General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLet's say you think this past election was rigged.
It's not election conspiracy theory IF white hat/red team hackers can get evidence.BUT sufficient evidence could be an oligarch Leviathan.
I saw this video on DU and forwarded it to an IT expert.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220080224
What the IT expert texted back:
"...It's a conspiracy for sure, but this was an interesting thread that needs tugging:
-- Item A. NATO is considering invoking Article 5 in accordance with the Cyber policy, and no, it’s not because we “don’t like Elon."
It’s because Elon very quietly and rapidly built a low-orbit Direct-to-Cell constellation, in which 265 satellites were in place and operational just two weeks prior to the Nov 5 election.
These low-orbit satellites effectively place the equivalent of a hacker’s “Stingray” device in every voting precinct in America.
-- Now factor in Barre Seid’s 2020 transfer of his election security company Tripp Lite, to far-right predatory billionaire Leonard Leo.
Nearly ALL election machines in this country are certified to be used specifically with Tripp Lite products -- which are surge protectors for all ES&S DS450 and DS850 tabulators, and Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) units for all Dominion servers.
After a year of searching for the right buyer, Leonard Leo sold Tripp Lite to a company by the name of Eaton Corp., in 2021.
-- What has Eaton Corp. been up to?
One week after Musk created his “America PAC” for Trump, Eaton Corp. announced a partnership with Palantir, a company owned by another far-right predatory billionaire Peter Thiel (Elon Musk’s co-founder of PayPal), and used by militaries and counter-terrorism analysts. Its customers include the United States Intelligence Community (USIC) and United States Department of Defense.
The Eaton/Palantir partnership focused on secure erasure of digital footprints on Eaton devices, and on AI management of large datasets - such as large quantities of ballot images.
Also of note, Peter Thiel also has ownership in Polymarket, another company with ties to the outcome of the U.S. election. Polymarket had eerily accurate predictions of a Trump victory, and was raided shortly after the Nov 5 election.
In Sept 2024, Eaton Corp. announced another partnership, this time with Trump’s single largest campaign contributor, Elon Musk (via Tesla), further dirtying the election waters, and providing a convenient cover for their correspondence and monetary connections.
Item B: Why is a private, supposedly “neutral” election/voting system company sourcing core components from far-right individuals with direct connections to Donald Trump?
Understanding of product design and access to production facilities, kicks the doors wide open for widespread potential for the insertion of maliciously engineered products into the election systems.
-- In the time period in which Musk was building out Starlink’s low-orbit Direct-to-Cell constellation, he was also hosting weekly “Billionaire brain trust” meetings, and overseeing the ground-level infrastructure needed to pull off a mass-scale election exploit.
With all pieces in place, the remaining question is a probable motive...
Over $15T in minerals in Ukraine, needed to manufacture electric vehicles
Musk launched his bid to purchase the Twitter platform just 49 days after Putin invaded Ukraine, overpaid by $20B (w/help from Russian oligarchs), then promptly converted it to a pro-Trump/Russian propaganda dumpster fire.
-- Oct 25, 2024, Murdoch’s WSJ dropped a bombshell on Musk’s two+ years of private contact with Putin.
Why would Murdoch risk the “October Surprise,” especially considering he is IN the “Billionaire brain trust,” unless he knew the “fix” was in?
Trump’s campaign speech/confession on Nov 4:
“He looked at some that were just shipped in, some of these vote-counting computers. He knew it before it even came in the door. He looked like at the back of it. "Oh, I know that one." I mean, he knows that's how -- I mean, he knows this stuff better than any. And he actually said -- and this is for the good of everybody, it's the good of mankind, essentially.”
Nov 5: Trump “wins” ALL swing states, the “Blue Wall” falls, not one single district flips “blue” and Musk is overheard announcing the “win” four hours prior to official results.
Tesla-Ukraine...incoming...
Today 350 low-orbit Direct-to-Cell satellites are now in place across the globe.
So which country is Musk taking next?”
At this point, I'm afraid to ask the IT guy (who's deciding whether to go for a scholarship for a law degree):
Can journalists and hacker teams possibly get sufficient evidence to prove the suspected connections here?
Will free and fair elections end because of insufficient, or even sufficient evidence?
Can Quinn Emanuel, the world's most feared law firm, put the fear into the good cop/bad cop team destroying elections? And our country?
Is it a brave new world of AI-based capitalist surveillance that lies beyond democracy?
We're three years out. Can we be saved?

malaise
(282,688 posts)Every DUer must read this
I remain doubting malaise from Nov 5
I'm bookmarking too just in case.
usaf-vet
(7,420 posts).... but I have NEVER doubted the elections were being rigged and stolen. The addition of computers post-2000 was the key.
Here are some of my former post links, plus additional ones to support your arguments that the elections have been rigged. I believe the rigging has been going on since 2000.
Apologies for duplicates.
The fix in 2024 was in "they rigged the election" and the midterms as well
Read the word-by-word transcript.
https://www.youtube.com/live/44PSaIfKGtE?si=2uak0o5coCDKcKKt&t=145
And my original post.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/13242540
CLICK THROUGH THE ADS TO SEE THE ACTUAL VIDEOS
Social Security
https://tinyurl.com/SS-Gone
https://tinyurl.com/GP-Stuff
https://tinyurl.com/NTay5
https://www.thenumbersarewrong2024.com/across-the-us/flipped-counties
https://www.democraticunderground.com/132265983
Nathan Taylor
Mr. Evil
(3,234 posts)I'm on it!
BComplex
(9,358 posts)rally that they didn't need the votes, and that they'd never have to vote again, nobody questioned what happened. Why? Because for 4 years we had to mock the MAGAts for saying the 2020 election was stolen. What a perfect set-up for the Democratic party to have to STFU about the election being stolen in 2024?
