General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Bribe Heard 'Round the World: Paul Weiss and the $40 Million Favor
When history looks back on the legal and political decay of early 21st-century America, there will be few episodes as grotesque and revealing as the $40 million "pro bono" bribe given to Donald Trump by the elite Manhattan law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP.
Let us dispense with euphemisms. This was not an act of generosity. It was not a neutral commitment to the ideals of public service. It was not, despite the firms insistence, "routine legal support." It was a high-dollar payoff, a blatant and ethically bankrupt transaction that should disqualify the firm from any claim to independence, public integrity, or professional honor.
The Setup: An Executive Order with a Target
Trumps administration, notorious for its transactional approach to power, issued an executive order taking aim at Paul Weiss citing, of all things, the firm's diversity and equity programs, and its history of pursuing corporate accountability. Notably, the firm had employed attorneys involved in investigating Trumps financial dealings. In any healthy democracy, that would be a mark of honor. In Trumps America, it was a declaration of war.
The executive order was sudden, specific, and aggressive. It threatened to limit the firms access to federal contracts and its influence in regulatory decisions. For a firm whose business model depends on high-stakes corporate entanglements, this was not a symbolic threat it was an economic one. And Paul Weiss blinked.
The Offer: $40 Million for Presidential Peace
Within weeks, Paul Weiss announced it would provide $40 million worth of pro bono legal services... to the Trump administration. That number is not a rounding error. It is not a press release exaggeration. Forty million dollars in free legal labor was handed over in exchange for one thing: the removal of the executive order.
The result? The order was rescinded. Trump praised the firm. And Paul Weiss, the once-proud legal titan, became a cautionary tale.
The Ethics of Capitulation
Legal scholars are already debating the implications. But lets be clear: the ethical lines are not blurry. They are clear, bright, and blood-red.
Law firms are not supposed to be tools of appeasement. They are not meant to serve at the pleasure of any president, let alone one with a history of undermining democratic institutions. By offering Trump $40 million in legal cover and make no mistake, thats exactly what pro bono service becomes in this context Paul Weiss transformed itself from a legal institution into a political asset.
This is not merely about bad optics. Its about the future of the legal profession. If major firms can be bullied into submission or worse, can choose to bribe their way into presidential favor then what remains of the concept of legal independence?
A Firm's Fall from Grace
For decades, Paul Weiss cultivated a reputation as a firm of elite litigators with moral courage. It represented civil rights cases. It staffed pro bono clinics. It trained generations of attorneys who believed that the law was, at its best, a force for justice. But this decision stains all of it. You do not get to wear the robes of righteousness while offering hush money to an autocrat.
Some at the firm reportedly dissented. Junior associates and partners expressed concerns internally. None went public. Silence, it seems, was part of the price.
The True Cost of Silence
In choosing to buy peace, Paul Weiss sold its credibility. And in doing so, it sent a message to every other law firm in the country: when the president threatens your bottom line, principles are negotiable.
But here is the more dangerous message: when legal institutions collude with political power, democracy decays. When elite firms treat authoritarian pressure as just another client problem to manage, the rule of law itself begins to rot.
This Was a Bribe
Lets call it what it was. Not a donation. Not a service. Not a compromise. It was a bribe. A legal favor in exchange for political mercy. A $40 million gift for silence and submission.
And it will be remembered.
History may not care about the billable hours Paul Weiss sacrificed. But it will care about the moment one of Americas most powerful law firms chose fear over principle, obedience over independence and ensured its legacy not as a protector of justice, but as a servant of power.
Let the record show: they paid the bribe. They made the deal. And now, the world knows the cost.
DeeDeeNY
(3,901 posts)mikelewis
(4,541 posts)Who can trust people like that?
No ethics... no spine... I wouldn't hire those people to fight a parking ticket.
ampm
(369 posts)How bad it is for them because everything F-45 touches dies.
Kid Berwyn
(22,931 posts)Thank you for sharing, Mike Lewis!
Nanjeanne
(6,508 posts)Scrivener7
(58,297 posts)And I say that as a person with a good friend who works there.
NJCher
(42,470 posts)about a decade ago. He told me some horror stories about the place.
First, attorneys do not even look at paralegals or admins. Yeah, you heard me right. It's kind of like a caste system in India.
My friend, a paralegal at the time, now a lawyer, asked one of the more approachable attorneys about it. He was told that yes, the lawyers considered themselves above day-to-day friendliness.
Can you imagine working in a place like that? My friend only spent a year there.
If you have a chance, ask your friend if it's still this way. I'm curious and I am sure he would like to hear recent feedback, too.
Scrivener7
(58,297 posts)and are treated very well.
underpants
(194,873 posts)Are his personal litigation concerns of the White House?
