Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 08:46 PM Mar 23

Let's say you think this past election was rigged.

It's not election conspiracy theory IF white hat/red team hackers can get evidence.
BUT sufficient evidence could be an oligarch Leviathan.

I saw this video on DU and forwarded it to an IT expert.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220080224

What the IT expert texted back:

"...It's a conspiracy for sure, but this was an interesting thread that needs tugging:

-- Item A. NATO is considering invoking Article 5 in accordance with the Cyber policy, and no, it’s not because we “don’t like Elon."

It’s because Elon very quietly and rapidly built a low-orbit Direct-to-Cell constellation, in which 265 satellites were in place and operational just two weeks prior to the Nov 5 election.

These low-orbit satellites effectively place the equivalent of a hacker’s “Stingray” device in every voting precinct in America.

-- Now factor in Barre Seid’s 2020 transfer of his election security company Tripp Lite, to far-right predatory billionaire Leonard Leo.

Nearly ALL election machines in this country are certified to be used specifically with Tripp Lite products -- which are surge protectors for all ES&S DS450 and DS850 tabulators, and Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) units for all Dominion servers.

After a year of searching for the right buyer, Leonard Leo sold Tripp Lite to a company by the name of Eaton Corp., in 2021.

-- What has Eaton Corp. been up to?
One week after Musk created his “America PAC” for Trump, Eaton Corp. announced a partnership with Palantir, a company owned by another far-right predatory billionaire Peter Thiel (Elon Musk’s co-founder of PayPal), and used by militaries and counter-terrorism analysts. Its customers include the United States Intelligence Community (USIC) and United States Department of Defense.

The Eaton/Palantir partnership focused on secure erasure of digital footprints on Eaton devices, and on AI management of large datasets - such as large quantities of ballot images.

Also of note, Peter Thiel also has ownership in Polymarket, another company with ties to the outcome of the U.S. election. Polymarket had eerily accurate predictions of a Trump victory, and was raided shortly after the Nov 5 election.

In Sept 2024, Eaton Corp. announced another partnership, this time with Trump’s single largest campaign contributor, Elon Musk (via Tesla), further dirtying the election waters, and providing a convenient cover for their correspondence and monetary connections.

Item B: Why is a private, supposedly “neutral” election/voting system company sourcing core components from far-right individuals with direct connections to Donald Trump?

Understanding of product design and access to production facilities, kicks the doors wide open for widespread potential for the insertion of maliciously engineered products into the election systems.

-- In the time period in which Musk was building out Starlink’s low-orbit Direct-to-Cell constellation, he was also hosting weekly “Billionaire brain trust” meetings, and overseeing the ground-level infrastructure needed to pull off a mass-scale election exploit.

With all pieces in place, the remaining question is a probable motive...
Over $15T in minerals in Ukraine, needed to manufacture electric vehicles

Musk launched his bid to purchase the Twitter platform just 49 days after Putin invaded Ukraine, overpaid by $20B (w/help from Russian oligarchs), then promptly converted it to a pro-Trump/Russian propaganda dumpster fire.

-- Oct 25, 2024, Murdoch’s WSJ dropped a bombshell on Musk’s two+ years of private contact with Putin.
Why would Murdoch risk the “October Surprise,” especially considering he is IN the “Billionaire brain trust,” unless he knew the “fix” was in?

Trump’s campaign speech/confession on Nov 4:
“He looked at some that were just shipped in, some of these vote-counting computers. He knew it before it even came in the door. He looked like at the back of it. "Oh, I know that one." I mean, he knows that's how -- I mean, he knows this stuff better than any. And he actually said -- and this is for the good of everybody, it's the good of mankind, essentially.”

Nov 5: Trump “wins” ALL swing states, the “Blue Wall” falls, not one single district flips “blue” and Musk is overheard announcing the “win” four hours prior to official results.

Tesla-Ukraine...incoming...

Today 350 low-orbit Direct-to-Cell satellites are now in place across the globe.
So which country is Musk taking next?”