But I've been watching elections longer than most DUers have been on this planet, and I've never seen one that was so pristinely clean and fast. It was like a staged event. It wasn't like any election I've ever seen. And I knew that night. I told my husband as we watched that the computers were hacked by trump's silicon valley friend$$.
Scrivener7
(55,137 posts)we need to know the answers.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)
Scrivener7
(55,137 posts)It's like some dystopian nightmare.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)This country wasn't "constituted" for the oligarchs.
The oligarchs became so because of this country.
America needs to be saved from oligarchy. Our patriots, Walz, AOC, Sanders and others, are on the right track. Let's hope they can inspire hackers and heavy hitting trial law firms to take this on.
brakester
(301 posts)"red hat" teams? Google listed every color but red.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)DEF CON (Las Vegas) has used red teams the past few years to discover the weak/vulnerable/harmful internals of the AI that some AI owners submit them to.
brakester
(301 posts)Here's a reddit post that added to my confusion.
https://www.reddit.com/r/redhat/comments/ei19ga/explain_me_who_is_red_hat_hacker_and_also_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
This reddit post does mention red hat. I'm including all this to inform other posters about this important definition.
https://www.reddit.com/r/redhat/comments/ei19ga/comment/fcow7qd/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
ancianita
(40,236 posts)or exploits human users or humans in general.
BonnieJW
(2,842 posts)Like we'll lose every election going forward
ancianita
(40,236 posts)and hacker folks can do when they're pissed off for the sake of their children's futures.
was mentioned. He's in with the Tech Bros, also Thiel is the person who suggested Vance as VP. Thiel is tight with Musk. These guys want to tank the economy and promote cryptocurrency. They have their own agenda.
I noticed on Ayman tonight, they were talking about this. Also, the felon is just in it for himself, or as we know he is in it for himself.
Also they were talking about bad blood between Bannon and Musk.
Bookmarking this thread.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)They're into control of wealth and power for themselves while the felon goes on his distraction/revenge tour.
JD's been quiet because he rides their coattails and plans to win in 2028 the way the felon won in 2024.
bdamomma
(67,881 posts)is in as some DU posters have said. I have to read this OP closely, but is this being investigated thoroughly now??
ancianita
(40,236 posts)The fix was a digital network hack. That hack doesn't have to be permanent; it can be stopped when the evidence is tracked down. But it takes lawyers, hackers and money.
Blue Owl
(55,838 posts)Think. Again.
(22,330 posts)H2O Man
(76,525 posts)Recommended.
Clouds Passing
(4,285 posts)Democrats should be screaming
DENVERPOPS
(11,653 posts)I also had those exact feelings after the 1980 election when HW committed treason to throw the election to Reagan.
And again in 2000, 2004, 2008, 2016, as well as 2024................
Some of us here on DU have been screaming our heads off since the 1980 election..............
As I have repeatedly said here on DU.......The perfect title for a book about the past 45+ years would be:
WHILE THE NATION SLEPT................
Clouds Passing
(4,285 posts)DENVERPOPS
(11,653 posts)was peanuts compared to what the HW CABAL rolled out, starting in late 1979's.....
But yes, Nixon was a piece of work, and helped with the beginning of some of their groundwork......
Clouds Passing
(4,285 posts)brakester
(301 posts)HW was pissed that Carter let WHO go? Go where?
Thanks!
This whole subject is a big flashing red light and I want to understand it thoroughly.
Clouds Passing
(4,285 posts)The entire article is worth a read.
https://inteltoday.org/2019/11/30/remembering-cia-director-george-h-w-bush-june-12-1924-november-30-2018/
“As the committees continued their investigations into late 1975, the Ford Administration had come to feel that then-DCI William Colby had disclosed more information to Congress than was necessary. This belief, coupled with the harsh reality that a dark cloud now hung over the CIA, led the President to conclude the Agency needed a new sense of morale and a new director who could improve strained relations with Congress. On January 30, 1976, Ford replaced Colby with George H.W. Bush. (…)
Three days after Jimmy Carter’s victory over President Ford, Bush called and offered his resignation. Carter became only the second president to pick a new DCI when he first entered the Presidency, setting a trend for presidents to come.
A final briefing between the two occurred on November 19th, when Bush described more than ten sensitive programs being run by the CIA and even mentioned staying on as Director. Carter was notably quiet. He later shut down many of these programs and accepted Bush’s resignation on January 10, 1977, the day of the Presidential Inauguration.“
So Carter sort of pushed bush to go, but bush resigned. My correction.
brakester
(301 posts)That's another feather in Carter's hat, and even more reason for my admiration for that great statesman!
DENVERPOPS
(11,653 posts)that many recognize a common theme through decades, was HWBush, lurking in the back ground, with his CABAL of Cheney/Rumsfeld/Pearle/Wolfowitz and a hundred others.
At the end of Reagan's occupation of the White House, there were over a hundred of his admin that were sitting on indictments.
It was mandatory HW be elected President, so upon his first day in office he could pardon all of them for their corruption, felonies, or Treasonous acts..................
Clouds Passing
(4,285 posts)Be Leave On
(143 posts)Greg Palast also told of very many voters being kicked off the rolls.
Many layers and levels and methods of deceit and trickery here.
brakester
(301 posts)I noticed an early reaction of mine to this story was, "This is too big to fight!"
But, we have to prepare and protect ourselves, as well as continue fighting.
DENVERPOPS
(11,653 posts)Many of us here on DU were screaming our heads off since when HW committed TREASON in getting Reagan in office, then using him as a front man or pawn, so that HW and his CABAL could run things from the shadows in the background.
The amount of damage they did during that eight years was un-fathomable, and helped in a big way to all that we are experiencing today.
