Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sop

(17,280 posts)
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 06:09 PM Apr 2025

11 Bluesky texts from Senator Chris Murphy, posted overnight to explain what Trump's tariffs are really all about:

1/ Those trying to understand the tariffs as economic policy are dangerously naïve. No, tariffs are a tool to collapse our democracy. A means to compel loyalty from every business that will need to petition Trump for relief.

2/ This week you will read many confused economists and political pundits who won't understand how the tariffs make economic sense. That's because they don't. They aren't designed as economic policy. The tariffs are simply a new, super dangerous political tool.

3/ You see, our founders created a President with limited and checked powers. They specifically put the power of spending and taxation in the hands of the legislature. Why?
Because they watched how kings and despots used spending and taxes to control their subjects.

4/ British kings used taxation to reward loyalty and punish dissent. Our own revolution was spurred by the King's use of heavy taxation of the colonies to punish our push for self-governance. The King's message was simple: stop protesting and I'll stop taxing.

5/ Trump knows that he can weaken (and maybe destroy) democracy by using spending and taxation in the same way. He is using access to government funds to bully universities, law firms and state and local governments into loyalty pledges.

6/ Healthy democracies rely on an independent legal profession to maintain the rule of law, independent universities to guard objective truth and provide forums for dissent to authority, and independent state/local government to counterbalance a powerful federal government.

7/ But the private sector also plays a rule to protect democracy. Independent industry has power. The tariffs are Trump's tool to erode that independence. Now, one by one, every industry or company will need to pledge loyalty to Trump in order to get sanctions relief.

8/ What could Trump demand as part of a quiet loyalty pledge? Public shows of support from executives for all his economic policy. Contributions to his political efforts. Promises to police employees' support for his political opposition.

9/ The tariffs are DESIGNED to create economic hardship. Why? So that Trump has a straight face rationale for releasing them, business by business or industry by industry. As he adjusts or grants relief, it's a win-win: the economy improves and dissent disappears.

10/ And once Trump has the lawyers, colleges and industry under his thumb, it becomes very hard for the opposition to have any viable space to maneuver. Trump didn't invent this strategy. It's the playbook for democratically elected leaders who want to stay in power forever.

11/ The tariffs aren't economic policy. They are political weapons. But as long as we see this clearly, we can stop him. Public mobilization is working. Today, a few Republicans joined Democrats to vote against one set of tariffs.

The people still have the power.

50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
11 Bluesky texts from Senator Chris Murphy, posted overnight to explain what Trump's tariffs are really all about: (Original Post) sop Apr 2025 OP
Pump and dump enid602 Apr 2025 #1
Or tank stocks to buy them cheaply. Chemical Bill Apr 2025 #17
Trump is using the tariffs to get control of the US. Irish_Dem Apr 2025 #2
Great analysis by Sen Murphy. + reminder of our power nt delisen Apr 2025 #3
Get thee to the greatest page malaise Apr 2025 #4
Congress could undo ALL of this tomorrow if they chose to. Scrivener7 Apr 2025 #5
If only we had a Legislative branch in government! n/t leftstreet Apr 2025 #24
Mike Johnson is blocking it flamingdem Apr 2025 #34
"every industry or company will need to pledge loyalty to Trump"." Australians were talking about this yesterday Demovictory9 Apr 2025 #6
The Aussies also told him to fuck off PortTack Apr 2025 #42
That is 100% correct, and once the game is public knowledge bucolic_frolic Apr 2025 #7
Where is the something being done and where can i see it? Terry_M Apr 2025 #10
As I see it, we are stuck with Trump for four years. Lonestarblue Apr 2025 #40
Vance will not be worse-- he doesn't control the cult. But otherwise it is all terrible, especially the loss of science LymphocyteLover Apr 2025 #45
I see this as key birdographer Apr 2025 #50
This is really good interpretation.... hlthe2b Apr 2025 #8
Murphy gets it. dem4decades Apr 2025 #9
Yep ibegurpard Apr 2025 #11
Really Good Analysis CitizenZero Apr 2025 #12
thanks for this stillcool Apr 2025 #13
Hear the people sing Gray Champion Apr 2025 #14
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2025 #49
I like how he referenced the revolutionary times crud Apr 2025 #15
Great Post! Thank You!!! MayReasonRule Apr 2025 #16
This is critical information. Concise, to the point, and easily understood by everyone (well, almost everyone). wordstroken Apr 2025 #18
Absolutely correct. He is trying to cause as much damage as possible relayerbob Apr 2025 #19
Small businesses will KT2000 Apr 2025 #20
While the points may be true, I think that to 47 it is simpler than that. pat_k Apr 2025 #21
I would love to know how involved he is babylonsister Apr 2025 #25
Krugman had a similar, if more straightforward, analysis. Martin68 Apr 2025 #22
Just went to Bluesky and read the thread.. Diabolical.. Trump isn't smart enough to figure this out Joinfortmill Apr 2025 #23
A keeper for sure! calimary Apr 2025 #26
And an even scarier possibility about his rise to 'absolute power'... LaRaven Apr 2025 #27
Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein retread Apr 2025 #28
Good Book CitizenZero Apr 2025 #29
K&R n/t Alice Kramden Apr 2025 #30
He wants the world leaders on their Figarosmom Apr 2025 #31
Most if not all will not go along. China, Canada, Australia and all of the EU other than Trkiye and Hungary are nos PortTack Apr 2025 #43
Baron von Trumphausen WhatTheFlux Apr 2025 #32
KNR and bokmarking. niyad Apr 2025 #33
Kick and rec LiberalLovinLug Apr 2025 #35
Simply, that thing in the White House is attacking us. Six117 Apr 2025 #36
My senator is getting lots of good press lately...dare I hope he aspires to higher office? CTyankee Apr 2025 #37
Kick for the morning crows n/t malaise Apr 2025 #38
EXACTLY. Tariffs are EXTORTION. Martin Eden Apr 2025 #39
K&R WestMichRad Apr 2025 #41
His Point #4 is ahistoric. malthaussen Apr 2025 #44
I think history is full of examples of rulers using taxation as a punishment LymphocyteLover Apr 2025 #47
I think this is possible but the problem I see is that how many entities affected will really be able to negotiate with LymphocyteLover Apr 2025 #46
I'm really digging Murphy these days, but... returnee Apr 2025 #48

