Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

surfered

(11,535 posts) Fri Apr 4, 2025, 09:04 AM Apr 2025

RFK, Jr admits 20% of DOGE cuts to HHS were a mistake and there need to be rehires.

Just another instance of incompetence, with no planning or forethought to these layoffs.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/04/rfk-jr-doge-cuts

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

RFK, Jr admits 20% of DOGE cuts to HHS were a mistake and there need to be rehires. (Original Post) surfered Apr 2025 OP

Worm boy and the Clustertrump underpants Apr 2025 #1

What a goat-fuck this is turning out to be. Ocelot II Apr 2025 #2

Who knew a (former ?) heroin user, who doesn't believe in science and data, and who likes to play with.. Botany Apr 2025 #3

underpants

(194,911 posts)

1. Worm boy and the Clustertrump

Reply to surfered (Original post)

Fri Apr 4, 2025, 09:08 AM

Apr 2025

🙄

Ocelot II

(129,076 posts)

2. What a goat-fuck this is turning out to be.

Reply to surfered (Original post)

Fri Apr 4, 2025, 09:13 AM

Apr 2025

When you hire clowns you're going to get a circus. And this is The Dumbest Show On Earth.

Botany

(76,398 posts)

3. Who knew a (former ?) heroin user, who doesn't believe in science and data, and who likes to play with..

Reply to surfered (Original post)

Fri Apr 4, 2025, 09:20 AM

Apr 2025

… dead animal bodies would make bad choices. Even if the hire back some of the laid off
scientists some of the “cell lines” that researchers have been kept going for years might be
lost.

I hope if the workers go back they get back pay and demand that the other workers get rehired.

Reply to this discussion