As I have often said here, the perfect title for a book about the last 45+ years would be:
WHILE THE NATION SLEPT...... or at the risk of getting censored......WHILE THE DEMOCRATS SLEPT
They were all walking down the jungle path, swatting at mosquitoes, completely oblivious to the herd of charging elephants......
PUN INTENDED.........
brakester
(301 posts)into that era. I wasn't as involved with politics as I have been since then, so I wasn't aware of that whole cabal's shenanigans. Can you suggest any reading that would shine a light on that?
DENVERPOPS
(11,653 posts)out there, trading arms for hostages, the Iran/Contra affair, etc etc etc
Congress had explicitly banned them from weapon sales, and HW & CIA went ahead and did it anyways....
Google it, I'm sure there will be more reading than you want to do........
proud patriot
(101,787 posts)
Amaryllis
(10,218 posts)I've read so far what so many of us were convinced of; that nearly half of the US did not vote for Trump.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)this could very well be proven.
malaise
(282,688 posts)This is serious shit
I agree, malaise. I read his/her posts are very in-depth.
Joinfortmill
(17,730 posts)ancianita
(40,236 posts)He taught me who to look up more stuff on... the more I learned, the more the sirens went off.
I wish the New York Times investigative teams got on this.
This information could be the catalyst for white hat/red teams prepping for 2026 and 2028.
It would be quoted and re-reported national news for at least a week and beyond.
Lancero
(3,167 posts)The commentary that got ripped right from random Twitter screenshots?
https://www.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1ia7dkd/elons_role_in_stealing_the_us_election_explained/
ancianita
(40,236 posts)over 30 years. He's honest. And too busy, as far as I know to make stuff up. I sat on his text for a week and looked around on reddit (reddit's hooked up with AI now, so ...), EFF and other sites and haven't seen anything.
But hey, if you've got something to prove, post the screen shots. It must be out there somewhere these days, so I wouldn't be surprised if he's come across this info in places I don't know about.
Lancero
(3,167 posts)Can I just say that I love the irony here? Making a topic complaining about Elon Musk, while also ripping all of the commentary from Twitter?
ancianita
(40,236 posts)ancianita
(40,236 posts)ancianita
(40,236 posts)likely went after Paul Weiss' firm -- he wins major tech battles. +1 for Musk/Thiel oligarchs.
https://www.paulweiss.com
brakester
(301 posts)fell to their knees toute suite, I thought, hmm, they have a thousand lawyers. Couldn't they find a lawyer in their firm to fight this??!! /s. And I read that H. Clinton had hired them, which puzzled me, too. (But then, who says Clinton is not corrupt?)
But the more I read about Paul, Weiss, I get the picture that they started out with admirable intentions because they were a firm that wanted to be an example of diversity, where Jews and Gentiles worked together. They also, in addition to hiring from the top law schools, also hired from a variety of schools.
But, they seem to have a very mixed reputation and I understood why they did this.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)The power and wealth of Big Tech is about expanding itself without pesky govt or human interference or even tech law firms.
What Weiss did was about its long term survival.
BurnDoubt
(215 posts)To necessitate an investigation. If only the Rigging of the Federal Government to remove anyone who might hinder his slightest whim or suggest making him accountable for ANYTHING and inoculating his Administration against investigation by "flooding the zone" with fake news and conspiracy theories and chaff. Truth is now just his opinion. Does ANYONE think he would think twice before cheating. That's the only thing you can trust him to do: look out for Number One. So pardon me for thinking he ripped-off America.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)transfer level to the actual white hat/red team digital footprint sleuthing they know how to do.
Of course you're absolutely right that we can't depend on the oligarch run loyalists of the felon to launch anything.
Of course they threaten those with the facts, truth and evidence. They don't want it revealed.
They're also in the process of erasing public data so that history can be rewritten about these events of the last 5 months.
Here's what WaPo's opinion section said about the felon reinventing reality -- in it's Op-Ed section, no less! From 13 days ago ... It's got good graphs!
https://archive.ph/RBvrt
Meanwhile, missing or untrustworthy data lead to worse decisions: Auto companies, for example, draw on dozens of federally administered datasets when devising new car models, how to price them, where to stock and market them and other key choices. Retailers need detailed information about local demographics, weather and modes of transit when deciding where to locate stores.
moondust
(20,834 posts)that the companies like Cyber Ninjas doing election "audits" in 2021 may have found a way into the voting machines, copied the code, and spent the next 3-4 years developing ways to hack into them and switch enough votes to win.
those guys were nothing in the IT/hacker world, and they were proven incompetent.
But what they did open up concerns about was IT and possible satellite interference in elections. And so you're right to be concerned.
Now there is a pattern of circumstantial evidence. Enough to have all kinds of hacker teams and law firms investigating for evidence of wire fraud, code and ballot erasures, and who knows what else happened through the tabulators and servers.
brakester
(301 posts)And that election worker, Tina Peters, in CO who was caught on tape bringing in right wingers to check out the machines. The passwords to the machines were posted on a RW blog!
She got nine years, but the damage was already done.
She's a traitor of the first order!
FakeNoose
(37,088 posts)Holy shit!!!
Liberal In Texas
(15,075 posts)One where paper ballots were printed out that can be assessed physically, not machine read.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)and was apprised of the means, but it was too late for him to do anything but enable a transition and the securing of a lot of valuable government documents. It was a big transition out as much as a transition of oligarchs in.
But there is a weird silence going on from our past presidents, fired CISA people and Silicon oligarchs. We need to not give up and keep them on our radar.
brakester
(301 posts)Harris conceded in a New York minute, then disappeared!!
Crickets!
At least Tim Walz is out there fighting! Love that guy!
