Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Watchfoxheadexplodes

(3,539 posts)
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 09:12 AM Apr 3

Just heard on Fox business ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

All major CFOs are now going over numbers to off set tarrifs.

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

unblock

(55,031 posts)
7. there is a small effect, in the sense that every business in the chain will absorb a portion of the cost, but the bulk
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 09:37 AM
Apr 3

of tariffs will be paid by consumers.

say something cost $100, but donnie slapped a $30 tariff on it. few, if any, businesses have margins that large, the can't fully absorb it even if they wanted to.

say the arrangement was the importer paid $100, they charged $125 to the distributor, who charged $160 to the retailer, who charged $200 to the consumer.

a best case scenario might be prices might change to $95, $115, $145, $180 respectively, ignoring the tariff.

but with the tariff (now $28.50 on the lower price of $95), it's actually $123.50, $143.50, $173.50, $208.50. So every business along the chain takes a hit and the end consumer still winds up seeing an $8.50 price increase.

in practice, most the numbers won't like this. most businesses aren't going to absorb $20 out of the $28.50 hit, more of it will be passed on to the consumer.

and as tariffs aren't listed on receipts, all anyone will really see is prices going up.

well, other than the CFOs, who will see sales and net revenue go down.

unblock

(55,031 posts)
8. more precisely, they will raise prices enough to minimize the damage to net profit.
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 09:40 AM
Apr 3

this means absorbing a (usually) small portion of the tax.

they have to find the new optimal point, increasing prices to the point where lower sales at the new price (higher for their customer, lower net for the business itself after tariffs) optimizes net profit.

Irish_Dem

(68,628 posts)
9. In other words, they are looking for that sweet spot.
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 09:46 AM
Apr 3

Taking into account the new variables, increased prices, lowered sales, lower net, etc.
They are going to lose as little as possible.

unblock

(55,031 posts)
10. yup. and that "sweet" spot usually involves taking only a small portion of the hit.
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 09:58 AM
Apr 3

it spreads around the pain to everyone involved, but no one ends up happy. except putin.

Irish_Dem

(68,628 posts)
11. Exactly. Spread the pain around. Putin is thrilled.
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 10:00 AM
Apr 3

Destroying American without firing a shot.
Causing pain, hardship, deaths.
He loves it.

sop

(13,815 posts)
5. Figuring out just how much of the tariffs they can pass on in price increases to American consumers before
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 09:23 AM
Apr 3

affecting either demand or profits.

Omnipresent

(6,852 posts)
6. They wouldn't want to yell, "Fire!" In a crowded theater.
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 09:24 AM
Apr 3

So they are saying instead โ€œWe need to offset ourselves from the flames and smokeโ€.
In this way, only we get burned!

lanlady

(7,209 posts)
13. I've got a better idea
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 10:45 AM
Apr 3

Why not get Mikey J on the phone and demand he get the House together to vote to overrule the tariffs? Or else no more big checkies to any GOP

Latest DiscussionsยปGeneral DiscussionยปJust heard on Fox busines...