Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(175,033 posts)
Fri Mar 21, 2025, 07:17 PM Mar 2025

The biggest (and most avoidable) mistake in Trump's release of the JFK assassination files

The White House knew unredacted JFK assassination files would expose Social Security numbers. Donald Trump did it anyway.



https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/biggest-avoidable-mistake-trumps-release-jfk-assassination-files-rcna197557

Donald Trump took a moment at an Oval Office event to brag about his decision to release thousands of documents related to John F. Kennedy’s assassination, which he characterized as a great breakthrough. Unprompted, however, the president brought up a serious point of contention.

“We even released Social Security numbers; I didn’t want anything deleted,” he told reporters. “They said, ‘Sir, what about Social Security numbers?’ ... But they’re long gone. I can’t imagine.”
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:4llrhdclvdlmmynkwsmg5tdc/post/3lkvkuq2yj622


Evidently, the president isn’t keeping up on current events. The New York Times reported:

The Trump administration scrambled to minimize fallout on Thursday after exposing personal information, including Social Security numbers, of hundreds of congressional staff members, intelligence researchers and even an ambassador when releasing files pertaining to the death of President John F. Kennedy.


I realize the Trump White House has faced important questions about its competence, but it would’ve been easy to avoid this humiliation.......

In the hopes of putting things right, the White House directed the Social Security Administration to issue new numbers to the affected people, as well as offering free credit monitoring.

Because if there’s one thing people in their 80s and 90s want to deal with, it’s to start over with new Social Security numbers and incorporate those into their financial lives.

The New York Times’ report added administration officials “knew before the documents went out that releasing them without redactions would expose some personal information,” and while that might seem outrageous, Trump confirmed this morning that when he was confronted with this warning, he chose to ignore it because he assumed all of the relevant people Many of the relevant people are, however, alive and well — but suddenly worried about being doxxed.

It’s possible at this point that some readers might be thinking to themselves, “This might be awful for those affected by the White House’s latest fiasco, and I’m relieved that I’m not involved.” And while that would be an understandable reaction, let’s not forget that Team Trump isn’t exactly going out of its way to protect everyone else’s private Social Security information, either. The Washington Post also reported:

A federal judge on Thursday barred U.S. DOGE Service employees from accessing sensitive Social Security Administration data and ordered members of the team led by Elon Musk to delete any personally identifiable information it has obtained from the agency. On the broad premise of rooting out fraud within the federal government, about a dozen Musk-aligned tech engineers gained access to databases containing reams of taxpayer information.


“To facilitate this expedition, SSA provided members of the SSA DOGE Team with unbridled access to the personal and private data of millions of Americans,” U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander wrote. That included access to “Social Security numbers, medical records, mental health records, hospitalization records, drivers’ license numbers, bank and credit card information, tax information, income history, work history, birth and marriage certificates, and home and work addresses.”

In the process, the judge added, the Trump administration exposed “personal, confidential, sensitive, and private information that millions of Americans entrusted to their government.”

I have a hunch we haven’t heard the last of this story.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The biggest (and most avoidable) mistake in Trump's release of the JFK assassination files (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 OP
Trumps plans are always well thought out and carefully executed. Turbineguy Mar 2025 #1
Criminal and civil lawsuits Blue Full Moon Mar 2025 #2
Except Trump is immune, thanks to SCOTUS. *** BUT *** if Roe v Wade could be overturned ... RandomNumbers Mar 2025 #3
It's right there he can't own a gun but he has nuke codes. Blue Full Moon Mar 2025 #4
One doxed was that asspickle Joe Degenova maxrandb Mar 2025 #5
Trump Brags About Publishing Innocent People's Social Security Numbers LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #6
That breach was the only info that had not been previously released malaise Mar 2025 #7

Blue Full Moon

(3,180 posts)
2. Criminal and civil lawsuits
Fri Mar 21, 2025, 07:26 PM
Mar 2025

What is PII?
PII, as defined by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), is information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual's identity, either alone or when combined with other personal or identifying information.
Federal Privacy Act:
The Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, provides privacy protections for records containing information about individuals collected and maintained by the federal government.
Criminal Penalties:
Under the Privacy Act, a person who knowingly and willfully discloses PII can face criminal penalties, including a fine of not more than $5,000.
This applies to government employees who violate the act.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutes criminal violations of privacy laws, including the Federal Privacy Act.
Civil Actions:
Individuals can bring a civil action in federal court for damages against any agency of the U.S. Government that violates the Federal Privacy Act.
This includes violations related to the release of information to the person who is the subject of the record or failing to maintain an accurate record.

RandomNumbers

(19,070 posts)
3. Except Trump is immune, thanks to SCOTUS. *** BUT *** if Roe v Wade could be overturned ...
Fri Mar 21, 2025, 07:59 PM
Mar 2025

How long before people realize that presidential immunity is a really, REALLY bad idea, and that concept impinges on the psyches of the dim witted justices who didn't already get that?

Okay I know I'm reaching ... just gotta find a little hope in this mess.

maxrandb

(17,173 posts)
5. One doxed was that asspickle Joe Degenova
Fri Mar 21, 2025, 09:25 PM
Mar 2025

He was pissed, but went out of his way to say; "it wasn't Donnie Dipshits fault" and he railed against the "incompetence" of those that released his SSN for the world to see.

What do you say Joe? I mean, now that Donnie Dipshit has admitted that the Archive people warned him about this, but he said; "meh"?

I hope someone uses Degeonova's SSN to open an Amazon account and order him 1,000,000 Orange toupees.

LetMyPeopleVote

(175,033 posts)
6. Trump Brags About Publishing Innocent People's Social Security Numbers
Sat Mar 22, 2025, 11:06 AM
Mar 2025

Imagine being such a degenerate asshole that you delight in publishing the personal information of others



https://newrepublic.com/post/193053/trump-brags-publish-social-security-numbers-jfk-files

Donald Trump bragged about releasing the Social Security numbers of hundreds of people during his anticlimactic release of the John F. Kennedy assassination files.

“Eighty thousand pages of documents is a lot to sift through,” a reporter said to Trump on Friday. “Can you just tell us who killed Kennedy?”

“Well, you know, I was given the task of releasing that. Many presidents have gone through it, and they haven’t released. And I said, ‘Release.’ We even released Social Security numbers, I didn’t want anything deleted,” Trump replied. “They said, ‘So what about Social Security?’ People long gone.… We gave Social Security, we gave everything. And the rest is for you to look at.”

These Social Security numbers are from potentially hundreds of people who are alive, not “long gone,” as the president wrongly claimed.

One of them, Reagan-era Justice Department attorney and Trump’s own former campaign lawyer Joseph diGenova, was furious about the release of his personal data. “I intend to sue the National Archives,” he told USA Today. “They violated the Privacy Act.”

malaise

(292,917 posts)
7. That breach was the only info that had not been previously released
Sat Mar 22, 2025, 11:07 AM
Mar 2025

Effin incompetents the KKKK

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The biggest (and most avo...