For years I have rejected some people's insistence that the Democratic Party was as corrupt as the RWers.
I'm beginning to change my mind.
yellow dahlia
(2,165 posts)I called, and left a message to find out more. Maybe I will call again.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)fund some investigations, since he worked for SDNY and knows how money Treasury->Fed->to on & offshore banks work. Goldman's got connections. Now I have an idea why he's been so quiet. I do hope you get a response that lets you know a bit more.
Thanks for the info!
brakester
(301 posts)I listened to his podcasts. He's knowledgeable, dedicated and I learned so much about the election from him.
OAITW r.2.0
(29,830 posts)He's the threat.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)OAITW r.2.0
(29,830 posts)They took over the rotted elephant carcass that was the GOP.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)
Think. Again.
(22,330 posts)...and DEEPLY looked into.
aggiesal
(9,911 posts)I want to know who really won this election.
Statistics are good, but I would like those statistics proven in one location.
Then maybe I'd donate more money to start looking at actual swing states.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)wouldn't prove anything.
questionseverything
(10,654 posts)Would prove the reported results were incorrect
ancianita
(40,236 posts)Could precincts keep double books? It happens. Does the party really want to pay for all that across battleground states? idk
questionseverything
(10,654 posts)The cost to electronic elections isn’t cheap, election departments hire the consultants to enter the choices and questions at thousands of dollars per . I think paying some honor roll 4th graders to count the top two races as a check on the system and to have transparency is worth while.
aggiesal
(9,911 posts)Of course it will.
If no vote erasure or vote flips, the hand count would match the ballot reader.
Before ballot readers like ES&S & Diebold, all ballots were counted by hand.
The precinct workers would count the ballots until about 1 - 2 am and post the precinct results, so voters could see how the precinct voted. Then they would send the ballots to the Registrar office. No counting was done at the Registrar's office, they just went by the precinct numbers and the election was determined way before 6am.
If they do that now, when they run the ballots through the readers, and they find a numbers discrepancy, handcount would happen a second time and ballot read a second time If the discrepancy still remains the handcount would have precedence.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)Did you read this part of the IT guy's info...because if at any point in the chain of vote custody there is digital counting, there can be changed/deleted votes through any pre-set codes.
It’s because Elon very quietly and rapidly built a low-orbit Direct-to-Cell constellation, in which 265 satellites were in place and operational just two weeks prior to the Nov 5 election.
I'm not going to argue that that's what happened, but the OP timeline of oligarch and corporate involvement seem plausible.
aggiesal
(9,911 posts)Handcount removes all the electronics/computers/ballot readers out of the loop.
Why do you think they did the handcount in Arizona?
To prove the handcount numbers didn't match the ballot readers and prove Trump was correct.
Instead, the ballot readers got it wrong, but they ended up finding more votes for Biden.
Which numbers do you think they went with?
The numbers were changed to match the handcount.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)in battlegrounds for once. That would be progress.
bluestarone
(19,430 posts)100%. I've always said we should check in a state we have control of!! They definitely cheated somehow. We have got to get this figured out BEFORE the 2026 election, for sure.
Wiz Imp
(4,628 posts)Elections can generally be hand counted quickly and accurately only when there is one or at most 2 races on the ballot.
questionseverything
(10,654 posts)Especially if hand counts were readily available if a problem showed itself
aggiesal
(9,911 posts)that would limit how many races to count when counting ballots with more than 2 races.
It takes longer but it gets done before the next day.
Be Leave On
(143 posts)Any software that isn't opensource, freely auditable by all parties is less than trustworthy. Same goes for the hardware. There are too many ways machines can be corrupted, but with open systems, the machines are indeed more accurate and trustworthy than are hand counts with all the possibilities of human error and nefarious actors.
Baron2024
(1,492 posts)nt
azureblue
(2,381 posts)Trump admitted it was rigged for him..
ancianita
(40,236 posts)in time for 2024 and 2028. This thread is really about how, and who can/will get the hard evidence that supports the circumstantial evidence laid out here.
BoRaGard
(4,830 posts)The GOP draft-dodging felon-rapist is proud of his corruption.
AmericaUnderSiege
(777 posts)This was a combination of unprecedented demographic targeting verging on personalized brainwashing in swing states; an entire enemy power's intelligence apparatus focused on propaganda; and us only having a small fraction of a normal campaign season to work with.
I say that as someone who will defend until the end of time that 2004 and 2016 were rigged to hell and back, by every possible vector.
What we witnessed was a circus. We saw Musk openly offering bribes for votes. Manufactured discontent in Michigan. A lot of noise, which points to psy-op that's a lot of work compared to an outright rig. Rigs push the narrative of "both sides," convince people they're powerless, and don't try to excite anyone - not even their own zombie voters. Energy is harder to control than despair. They don't seek out niche interests to bribe; instead they try to keep everyone else confused and uninvolved.
As for the satellite thing, you'd need the entire SpaceX organization to be involved, not just its owner. That's Moon Hoaxer level ridiculous. SpaceX (and Tesla, btw) are packed to the rafters with liberal Democrats, and always have been. Any whiff of what you're suggesting and the companies would just cease to function immediately. They're not some Kafka factory of a 100-year-old aerospace institution, they're idealists - and the ideals are the opposite of the path Elon Musk chose lately in some drug psychosis.
We just didn't have time, and our leaders simply refused to stand up for the fact that the Trump campaign was unconstitutional.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:57 AM - Edit history (1)
what the IT guy did about the players and timeline.
Okay if you think this is all about nothing. But me, if I were you, I'd rather err on the side of real investigations on the election tabulators and servers, and the aforementioned companies involved with Leonard Leo and Thiel, both connected to Musk and the felon. All down at Maralago a number of times in 2024.