Does he make them support RW law operations like Alliance Defending Freedom and First Liberty Institute? Both of those have gotten actual fake cases to and won in the SCOTUS. 303 Creative for ADF and the football coach one in Washington state for FLI. ADF wrote the Mississippi law that became Dobbs.
MLWR
(773 posts)This is EXTORTION on the part of Krasnov: "Trumps administration, notorious for its transactional approach to power, issued an executive order taking aim at Paul Weiss citing, of all things, the firm's diversity and equity programs, and its history of pursuing corporate accountability. Notably, the firm had employed attorneys involved in investigating Trumps financial dealings." This law firm didn't offer a "bribe" out of the clear blue sky; they were blackmailed into it.
unblock
(55,911 posts)If a corrupt government official insists on a bribe before doing their job properly, it's a shakedown; but it's still a bribe if you cave to that pressure.
mikelewis
(4,541 posts)But that's why you know it's a bribe. Stop prosecuting me and I will give you $40 million dollars... Extortion and Bribery... only the President can't be prosecuted by anyone but congress.
bluesbassman
(20,372 posts)With his immunity ruling, wont his attorneys argue that this is part of his official duties as he was executing an executive order? At the minimum they drag this out for a year before it got to the USSC, and who knows how theyd rule.
FakeNoose
(40,163 posts)I hope the Paul Weiss law firm keeps its integrity intact while they are forced to serve him, and maybe they can find a way to bring him down when he least expects it.
Ping Tung
(4,138 posts)NotHardly
(2,620 posts)I wonder if they know what happened to the capitulators under the last Nazi regime? Collaborators meet with a harsh upcoming.
58Sunliner
(6,273 posts)moniss
(8,704 posts)Demobrat
(10,263 posts)He doesnt keep his word. Everyone knows that. They would have been better off going down fighting than going down on Trump. (Sorry I couldnt resist). At least then they would have their pride.
G_j
(40,558 posts)Paladin
(32,276 posts)Absolutely shameful. Plenty of other big, prominent law firms to choose from. Democrats, act accordingly...
oldmanlynn
(778 posts)Now all pull out and dont do business with them again and make it painful just like owners dumping Tesla
pat_k
(12,665 posts)Brad Karp and co will just have rake in the billions as hacks for corporate malfeasance and extremist right ideologues.
Can't wait to see the firm's arguments for shipping Tesla vandals who are citizens to suffer horrors in El Salvadoran prison.
My these souless stains on the legal profession "enjoy" the kind of life they deserve.
Wicked Blue
(8,446 posts)Trusk will try this with many other businesses. Who or what can stop them?
OldBaldy1701E
(10,170 posts)But it will care about the moment one of Americas most powerful law firms chose fear over principle, obedience over independence...
They chose money over principle. Why? Because any 'legal' attempt to rectify the matter would be ignored by the orange gibbon and his cronies. The administration would lose, but since they don't care...
We really need to call out those who want to couch this truth in banal ramblings in their ongoing attempt to hide the fact that unfettered greed is destroying this country.
Ms. Toad
(38,282 posts)The pro bono work is no more a bribe, than Mexico's and Canada's assistance at the border in connection with the initial tariff threat were bribes.
All three were things they were going to do anyway. Canada's and Mexico were already providing the border assistance they promised to avoid the Tattoos. Weiss already provides in the range of $200 million in pro bono annually. It may mean a slight redirection as to the recipients of the services - or they may have simply named current recipients they believed would please Trump. BUT the services are NOT, as suggested, going to Trump.
What is disgusting is (if correct, as asserted by the White House - and not denied by Weiss) that they admitted wrong doing by a former partner, and that consented to have their hiring practices audited by a firm biased against DEI.
mikelewis
(4,541 posts)That's not a bribe... that's extorting a bribe... if you pay me... that's the bribe. That's how it works...
Ms. Toad
(38,282 posts)It agreed to do a fraction of the pro bono work which it does every year anyway for groups/causes which are typical recipients of pro bono work. I would be very surprised if Weiss even has to divert any of it's existing pro bono work to different recipients. So no. Weiss did not give Trump ANY free legal work at all.
This is the same as when Trump claimed Mexico and Canada promised border assistance (they were already providing) in exchange for delaying the tariffs - and the response them, was that they were so smart in pulling the will over Trump's eyes.
What isn't the same is the rest of the deal (and isn't receiving the reporting it deserves) and which actually gives Trump a win, as long as the reports (not denied by Weiss) are true.
mikelewis
(4,541 posts)Earlier this week, though, Paul Weiss indicated that it will engage in a remarkable change of course. Specifically, Paul Weiss has acknowledged the wrongdoing of its former partner Mark Pomerantz, and it has agreed to a number of policy changes to promote equality, justice, and the principles that keep our Nation strong, including: adopting a policy of political neutrality with respect to client selection and attorney hiring; taking on a wide range of pro bono matters representing the full political spectrum; committing to merit-based hiring, promotion, and retention, instead of diversity, equity, and inclusion policies; dedicating the equivalent of $40 million in pro bono legal services during my term in office to support causes including assisting our Nations veterans, fairness in the justice system, and combating anti-Semitism; and other similar initiatives.
