Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow a Major Democratic Law Firm Ended Up Bowing to Trump
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/21/us/politics/paul-weiss-trump.htmlhttps://archive.ph/Tt2Bj
How a Major Democratic Law Firm Ended Up Bowing to Trump
Paul Weiss was targeted by an executive order from President Trump. Its chairman, who had worked against Mr. Trump during his first term, then went to the Oval Office and cut a deal.
By Michael S. Schmidt, Matthew Goldstein, Jessica Silver-Greenberg and Ben Protess
March 21, 2025
Since President Trumps first term, Brad S. Karp, the chairman of the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, championed himself as a bulwark against what he saw as an unlawful and unpredictable presidency.
Mr. Karp, who has a long history of fund-raising for Democrats, sought to unite major law firms in a call to arms to fight Mr. Trump in court on issues like his administrations policy of separating migrant children from their parents. He publicly said lawyers were obligated to defend the rule of law.
He hosted a Lawyers for Biden fund-raiser in 2023, and one of his top partners prepared Vice President Kamala Harris for her debates with Mr. Trump.
So it was not surprising that Mr. Trump targeted Paul Weiss with an executive order last week that created a potential existential threat for the firm, although the order was legally dubious and undercut fundamental principles of the justice system. In response, Mr. Karp began discussions with another big firm about presenting a unified and bipartisan front and challenging the order in court.
But on Wednesday, Mr. Karp walked into the Oval Office around 8:30 a.m., leaving behind the adversarial approach.
Now, he wanted to make a deal.
...
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/21/business/paul-weiss-trump-reaction.html
https://archive.ph/GFeHw
Paul Weiss Deal With Trump Faces Backlash From Legal Profession
Paul Weiss, a law firm targeted by President Trump, reached a deal to settle a conflict. Many in the legal field are condemning the agreement.
By Danielle Kaye, Lauren Hirsch and Maureen Farrell
March 21, 2025
Some lawyers said the deal was driven by profit. Others said it was enabling autocracy. One said the move had prompted her to quit her legal job in disgust.
All over the legal world, lawyers on Friday were talking about the deal that Paul Weiss, one of the nations most prominent law firms, had made with President Trump to escape an onerous executive order that would have prevented it from representing many clients before the federal government. To avoid the hit to its business, the firm agreed to do $40 million worth of pro bono work for causes favored by the White House.
It was a striking development in the White Houses broad retribution campaign against big law firms that represented lawyers or prosecutors in the criminal cases against Mr. Trump before the 2024 election.
Paul Weisss move was a particular point of contention because of the firms standing in the legal community. The firm has long been dominated by Democrats and prided itself on being at the forefront of fights against the government for civil rights.
They have all the resources they need to fight an unlawful order, said John Moscow, who was a top prosecutor at the Manhattan district attorneys office under Robert Morgenthau. The example they are setting is to surrender to unlawful orders rather than fight them in court.
Lawyers at firms both large and small took to social media to denounce the firm.
...
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/22/us/politics/trump-memo-lawyers.html
https://archive.ph/6xjNJ
With New Decree, Trump Seeks to Cow the Legal Profession
A presidential memorandum aimed at lawyers everywhere struck a menacing tone.
By Devlin Barrett
March 22, 2025 Updated 6:08 p.m. ET
President Trump broadened his campaign of retaliation against lawyers he dislikes with a new memorandum that threatens to use government power to punish any law firms that, in his view, unfairly challenge his administration.
The memorandum directs the heads of the Justice and Homeland Security Departments to seek sanctions against attorneys and law firms who engage in frivolous, unreasonable and vexatious litigation against the United States or in matters that come before federal agencies.
Mr. Trump issued the order late Friday night, after a tumultuous week for the American legal community in which one of the countrys premier firms, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, struck a deal with the White House to spare the company from a punitive decree issued by Mr. Trump the previous week.
Vanita Gupta, who as a civil rights lawyer and a former Justice Department official has both sued the government and defended it in court, said Mr. Trumps memo attacks the very foundations of our legal system by threatening and intimidating litigants who aim to hold our government accountable to the law and the Constitution.
Mr. Trump also used the announcement to attack one particular lawyer by name, Marc Elias.
Mr. Elias previously worked at Perkins Coie, and has long represented Democrats. Mr. Trump blames Mr. Elias, among others, for a dossier of unsubstantiated allegations about his links to Russia that was investigated by the F.B.I. in 2016 and 2017.
President Trumps goal is clear. He wants lawyers and law firms to capitulate and cower until there is no one left to oppose his administration in court, Mr. Elias said in a written statement. He added, There will be no negotiation with this White House about the clients we represent or the lawsuits we bring on their behalf.
...
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How a Major Democratic Law Firm Ended Up Bowing to Trump (Original Post)
dalton99a
Mar 2025
OP
MLAA
(19,669 posts)1. Good clients will leave this firm yet the firm will not feel that pain as they will have many more new Republican
clients given republicans proclivity for grifting, domestic violence, business fraud and crimes against children.
Baitball Blogger
(51,696 posts)2. I wonder if this has anything to do with the ActBlue fiasco?
BTW, I'm only assuming it's a fiasco because so many lawyers jumped ship.