AmericaUnderSiege
(777 posts)They don't get to have it both ways. But for ourselves, we pretty much always succeed on turnout and moral clarity rather than the details of Republican crimes against democracy. So the fact of a GOP coup is something to mention, but not something to dwell on as the main point.
We've overcome coups twice now in this century alone. We'll do it again.
Personally, I'm more outraged by the open illegality of the regime than any question about how it came to power. This isn't a question of electoral method: The Constitution literally says these people are not allowed in power. Because people like them tried to destroy the country in the 1860s, and they're trying again now.
Until someone at least mentions that in an official context, we're not being serious.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)how we've succeeded in the past. We HAVE the numbers. We know that.
And to your larger point, understand that the past doesn't offer lessons or formulas for solving what circumstantial evidence shows could have been going on six months ago. .
AmericaUnderSiege
(777 posts)The GOP lives in a memory-free, totalitarian Ministry of Truth bubble where the past changes every second to make them feel better about themselves in the present. Despite the damage they do, there's really not much going on there: They're just a chemical spill masquerading as people.
But we remember things and learn from them, and one is that we win elections when we do them right. Democracy doesn't have an autopilot setting. It exists when we show up, and flickers out when we don't. That's it.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)I hope it's mostly about people showing up, since it seems historically true that 90% of success is that. I hope you're right because we know there's righteous outrage out there. It's usually that print and digital media ignore human crowds these days until footage shows up on couple of prime time news sources, and even then corporate media downplay protests.
brakester
(301 posts)is not where our main focus should be.
These people, in a narrow way, are geniuses and I am bowled over by this world-shaking scheme! With emphasis on "World."
How long before F-Elon rules the world?
SheltieLover
(65,909 posts)
NowsTheTime
(1,081 posts).....the vote they cast and real time camera recording of the vote tally simultaneously.
We go crazy to make sure the person is eligible to vote, but we never allow that person to verify that the was recorded correctly.
Then for absentee and such something else to record votes as they are tabulated.
Of course it's probably unrealistic for the short term, but it would settle a lot of questions.
It could still be a secret ballot.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)And Direct-to-Cell and Palantir, which has been invested in and used by both the CIA and DoD.
I know my bar coded mail in ballot was burned because Florida does not send vote ballot verifications to voters. How I know is that I checked all the registrations and vote count sites that showed which states use voter verification and which don't.
FL's been cheating on both party registration numbers and vote counts since Gore in 2000.
NowsTheTime
(1,081 posts)...with voter name not disclosed in that tally.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)Voters can walk away with verifications receipts -- though I and millions in Florida didn't get any
-- and they still won't guarantee an honest vote count if tabulators are used later.
Even a hand counted recount might not work. Because even verification slips can be lost, or counterfeited, or ... who knows.
Wiz Imp
(4,628 posts)I'm not going to argue either way about the veracity of this election. However, allowing the voter to verify his/her vote was recorded correctly, while a very good thing, does nothing to guarantee votes are tabulated correctly. If every Harris voter got a verification that their vote was recorded for Harris, where is the guarantee that each of those votes are actually counted correctly in the final tabulation?
ancianita
(40,236 posts)NowsTheTime
(1,081 posts)a camera with a date time stamp records the displayed total (via a computer) votes in real time. What the camera records can be watched by auditors (from both parties.)
It sees that the vote which is verified by the voter (the voter only sees his tabulation but the camera records both the voters choices and the total vote change simultaneously.
..and no it doesn't address mail in votes, absentee votes, voter purges, or other means of voter suppression.
But it would make the count in precincts visible, verifiable in real time, and easily reviewed. You couldn't just delete votes after they are cast by some electronic program.
Bayard
(24,662 posts)Now, what do we do with this information? I'm sure top Dem movers and shakers already have it. Where's the cavalry?
We're called the "underground" for a reason. We know very well that when investigations are ongoing -- if there are any right now -- and if they're sealed by a court, we can't know one darn thing, right?
There were a lot of names left off the felon's list of people denied classified access -- Lloyd Austin, fired CISA employees, Obama, Joint Chiefs, and Silicon Valley oligarchs who have war rooms with the Pentagon. At this point, who knows what they know.
So who is the cavalry is, we might never know, and what they do might be completely under wraps until court filings begin by big trial firms. Because it's highly unlikely that the military will use any reason but illegal orders for its stopping the felon.
AncientOfDays
(229 posts)I don't see how surge protectors and battery backups could access the computer CPU or memory.
I'd need a bit more product information - because the surge protectors and battery backups i;m familiar with would have no internet or computing capability.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)If Thiel's Polymarket was raided after Nov 5, there should be a look at what the other companies actually do in connection with elections, imo.
The way I see it, the Direct-to-Cell Stingray capability is the problem.
Meowmee
(8,375 posts)it was often a conspiracy theory... find the evidence/proof and you have a conspiracy.
Lancero
(3,167 posts)To be an essential part of election security.
I'm not going to bother addressing any of the other BS in the post, as it is all directly related to the false assumption that Tripp Lite is an election security company.
Edit - Looked into Tripp Lite some more to see what sort of history they have. Hilariously, my search dug up the Reddit topic and Twitter screenshots that OPs supposed IT guy ripped all his commentary from.
https://www.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1ia7dkd/elons_role_in_stealing_the_us_election_explained/
Wiz Imp
(4,628 posts)with people desperately looking for evidence of "cheating" in the 2024 election. Unfortunately his arguments are extremely weak and provide little to no credible evidence of anything.
Lancero
(3,167 posts)ancianita
(40,236 posts)So even if he used that info, does it prove the other posters are wrong? He just said there's a thread that could be pulled, and so if you just want to be right about his sourcing, fine. If it's from reddit, I read they're contracted with ChatGPT, but not sure.
