General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"For the first time in the poll's history, congressional Democrats are now underwater with their own voters"
In 2023 Democrats in Congress were +54 with Democrats. Now, two years later, they are -9.
Waiting for the Schumer debacle to blow over and playing business-as-usual isn't flying with the base, nor should it.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/03/21/polling-data-democrats-primaries-grassroots-tea-party-00241769
LiberalArkie
(19,296 posts)Passages
(3,986 posts)The path out is rather obvious and has been for quite a while.
lapucelle
(20,947 posts)https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/us/politics/bernie-sanders-democrats-independents.html
mike_c
(36,902 posts)...the democratic party has cut off its nose to spite Bernie? Even now I suspect there are dems who think Trump and the death of democracy are a fair price to pay for keeping Bernie out of the presidency. This thread is full of their rationalizations. "He's not a real democrat!" Neither is TSF.
lapucelle
(20,947 posts)It sounds as if you're saying that Senator Sanders is so embittered by his losses that he's telling folks to abandon the Democratic Party. Do you have evidence for that claim?
Why on earth would anyone here say that there are Democrats who think "the death of democracy" is a fair price to pay" for anything whatsoever?
doc03
(38,823 posts)1980s. Sorry Jeffries may be a good man, but he has no communications skills or charisma. Chuck is
in the last century.
LiberalArkie
(19,296 posts)JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)around the country preaching to the choir or attacking other Democrats. Too many people want to "burn it all down". Well, that is what gave us 2000, 2016, and 2024, along with citizens united, and a Supreme Court with an extremist agenda for at least the next decade.
Elections have consequences, and perhaps it is time to pay the piper, and pay for the consequences of our collective actions.
lapucelle
(20,947 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 22, 2025, 10:15 AM - Edit history (1)
saying things like
instead of
Imagine giving an interview to the New York Times and admitting on the record
No wonder there are politicians offering a joke-y apologies to Democrats who they badmouthed just a few years ago. They need to be more self-aware.
Demsrule86
(71,492 posts)We would lose every election.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/bernie-sanderss-bad-idea-left-should-quit-democratic-party.html
lapucelle
(20,947 posts)https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/us/politics/bernie-sanders-democrats-independents.html
JI7
(93,203 posts)Ratings for Congress as a whole are usually low but when asked about their own member it's much higher.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)The excerpt above says:
In 2023 Democrats in Congress were +54 with Democrats. Now, two years later, they are -9.
lapucelle
(20,947 posts)(two of which didn't even ask the "approval" question) and devised the chart. Apparently the author thought that no one would read the fine print or research the actual polling dates and questions.
All of the data he sources comes from February polling. It has nothing to do with Chuck Schumer voting to keep the federal courts and the Social Security Administration open rather than closing them as an act of "resistance".
It turns out that the author owns the data company that devised the chart. No wonder he's flogging it.
=========================================
Interestingly, the author of the opinion piece does link to a Gallup poll (from February as well) that asked Democrats this question:
If you had to choose, would you rather see the Democratic Party become more liberal, stay the same or become more moderate?

https://news.gallup.com/poll/656636/democrats-favor-party-moderation-past.aspx
lapucelle
(20,947 posts)The "data scientist" who wrote this opinion piece does not link to the February 2025 poll that he inexplicably cites under the screen shot of a chart that his own company (Split Ticket) devised as "net approval" based on the results of three different polls, two of which did not actually ask a "do you approve of your party" question.
Did anyone bother to go to the primary sources (i.e. the polls themselves and the author's company's website) to see whether the data were massaged or manipulated?
Unfortunately, there are politicians running around blaming Republicans and Democrats equally for Trump's abuses, working hard to convince voters that there is no difference between the two parties, and even encouraging potential candidates to run against Democrats as independents.
There are even politicians offering joke-y apologies to the Democrats they badmouthed a few years ago, finally admitting how very wrong they were now that's too late and the damage has been done.
Why on earth are politicians on tours saying things like "We need a Democratic Party that will fight". In what way does that help the Democratic Party? Who benefits from that kind messaging? Why aren't they saying things like "We are the Democratic Party and we are fighting"?
And of course the MSM is running with the "Democrats badmouthing Democrats" narrative. It's great for ratings.
Meanwhile, because the government was not shut down, the federal courts are still operating, the vast majority of federal workers have not been furloughed (with the remainder working without pay), and Social Security Administration continues to cut checks and process applications.
Yes, it may have been disappointing to be deprived of a moment to pump one's fist in the air and yell, "Resist!", but luckily cooler heads prevailed because there was no viable exit strategy for a hot-headed move.
And now, nothing that the Trump administration is doing can be blamed on "Democrats shutting down the government".
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)lapucelle
(20,947 posts)
====================================
Pro tip: Conflating " more moderate" with "further to the right" demonstrates the type of flawed reasoning common and egregious enough to actually have a name in both formal and informal logic. It's a trifecta error in reasoning: it even has a Latin name.

Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)...moving something from the left to the center moves it toward the right.
Luckily, more Democrats (and Americans in general) are leaning more toward liberal views than conservative, according this 2024 Gallup poll...
BY MIRANDA NAZZARO - 06/10/24 10:31 AM ET
Source: https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/4713508-democrats-liberal-identification-social-economic-issues-gallup/
Democrats have become much more likely to lean liberal in their social views over the past 25 years, according to a new Gallup analysis.
An analysis of a May Gallup survey found liberal identification has gradually increased since 1999, while conservative and moderate identification have each decreased slightly over the years.
When Gallup began asking Americans about their ideologies in 1999, survey participants were more likely to identify as socially conservative than liberal, researchers noted. From 1999 to 2008, a third or more of Americans each identified as conservative or moderate on social issues, while roughly a quarter said they were socially liberal.
In the latest survey, Gallup found Americans are now nearly equally likely to hold socially conservative, moderate or liberal views, with 32 percent each choosing the former two options and 33 percent choosing liberal.
-snip-
lapucelle
(20,947 posts)
==================
As for the "Quick,! Look over here!" ploy, that doesn't work either.
It's hard to take someone seriously when they support flawed reasoning with flawed reasoning and think that the long term analysis of 25 years of polling data is the same thing as a poll.

Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)Kid Berwyn
(22,931 posts)Vs Democrats hold a press conference opposing their latest outrage Americas press corpse fails to cover.
Meanwhile most people dont know or care because they are too busy finding a way to pay for rent, food and toilet paper.
Demsrule86
(71,492 posts)But, I would walk across broken glass to vote for them in the General...it is them or more Republicans. I don't think our Republic can survive if we don't take back the House at least at the midterm and maybe maybe we get the Senate. This is the most dangerous regime in our history. It is sort of like the 90's only much worse when everything had gone ultra-right for 12 years. Clinton ran as a centrist and stopped Bush I. It would have been 16 years of the GOP holding the presidency if Bush had won.
We won't last long a a country if we don't stop Trump and his merry band of Fascist scum....so I will vote for any any Democrat in the General=it is our only play I do hope we can primary some of the traitorous Democrats who voted with the GOP and helped pass the continuing resolution. But the bottom line is we have to stop the bleeding by electing as many Democrat as we can in the General. We can do nothing if we remain in the minority. Dividing the Party will only help Republicans. And a new party takes years to launch...we don't have years.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)Why can't it be other, more trustworthy Democrats?
lapucelle
(20,947 posts)do you mean Democrats who are not on tour saying
instead of
or giving interviews to the NYT saying
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)lapucelle
(20,947 posts)Any shutdowns, slowdowns, or stoppages of services are solely and completely Trump's fault.
During the last shut down in a Trump administration, he closed the immigration courts.
Because those courts are open, Mahmoud Kahlil had a hearing this week, and federal judges are demanding answers on when and why the Trump administration disappeared people to El Salvador and reinstating fired federal workers to their jobs.
Think. Again.
(22,456 posts)lapucelle
(20,947 posts)And the federal courts postponed cases that the DOJ was party to.
Johonny
(25,435 posts)Democrats are engaged and understand the country is going to shit. Trump is in the glorious fucking around phase. But the find out is coming. There is no way the consequences of all the bad decisions are going to bear fruit.
And Democratic leaders really are powerless to do much. But I think their base is going to be very, very motivated in 2026. The 2026 primary and general is going to be interesting.
I would be shocked right now if any democratic voter answered a poll saying they're satisfied. Sure they hate Trump, but the general anger at the whole corrupt system is obvious.
IrishBubbaLiberal
(2,561 posts)Thanks for your thoughts
Couldnt have said it better
Kaleva
(40,167 posts)The smallest group wants the Party to become more liberal
IrishBubbaLiberal
(2,561 posts)Lots of polls are relatively useless push polls,
BUT When the exact topic or govt issue is asked, guess what?
Voters AGREE with the progressives!
Far too long the idiot monied interests have skewed
BOTH political parties to the right.
When voters are asked specifically on most issues
It definitely shows a LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE slant.
Kaleva
(40,167 posts)IrishBubbaLiberal
(2,561 posts)Nt
elocs
(24,486 posts)"I am a Democrat"--Will Rogers