This development should give Americans hope. If the legal profession dedicates a fraction of its energy to bringing justice to local communities, unleashing hard-working businesses, strengthening the American family, and unifying our Nation, all Americans will benefit.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/addressing-remedial-action-by-paul-weiss/
So you're right.... Brave Sir Robin stood up to the big bad President!
Ms. Toad
(38,282 posts)Trump is not claiming, as you have repeatedly asserted, that they are giving HIM pro bono services. He is not even claiming they are going to do more/new pro bono services than they are already doing.
Every year the provide about five times the legal services mentioned in the statement - $200 million. According to their pro bono blurb on their website - serving veterans is already one of the significant focuses for pro bono work. So, as I said. They aren't giving him ANYTHING that they aren't already doing.
So, no. I'm not going to argue with Trump about it. You are the one mischaracterizing what he said. He made no claim they are proving free legal services TO HIM.
The other portion you highlighted is what I mentioned in my very first response as a disgusting capitulation, if true. Weiss has not expressly denied it - but it is not included in their statement of the deal. That is what needs to be verified, and one of two things being headlined.
Not the "shocker" that a law firm that already does $200 million in pro bono work, including for veterans and anti-hate work, agreed to do at least $40 million in the next year, including for veterans and work against anti-semitism.
And nowhere did I say the firm stood up to Trump. They didn't. But focusing on an agreement to continue doing exactly what they are already doing, as if that was their capitulation is misguided.
usaf-vet
(7,753 posts)mikelewis
(4,541 posts)but that's just my take on it.
These aren't the most hardy people... put a little pressure on them and they cave... real legal eagles.
surfered
(11,510 posts)bronxiteforever
(11,088 posts)They look really weak.
Demobrat
(10,263 posts)They look weak and stupid. Trump is going to screw them bigtime. He cant refuse to pay them for free work, but he can refuse to honor the agreement. And he will. Its what he does.
moondust
(21,203 posts)It was just a "transaction." No big deal.
Irish_Dem
(79,782 posts)The cash is rolling in.
It is also about power, control, revenge, humiliation.
SunSeeker
(57,539 posts)If it fought Trump, it would lose its corporate book of business, their clients would go to other firms, and Paul Weiss would die. The EO was an existential threat for them. They had no choice but to make nice with Trump or die.
Yes, Paul Weis did some progressive pro bono work and represented a lot of Dems. But at their core, they are a corporate law firm. Their lawyers are pressured to bill at least 2,000 hours per year. It is a miserable life, basically a legal sweatshop. The lawyers who choose to work at these big firms have chosen money over quality of life. Paul Weiss pays first year lawyers $225,000 per year. While exact figures are hard to pinpoint due to the nature of partnership compensation, Paul Weiss partners, especially those with significant client business, can earn millions annually, with some potentially reaching $20 million or more.
I have never considered big firms like Paul Weiss paragons of virtue. Their Trump capitulation just makes it more obvious what they really are.
Hekate
(100,132 posts)Do I agree with what you said? Oh yes, yes I do.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,599 posts)Thank you.
bluestarone
(21,157 posts)I so look forward to that day. Just hope it happens before i leave this earth.
pat_k
(12,665 posts)And that is perhaps the most disheartening thing of all about this.
Brad Karp, cowardly, evil fuck.
As George Conway noted, these are people of vast wealth with the wherewithal to take a stand.
How many houses in the Hamptons do you need ??
Straw Man
(6,928 posts)If I were in their shoes, I would make sure that the services they provide him are less than stellar, if you get my drift.
Bread and Circuses
(1,556 posts)I bet that #47 will deploy Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP to defend the dictator against civil rights filed against the administration. Also Pam Bondi is threatening to investigate and file charges against any attorneys who sue the fascists.
Were in a constitutional crisis . The Coup is speeding along . We have weeks - not years left.
Bread and Circuses
(1,556 posts)I bet that #47 will deploy Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP to defend the dictator against civil rights filed against the administration. Also Pam Bondi is threatening to investigate and file charges against any attorneys who sue the fascists.
Were in a constitutional crisis . The Coup is speeding along . We have weeks - not years left.
BidenRocks
(2,772 posts)That self serving shit is impeachable.
I would do one hour of work, present a bill for 40 mil and call it even.
Inflation is raising prices. chump mentioned eggs, not legal fees.
OhioTim
(380 posts)administration attorneys