Lancero
(3,167 posts)They're not. They manufacture various electronics protection equipment - Surge protectors, UPSs, circuit breakers, ect... They're not exactly an election security company, unless of course we're considering these pieces of equipment to be on the same level as a voting machine.
But hey, since you brought up ChatGPT, I suppose that explains why your 'IT Guy' ended up passing off stuff ripped from a Reddit post. Probably a spelling error. They mistyped Election Security into ChatGPT as Electronics Security (On second thought, it could also have been autocorrect.) and it ended up regurgitating, word for word, some of its training material.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)When stuff floats around the nets and gets mixed with some ChatGPT version used on one of the biggest internet sites, you never know. Reddit's lost some of its cred over that.
Lancero
(3,167 posts)Dead Internet Theory has certainly gained a lot of traction in recent years.
That said, the connection to Eaton is dubious. They manufacture... Huh. Various electronics safety equipment - Surge protectors, battery backups, ect. A company that makes Surge Protectors buying a competitor is hardly a shocker - More often than not, it's the easiest way for a investor to get a return on their investment.
Like I said. The entire line of reasoning is dubious, since it's based entirely on the false belief that Tripp Lite is a election security company.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)It's not based on the TrippLite donation to a Leonard Leo connection. The whole thing's premised on the timing of Musk's low orbit satellites lining up with Direct-to-Cell/Palantir/Thiel on this election deal. They invested in the felon & JD for a big payoff. Doing the same in Wisconsin.
Lancero
(3,167 posts)But where'd the media get this information? Well, the article is quite forthcoming with that information. They... Huh. Got it from a public event. That... oh. Was recorded, and put up on Youtube.
Quietly built my ass.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)faulted for not knowing when it was already in place. Because Musk didn't give a start date in the announcement. There's a reason tech media I read -- ars technica, techdirt, techcrunch, slashdot, even EFF -- were kinda quiet about it, too.
So the IT guy was correct. It WAS quietly built -- meaning built AND launched.
What I read is this:
A user's cell phone would look for service first from a cell phone tower, but when it did not detect this, instead of providing a user with no bars of service, the phone would search the sky. It would then draw connectivity from the nearest available satellite, with software on the satellite communicating to the mobile phone as if it were a virtual cell tower on the groun
AFTER Musk quietly and rapidly -- don't forget rapidly, which is 265 satellites after the announcement -- the text above has spread as much as the T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T's announcements of having satellite contracts for Direct-to-Cell.
I get AT&T. It has not offered this direct to cell option.
Lancero
(3,167 posts)"Hey, look at what we're gonna be building!"
As for rapidly? SpaceX had spent years before hand building out the capability to launch thousands of satellites in a year. That they were able to allocate launch windows to put up a couple hundred satellites isn't a shock for a company that was already edging towards a hundred launches per year. All the necessary infrastructure, the lack of which would normally slow down a project like this, was built out years in advance. "Rapidly done!" Yeah, if you set the goalposts to after all that infrastructure was built out and established.
The only thing that has "Rapidly" happened is DU embracing the same election denialism we used to call out.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,299 posts)this is all they do?
Lancero
(3,167 posts)This the type of argument that you're making here.
Sober Retiree
(27 posts)Of course it was. Corporate was OK with what was coming, national news media etc. I always get a kick out of well when we have enough proof we will launch an investigation, well we haven't even heard the usual line of bullshit. Whats it all mean ? Well were fucked and if you are still holding on to the hope that something, someone is going to rescue us , well keep dreaming. Back in the day people like Mike Molly and others were trying to rally the troops increase awareness of the coming storm , calling Americans sheeple well the storm has arrived. You can intellectualize all you can the truth is were fucked. Remember when the troops hit the streets, this was a well lubed machine that started the take over long ago. Now we play catch up and try to salvage what we can. So when you hear some dummy talking shit about Bernie or any other progressive, educate tell them to get their heads out of their ass and support what's being uncovered, support the protests call your reps tell them to do their fucking job. Enough whining this is the time for action. of course the election was rigged if one thinks otherwise, slap them on the side of the head and tell them they better wise up quick. Man this is depressing. Solidarity Brothers and Sisters
dchill
(41,862 posts)ecstatic
(34,709 posts)Everything after that fact is moot.
Tree Lady
(12,345 posts)and kept it up screaming it was a stolen election so when he did it if anyone said anything he would say your doing this because of what I said.
He is the master of blaming stuff he and his people do on us.
GoreWon2000
(1,417 posts)and the grassroots sure knows it. That election theft made tRump possible. No one should forget this.
pat_k
(11,101 posts)I have no doubt we will, once again, see disparate treatment and access.
Lines in populous areas that lean democratic is the most effective "riggin'"
And often, silly, silly Dems cheer and say "look at the turnout!" when in fact, you've just lost a minimum of 1 in 10 voters who never get in the line because they simply can't afford more than an hour to vote. Time is money and lines are a poll tax.
And where there is mail in voting, a FAR greater percentage of ballots cast in urban areas are rejected.
One thing that drove me nuts about defending against election deniers were the thousands of assurances of how well the system works when voter suppression is rampant and getting worse every cycle.
pnwmom
(109,816 posts)which can be counted by hand if any discrepancies appear, and both of those states had results almost identical to 4 years earlier.
sl8
(16,301 posts)ancianita
(40,236 posts)it didn't go viral, tho', and he picked it up elsewhere. Regardless, I suppose that in response to the video I sent him, he though his info would be plausible enough information that we hadn't known and might consider. I believe he added some of his own thinking, as well, though I don't know him well, but know of his work.
