven by the subset of Latino voters who hold negative attitudes toward the LGBTQ community and is not based on a broader reaction against the new term, which first began to appear about 20 years ago.
https://rhodeislandcurrent.com/2024/10/31/study-finds-use-of-gender-neutral-latinx-by-democratic-pols-is-costing-them-votes/
I think she is leadership material, but unfortunately many Democrats have been primed to hate her by some in the party so I agree that it should be someone else. I think everyone would love someone like Chris Murphy leading us.
PurgedVoter
(2,677 posts)Do you have a better plan or do you not believe in climate change? If you have a better set of "ideas" then please let us know. Since AOC appears to base her "ideas" on science and compassion, if your ideas on how to keep this planet livable are good, and based on science then I suspect she would like to hear them as well.
As far as the term "LatinX" goes, it is part of an academic approach to trying to deal with the inherent gender bias built into the Spanish language. I will agree that there is a large faction that don't like the term "LatinX." It is unpopular, kind of like "Antifa" is unpopular, "Woke" is unpopular, and a compassionate Jesus who supports the poor is unpopular. I don't particularly love the term, "LatinX," but I respect the reasoning behind it.
Gender pronouns are interesting things these days, and there are people who get angry about them. I am not one of those people, but I am one of those who hopes that AOC's "ideas" are a strong part of our future.
AZProgressive
(29,847 posts)The people that complain about "latinx" the most were white centrists.
Celerity
(53,653 posts)That is demonstrably false.
She is pro-choice, as is the majority of the country. That one example alone puts paid to your 'none of her ''ideas'' are tolerable to the majority of the country' absolute statement.
Also why did you put the word ideas in inverted commas? Seems like a wee snip of condescension to me, but your mileage may vary.
RJ-MacReady
(603 posts)In her district she and her ideas may be very popular but nationwide they are far less so. She has come a long way and had matured. She speaks well and is one of the few going after the Nazis. However I agree elevating her to party leader will hurt us even more.
murielm99
(32,690 posts)She does not hold any recognized leadership position within the Democratic Party. She is a rank and file representative.
Pritzker is a leader. So is Whitmer. So is Newsom. Even though a lot of people here are showing their disdain of Schumer, he is a leader.
Hornedfrog2000
(866 posts)EuterpeThelo
(171 posts)Up until a month ago, I'd have been open-throated in my support of Gavin Newsom. He's my governor and his leadership through COVID (notwithstanding the stupid French Laundry B.S.) was a source of great comfort to me, watching my closest friend suffer the likes of Doug Ducey.
This recent, BIZARRE turn he's taken, platforming the proponents of literal hate speech, has completely lost me. Michael Savage was almost single-handedly responsible for brainwashing my beloved father, a JFK Democrat, into someone whose political views towards the end of his life (he passed in 2005) I barely recognized. Hadn't heard his name in years until Gavin Newsom thought it would be a good idea to feature him on his podcast a couple weeks ago.
Just like I used to pay for HBO solely to watch Bill Maher but I now consider him totally unwatchable, Gavin has now become absolutely repellent to me because of the scum he's willing to platform. He's killed his 2028 chances, if he even ever had any due to the demonization of anything associated with my great home state of California (they hate us for our freedoms!).
Celerity
(53,653 posts)Leadership doesn't only come from official titles. I think we are unfortunately now seeing that play out with Schumer.
Also for only being (your words) 'a rank and file representative', which implies limited power and/or not much significance, she sure does engender myriad screeds against her amongst certain types within our Party's big tent, both here and outside of DU's cyber environs.
H2O Man
(78,610 posts)AOC is a leader among people. But not of corporations.
B.See
(7,751 posts)"leader" or not, at least she has demonstrated she has more...moxie...(and here u thought I was going to use the b word)... than many who are too afraid to stand up or speak out.
And by many, I'm not referring to any person(s) or party in particular.
Kaleva
(40,162 posts)redqueen
(115,186 posts)malaise
(292,691 posts)From day one
Emile
(40,576 posts)Mysterian
(6,169 posts)We need fighters.
Not milquetoast surrender monkeys.
BluenFLA
(219 posts)Unlike Shumer and his buddies she is willing to fight and do so in an articulate way. Whatever her future is she should be applauded for speaking out in these trying times when few are willing or able to do so.
ananda
(34,391 posts)I like her.
She and Bernie Sanders are so great!