enid602

(9,608 posts)
1. Pump and dump
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 06:16 PM
Apr 2025

12: the on again, off again way that Trump has threatened and applied (and will no doubt continue to adjust) these tariffs have presented him and his cronies many opportunities to ‘pump and dump’ stocks. Should make billions.

Chemical Bill

(3,032 posts)
17. Or tank stocks to buy them cheaply.
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 07:30 PM
Apr 2025

Or bet stocks will fall and then make them.

He (they) can make lots of money from this.

Demovictory9

(37,113 posts)
6. "every industry or company will need to pledge loyalty to Trump"." Australians were talking about this yesterday
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 06:24 PM
Apr 2025

that they understood Trump's psychology. he wants to be seen as the power, the one you have to go crawling to.

Discussion on Australian news yesterday.

bucolic_frolic

(53,792 posts)
7. That is 100% correct, and once the game is public knowledge
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 06:33 PM
Apr 2025

some plans can be made to do something about it, the people know what's going on, they pressure their representatives, the media might even report it here or there. Also our (former) allies are helping us by shunning this entire fiasco. This has been a blitzkrieg for some reason. If Trump had done this slowly it's possible few would have noticed, but this is shock treatment.

Nonetheless, BlueSky is not exactly something seen by all, so work must be done.

Terry_M

(817 posts)
10. Where is the something being done and where can i see it?
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 06:45 PM
Apr 2025

It seems like this situation will start causing harm quickly.
Seems like one swift way to block most of the devolution would be for other countries to start sanctioning or fully banning future business with companies that and business leaders that play ball here.
If bezos buys trump coin to ease china sanctions, great for him. Sanction amazon in your own country. If amazon can pay into trump's coffers, they can pay Canada or France too.

Lonestarblue

(13,195 posts)
40. As I see it, we are stuck with Trump for four years.
Fri Apr 4, 2025, 08:16 AM
Apr 2025

Republicans would not impeach him if he declared the Constitution null and void and declared himself king. He could then issue his own charter for the US, most of which has already been written by the Heritage Foundation as Project 2025.

I’m not sure we should be hoping for his impeachment because Vance could be even worse. He is totally in the pockets of the tech billionaires and the Heritage Foundation nihilists. And all they plan to create is an oligarchy ruled by wealthy white men whose religious views belong in the 1800s.

I fear we are in for a rough four years with no idea what will be left standing and what will be destroyed beyond repair for generations to come. Our scientific community comes to mind. Established scientists are taking jobs in Canada and other countries, but many fewer younger scientists and doctoral students are being trained because there is no money. One commenter to a NYT piece said no problem, the billionaires will simply step up and fund private research, which is a problem. They will fund no basic research that the NIH funds, only the research they can monetize. We are losing a decade at least of future scientists.

LymphocyteLover

(9,298 posts)
45. Vance will not be worse-- he doesn't control the cult. But otherwise it is all terrible, especially the loss of science
Fri Apr 4, 2025, 01:34 PM
Apr 2025

my profession

birdographer

(2,937 posts)
50. I see this as key
Fri Apr 4, 2025, 05:57 PM
Apr 2025

We need the other countries to cease all business and trade with companies that kneel to trump. Let those companies be stuck with only doing business in the US, and we have active lists of who they are and we will also refuse to do business with them. Therefore, show all the loyalty you want to trump, but your business will fail miserably as a result. Everything trump touches dies, and that will not be changing any time soon.

ibegurpard

(17,073 posts)
11. Yep
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 06:51 PM
Apr 2025

Someone's been whispering in Trump's ear to prop up his obsession with tariffs but this is the real play

crud

(1,190 posts)
15. I like how he referenced the revolutionary times
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 07:15 PM
Apr 2025

No taxation without representation. With tariffs and pardons he claims a kings power.

wordstroken

(1,402 posts)
18. This is critical information. Concise, to the point, and easily understood by everyone (well, almost everyone).
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 07:31 PM
Apr 2025

Excellent job, Senator Murphy. Let’s hope this message gets out there.