When it comes to questioning elections, it's important to consider the source. We understand that. But often, when a group's thinking gets summarized, and when it sounds condensed as it's passed on to an audience, it needs unpacking by the audience. Which is one of the reasons I offered the info here to file away in case we learn of related events.
brakester
(301 posts)returnee
(489 posts)My current prediction is that unless the digital subtrrfuge is exposed and destroyed we will not gain any ground in 2026, despite TSF and maga unpopularity.
This needs to be spread widely.
neohippie
(1,222 posts)This is a bunch of speculation about different technology that clearly people don't really have much understanding about
You can line up a bunch of different ideas without much depth or evidence about how the election was actually rigged, but any simple investigation into actual recounts would reveal any kind man in the middle data swap this seems like a lot of desperate people fishing for reasons to devalue the outcome of the election without any real proof just taking random news and stringing it along with a story that doesn't really fill in huge gaps with the details needed to prove anything
I am an IT guy for over 25 years that doesn't make me any kind of expert on hacking or election security and all the processes involved that check and balance voters and their votes
It just seems like a lot of wishful thinking that there is some kind of smoking gun evidence out there and people who are desperate enough to find a trail of breadcrumbs that they are ignoring huge gaps, or the fact that the breadcrumbs are not even made from the same kind of bread or dropped by the same people etc..
Dem4life1234
(2,530 posts)Sympthsical
(10,442 posts)What we have here is erroneous copy pasta from AI that spit out total gobbledygook (that is, for some reason, presented as original information from an IT guy), and because people don't at all understand what they're reading - but it sounds ominous! - they can't recognize that this is total nonsense.
It is literally mushmouth, incoherent gibberish.
150 recs.
Woof.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)it was worth considering.
brakester
(301 posts)We need to explore this theory!
Thanks for posting!
TomWilm
(1,898 posts)
Lancero
(3,167 posts)To make it impossible for all those voters to drive to the voting sites.
I wish the above wasn't necessary, but given how common election denialism these days I wouldn't be surprised if their were people who'd legitimately believe this.
Then again, maybe it is the truth. Maybe I'm just calling it sarcasm to trick people.
Trueblue Texan
(3,268 posts)kimbutgar
(24,736 posts)But I see how it was rigged and the muskrat owns the orange Hitler and installed him. So the orange monster can never go after him or get rid of him. Basically he made a deal with the pseudo devil elon.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)are the Canadians prepared for the oligarchs' beta test "trying." About their satellite use...
from Google AI (but don't know how up-to-date it is):
While Canada and the US share some satellite systems for weather and communications, Canada also has its own satellites and systems, including the RADARSAT Constellation Mission and the Gray Jay constellation for remote surveillance.
Because as recently as last August Canada & the US were talking about
Canada strikes deal to use U.S. space tech, clearing way for rocket launch pad in N.S.
Federal cabinet minister and Nova Scotia MP Sean Fraser announced in Halifax Friday that the two countries have negotiated a Technology Safeguards Agreement, which would allow the use of U.S. space launch technology, expertise and data for space launches in Canada.
The agreement doesn't come into force until both countries independently review and approve it, and Fraser couldn't provide a timeline for that. But he said he expects each government to move forward immediately and quickly with their respective domestic approvals....
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/canada-deal-u-s-space-tech-rocket-launch-pad-1.7283679#:~:text=comments-,A%20new%20agreement%20between%20Canada%20and%20the%20United%20States%20is,massive%22%20development%20for%20his%20startup.
So this tariff war has likely negatively affects on Canada's other prior agreements.
Fil1957
(35 posts)it would be very hard to prove.
There is ample evidence that voter suppression caused the election to go in Trump’s favor according to Greg Palast, but unfortunately that is all legal.
However, whatever you believe, the bottom line is, and what we should be focused on, is that over 70 million people voted for a dangerous criminal like Trump. As long as there are that many people brainwashed, even if we win elections in the future, it’ll be very hard to accomplish anything of substance.
We should not go down the conspiracy rabbit hole even if the conspiracy is real; it’s a diversion. We must focus instead on why 70 million plus voted for Trump.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)I thought that, given the stakes, this nation does have the expertise to prove whether or not these actors changed and/or deleted votes in battlegrounds -- and it would take their tracking down evidence from those 6 states.
Evidence opens diehard believers up to reality. Even now, just the suffering of other Americans they live near is evidence enough to wake some of them up to how their votes indirectly caused unintended harms.
There are rabbit holes... agreed. I've seen my share, but this time, thought this info was different and worth thinking about as circumstantial.
If this timeline and actors' operations were to get into the hands of those with the means and expertise to investigate, all the more to the good.
If investigative entities were to decide not to investigate, we'd likely know when we don't read about results in the next year or so.
But keep in mind that unless well funded/expert investigative entities give reasons why they don't have sufficient cause, we can't likely know whether or not there was a there there.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,299 posts)I do have the common sense to suspect, especially after now seeing what he was planning in great detail to gain by his influence on Trump and power he had confidence he'd be given, that Muskolini was extremely highly motivated to prevent Trump losing this election.
There's a lot you can do with billions & billions of dollars.
NJCher
(39,608 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 24, 2025, 04:25 PM - Edit history (1)
Please see my post at:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220171214
In response to lawsuit by Smart Elections. Rockland County, NY.
Note: revised my subject heading.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)Because the first doesn't necessarily mean the second follows...
colorado_ufo
(6,035 posts)I knew then that the fix was in, and it was confirmed to me when I heard about the satellite connection before the election.
He always "telegraphs" information; he can't help himself.
Add Trump's remarks that, "You won't ever have to vote again."