At this point, I'm afraid to ask the IT guy (who's deciding whether to go for a scholarship for a law degree):
Can journalists and hacker teams possibly get sufficient evidence to prove the suspected connections here?
Will free and fair elections end because of insufficient, or even sufficient evidence?
Can Quinn Emanuel, the world's most feared law firm, put the fear into the good cop/bad cop team destroying elections? And our country?
Is it a brave new world of AI-based capitalist surveillance that lies beyond democracy?
We're three years out. Can we be saved?
165 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let's say you think this past election was rigged. (Original Post) ancianita Mar 23 OP
Get thee to the greatest page malaise Mar 23 #1
Hell Yes! Mr. Evil Mar 23 #29
I have been saying the election is being rigged since the 2000 election. I spent 30 years working in IT. Retired now... usaf-vet Mar 24 #141
Thanx so much! Mr. Evil Mar 24 #142
I'm right there with you, malaise! That very night of the election I KNEW. Even though he had already told his BComplex Mar 25 #151
This is pretty ... horrifying, yet awesome information. I am afraid for you to ask too, but Scrivener7 Mar 23 #2
Agree. It's beyond horrifying. It's a Musk/Thiel insurgency network. ancianita Mar 23 #4
Seriously, I felt a little nauseous reading that. But let us know if you ask guy those questions. Scrivener7 Mar 23 #8
And yet we have to keep our heads. My hope & prayer is that white hat/red teams are working on this. ancianita Mar 23 #11
Good comment, what are brakester Mar 24 #115
Google AI says it more succinctly than I... ancianita Mar 24 #117
Anianita, sorry, I'm still confused. brakester Mar 24 #120
The core definition of red teams is that they're "ethical hackers" -- like white hats -- who look for what harms ancianita Mar 24 #134
It doesn't seem like we can do anything BonnieJW Mar 23 #23
It doesn't. But we're not part of the IT world, are we. You never know what fired CISA ancianita Mar 23 #25
Thiel bdamomma Mar 23 #43
Neither Thiel nor Musk care about American children's futures, nor do they have to care about the economy ancianita Mar 23 #45
The fix bdamomma Mar 23 #49
We don't know. But the circumstantial evidence presented seems too compelling not to. ancianita Mar 23 #50
Any company or technology that Musk has a hand in cannot be a part of the election process Blue Owl Mar 23 #3
But it was. Think. Again. Mar 23 #37
Interesting. H2O Man Mar 23 #5
Yup, the fix was in. Clouds Passing Mar 23 #6
I have felt the same. DENVERPOPS Mar 23 #14
Actually back to tricky dick nixon Clouds Passing Mar 23 #16
Tricky Dick DENVERPOPS Mar 23 #17
HW was pissed that Carter let him go. The fix was in, dirty bushes. Clouds Passing Mar 23 #20
Could you expand your comment? brakester Mar 24 #118
Carter shut down bush programs and accepted bush's resignation. Clouds Passing Mar 24 #148
Very interesting! brakester Mar 25 #165
I don't think DENVERPOPS Mar 24 #139
The treason continues..... Clouds Passing Mar 24 #149
also disenfranchised voters Be Leave On Mar 24 #111
This whole story is brakester Mar 24 #125
Agree Brakester DENVERPOPS Mar 24 #140
Thanks for the insight brakester Mar 25 #163
there is a ton of stuff DENVERPOPS Mar 25 #164
K&R 2naSalit Mar 23 #7
kick for people a whole lot smarter than I proud patriot Mar 23 #9
It's scary and creepy but at the same time there is a certain relief in that it confirms more than anything else Amaryllis Mar 23 #10
When you say "I've read so far what so many of us were convinced of; that nearly half of the US did not vote for Trump." ancianita Mar 23 #12
ancianita Is a very cautious poster malaise Mar 23 #13
Yes bdamomma Mar 23 #46
Yup. Is this why Trump twisted the arm of law firm Paul Weiss? Joinfortmill Mar 23 #15
Thank you for posting on this issue so I could run it by my IT expert in NM. ancianita Mar 23 #18
This the same IT guy you got the original commentary from? Lancero Mar 23 #69
Do not know. As far as I know he's not on either Twitter or reddit, and I've known him for ancianita Mar 24 #72
Read the topic I linked, it has the screenshots that your supposed IT guys commentary was taken from. Lancero Mar 24 #74
I saw it. See my other post. Yeah, the irony. Guess you're proving them wrong, huh. ancianita Mar 24 #77
Please explain Paul Weiss? I just haven't thought to make the connection. It's important that people know these things. ancianita Mar 23 #19
I just looked Paul Weiss up (cuz I hadn't kept up with that news) and you're likely right. Here's why the felon ancianita Mar 23 #21
When I first read that Paul, Weiss brakester Mar 24 #124
Agree. Tech law firms are outgunned in terms of wealth; an ongoing fight is a war of attrition for their attackers ancianita Mar 24 #135
There is certainly enough Circumstantial Evidence... BurnDoubt Mar 23 #22
There is. And a feared tech law firm could have teams of investigators on this from the wired money ancianita Mar 23 #24
I've had concerns moondust Mar 23 #26
Well, ancianita Mar 23 #30
You betcha! brakester Mar 24 #128
K&R bookmarking FakeNoose Mar 23 #27
The democratic party should have insisted and paid for at least one recount. Liberal In Texas Mar 23 #28
They should've. Just for a baseline effort. But. We can't blame the leaders now. Biden probably knew ancianita Mar 23 #35
And, brakester Mar 24 #129
Dan Goldman talked about investigating the election. yellow dahlia Mar 23 #31
Right! I heard him. He comes from billionaire money, too. He and Prizker and others could ancianita Mar 23 #33
Goldman is top notch. brakester Mar 24 #132
Richest Man in the world with tech capabilities to erase any value on votes/Democracy. OAITW r.2.0 Mar 23 #32
He is. But it's a 50 state election system in a bigass country. So we know he couldn't do it all alone. ancianita Mar 23 #34
It takes an Organized Crime Party to make a 1 Party State. Just ask Vlad. OAITW r.2.0 Mar 23 #36
And that's exactly what we're looking at with this IT guy's threads of circumstantial evidence. ancianita Mar 23 #38
Let's hope ALL of this info becomes more commonly understood.... Think. Again. Mar 23 #39
I would donate money for a hand recount in Clark county ... aggiesal Mar 23 #40
Ok, but do you see what this is really about? But it's about digital erasure of votes, so a hand recount ancianita Mar 23 #41
If they are erasing votes, a precinct by precinct hand count questionseverything Mar 23 #59
Depends on who at precinct levels does the counts. ancianita Mar 23 #61
Yes that's assuming an honest count questionseverything Mar 24 #93
WOW 😳 ! ... aggiesal Mar 23 #66
What's the time lag between the vote count and finding numbers discrepancies? ancianita Mar 23 #70
Not from a handcount!!! ... aggiesal Mar 24 #76
Okay, I'll take your word for it. I hope you're right. And we deserve a hand counted election ancianita Mar 24 #79
Absolutely!! bluestarone Mar 24 #126
It's been proven conclusively that hand counting ballots is less accurate than machine counts. Wiz Imp Mar 24 #82
Hand counting the top two races would be a huge improvement questionseverything Mar 24 #90
There are multiple techniques to counting ballots, ... aggiesal Mar 24 #95
open source free software Be Leave On Mar 24 #112
Following This Thread Baron2024 Mar 23 #42
whaddaya mean? azureblue Mar 23 #44
That's one piece of evidence. Not enough, though. The rest to get is how they did it. And shut that down ancianita Mar 23 #47
Indeed. He's let the actual truth slip out at least twice BoRaGard Mar 24 #99
Nah, not like that. AmericaUnderSiege Mar 23 #48
Thanks for your thoughts. Some are highly arguable, but I'm not defending this, just laying out ancianita Mar 23 #52
Definitely throw their own election-denying words back at them. AmericaUnderSiege Mar 23 #57
OF COURSE it's a question of electoral method. That's the point of the OP. It's not about ancianita Mar 23 #64
The past is literally the only source of lessons to learn from, by definition. AmericaUnderSiege Mar 24 #86
I hear you. But I'm not sure how the past shows us how to overcome a Big Tech insurgency. ancianita Mar 24 #87
I agree. Past history brakester Mar 24 #133
Kick SheltieLover Mar 23 #51
Recounts of any April 1 House races. We need a realtime system where the person who just voted verifies electronically. NowsTheTime Mar 23 #53
That's part of the problem. The vote tabulation systems. And Eaton Corp. And TrippLite. ancianita Mar 23 #55
I'm not talking about voter being verified they voted, but voter verifying on who they voted for as a real time tally. . NowsTheTime Mar 23 #56
Sure, that can be done. But it's after that, that we need to be concerned about. ancianita Mar 23 #60
That would do nothing to assure people who are convinced there is cheating happening. Wiz Imp Mar 24 #80
Thanks. That was exactly my point. ancianita Mar 24 #92
My suggestion only addresses votes cast at precincts let's say. So Instead of the computer recordiing the vote count.... NowsTheTime Mar 24 #100
K&R, with BIG Bookmark Bayard Mar 23 #54
... ancianita Mar 23 #58
I don't see AncientOfDays Mar 23 #62
Me, neither, unless that's just what they publicly market, and not lesser known equipment. ancianita Mar 23 #67
Before a conspiracy becomes that Meowmee Mar 23 #63
Tripp Lite isn't an "election security company" unless, of course, you consider the manufacture of surge protectors... Lancero Mar 23 #65
Nathan Taylor (from the original video in the post) has been making the rounds Wiz Imp Mar 24 #84
"Saw this on DU and sent it to an IT guy" my foot, here's the Reddit topic w/ Twitter screenshots you took this from. Lancero Mar 23 #68
Thanks. I'll check with him about it. ancianita Mar 24 #75
The thread to be pulled is based on Tripp Lite being an election security company. Lancero Mar 24 #88
Yeah, maybe, but I think the Eaton Corp, Direct-to-Cell and Palantir are more important. ancianita Mar 24 #89
Yeah, a lot of people aren't willing to give AI manufactured content the light of day. Lancero Mar 24 #91
I hear you about TrippLite. It's the crazy billionaire guy who owned it. Now I get it. ancianita Mar 24 #94
Ah yes, the quietly built Direct-to-Cell network... So quietly built, that tech media was reporting on it in '22. Lancero Mar 24 #97
The "public event" was an ANNOUNCEMENT, not a done deal. No one should be ancianita Mar 24 #105
You can't reasonably claim that something was "quietly built" when the company behind it publically announced... Lancero Mar 24 #143
How could we know for sure Dark n Stormy Knight Mar 24 #119
"How could we know for sure that DU isn't in on it?" Lancero Mar 24 #144
Duh Sober Retiree Mar 24 #71
Kick. dchill Mar 24 #73
We let a known cheater and insurrectionist run again ecstatic Mar 24 #78
This is why Trump said he won in 2020 Tree Lady Mar 24 #81
The 2000 election was stolen by W GoreWon2000 Mar 24 #83
The data on vote suppression is pretty clear in past elections. pat_k Mar 24 #85
I wonder if WA and NM machines are in that loop. Because both of those states use all paper ballots, pnwmom Mar 24 #96
The same thing was posted on Twitter a couple of months ago: sl8 Mar 24 #98
I don't know because I'm not on twitter, and as far as I know, neither is the IT guy. Doesn't mean ancianita Mar 24 #106
Many thanks for that! n/m brakester Mar 24 #136
We are 1.5 yrs out from 2026. returnee Mar 24 #101
there is only speculation here about things people don't have much understanding neohippie Mar 24 #102
That will explain why they were acting like humans who were raised by animals Dem4life1234 Mar 24 #103
DU really needs to bring back the Creative Speculation forum with this stuff Sympthsical Mar 24 #104
Sorry. I thought after sitting on the text for a week & checking the names & timeline out, that ancianita Mar 24 #108
I hope you are not apologizing! brakester Mar 24 #138
I FOUND ALL THE MISSING VOTES! TomWilm Mar 24 #107
It's a grand conspiracy! Starlink used their satelites to hack their cars tires (Thiel owns Firestone stock!)... Lancero Mar 24 #145
Salvation comes in the form of paper ballots. nt Trueblue Texan Mar 24 #109
Will he try to mess with Canada's election in the next month? kimbutgar Mar 24 #110
Good question! Better to ask what Canadian leadership thinks. We don't trust the felon, but ancianita Mar 24 #114
The above theory is interesting, but if it is true, Fil1957 Mar 24 #113
Yes, that's the starting point of the OP. But ancianita Mar 24 #116
I don't have the expertise to evaluate all of this. Dark n Stormy Knight Mar 24 #121
First hearing for hand count of 2024 just granted! NJCher Mar 24 #122
Okay... I read the link and am confused. Are you granted a hearing? or granted a recount? ancianita Mar 24 #137
Remember when Trump said that he didn't need the votes? colorado_ufo Mar 24 #123
There are millions of ways to confuse people. 1WorldHope Mar 24 #127
So true. If people allow it. ancianita Mar 25 #152
You are incredibly kind and a wise person. 1WorldHope Mar 25 #154
They're rigging elections out in the open, in plain view. Jeebo Mar 24 #130
Why so close Bluestocking Mar 24 #131
The polls were rigged too. lees1975 Mar 24 #146
Strange that Harris stays so quiet about such an obvious and massive conspiracy, involving so many parties! tritsofme Mar 25 #160
Kick Hekate Mar 24 #147
Looking at this problem from different angles... ultralite001 Mar 24 #150
I don't know enough about how any of this stuff works malaise Mar 25 #153
Wow, that's a new one. Never on God's green earth heard of that "perhaps... treated paper ballots" idea. ancianita Mar 25 #157
Thx for reading... ultralite001 Mar 25 #158
What triggered the thought... ultralite001 Mar 25 #159
So... what machines retain scanned ballot images rather than actual ballots? What are the machines called? ancianita Mar 25 #161
Scattered collection of instances... ultralite001 Mar 25 #162
2024 Election questions HopeAlive Mar 25 #155
Hi, Mindy! Welcome to DU. ancianita Mar 25 #156

malaise

(282,688 posts)
1. Get thee to the greatest page
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 08:53 PM
Mar 23

Every DUer must read this

I remain doubting malaise from Nov 5

usaf-vet

(7,420 posts)
141. I have been saying the election is being rigged since the 2000 election. I spent 30 years working in IT. Retired now...
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 04:41 PM
Mar 24

.... but I have NEVER doubted the elections were being rigged and stolen. The addition of computers post-2000 was the key.

