Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

senseandsensibility

(24,205 posts)
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 02:36 PM Apr 2025

NYT sanewashing knows no bounds

How's this for a headline meant to normalize and downplay the complete insanity of tariffs? Trump's Tariffs are Latest Sign of His Second-Term Appetite for Risk

I tweaked it for them, in case they're ever interested in rejoining the reality-based world: Trump's Tariffs are Based on Lies and Will Tank the US Economy for No Reason

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT sanewashing knows no bounds (Original Post) senseandsensibility Apr 2025 OP
The NYTs apologists here will just poo-poo it and tell us jrthin Apr 2025 #1
Let them read art senseandsensibility Apr 2025 #2
The cases they are failing at are the cases that seriously hurt us and can destroy. jrthin Apr 2025 #8
Is the article not fact-based? maxsolomon Apr 2025 #11
It doesn't contain any criticism; it's pretty much "he's in control now" muriel_volestrangler Apr 2025 #14
Thank you senseandsensibility Apr 2025 #17
Please stop it. It doesn't matter if the article is accurate or not. jrthin Apr 2025 #15
A lot of work goes into writing headlines senseandsensibility Apr 2025 #16
Responding to Reply #2. maxsolomon Apr 2025 #18
But most don't read full articles SocialDemocrat61 Apr 2025 #19
There seem to be a few SocialDemocrat61 Apr 2025 #12
I agree that is strange senseandsensibility Apr 2025 #13
I wish I could recommend your post a millions times! jrthin Apr 2025 #21
I guess that on December 7, 1941, the Japanese demonstrated that steel is Wonder Why Apr 2025 #3
Perfect! senseandsensibility Apr 2025 #4
Jeebus, that is a terrible headline Redleg Apr 2025 #5
Too true senseandsensibility Apr 2025 #7
Several respondents called them out for it AStern Apr 2025 #6
Glad to hear they were called out senseandsensibility Apr 2025 #20
Should be 'Appetite for Destruction' SocialDemocrat61 Apr 2025 #9
Welcome to the Jungle EnergizedLib Apr 2025 #10
They may be afraid of the ire of Trump, but ReRe Apr 2025 #22
Probably both senseandsensibility Apr 2025 #23

senseandsensibility

(24,205 posts)
2. Let them read art
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 03:01 PM
Apr 2025

or something? The NYT has a serious obligation to provide fact based news especially during times like these. They are failing in many (not all) cases.

jrthin

(5,215 posts)
8. The cases they are failing at are the cases that seriously hurt us and can destroy.
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 03:49 PM
Apr 2025

An example, by normalizing this insane man they allow many to view what he's doing as normal.

muriel_volestrangler

(105,496 posts)
14. It doesn't contain any criticism; it's pretty much "he's in control now"
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 04:22 PM
Apr 2025

Archive link: https://archive.ph/HRCdu

It's the epitome of "this is all normal, nothing to see here."

senseandsensibility

(24,205 posts)
17. Thank you
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 04:31 PM
Apr 2025

I suppose one could write an article with no factual errors about the Covid pandemic that did not assign blame to anyone or call out any lies. Often what is omitted is the real culprit and by doing that, you do not give the reader a clear picture of the truth.

jrthin

(5,215 posts)
15. Please stop it. It doesn't matter if the article is accurate or not.
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 04:24 PM
Apr 2025

The accuracy or lack thereof is not the point I'm trying to make. What matters is the headline. Many people only look at the headlines and inform themselves from that perspective.

senseandsensibility

(24,205 posts)
16. A lot of work goes into writing headlines
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 04:29 PM
Apr 2025

Last edited Thu Apr 3, 2025, 05:39 PM - Edit history (1)

I remember having to get them approved by the editor when I wrote for my college paper. They are supposed to summarize the most important parts of the article. Because of that, it would be journalistic malpractice to write a headline like that to summarize an article that was critical of the policy.

maxsolomon

(38,108 posts)
18. Responding to Reply #2.
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 05:40 PM
Apr 2025

You weren't Reply #2. SenseandSensibility was.

If all that matters is the headline, why have articles at all? More fool me for reading them.

SocialDemocrat61

(6,656 posts)
19. But most don't read full articles
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 05:43 PM
Apr 2025

They read headlines only. Some may read a paragraph or two but most don’t read the whole article.

SocialDemocrat61

(6,656 posts)
12. There seem to be a few
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 04:12 PM
Apr 2025

who think this is corporate media underground instead of Democratic Underground, spending a lot of time defending billion dollar media corporations like NYT and CNN as well as millionaire celebrities like Bill Maher.

Wonder Why

(6,512 posts)
3. I guess that on December 7, 1941, the Japanese demonstrated that steel is
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 03:18 PM
Apr 2025

not impervious and 4 years later, the Americans showed a new urban renewal technique.

Redleg

(6,808 posts)
5. Jeebus, that is a terrible headline
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 03:24 PM
Apr 2025

Trump does have a great appetite for risk- when he's risking other people's money and livelihoods.

senseandsensibility

(24,205 posts)
7. Too true
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 03:44 PM
Apr 2025

And he's never faced any consequences for risking anything of his own. Of course the last thing he cares about is the well being of his fellow citizens. These tariffs are extremely dangerous and the NYT is obligated to inform its readers of that. It is not an opinion.

ReRe

(12,164 posts)
22. They may be afraid of the ire of Trump, but
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 05:49 PM
Apr 2025

I think the one they are really afraid of is Mu$k.

senseandsensibility

(24,205 posts)
23. Probably both
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 06:12 PM
Apr 2025
But journalists should be in the business of standing up to power, not withering in the face of it.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT sanewashing knows no ...