1WorldHope
(1,123 posts)I want so badly to make a difference in the world and stand on the side of truth. I listened to the pod cast and I read all of the text. It made perfect sense to me. Then I read the comments and there are people calling us fools to believe it. I am getting ready to volunteer a lot of time for Nebraska Democratic party to get out the vote. But, if the election was stolen by the tech bros then what is the point of working to get people to vote?
It never made sense to me that the plump felon won. America can't be that stupid! Sure, 30% stupid, but 60% stupid? I just don't know where to put my energies and this is eating up my "golden years".
ancianita
(40,236 posts)We are not the circumstances foisted upon us.
We are not what we are called. We are only what we answer to.
Don't worry. In your golden years you've got nothing to prove.
Here's the thing. Keep to your golden years. You don't have to be on the front lines. Just support those with the time and energy to create a better future, and choose wisely who you support.
1WorldHope
(1,123 posts)I will keep your words in the back of my mind while I decide if I'm right for the action I already signed up for. I would rather feed people and give them rides and hugs when needed. I'm not sure if that opportunity will arise. I love reading everything you write. I spent a lot of my time yesterday on your post. We are all in this together, and there are more of us than them. We will persevere. 🕉️
Jeebo
(2,409 posts)Gerrymandering, voter purges, voter intimidation, voter suppression. Greg Palast says Harris would have won several more states if it were not for the voter suppression in those states. If they'll do it in plain view, of course they'll do in surreptitious ways too.
-- Ron
Bluestocking
(36 posts)If this is true why make the results by the thinnest of margins? Why not give themselves a larger majority it congress? The results were pretty consistent with the polls.
lees1975
(6,392 posts)They own the media that did this. It wouldn't sound plausible if Harris had maintained the 4-5 point lead she had, so they invented numbers to match what they were going to do. Same thing happening now, every media outlet owned by a billionaire every media outlet puffing Trump's job approval. It would be a lie if they reported it at 35%. It's no where near 42%.
tritsofme
(19,039 posts)I mean if it is so obvious to all of the absolute geniuses on the internet, Harris’ silence can only be explained by either gross incompetence, she is just too dumb to figure out what you all did, or she must have been a willing accomplice to the conspiracy.
Or…just hang with me here….the Trumpian conspiracy theories being peddled are nothing but silly nonsense.
Hekate
(97,062 posts)ultralite001
(1,503 posts)Perhaps paper used for ballots was manipulated before the election...
Treated to block votes for Harris...
Treated to record/fluoresce "invisible" votes for Krasnov...
Only revealed by scanner "magic"...
Such nanodot technology seems easily within the Musketeer's purview...
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-10406-7
Let's give the pirates + counterfeiters a hand...
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/05/25/2023-10770/future-strategies-in-anticounterfeiting-and-antipiracy
malaise
(282,688 posts)I start with a simple,e problem - how the hell,did this Convicted felon win every swing state. Smells really stink to me.
ancianita
(40,236 posts)It would be good if you'd post an excerpt from each of the links to help most folks here understand better, thx. I'm already running a Wayback archive version of the Nature link, but may you could excerpt the second?
If treating bar coded ballots could be done... Lord help us.
ultralite001
(1,503 posts)I'll try to get to it today...
ultralite001
(1,503 posts)was retention of scanned ballot images rather than actual ballots...
The actual ballors are the evidence...
Micro/nano dots embedded or applied to the ballots before or during printing would be destroyed after ballots are scanned. No trace
remains to validate against the scanned image.
This works for paper ballots... The process could be modified for touchscreens.
(Trump told us himself: "What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening.”)
ancianita
(40,236 posts)Last edited Tue Mar 25, 2025, 05:10 PM - Edit history (2)
What states use them?
Are tabulators the same as vote scanning machines?
Do tabulators use scanned ballot images?
The public in general, and voters in each state ought to know
1) the chain of custody of ballots, from voter to certification;
2) if ballots are scanned, what percentage;
3) what machines do ballot scanning (if scanning is done), and how, where, and by whom; then finally,
4) the final destinations of all scanned ballot images and the final destination of all ballots filled out by voters, whatever form they take.
I've seen no maps of any chain of custody sequence.
There is no chain of custody made transparent to the voting public, from a voting precinct to the Sec of State's Board of Elections.
Neither does anyone see any named election person in charge of each stage of any state's vote ballot chain of custody.
None of the above are discussed on this site of the US Election Assistance Commission.
https://www.eac.gov/election-officials/election-results-canvass-and-certification
https://www.cisecurity.org/insights/spotlight/election-security-spotlight-chain-of-custody-is-crucial-for-election-offices
ultralite001
(1,503 posts)HopeAlive
(1 post)Hello! I've been following the voting irregularities since november and in touch with the orgs that are doing the data crunching right now. This was great to find. I have a question though as it seems to be a big detail that is missing - can you share how your IT friend knows about the NATO art. 5 possibly being invoked? Is there anyway to find further information about that or why he knows about that? I'm trying to get press involved etc so as much info that's available, the better chance we have at getting this all to go public. There are current lawsuits happening to get access to the actual ballots, because that is what is needed to further prove that there was fraud. They have tons of data that show the irregularities and its overwhelming but need to see the ballots to prove it. I also have a missing link that I'm sure you would be interested in hearing about but I'll wait to share that until I hear back from you. Thanks! Mindy
ancianita
(40,236 posts)You explain what you're doing, but you don't explain your work, or more importantly,
how you know there are current lawsuits happening. If that were so, we on DU would know about them.
Who are the parties to the lawsuits? How do you know they have "tons of data that show irregularities"? Are the lawsuit filings on record with Court Listener or other docket sources?
Do you have links for your answers to the above questions?
Re your NATO question, the answers are pretty easily found from NATO's site and from the commons of the Internet, Wikipedia.
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_110496.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO
Look forward to your missing link and the rest. Cheers.