Here are some of my former post links, plus additional ones to support your arguments that the elections have been rigged. I believe the rigging has been going on since 2000.

Apologies for duplicates.

The fix in 2024 was in "they rigged the election" and the midterms as well

Read the word-by-word transcript.
https://www.youtube.com/live/44PSaIfKGtE?si=2uak0o5coCDKcKKt&t=145

And my original post.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/13242540

CLICK THROUGH THE ADS TO SEE THE ACTUAL VIDEOS

Social Security
https://tinyurl.com/SS-Gone

https://tinyurl.com/GP-Stuff

https://tinyurl.com/NTay5

https://www.thenumbersarewrong2024.com/across-the-us/flipped-counties

https://www.democraticunderground.com/132265983

RachMad SS#

Nathan Taylor



BComplex

(9,358 posts)
151. I'm right there with you, malaise! That very night of the election I KNEW. Even though he had already told his
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 01:56 AM
Mar 25

rally that they didn't need the votes, and that they'd never have to vote again, nobody questioned what happened. Why? Because for 4 years we had to mock the MAGAts for saying the 2020 election was stolen. What a perfect set-up for the Democratic party to have to STFU about the election being stolen in 2024?

But I've been watching elections longer than most DUers have been on this planet, and I've never seen one that was so pristinely clean and fast. It was like a staged event. It wasn't like any election I've ever seen. And I knew that night. I told my husband as we watched that the computers were hacked by trump's silicon valley friend$$.

Scrivener7

(55,137 posts)
2. This is pretty ... horrifying, yet awesome information. I am afraid for you to ask too, but
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 08:54 PM
Mar 23

we need to know the answers.

Scrivener7

(55,137 posts)
8. Seriously, I felt a little nauseous reading that. But let us know if you ask guy those questions.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 09:08 PM
Mar 23

It's like some dystopian nightmare.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
11. And yet we have to keep our heads. My hope & prayer is that white hat/red teams are working on this.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 09:13 PM
Mar 23

This country wasn't "constituted" for the oligarchs.

The oligarchs became so because of this country.

America needs to be saved from oligarchy. Our patriots, Walz, AOC, Sanders and others, are on the right track. Let's hope they can inspire hackers and heavy hitting trial law firms to take this on.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
117. Google AI says it more succinctly than I...
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:33 PM
Mar 24
In cybersecurity, a red team is a group that simulates real-world cyberattacks to identify vulnerabilities and test an organization's defenses, acting as an adversary to improve security


DEF CON (Las Vegas) has used red teams the past few years to discover the weak/vulnerable/harmful internals of the AI that some AI owners submit them to.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
134. The core definition of red teams is that they're "ethical hackers" -- like white hats -- who look for what harms
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 03:51 PM
Mar 24

or exploits human users or humans in general.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
25. It doesn't. But we're not part of the IT world, are we. You never know what fired CISA
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:05 PM
Mar 23

and hacker folks can do when they're pissed off for the sake of their children's futures.

bdamomma

(67,881 posts)
43. Thiel
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:41 PM
Mar 23

was mentioned. He's in with the Tech Bros, also Thiel is the person who suggested Vance as VP. Thiel is tight with Musk. These guys want to tank the economy and promote cryptocurrency. They have their own agenda.

I noticed on Ayman tonight, they were talking about this. Also, the felon is just in it for himself, or as we know he is in it for himself.

Also they were talking about bad blood between Bannon and Musk.

Bookmarking this thread.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
45. Neither Thiel nor Musk care about American children's futures, nor do they have to care about the economy
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:45 PM
Mar 23

They're into control of wealth and power for themselves while the felon goes on his distraction/revenge tour.

JD's been quiet because he rides their coattails and plans to win in 2028 the way the felon won in 2024.

bdamomma

(67,881 posts)
49. The fix
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:53 PM
Mar 23

is in as some DU posters have said. I have to read this OP closely, but is this being investigated thoroughly now??

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
50. We don't know. But the circumstantial evidence presented seems too compelling not to.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:57 PM
Mar 23

The fix was a digital network hack. That hack doesn't have to be permanent; it can be stopped when the evidence is tracked down. But it takes lawyers, hackers and money.

DENVERPOPS

(11,653 posts)
14. I have felt the same.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 09:20 PM
Mar 23

I also had those exact feelings after the 1980 election when HW committed treason to throw the election to Reagan.
And again in 2000, 2004, 2008, 2016, as well as 2024................

Some of us here on DU have been screaming our heads off since the 1980 election..............

As I have repeatedly said here on DU.......The perfect title for a book about the past 45+ years would be:

WHILE THE NATION SLEPT................

DENVERPOPS

(11,653 posts)
17. Tricky Dick
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 09:33 PM
Mar 23

was peanuts compared to what the HW CABAL rolled out, starting in late 1979's.....

But yes, Nixon was a piece of work, and helped with the beginning of some of their groundwork......

brakester

(301 posts)
118. Could you expand your comment?
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:41 PM
Mar 24

HW was pissed that Carter let WHO go? Go where?

Thanks!

This whole subject is a big flashing red light and I want to understand it thoroughly.

Clouds Passing

(4,285 posts)
148. Carter shut down bush programs and accepted bush's resignation.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 06:46 PM
Mar 24

The entire article is worth a read.

https://inteltoday.org/2019/11/30/remembering-cia-director-george-h-w-bush-june-12-1924-november-30-2018/

“As the committees continued their investigations into late 1975, the Ford Administration had come to feel that then-DCI William Colby had disclosed more information to Congress than was necessary. This belief, coupled with the harsh reality that a dark cloud now hung over the CIA, led the President to conclude the Agency needed a new sense of morale and a new director who could improve strained relations with Congress. On January 30, 1976, Ford replaced Colby with George H.W. Bush. (…)

Three days after Jimmy Carter’s victory over President Ford, Bush called and offered his resignation. Carter became only the second president to pick a new DCI when he first entered the Presidency, setting a trend for presidents to come.

A final briefing between the two occurred on November 19th, when Bush described more than ten sensitive programs being run by the CIA and even mentioned staying on as Director. Carter was notably quiet. He later shut down many of these programs and accepted Bush’s resignation on January 10, 1977, the day of the Presidential Inauguration.“

So Carter sort of pushed bush to go, but bush resigned. My correction.

brakester

(301 posts)
165. Very interesting!
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 06:42 PM
Mar 25

That's another feather in Carter's hat, and even more reason for my admiration for that great statesman!

DENVERPOPS

(11,653 posts)
139. I don't think
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 04:23 PM
Mar 24

that many recognize a common theme through decades, was HWBush, lurking in the back ground, with his CABAL of Cheney/Rumsfeld/Pearle/Wolfowitz and a hundred others.

At the end of Reagan's occupation of the White House, there were over a hundred of his admin that were sitting on indictments.
It was mandatory HW be elected President, so upon his first day in office he could pardon all of them for their corruption, felonies, or Treasonous acts..................

Be Leave On

(143 posts)
111. also disenfranchised voters
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 11:27 AM
Mar 24

Greg Palast also told of very many voters being kicked off the rolls.
Many layers and levels and methods of deceit and trickery here.

brakester

(301 posts)
125. This whole story is
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:47 PM
Mar 24
Chilling and Distopian!

I noticed an early reaction of mine to this story was, "This is too big to fight!"

But, we have to prepare and protect ourselves, as well as continue fighting.

DENVERPOPS

(11,653 posts)
140. Agree Brakester
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 04:31 PM
Mar 24

Many of us here on DU were screaming our heads off since when HW committed TREASON in getting Reagan in office, then using him as a front man or pawn, so that HW and his CABAL could run things from the shadows in the background.
The amount of damage they did during that eight years was un-fathomable, and helped in a big way to all that we are experiencing today.