Thanks for posting, sop!

relayerbob

(7,352 posts)
19. Absolutely correct. He is trying to cause as much damage as possible
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 07:54 PM
Apr 2025

And force the American people to their knees in front of him.

pat_k

(12,663 posts)
21. While the points may be true, I think that to 47 it is simpler than that.
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 08:12 PM
Apr 2025

Last edited Thu Apr 3, 2025, 09:12 PM - Edit history (2)

Yes, 47 undoubtedly recognizes his tariffs can be leveraged to bring the powerful to heel, but I don't think that is what is driving his obsession with them.

47 is simpleminded. Taxing great wealth and income to benefit the common weal is an affront to him. His obsession with tax cuts is driving his obsession with tariffs. To him, tariffs represent massive federal revenue. That's all. He has no vision of using tariffs as economic policy. He just sees dollar signs. He views the federal government coffers as the president’s personal piggy bank from which he can dole out benefits to those he sees as peers (other rich guys). That's it. He doesn't care what it does to the economy. In his head, any loss in GDP is just being sucked into the federal coffers. Then it's "his" money to hand out in massive tax cuts for the wealthy.

The worthwhile people (those with great wealth) must keep “their” money (never mind they couldn’t make that money without the support of the public sector, educated workforce, infrastructure, and on and on). No one and nothing else matters.

In his pea brain, the fact his tariffs probably represent the most massive and regressive tax increase in history is a feature, not a bug.

I think he has the same view toward the so-called "savings" from decimating the executive branch. Never mind that the operations of executive agencies represent a very small fraction of the federal budget (don't know who coined it, but from a budgetary perspective, the U.S. government is basically an insurance company with an army). He doesn't care. He sees dollar signs. It’s “his” money and he is absolutely confident “his” Congress with go along with whatever he wants to do with it.

babylonsister

(172,544 posts)
25. I would love to know how involved he is
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 08:48 PM
Apr 2025

in our current reality and who's really calling the shots.

Joinfortmill

(19,907 posts)
23. Just went to Bluesky and read the thread.. Diabolical.. Trump isn't smart enough to figure this out
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 08:33 PM
Apr 2025

So, who is behind this? Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation? This is damn scary, people.

LaRaven

(222 posts)
27. And an even scarier possibility about his rise to 'absolute power'...
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 09:03 PM
Apr 2025

he could appoint an ‘heir’ to the throne.

Figarosmom

(9,642 posts)
31. He wants the world leaders on their
Thu Apr 3, 2025, 11:19 PM
Apr 2025

Knees before him, begging him to deal with them, when they wouldn't before. It's worldwide extortion.

PortTack

(35,810 posts)
43. Most if not all will not go along. China, Canada, Australia and all of the EU other than Trkiye and Hungary are nos
Fri Apr 4, 2025, 11:13 AM
Apr 2025

Which they are so broke, not sure they have money to buy their way out of tariffs

Six117

(297 posts)
36. Simply, that thing in the White House is attacking us.
Fri Apr 4, 2025, 05:49 AM
Apr 2025

The United States of America is under attack by domestic enemies.

CTyankee

(67,737 posts)
37. My senator is getting lots of good press lately...dare I hope he aspires to higher office?
Fri Apr 4, 2025, 06:09 AM
Apr 2025

I'd like to see that. He's a really great Senator and should be supported by all good Dems.

Martin Eden

(15,314 posts)
39. EXACTLY. Tariffs are EXTORTION.
Fri Apr 4, 2025, 06:52 AM
Apr 2025

These tariffs are the tool of a despot, the purpose of which is to compel obedience to his demands.

LymphocyteLover

(9,298 posts)
46. I think this is possible but the problem I see is that how many entities affected will really be able to negotiate with
Fri Apr 4, 2025, 01:36 PM
Apr 2025

the WH? It doesn't seem practical except for a few special insiders. That means the vast majority of businesses are screwed

returnee

(797 posts)
48. I'm really digging Murphy these days, but...
Fri Apr 4, 2025, 04:46 PM
Apr 2025

…he and many are missing what I thing is a slightly bigger picture item: helping Putin.
Russia got no tariffs despite a substantial trade imbalance. Given the enormity of TSF tariffs move, I consider it a huge tell that Russia was spared. Even the penguins got tariffed but not Russia. Add this to all his other pro-Putin moves, the specter of SERIOUS kompromat raises its ugly head once again. And not just with TSF but all the other politicians who once rightly castigated TSF then switched sides abruptly. This includes any number of the current maga Kongress rats, 2/3 of Scotus, but also Manchin, Sinema, and now Fetterman, and I wouldn’t necessarily exclude Schumer and others. I suspect Putin’s got TSF by the neck and kompromat shit flows downhill fast in the digital era. When TSF says, “Russia, Russia, Russia,” he means it.

To me, this pulls it all together.
YMMV.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»11 Bluesky texts from Sen...