General Discussion

Dennis Donovan

(31,059 posts) Sun Mar 30, 2025, 09:09 AM Mar 2025

Steve Vladeck: As of Friday, there have been 46 cases in which federal judges have blocked Trump policies.

Steve Vladeck
‪@stevevladeck.bsky.social‬
As of Friday, there have been 46 cases in which federal judges have blocked Trump policies.

The rulings in those cases have come from 39 different judges appointed by 5 different presidents (of both parties) to 11 different district courts across 7 different circuits.

Maybe it's not the judges?
March 30, 2025 at 9:15 AM

That's hopeful news!

As of Friday, there have been 46 cases in which federal judges have blocked Trump policies.

The rulings in those cases have come from 39 different judges appointed by 5 different presidents (of both parties) to 11 different district courts across 7 different circuits.

Maybe it's not the judges?
— Steve Vladeck (@stevevladeck.bsky.social) 2025-03-30T13:15:45.993Z

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Steve Vladeck: As of Friday, there have been 46 cases in which federal judges have blocked Trump policies. (Original Post) Dennis Donovan Mar 2025 OP

And I'm pretty sure that the USSC no_hypocrisy Mar 2025 #1

Not bad... rasputin1952 Mar 2025 #2

It seems to me HappyH Mar 2025 #3

How many of those rulings has the orange sack of shit complied with? Autumn Mar 2025 #4

That's the question kacekwl Mar 2025 #5

That's my thinking too. None on both. Autumn Mar 2025 #6

Good thing the Courts are open and the focus... yowzayowzayowza Mar 2025 #7

The courts are blocking man of trump's and Project 2025's plans LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2025 #8

no_hypocrisy

(54,194 posts)

1. And I'm pretty sure that the USSC

Reply to Dennis Donovan (Original post)

Sun Mar 30, 2025, 09:13 AM

Mar 2025

won't take ALL 46 cases to consider. That's about the number of cases it takes WITHOUT TSF's EO's.

rasputin1952

(83,497 posts)

2. Not bad...

Reply to Dennis Donovan (Original post)

Sun Mar 30, 2025, 09:17 AM

Mar 2025

Since we don't accept edicts from individuals who consider themselves gods.

HappyH

(172 posts)

3. It seems to me

Reply to Dennis Donovan (Original post)

Sun Mar 30, 2025, 09:24 AM

Mar 2025

that the firehose of unconstitutional EOs and actions by the administration fly in the face of the oath the Felon took to “…preserve, protect and defend the Constitution…”. Probably it’s just my quaint notion that leaders and other folks should at least try to uphold any oaths they may have uttered.