As I have often said here, the perfect title for a book about the last 45+ years would be:

WHILE THE NATION SLEPT...... or at the risk of getting censored......WHILE THE DEMOCRATS SLEPT
They were all walking down the jungle path, swatting at mosquitoes, completely oblivious to the herd of charging elephants......
PUN INTENDED.........

brakester

(301 posts)
163. Thanks for the insight
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 06:33 PM
Mar 25

into that era. I wasn't as involved with politics as I have been since then, so I wasn't aware of that whole cabal's shenanigans. Can you suggest any reading that would shine a light on that?

DENVERPOPS

(11,653 posts)
164. there is a ton of stuff
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 06:37 PM
Mar 25

out there, trading arms for hostages, the Iran/Contra affair, etc etc etc

Congress had explicitly banned them from weapon sales, and HW & CIA went ahead and did it anyways....

Google it, I'm sure there will be more reading than you want to do........

Amaryllis

(10,218 posts)
10. It's scary and creepy but at the same time there is a certain relief in that it confirms more than anything else
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 09:12 PM
Mar 23

I've read so far what so many of us were convinced of; that nearly half of the US did not vote for Trump.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
12. When you say "I've read so far what so many of us were convinced of; that nearly half of the US did not vote for Trump."
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 09:16 PM
Mar 23

this could very well be proven.

The Eaton/Palantir partnership focused on secure erasure of digital footprints on Eaton devices, and on AI management of large datasets - such as large quantities of ballot images.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
18. Thank you for posting on this issue so I could run it by my IT expert in NM.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 09:34 PM
Mar 23

He taught me who to look up more stuff on... the more I learned, the more the sirens went off.

I wish the New York Times investigative teams got on this.

This information could be the catalyst for white hat/red teams prepping for 2026 and 2028.

It would be quoted and re-reported national news for at least a week and beyond.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
72. Do not know. As far as I know he's not on either Twitter or reddit, and I've known him for
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:06 AM
Mar 24

over 30 years. He's honest. And too busy, as far as I know to make stuff up. I sat on his text for a week and looked around on reddit (reddit's hooked up with AI now, so ...), EFF and other sites and haven't seen anything.

But hey, if you've got something to prove, post the screen shots. It must be out there somewhere these days, so I wouldn't be surprised if he's come across this info in places I don't know about.

Lancero

(3,167 posts)
74. Read the topic I linked, it has the screenshots that your supposed IT guys commentary was taken from.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:09 AM
Mar 24

Can I just say that I love the irony here? Making a topic complaining about Elon Musk, while also ripping all of the commentary from Twitter?

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
19. Please explain Paul Weiss? I just haven't thought to make the connection. It's important that people know these things.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 09:36 PM
Mar 23

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
21. I just looked Paul Weiss up (cuz I hadn't kept up with that news) and you're likely right. Here's why the felon
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 09:48 PM
Mar 23

likely went after Paul Weiss' firm -- he wins major tech battles. +1 for Musk/Thiel oligarchs.

https://www.paulweiss.com

brakester

(301 posts)
124. When I first read that Paul, Weiss
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:40 PM
Mar 24

fell to their knees toute suite, I thought, hmm, they have a thousand lawyers. Couldn't they find a lawyer in their firm to fight this??!! /s. And I read that H. Clinton had hired them, which puzzled me, too. (But then, who says Clinton is not corrupt?)
But the more I read about Paul, Weiss, I get the picture that they started out with admirable intentions because they were a firm that wanted to be an example of diversity, where Jews and Gentiles worked together. They also, in addition to hiring from the top law schools, also hired from a variety of schools.

But, they seem to have a very mixed reputation and I understood why they did this.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
135. Agree. Tech law firms are outgunned in terms of wealth; an ongoing fight is a war of attrition for their attackers
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 04:00 PM
Mar 24

The power and wealth of Big Tech is about expanding itself without pesky govt or human interference or even tech law firms.

What Weiss did was about its long term survival.

BurnDoubt

(215 posts)
22. There is certainly enough Circumstantial Evidence...
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 09:54 PM
Mar 23

To necessitate an investigation. If only the Rigging of the Federal Government to remove anyone who might hinder his slightest whim or suggest making him accountable for ANYTHING and inoculating his Administration against investigation by "flooding the zone" with fake news and conspiracy theories and chaff. Truth is now just his opinion. Does ANYONE think he would think twice before cheating. That's the only thing you can trust him to do: look out for Number One. So pardon me for thinking he ripped-off America.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
24. There is. And a feared tech law firm could have teams of investigators on this from the wired money
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:04 PM
Mar 23

transfer level to the actual white hat/red team digital footprint sleuthing they know how to do.

Of course you're absolutely right that we can't depend on the oligarch run loyalists of the felon to launch anything.
Of course they threaten those with the facts, truth and evidence. They don't want it revealed.

They're also in the process of erasing public data so that history can be rewritten about these events of the last 5 months.

Here's what WaPo's opinion section said about the felon reinventing reality -- in it's Op-Ed section, no less! From 13 days ago ... It's got good graphs!

https://archive.ph/RBvrt

The Trump team’s efforts to suppress nettlesome numbers have similarly eroded trust in U.S. data. Only about one-third of Americans trust that most or all of the statistics Trump cites are “reliable and accurate.”..
Meanwhile, missing or untrustworthy data lead to worse decisions: Auto companies, for example, draw on dozens of federally administered datasets when devising new car models, how to price them, where to stock and market them and other key choices. Retailers need detailed information about local demographics, weather and modes of transit when deciding where to locate stores.

moondust

(20,834 posts)
26. I've had concerns
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:06 PM
Mar 23

that the companies like Cyber Ninjas doing election "audits" in 2021 may have found a way into the voting machines, copied the code, and spent the next 3-4 years developing ways to hack into them and switch enough votes to win.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
30. Well,
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:11 PM
Mar 23

those guys were nothing in the IT/hacker world, and they were proven incompetent.

But what they did open up concerns about was IT and possible satellite interference in elections. And so you're right to be concerned.

Now there is a pattern of circumstantial evidence. Enough to have all kinds of hacker teams and law firms investigating for evidence of wire fraud, code and ballot erasures, and who knows what else happened through the tabulators and servers.

brakester

(301 posts)
128. You betcha!
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 02:04 PM
Mar 24

And that election worker, Tina Peters, in CO who was caught on tape bringing in right wingers to check out the machines. The passwords to the machines were posted on a RW blog!

She got nine years, but the damage was already done.

She's a traitor of the first order!

Liberal In Texas

(15,075 posts)
28. The democratic party should have insisted and paid for at least one recount.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:10 PM
Mar 23

One where paper ballots were printed out that can be assessed physically, not machine read.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
35. They should've. Just for a baseline effort. But. We can't blame the leaders now. Biden probably knew
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:20 PM
Mar 23

and was apprised of the means, but it was too late for him to do anything but enable a transition and the securing of a lot of valuable government documents. It was a big transition out as much as a transition of oligarchs in.

But there is a weird silence going on from our past presidents, fired CISA people and Silicon oligarchs. We need to not give up and keep them on our radar.

brakester

(301 posts)
129. And,
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 02:12 PM
Mar 24

Harris conceded in a New York minute, then disappeared!!

Crickets!

At least Tim Walz is out there fighting! Love that guy!

For years I have rejected some people's insistence that the Democratic Party was as corrupt as the RWers.

I'm beginning to change my mind.

yellow dahlia

(2,165 posts)
31. Dan Goldman talked about investigating the election.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:11 PM
Mar 23

I called, and left a message to find out more. Maybe I will call again.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
33. Right! I heard him. He comes from billionaire money, too. He and Prizker and others could
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:15 PM
Mar 23

fund some investigations, since he worked for SDNY and knows how money Treasury->Fed->to on & offshore banks work. Goldman's got connections. Now I have an idea why he's been so quiet. I do hope you get a response that lets you know a bit more.

Thanks for the info!

brakester

(301 posts)
132. Goldman is top notch.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 03:02 PM
Mar 24

I listened to his podcasts. He's knowledgeable, dedicated and I learned so much about the election from him.

OAITW r.2.0

(29,830 posts)
32. Richest Man in the world with tech capabilities to erase any value on votes/Democracy.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:12 PM
Mar 23

He's the threat.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
34. He is. But it's a 50 state election system in a bigass country. So we know he couldn't do it all alone.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:16 PM
Mar 23

OAITW r.2.0

(29,830 posts)
36. It takes an Organized Crime Party to make a 1 Party State. Just ask Vlad.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:24 PM
Mar 23

They took over the rotted elephant carcass that was the GOP.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
38. And that's exactly what we're looking at with this IT guy's threads of circumstantial evidence.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:29 PM
Mar 23

aggiesal

(9,911 posts)
40. I would donate money for a hand recount in Clark county ...
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:32 PM
Mar 23

I want to know who really won this election.

