Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWaPo: Lutnick's economically incoherent and contradictory commentary
WaPo - (archived: https://archive.ph/xYmuI ) Lutnicks economically incoherent and contradictory commentary
The Commerce secretary is constantly on television, but his claims dont make much sense.
May 8, 2025 at 5:00
Analysis by Glenn Kessler
You can hardly turn on the television without catching an interview with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, a billionaire and former Wall Street executive. But much of what he says is economically incoherent and contradictory. Heres a guide to Lutnicks talking points and whats wrong about them. (A Commerce Department spokesman did not respond to a detailed request for comment.)
Tariffs arent a big deal
This flies in the face of basic economics. Economists agree that tariffs essentially a tax on domestic consumption are paid by importers, such as U.S. companies, which in turn pass on most or all of the costs to consumers or producers who may use imported materials in their products. As a matter of demand and supply elasticities, overseas producers will pay part of the tax if there are fewer goods sold to the United States. Moreover, because imported goods are more expensive, domestic producers will raise their prices to the level imposed on importers.
Lutnick often goes on to say that companies can avoid tariffs by simply making products in the United States. Even so, domestic manufacturers will price their products higher to match the cost of imported goods. After all, why give up that potential profit?
Great jobs will come for robots
Lutnick frequently brings up the iPhone as the type of product that can be made in the United States.
/snip
The Commerce secretary is constantly on television, but his claims dont make much sense.
May 8, 2025 at 5:00
Analysis by Glenn Kessler
You can hardly turn on the television without catching an interview with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, a billionaire and former Wall Street executive. But much of what he says is economically incoherent and contradictory. Heres a guide to Lutnicks talking points and whats wrong about them. (A Commerce Department spokesman did not respond to a detailed request for comment.)
Tariffs arent a big deal
A 10 percent tariff is not going to change virtually any price. The only price it would change would be a product that we dont make here, like a mango.
Lutnick, remarks during an interview on CNBC, April 29
This flies in the face of basic economics. Economists agree that tariffs essentially a tax on domestic consumption are paid by importers, such as U.S. companies, which in turn pass on most or all of the costs to consumers or producers who may use imported materials in their products. As a matter of demand and supply elasticities, overseas producers will pay part of the tax if there are fewer goods sold to the United States. Moreover, because imported goods are more expensive, domestic producers will raise their prices to the level imposed on importers.
Lutnick often goes on to say that companies can avoid tariffs by simply making products in the United States. Even so, domestic manufacturers will price their products higher to match the cost of imported goods. After all, why give up that potential profit?
Great jobs will come for robots
Lutnick frequently brings up the iPhone as the type of product that can be made in the United States.
We invent the iPhone, which is awesome. Why do we let everyone else build it? Why can't we build it here? We need hundreds of thousands of Americans who work in those factories. And I think we are going to produce 5 million great trade craft jobs in America.
/snip
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo: Lutnick's economically incoherent and contradictory commentary (Original Post)
Dennis Donovan
May 2025
OP
hildegaard28
(792 posts)1. And he
Says trade craft like he know what that is. Apparently he thinks what the peasants do is "trade craft". Just another out of touch billionaire who has no idea what it's like to be a regular person.
sop
(17,400 posts)2. Trump wants to bring back Gilded Age manufacturing business models: no unions, slave wages, no taxes on wealthy...
"The problem is: those who credit manufacturing jobs for a glorious past America mistake correlation for causation. They think their parents and grandparents had the 'good life' because of jobs in manufacturing. In reality, their parents and grandparents had that life because of unions, pensions, high marginal tax rates, and strong social policies with a little post-war exceptionalism and a lot of racism and sexism thrown in."
MayReasonRule
(4,011 posts)3. Just Say No To Nut Lick

Swede
(38,319 posts)4. Trump is destroying education, so that destroys innovation. Do they really want low paying jobs replacing high paying?
This seems to be the case.