Kiss the ring. Or replace the word "ring" with your choice of words.

We do not have a free press any long, at least not in the traditional form.

If their articles about the mass protests are fighting for space, it's because the rest of the front page is about Trump's tariffs, dismantling agencies, rewriting history, etc.

Straight news stories do not seem to me to have been limited. Lots are critical of this administration’s actions.

See the free links I posted below.

the demonstrations yesterday. It was the second from the top story yesterday. I don’t know how you stay on top of their articles if you don’t actually subscribe. If you have a trick to do this, please tell!

So give it a rest, please.

Their editorial section left a better feeling regarding approval of his antics lately. Hardly a disappointment to the many of us who are more and more appalled by him.

Why, I’m shocked! Shocked I tell you!!

Just look at front pages of US newspapers

Minimal coverage.
Below the ‘fold’ maybe.

Or no covering at all

Look at today’s front pages …..
https://www.frontpages.com/us-newspapers/

I had to work a double yesterday, I kept checking the news but didn't find much of anything until I signed on here

Those papers work for the billionaires who now run our government.

It's only worth it for them if Police Officers riot.

He was on MSNBC on Friday. Said their change of editorial policy was the reason why.

since Bezos has made his intentions clear as to how he expects his employees ( I won't call them writers or reporters) to cover the news. No, I'm not surprised as to how these oligarch newspapers covered the protests yesterday. Had they covered it otherwise, I'd be in shock.

They also have given more prominent space to some conservatives, but they are in the distinct minority.

The actual front page, not just a footnote at the bottom of the front page (like the Washington Post)

below the fold. The article is on page 19, deep inside the paper.

I was responding to someone who said they really had to search for the NYTimes coverage, as opposed to the post, which was at least on the front page.

Both were on the front page, and NYT was more prominent.

I made no comment on whether the coverage was adequate - merely that the NYTimes was on the front page, as opposed to the note in the footer in the Post.

The four pictures above are bigger. But I get your point.

Don’t see any major coverage of the protests in either

and a photograph of the protesters doesn't count? I get it.

?

There is no such headline! Period.

A tiny photo, with a tiny tiny font few words IS NOT A HEADLINE

I had to try really hard to even find that so-called “Headline” you mentioned.
It’s really a photo caption, in no way would it ever be considered a “headline”

——-
DEFINITION
Photo captions, also known as cutlines, are a few lines of text used to explain and elaborate on published photographs. In some cases captions and cutlines are distinguished, where the caption is a short title/explanation for the photo, while the cutline is a longer, prose block under the caption, generally describing the photograph, giving context, or relating it to the article

below the fold is not major coverage.

to anybody who can read where the story is.

It’s on page 19, deep inside the paper.

Essentially NOTHING.

Minimal coverage.
Almost completely hidden at very very bottom for WPost

NYTIMES is merely a photo, that’s below the fold,
And that ‘protest’ photo is hidden by the other 4 LARGE PHOTOS at the top headline area

So it’s correct to say there is almost NO COVERAGE AT ALL.
It’s the typical BS ‘coverage minimum’ so they can say ‘we covered it’

happened way back in october before the election when Bezos forced the editorial board not to endorse Kamala. They lost 250K subscribers so what are you waiting for

Address: letters@washpost.com

Would you mind telling me why you are not covering the massive protests across
the country yesterday? Are you out of touch with reality? Are you not the free press
anymore?

They addressed it but not in bold and no pix on the front page and it wasn't even mentioned until below the fold. Still was pitiful and totally insufficient to this wonderful day!

More people watch local news programs than the network news.

And I can say here in South Central PA, it was the top story on all the local news channels yesterday at 6:00 pm AND 11:00 pm and even in this morning's newscasts. And they spent a considerable amount of time on it as well. I was pleasantly surprised that they gave it as much attention as they did.

No paywall for the Post:
https://wapo.st/4i12zgc

Mass protests across the U.S. signal opposition to Trump, Musk
April 5, 2025 at 2:04 p.m. EDT


No paywall for the Times:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/05/us/politics/trump-protests-hands-off-saturday.html?unlocked_article_code=1.9k4.nHKm.060OQPxknjd4&smid=url-share

POLITICS
Anti-Trump Protests Try to Reach the Newly Alarmed
The rallies on Saturday are being held all over the country and emphasize cuts to health care, Social Security and education.
By Katie Benner

When I clicked the news headline to go to the story yesterday, it was preceded by a video clip depicting wildly burning teslas on a different day.



The implication was that whoever set fire to the vehicles was connected to the April 5 protests. In other words, NBC is trying to paint us all as arsonists.



And I wouldn't be surprised to learn that some of the car arson was done by MAGAs. Typical Nazi tactic to try and frame the opposition.

ZERO pictures on the front page and the only mentions on the front page are a very small blurb below the fold!

It was billed as an Anti Trump event by them. They set the tone when in fact it was the urgency of the Constitution and pillaging of citizens private information that woke the people up. The signs at our rally had very little mention of T or E! Next rally is the 19th I believe. We need a clearer message. Our local paper had zero acknowledgement of a rally that brought over 550 people. The largest group we have ever seen. The paper is owned by Gannett.

that the MSM was not covering how Obama allowed 911 to happen!! Why aren’t they getting 24/7 coverage?

in The World Says NO to War Rallies across the World.

I was three and couldn't wait to see what was on the Front page right in their City@

Fuckers Wanted WAR