Statistics are good, but I would like those statistics proven in one location.
Then maybe I'd donate more money to start looking at actual swing states.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
41. Ok, but do you see what this is really about? But it's about digital erasure of votes, so a hand recount
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:35 PM
Mar 23

wouldn't prove anything.

questionseverything

(10,654 posts)
59. If they are erasing votes, a precinct by precinct hand count
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:36 PM
Mar 23

Would prove the reported results were incorrect

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
61. Depends on who at precinct levels does the counts.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:40 PM
Mar 23

Could precincts keep double books? It happens. Does the party really want to pay for all that across battleground states? idk

questionseverything

(10,654 posts)
93. Yes that's assuming an honest count
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:43 AM
Mar 24

The cost to electronic elections isn’t cheap, election departments hire the consultants to enter the choices and questions at thousands of dollars per . I think paying some honor roll 4th graders to count the top two races as a check on the system and to have transparency is worth while.

aggiesal

(9,911 posts)
66. WOW 😳 ! ...
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:47 PM
Mar 23

Of course it will.
If no vote erasure or vote flips, the hand count would match the ballot reader.

Before ballot readers like ES&S & Diebold, all ballots were counted by hand.
The precinct workers would count the ballots until about 1 - 2 am and post the precinct results, so voters could see how the precinct voted. Then they would send the ballots to the Registrar office. No counting was done at the Registrar's office, they just went by the precinct numbers and the election was determined way before 6am.

If they do that now, when they run the ballots through the readers, and they find a numbers discrepancy, handcount would happen a second time and ballot read a second time If the discrepancy still remains the handcount would have precedence.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
70. What's the time lag between the vote count and finding numbers discrepancies?
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:59 PM
Mar 23

Did you read this part of the IT guy's info...because if at any point in the chain of vote custody there is digital counting, there can be changed/deleted votes through any pre-set codes.

It’s because Elon very quietly and rapidly built a low-orbit Direct-to-Cell constellation, in which 265 satellites were in place and operational just two weeks prior to the Nov 5 election.

I'm not going to argue that that's what happened, but the OP timeline of oligarch and corporate involvement seem plausible.


aggiesal

(9,911 posts)
76. Not from a handcount!!! ...
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:12 AM
Mar 24

Handcount removes all the electronics/computers/ballot readers out of the loop.

Why do you think they did the handcount in Arizona?
To prove the handcount numbers didn't match the ballot readers and prove Trump was correct.
Instead, the ballot readers got it wrong, but they ended up finding more votes for Biden.

Which numbers do you think they went with?
The numbers were changed to match the handcount.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
79. Okay, I'll take your word for it. I hope you're right. And we deserve a hand counted election
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:17 AM
Mar 24

in battlegrounds for once. That would be progress.

bluestarone

(19,430 posts)
126. Absolutely!!
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:50 PM
Mar 24

100%. I've always said we should check in a state we have control of!! They definitely cheated somehow. We have got to get this figured out BEFORE the 2026 election, for sure.

Wiz Imp

(4,628 posts)
82. It's been proven conclusively that hand counting ballots is less accurate than machine counts.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:40 AM
Mar 24

Elections can generally be hand counted quickly and accurately only when there is one or at most 2 races on the ballot.

questionseverything

(10,654 posts)
90. Hand counting the top two races would be a huge improvement
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:31 AM
Mar 24

Especially if hand counts were readily available if a problem showed itself

aggiesal

(9,911 posts)
95. There are multiple techniques to counting ballots, ...
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 02:41 AM
Mar 24

that would limit how many races to count when counting ballots with more than 2 races.
It takes longer but it gets done before the next day.

Be Leave On

(143 posts)
112. open source free software
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 11:39 AM
Mar 24

Any software that isn't opensource, freely auditable by all parties is less than trustworthy. Same goes for the hardware. There are too many ways machines can be corrupted, but with open systems, the machines are indeed more accurate and trustworthy than are hand counts with all the possibilities of human error and nefarious actors.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
47. That's one piece of evidence. Not enough, though. The rest to get is how they did it. And shut that down
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:48 PM
Mar 23

in time for 2024 and 2028. This thread is really about how, and who can/will get the hard evidence that supports the circumstantial evidence laid out here.

BoRaGard

(4,830 posts)
99. Indeed. He's let the actual truth slip out at least twice
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 07:11 AM
Mar 24

The GOP draft-dodging felon-rapist is proud of his corruption.

 

AmericaUnderSiege

(777 posts)
48. Nah, not like that.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 10:51 PM
Mar 23

This was a combination of unprecedented demographic targeting verging on personalized brainwashing in swing states; an entire enemy power's intelligence apparatus focused on propaganda; and us only having a small fraction of a normal campaign season to work with.

I say that as someone who will defend until the end of time that 2004 and 2016 were rigged to hell and back, by every possible vector.

What we witnessed was a circus. We saw Musk openly offering bribes for votes. Manufactured discontent in Michigan. A lot of noise, which points to psy-op that's a lot of work compared to an outright rig. Rigs push the narrative of "both sides," convince people they're powerless, and don't try to excite anyone - not even their own zombie voters. Energy is harder to control than despair. They don't seek out niche interests to bribe; instead they try to keep everyone else confused and uninvolved.

As for the satellite thing, you'd need the entire SpaceX organization to be involved, not just its owner. That's Moon Hoaxer level ridiculous. SpaceX (and Tesla, btw) are packed to the rafters with liberal Democrats, and always have been. Any whiff of what you're suggesting and the companies would just cease to function immediately. They're not some Kafka factory of a 100-year-old aerospace institution, they're idealists - and the ideals are the opposite of the path Elon Musk chose lately in some drug psychosis.

We just didn't have time, and our leaders simply refused to stand up for the fact that the Trump campaign was unconstitutional.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
52. Thanks for your thoughts. Some are highly arguable, but I'm not defending this, just laying out
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:04 PM
Mar 23

Last edited Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:57 AM - Edit history (1)

what the IT guy did about the players and timeline.

Okay if you think this is all about nothing. But me, if I were you, I'd rather err on the side of real investigations on the election tabulators and servers, and the aforementioned companies involved with Leonard Leo and Thiel, both connected to Musk and the felon. All down at Maralago a number of times in 2024.

 

AmericaUnderSiege

(777 posts)
57. Definitely throw their own election-denying words back at them.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:29 PM
Mar 23

They don't get to have it both ways. But for ourselves, we pretty much always succeed on turnout and moral clarity rather than the details of Republican crimes against democracy. So the fact of a GOP coup is something to mention, but not something to dwell on as the main point.

We've overcome coups twice now in this century alone. We'll do it again.

Personally, I'm more outraged by the open illegality of the regime than any question about how it came to power. This isn't a question of electoral method: The Constitution literally says these people are not allowed in power. Because people like them tried to destroy the country in the 1860s, and they're trying again now.

Until someone at least mentions that in an official context, we're not being serious.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
64. OF COURSE it's a question of electoral method. That's the point of the OP. It's not about
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:45 PM
Mar 23

how we've succeeded in the past. We HAVE the numbers. We know that.

And to your larger point, understand that the past doesn't offer lessons or formulas for solving what circumstantial evidence shows could have been going on six months ago. .

 

AmericaUnderSiege

(777 posts)
86. The past is literally the only source of lessons to learn from, by definition.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:59 AM
Mar 24

The GOP lives in a memory-free, totalitarian Ministry of Truth bubble where the past changes every second to make them feel better about themselves in the present. Despite the damage they do, there's really not much going on there: They're just a chemical spill masquerading as people.

But we remember things and learn from them, and one is that we win elections when we do them right. Democracy doesn't have an autopilot setting. It exists when we show up, and flickers out when we don't. That's it.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
87. I hear you. But I'm not sure how the past shows us how to overcome a Big Tech insurgency.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:08 AM
Mar 24

I hope it's mostly about people showing up, since it seems historically true that 90% of success is that. I hope you're right because we know there's righteous outrage out there. It's usually that print and digital media ignore human crowds these days until footage shows up on couple of prime time news sources, and even then corporate media downplay protests.

brakester

(301 posts)
133. I agree. Past history
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 03:24 PM
Mar 24

is not where our main focus should be.
These people, in a narrow way, are geniuses and I am bowled over by this world-shaking scheme! With emphasis on "World."

How long before F-Elon rules the world?

NowsTheTime

(1,081 posts)
53. Recounts of any April 1 House races. We need a realtime system where the person who just voted verifies electronically.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:10 PM
Mar 23

.....the vote they cast and real time camera recording of the vote tally simultaneously.

