as insults to men?

Would that work?

Plenty of names we can call him without diminishing women yet again.

Last edited Sun Jun 22, 2025, 12:10 AM - Edit history (1)

July 17th..

My question is.. Is this what Putin wanted?

Aren't Russia & Iran BFF's?

the honchos in Iran are buds.

I'm holding onto that until I hear otherwise .. Traitor going Off the Putin playbook.

If it's true that alot of their nuclear facilities were relocated
( https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/images-show-unusual-activity-at-iran-nuclear-site-before-strikes/ar-AA1HbAqv ) then Putin might have played Trump into attacking just to get us in another middle east mess. Otherwise, Russia stood to lose alot and it seems like Putin would have tried to stall him. But I don't know much about this, just speculating.

Strikethrough over "no" and "kings" isn't that creating an ambiguous message?

The striking of words usually means negation at least when editing. So, wouldn't that mean a double negative?

Subsequently, it's reversing the "no kings" opinion, changing the meaning to "no kings" is not ok, and kings are cool.

It's very confusing.



❤️

just through kings

Thanks smartypants!

💙

He needs to be tried by the ICC, and prosecuted by Jack Smith.

Link to tweet

What screams peace more than bombing something?

President Psychopath strikes again.

Trump attempts to deflect attention from his failed, unpopular, lawless regime.

they have only two synapses which respond to unfavorable polls. One evokes the TAX CUT response, the other the BOMB SOMEONE response. It seems to work for them.

Have been saying for months that Iran has not even decided to build a nuclear weapon. They were nowhere near having a nuclear weapon. Trump rejected his own intelligence agencies findings.

as a result, they've been working on turning them into Fox News-style video presentations to keep his attention. Yes, really.

It's fucking pathetic.

and "Moozlims" in particular. TheFelon wants to wants to burnish his white supremacy/Xtian nationalist creds with having bombed an "inferior race" into submission.

Right words for this crazy moment.

We get a lot of strongly worded missives from Democratic leaders. Looking forwarded to a well organized, highly promoted, dramatically rendered public spectacle where he proclaims his opposition to Trumps illegal and immoral actions.

Yup. We all just watch as it gets worse and worse.

Perhaps he can explain the War on America and the one on Iran at the same time.

... why isn't there some kind of mechanism to prevent military action without Congressional authorization? In these instances?

Like the second key to a safety deposit box?

How does this work? TSF can order bombs be dropped like he's ordering a pizza?

President Psychopath.

A provocative action like this could lead to war. Even though it's a Republican Congress, they should have had a chance to make their voices heard prior to an action that could suck us into the middle east quicksand.
Yes, I know that Congress doesn't have the courage to oppose Trump, but they should have been given a chance to at least say, "whatever you say master".

He is a dictator.

Thank you.
Actually, it looks like he told the Republican leadership, but not the Democrats.

Great message Hakeem!

Should have been screaming a week ago.

"Pathetic" democrats screaming would have definitely dissuaded the psychopathic narcissistic criminal from his destructive asinine actions.

That's Not Helping Anything.

How will TACO and Republicans try to blame President Biden and the Democrats?

I don't remember what they were, but my brother had Fox News on the TV earlier in the evening.

With VonShitzInPantz's GOP enablers controlling both houses of Congress and SCOTUS, we are all doomed!

Given the antipathy he has toward non-whites -- especially ones in positions of authority -- Obama's award has been eating at him since early in his first term.

The Nobel Peace Prize isn’t something you apply for—it’s something you’re nominated for, and only by a select group of people:

Members of national governments and parliaments,
University professors in fields like history, law, philosophy and theology,
Directors of peace research institutes,
Past Nobel Peace Prize laureates,
Members of the International Court of Justice and similar bodies, and
Current and former members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee.

consequences on Trump right out of the gate

If left un-checked, trump is a menace to the U.S. and to the world.

He won't explain anything and the cult will applaud him for starting WWIII because he owned the libs 🙄

President Barack Obama authorized several military actions during his presidency that raised questions about bypassing Congress. Here are the most notable instances:

---

### **1. Libya (2011)**
Obama launched airstrikes in Libya as part of a NATO-led intervention to prevent a humanitarian crisis during the Libyan civil war. He did **not seek congressional authorization**, instead citing a United Nations Security Council resolution and humanitarian concerns. Critics argued this violated the **War Powers Resolution**, which requires congressional approval for sustained military action beyond 60 days.

---

### **2. Iraq and Syria (2014–2016)**
In response to the rise of ISIS, Obama ordered airstrikes in Iraq and later expanded them into Syria. He **relied on the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF)**—originally passed to target al-Qaeda after 9/11—as legal justification. Many lawmakers and legal scholars argued this was a stretch, since ISIS did not exist in 2001 and had split from al-Qaeda.

---

### **3. Yemen and Somalia (Drone Strikes)**
Obama significantly expanded the use of **drone strikes** in countries like Yemen and Somalia, targeting suspected terrorists. These operations were often conducted **without specific congressional approval**, under the broader umbrella of counterterrorism and the 2001 AUMF. The lack of transparency and oversight drew criticism from both human rights groups and members of Congress.

---

### **4. Iraq (2014 Airstrikes Against ISIS)**
In 2014, Obama authorized airstrikes in Iraq to protect U.S. personnel and humanitarian missions. He again **did not seek new congressional authorization**, instead citing his constitutional powers as Commander in Chief and the 2001 AUMF.

---

These actions reflect a broader trend in U.S. foreign policy where presidents—both Democratic and Republican—have increasingly relied on **executive authority and outdated AUMFs** to conduct military operations without new congressional approval.

If we didn't need him so much where he is, I'd say Hakeem for President. But we do! Right smack dab where he is!

After the Signal breaches, I would be surprised if the government can hold anything secure.