We go crazy to make sure the person is eligible to vote, but we never allow that person to verify that the was recorded correctly.

Then for absentee and such something else to record votes as they are tabulated.

Of course it's probably unrealistic for the short term, but it would settle a lot of questions.

It could still be a secret ballot.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
55. That's part of the problem. The vote tabulation systems. And Eaton Corp. And TrippLite.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:15 PM
Mar 23

And Direct-to-Cell and Palantir, which has been invested in and used by both the CIA and DoD.

I know my bar coded mail in ballot was burned because Florida does not send vote ballot verifications to voters. How I know is that I checked all the registrations and vote count sites that showed which states use voter verification and which don't.
FL's been cheating on both party registration numbers and vote counts since Gore in 2000.

NowsTheTime

(1,081 posts)
56. I'm not talking about voter being verified they voted, but voter verifying on who they voted for as a real time tally. .
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:24 PM
Mar 23

...with voter name not disclosed in that tally.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
60. Sure, that can be done. But it's after that, that we need to be concerned about.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:37 PM
Mar 23

Voters can walk away with verifications receipts -- though I and millions in Florida didn't get any
-- and they still won't guarantee an honest vote count if tabulators are used later.
Even a hand counted recount might not work. Because even verification slips can be lost, or counterfeited, or ... who knows.

Wiz Imp

(4,628 posts)
80. That would do nothing to assure people who are convinced there is cheating happening.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:23 AM
Mar 24

I'm not going to argue either way about the veracity of this election. However, allowing the voter to verify his/her vote was recorded correctly, while a very good thing, does nothing to guarantee votes are tabulated correctly. If every Harris voter got a verification that their vote was recorded for Harris, where is the guarantee that each of those votes are actually counted correctly in the final tabulation?

NowsTheTime

(1,081 posts)
100. My suggestion only addresses votes cast at precincts let's say. So Instead of the computer recordiing the vote count....
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 07:11 AM
Mar 24

a camera with a date time stamp records the displayed total (via a computer) votes in real time. What the camera records can be watched by auditors (from both parties.)
It sees that the vote which is verified by the voter (the voter only sees his tabulation but the camera records both the voters choices and the total vote change simultaneously.

..and no it doesn't address mail in votes, absentee votes, voter purges, or other means of voter suppression.

But it would make the count in precincts visible, verifiable in real time, and easily reviewed. You couldn't just delete votes after they are cast by some electronic program.

Bayard

(24,662 posts)
54. K&R, with BIG Bookmark
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:11 PM
Mar 23

Now, what do we do with this information? I'm sure top Dem movers and shakers already have it. Where's the cavalry?

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
58. ...
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:32 PM
Mar 23

We're called the "underground" for a reason. We know very well that when investigations are ongoing -- if there are any right now -- and if they're sealed by a court, we can't know one darn thing, right?

There were a lot of names left off the felon's list of people denied classified access -- Lloyd Austin, fired CISA employees, Obama, Joint Chiefs, and Silicon Valley oligarchs who have war rooms with the Pentagon. At this point, who knows what they know.

So who is the cavalry is, we might never know, and what they do might be completely under wraps until court filings begin by big trial firms. Because it's highly unlikely that the military will use any reason but illegal orders for its stopping the felon.

AncientOfDays

(229 posts)
62. I don't see
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:41 PM
Mar 23

I don't see how surge protectors and battery backups could access the computer CPU or memory.

I'd need a bit more product information - because the surge protectors and battery backups i;m familiar with would have no internet or computing capability.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
67. Me, neither, unless that's just what they publicly market, and not lesser known equipment.
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:49 PM
Mar 23

If Thiel's Polymarket was raided after Nov 5, there should be a look at what the other companies actually do in connection with elections, imo.

The way I see it, the Direct-to-Cell Stingray capability is the problem.

Meowmee

(8,375 posts)
63. Before a conspiracy becomes that
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:43 PM
Mar 23

it was often a conspiracy theory... find the evidence/proof and you have a conspiracy.

Lancero

(3,167 posts)
65. Tripp Lite isn't an "election security company" unless, of course, you consider the manufacture of surge protectors...
Sun Mar 23, 2025, 11:45 PM
Mar 23

To be an essential part of election security.

I'm not going to bother addressing any of the other BS in the post, as it is all directly related to the false assumption that Tripp Lite is an election security company.

Edit - Looked into Tripp Lite some more to see what sort of history they have. Hilariously, my search dug up the Reddit topic and Twitter screenshots that OPs supposed IT guy ripped all his commentary from.

https://www.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1ia7dkd/elons_role_in_stealing_the_us_election_explained/

Wiz Imp

(4,628 posts)
84. Nathan Taylor (from the original video in the post) has been making the rounds
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:51 AM
Mar 24

with people desperately looking for evidence of "cheating" in the 2024 election. Unfortunately his arguments are extremely weak and provide little to no credible evidence of anything.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
75. Thanks. I'll check with him about it.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:12 AM
Mar 24

So even if he used that info, does it prove the other posters are wrong? He just said there's a thread that could be pulled, and so if you just want to be right about his sourcing, fine. If it's from reddit, I read they're contracted with ChatGPT, but not sure.

Lancero

(3,167 posts)
88. The thread to be pulled is based on Tripp Lite being an election security company.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:18 AM
Mar 24

They're not. They manufacture various electronics protection equipment - Surge protectors, UPSs, circuit breakers, ect... They're not exactly an election security company, unless of course we're considering these pieces of equipment to be on the same level as a voting machine.

But hey, since you brought up ChatGPT, I suppose that explains why your 'IT Guy' ended up passing off stuff ripped from a Reddit post. Probably a spelling error. They mistyped Election Security into ChatGPT as Electronics Security (On second thought, it could also have been autocorrect.) and it ended up regurgitating, word for word, some of its training material.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
89. Yeah, maybe, but I think the Eaton Corp, Direct-to-Cell and Palantir are more important.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:28 AM
Mar 24

When stuff floats around the nets and gets mixed with some ChatGPT version used on one of the biggest internet sites, you never know. Reddit's lost some of its cred over that.

Lancero

(3,167 posts)
91. Yeah, a lot of people aren't willing to give AI manufactured content the light of day.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:32 AM
Mar 24

Dead Internet Theory has certainly gained a lot of traction in recent years.

That said, the connection to Eaton is dubious. They manufacture... Huh. Various electronics safety equipment - Surge protectors, battery backups, ect. A company that makes Surge Protectors buying a competitor is hardly a shocker - More often than not, it's the easiest way for a investor to get a return on their investment.

Like I said. The entire line of reasoning is dubious, since it's based entirely on the false belief that Tripp Lite is a election security company.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
94. I hear you about TrippLite. It's the crazy billionaire guy who owned it. Now I get it.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 02:08 AM
Mar 24

It's not based on the TrippLite donation to a Leonard Leo connection. The whole thing's premised on the timing of Musk's low orbit satellites lining up with Direct-to-Cell/Palantir/Thiel on this election deal. They invested in the felon & JD for a big payoff. Doing the same in Wisconsin.

Lancero

(3,167 posts)
97. Ah yes, the quietly built Direct-to-Cell network... So quietly built, that tech media was reporting on it in '22.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 05:08 AM
Mar 24
https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/08/forget-5g-wireless-spacex-and-t-mobile-want-to-offer-zero-g-coverage/

But where'd the media get this information? Well, the article is quite forthcoming with that information. They... Huh. Got it from a public event. That... oh. Was recorded, and put up on Youtube.

Quietly built my ass.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
105. The "public event" was an ANNOUNCEMENT, not a done deal. No one should be
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 09:15 AM
Mar 24

faulted for not knowing when it was already in place. Because Musk didn't give a start date in the announcement. There's a reason tech media I read -- ars technica, techdirt, techcrunch, slashdot, even EFF -- were kinda quiet about it, too.

So the IT guy was correct. It WAS quietly built -- meaning built AND launched.

What I read is this:

SpaceX and T-Mobile announced an ambitious plan on Thursday evening to provide ubiquitous connectivity from space...The project would ...will require SpaceX to finalize development of its second generation of Starlink satellites. These will be...Initially, at least, the service would not provide broadband Internet service. But in a typical cell of service, it should provide up to 2 to 4 megabits of data, enough for thousands of voice calls or millions of text messages. This would allow connectivity in areas off the grid, or during emergency situations such as when a hurricane knocks out service to a community.

A user's cell phone would look for service first from a cell phone tower, but when it did not detect this, instead of providing a user with no bars of service, the phone would search the sky. It would then draw connectivity from the nearest available satellite, with software on the satellite communicating to the mobile phone as if it were a virtual cell tower on the groun
d.

AFTER Musk quietly and rapidly -- don't forget rapidly, which is 265 satellites after the announcement -- the text above has spread as much as the T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T's announcements of having satellite contracts for Direct-to-Cell.

I get AT&T. It has not offered this direct to cell option.

Lancero

(3,167 posts)
143. You can't reasonably claim that something was "quietly built" when the company behind it publically announced...
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 05:13 PM
Mar 24

"Hey, look at what we're gonna be building!"

As for rapidly? SpaceX had spent years before hand building out the capability to launch thousands of satellites in a year. That they were able to allocate launch windows to put up a couple hundred satellites isn't a shock for a company that was already edging towards a hundred launches per year. All the necessary infrastructure, the lack of which would normally slow down a project like this, was built out years in advance. "Rapidly done!" Yeah, if you set the goalposts to after all that infrastructure was built out and established.

The only thing that has "Rapidly" happened is DU embracing the same election denialism we used to call out.


Lancero

(3,167 posts)
144. "How could we know for sure that DU isn't in on it?"
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 05:14 PM
Mar 24

This the type of argument that you're making here.

Sober Retiree

(27 posts)
71. Duh
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:04 AM
Mar 24

Of course it was. Corporate was OK with what was coming, national news media etc. I always get a kick out of well when we have enough proof we will launch an investigation, well we haven't even heard the usual line of bullshit. Whats it all mean ? Well were fucked and if you are still holding on to the hope that something, someone is going to rescue us , well keep dreaming. Back in the day people like Mike Molly and others were trying to rally the troops increase awareness of the coming storm , calling Americans sheeple well the storm has arrived. You can intellectualize all you can the truth is were fucked. Remember when the troops hit the streets, this was a well lubed machine that started the take over long ago. Now we play catch up and try to salvage what we can. So when you hear some dummy talking shit about Bernie or any other progressive, educate tell them to get their heads out of their ass and support what's being uncovered, support the protests call your reps tell them to do their fucking job. Enough whining this is the time for action. of course the election was rigged if one thinks otherwise, slap them on the side of the head and tell them they better wise up quick. Man this is depressing. Solidarity Brothers and Sisters

Tree Lady

(12,345 posts)
81. This is why Trump said he won in 2020
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:25 AM
Mar 24

and kept it up screaming it was a stolen election so when he did it if anyone said anything he would say your doing this because of what I said.

He is the master of blaming stuff he and his people do on us.

GoreWon2000

(1,417 posts)
83. The 2000 election was stolen by W
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:46 AM
Mar 24

and the grassroots sure knows it. That election theft made tRump possible. No one should forget this.

pat_k

(11,101 posts)
85. The data on vote suppression is pretty clear in past elections.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:58 AM
Mar 24

I have no doubt we will, once again, see disparate treatment and access.

Lines in populous areas that lean democratic is the most effective "riggin'"

And often, silly, silly Dems cheer and say "look at the turnout!" when in fact, you've just lost a minimum of 1 in 10 voters who never get in the line because they simply can't afford more than an hour to vote. Time is money and lines are a poll tax.

And where there is mail in voting, a FAR greater percentage of ballots cast in urban areas are rejected.

One thing that drove me nuts about defending against election deniers were the thousands of assurances of how well the system works when voter suppression is rampant and getting worse every cycle.

pnwmom

(109,816 posts)
96. I wonder if WA and NM machines are in that loop. Because both of those states use all paper ballots,
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 04:40 AM
Mar 24

which can be counted by hand if any discrepancies appear, and both of those states had results almost identical to 4 years earlier.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
106. I don't know because I'm not on twitter, and as far as I know, neither is the IT guy. Doesn't mean
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 09:28 AM
Mar 24

it didn't go viral, tho', and he picked it up elsewhere. Regardless, I suppose that in response to the video I sent him, he though his info would be plausible enough information that we hadn't known and might consider. I believe he added some of his own thinking, as well, though I don't know him well, but know of his work.

When it comes to questioning elections, it's important to consider the source. We understand that. But often, when a group's thinking gets summarized, and when it sounds condensed as it's passed on to an audience, it needs unpacking by the audience. Which is one of the reasons I offered the info here to file away in case we learn of related events.

returnee

(489 posts)
101. We are 1.5 yrs out from 2026.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 07:15 AM
Mar 24

My current prediction is that unless the digital subtrrfuge is exposed and destroyed we will not gain any ground in 2026, despite TSF and maga unpopularity.
This needs to be spread widely.

neohippie

(1,222 posts)
102. there is only speculation here about things people don't have much understanding
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 08:11 AM
Mar 24

This is a bunch of speculation about different technology that clearly people don't really have much understanding about

You can line up a bunch of different ideas without much depth or evidence about how the election was actually rigged, but any simple investigation into actual recounts would reveal any kind man in the middle data swap this seems like a lot of desperate people fishing for reasons to devalue the outcome of the election without any real proof just taking random news and stringing it along with a story that doesn't really fill in huge gaps with the details needed to prove anything

I am an IT guy for over 25 years that doesn't make me any kind of expert on hacking or election security and all the processes involved that check and balance voters and their votes

It just seems like a lot of wishful thinking that there is some kind of smoking gun evidence out there and people who are desperate enough to find a trail of breadcrumbs that they are ignoring huge gaps, or the fact that the breadcrumbs are not even made from the same kind of bread or dropped by the same people etc..

Sympthsical

(10,442 posts)
104. DU really needs to bring back the Creative Speculation forum with this stuff
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 08:56 AM
Mar 24

What we have here is erroneous copy pasta from AI that spit out total gobbledygook (that is, for some reason, presented as original information from an IT guy), and because people don't at all understand what they're reading - but it sounds ominous! - they can't recognize that this is total nonsense.

It is literally mushmouth, incoherent gibberish.

150 recs.

Woof.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
108. Sorry. I thought after sitting on the text for a week & checking the names & timeline out, that
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 10:51 AM
Mar 24

it was worth considering.

Lancero

(3,167 posts)
145. It's a grand conspiracy! Starlink used their satelites to hack their cars tires (Thiel owns Firestone stock!)...
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 05:27 PM
Mar 24

To make it impossible for all those voters to drive to the voting sites.



I wish the above wasn't necessary, but given how common election denialism these days I wouldn't be surprised if their were people who'd legitimately believe this.

Then again, maybe it is the truth. Maybe I'm just calling it sarcasm to trick people.

kimbutgar

(24,736 posts)
110. Will he try to mess with Canada's election in the next month?
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 11:02 AM
Mar 24

But I see how it was rigged and the muskrat owns the orange Hitler and installed him. So the orange monster can never go after him or get rid of him. Basically he made a deal with the pseudo devil elon.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
114. Good question! Better to ask what Canadian leadership thinks. We don't trust the felon, but
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:09 PM
Mar 24

are the Canadians prepared for the oligarchs' beta test "trying." About their satellite use...

from Google AI (but don't know how up-to-date it is):
While Canada and the US share some satellite systems for weather and communications, Canada also has its own satellites and systems, including the RADARSAT Constellation Mission and the Gray Jay constellation for remote surveillance.

Because as recently as last August Canada & the US were talking about
Canada strikes deal to use U.S. space tech, clearing way for rocket launch pad in N.S.

A new agreement between Canada and the United States is reigniting the possibility of a spaceport in rural Nova Scotia.

Federal cabinet minister and Nova Scotia MP Sean Fraser announced in Halifax Friday that the two countries have negotiated a Technology Safeguards Agreement, which would allow the use of U.S. space launch technology, expertise and data for space launches in Canada.

The agreement doesn't come into force until both countries independently review and approve it, and Fraser couldn't provide a timeline for that. But he said he expects each government to move forward immediately and quickly with their respective domestic approvals....


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/canada-deal-u-s-space-tech-rocket-launch-pad-1.7283679#:~:text=comments-,A%20new%20agreement%20between%20Canada%20and%20the%20United%20States%20is,massive%22%20development%20for%20his%20startup.

So this tariff war has likely negatively affects on Canada's other prior agreements.

Fil1957

(35 posts)
113. The above theory is interesting, but if it is true,
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:04 PM
Mar 24

it would be very hard to prove.

There is ample evidence that voter suppression caused the election to go in Trump’s favor according to Greg Palast, but unfortunately that is all legal.

However, whatever you believe, the bottom line is, and what we should be focused on, is that over 70 million people voted for a dangerous criminal like Trump. As long as there are that many people brainwashed, even if we win elections in the future, it’ll be very hard to accomplish anything of substance.

We should not go down the conspiracy rabbit hole even if the conspiracy is real; it’s a diversion. We must focus instead on why 70 million plus voted for Trump.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
116. Yes, that's the starting point of the OP. But
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:28 PM
Mar 24

I thought that, given the stakes, this nation does have the expertise to prove whether or not these actors changed and/or deleted votes in battlegrounds -- and it would take their tracking down evidence from those 6 states.

Evidence opens diehard believers up to reality. Even now, just the suffering of other Americans they live near is evidence enough to wake some of them up to how their votes indirectly caused unintended harms.

There are rabbit holes... agreed. I've seen my share, but this time, thought this info was different and worth thinking about as circumstantial.
If this timeline and actors' operations were to get into the hands of those with the means and expertise to investigate, all the more to the good.
If investigative entities were to decide not to investigate, we'd likely know when we don't read about results in the next year or so.
But keep in mind that unless well funded/expert investigative entities give reasons why they don't have sufficient cause, we can't likely know whether or not there was a there there.

Dark n Stormy Knight

(10,299 posts)
121. I don't have the expertise to evaluate all of this.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:03 PM
Mar 24

I do have the common sense to suspect, especially after now seeing what he was planning in great detail to gain by his influence on Trump and power he had confidence he'd be given, that Muskolini was extremely highly motivated to prevent Trump losing this election.

There's a lot you can do with billions & billions of dollars.

NJCher

(39,608 posts)
122. First hearing for hand count of 2024 just granted!
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:07 PM
Mar 24

Last edited Mon Mar 24, 2025, 04:25 PM - Edit history (1)

Please see my post at:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220171214

In response to lawsuit by Smart Elections. Rockland County, NY.

Note: revised my subject heading.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
137. Okay... I read the link and am confused. Are you granted a hearing? or granted a recount?
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 04:10 PM
Mar 24

Because the first doesn't necessarily mean the second follows...

colorado_ufo

(6,035 posts)
123. Remember when Trump said that he didn't need the votes?
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 01:32 PM
Mar 24

I knew then that the fix was in, and it was confirmed to me when I heard about the satellite connection before the election.

He always "telegraphs" information; he can't help himself.

Add Trump's remarks that, "You won't ever have to vote again."

1WorldHope

(1,123 posts)
127. There are millions of ways to confuse people.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 02:02 PM
Mar 24

I want so badly to make a difference in the world and stand on the side of truth. I listened to the pod cast and I read all of the text. It made perfect sense to me. Then I read the comments and there are people calling us fools to believe it. I am getting ready to volunteer a lot of time for Nebraska Democratic party to get out the vote. But, if the election was stolen by the tech bros then what is the point of working to get people to vote?
It never made sense to me that the plump felon won. America can't be that stupid! Sure, 30% stupid, but 60% stupid? I just don't know where to put my energies and this is eating up my "golden years".

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
152. So true. If people allow it.
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 06:05 AM
Mar 25

We are not the circumstances foisted upon us.
We are not what we are called. We are only what we answer to.

Don't worry. In your golden years you've got nothing to prove.

Here's the thing. Keep to your golden years. You don't have to be on the front lines. Just support those with the time and energy to create a better future, and choose wisely who you support.

1WorldHope

(1,123 posts)
154. You are incredibly kind and a wise person.
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 01:29 PM
Mar 25

I will keep your words in the back of my mind while I decide if I'm right for the action I already signed up for. I would rather feed people and give them rides and hugs when needed. I'm not sure if that opportunity will arise. I love reading everything you write. I spent a lot of my time yesterday on your post. We are all in this together, and there are more of us than them. We will persevere. 🕉️

Jeebo

(2,409 posts)
130. They're rigging elections out in the open, in plain view.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 02:18 PM
Mar 24

Gerrymandering, voter purges, voter intimidation, voter suppression. Greg Palast says Harris would have won several more states if it were not for the voter suppression in those states. If they'll do it in plain view, of course they'll do in surreptitious ways too.

-- Ron

Bluestocking

(36 posts)
131. Why so close
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 02:23 PM
Mar 24

If this is true why make the results by the thinnest of margins? Why not give themselves a larger majority it congress? The results were pretty consistent with the polls.

lees1975

(6,392 posts)
146. The polls were rigged too.
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 06:11 PM
Mar 24

They own the media that did this. It wouldn't sound plausible if Harris had maintained the 4-5 point lead she had, so they invented numbers to match what they were going to do. Same thing happening now, every media outlet owned by a billionaire every media outlet puffing Trump's job approval. It would be a lie if they reported it at 35%. It's no where near 42%.

tritsofme

(19,039 posts)
160. Strange that Harris stays so quiet about such an obvious and massive conspiracy, involving so many parties!
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 03:56 PM
Mar 25

I mean if it is so obvious to all of the absolute geniuses on the internet, Harris’ silence can only be explained by either gross incompetence, she is just too dumb to figure out what you all did, or she must have been a willing accomplice to the conspiracy.

Or…just hang with me here….the Trumpian conspiracy theories being peddled are nothing but silly nonsense.

ultralite001

(1,503 posts)
150. Looking at this problem from different angles...
Mon Mar 24, 2025, 08:05 PM
Mar 24

Perhaps paper used for ballots was manipulated before the election...

Treated to block votes for Harris...

Treated to record/fluoresce "invisible" votes for Krasnov...

Only revealed by scanner "magic"...

Such nanodot technology seems easily within the Musketeer's purview...
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-10406-7

Let's give the pirates + counterfeiters a hand...
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/05/25/2023-10770/future-strategies-in-anticounterfeiting-and-antipiracy

malaise

(282,688 posts)
153. I don't know enough about how any of this stuff works
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 07:21 AM
Mar 25

I start with a simple,e problem - how the hell,did this Convicted felon win every swing state. Smells really stink to me.

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
157. Wow, that's a new one. Never on God's green earth heard of that "perhaps... treated paper ballots" idea.
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 02:57 PM
Mar 25

It would be good if you'd post an excerpt from each of the links to help most folks here understand better, thx. I'm already running a Wayback archive version of the Nature link, but may you could excerpt the second?

If treating bar coded ballots could be done... Lord help us.



ultralite001

(1,503 posts)
159. What triggered the thought...
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 03:46 PM
Mar 25

was retention of scanned ballot images rather than actual ballots...

The actual ballors are the evidence...

Micro/nano dots embedded or applied to the ballots before or during printing would be destroyed after ballots are scanned. No trace
remains to validate against the scanned image.

This works for paper ballots... The process could be modified for touchscreens.

(Trump told us himself: "What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening.”)

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
161. So... what machines retain scanned ballot images rather than actual ballots? What are the machines called?
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 04:04 PM
Mar 25

Last edited Tue Mar 25, 2025, 05:10 PM - Edit history (2)

What states use them?
Are tabulators the same as vote scanning machines?
Do tabulators use scanned ballot images?

The public in general, and voters in each state ought to know
1) the chain of custody of ballots, from voter to certification;
2) if ballots are scanned, what percentage;
3) what machines do ballot scanning (if scanning is done), and how, where, and by whom; then finally,
4) the final destinations of all scanned ballot images and the final destination of all ballots filled out by voters, whatever form they take.

I've seen no maps of any chain of custody sequence.
There is no chain of custody made transparent to the voting public, from a voting precinct to the Sec of State's Board of Elections.
Neither does anyone see any named election person in charge of each stage of any state's vote ballot chain of custody.

None of the above are discussed on this site of the US Election Assistance Commission.
https://www.eac.gov/election-officials/election-results-canvass-and-certification

https://www.cisecurity.org/insights/spotlight/election-security-spotlight-chain-of-custody-is-crucial-for-election-offices

HopeAlive

(1 post)
155. 2024 Election questions
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 02:04 PM
Mar 25

Hello! I've been following the voting irregularities since november and in touch with the orgs that are doing the data crunching right now. This was great to find. I have a question though as it seems to be a big detail that is missing - can you share how your IT friend knows about the NATO art. 5 possibly being invoked? Is there anyway to find further information about that or why he knows about that? I'm trying to get press involved etc so as much info that's available, the better chance we have at getting this all to go public. There are current lawsuits happening to get access to the actual ballots, because that is what is needed to further prove that there was fraud. They have tons of data that show the irregularities and its overwhelming but need to see the ballots to prove it. I also have a missing link that I'm sure you would be interested in hearing about but I'll wait to share that until I hear back from you. Thanks! Mindy

ancianita

(40,236 posts)
156. Hi, Mindy! Welcome to DU.
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 02:50 PM
Mar 25

You explain what you're doing, but you don't explain your work, or more importantly,
how you know there are current lawsuits happening. If that were so, we on DU would know about them.

Who are the parties to the lawsuits? How do you know they have "tons of data that show irregularities"? Are the lawsuit filings on record with Court Listener or other docket sources?

Do you have links for your answers to the above questions?

Re your NATO question, the answers are pretty easily found from NATO's site and from the commons of the Internet, Wikipedia.
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_110496.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO

Look forward to your missing link and the rest. Cheers.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let's say you think this ...