Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(12,341 posts)
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 07:41 PM Jun 2025

Senate parliamentarian rejects GOP's attempt to limit courts' contempt powers

The Senate parliamentarian has ruled against a controversial provision in the Senate Republicans’ megabill that would have made it significantly more difficult for courts to enforce contempt findings against the Trump administration.

The parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, ruled that limiting courts’ ability to hold Trump officials in contempt violated the Senate’s rules governing what can be passed with a simple-majority vote on the budget reconciliation fast track.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) hailed the parliamentarian’s decision as a major victory.

“Senate Republicans tried to write Donald Trump’s contempt for the courts into law — gutting judicial enforcement, defying the Constitution and bulldozing the very rule of law that forms our democracy,” Schumer said in a statement responding to the development.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/senate-parliamentarian-rejects-gop-attempt-201608819.html
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate parliamentarian rejects GOP's attempt to limit courts' contempt powers (Original Post) In It to Win It Jun 2025 OP
This sounds Good.. but I don't Cha Jun 2025 #1
The Parliamentarian is presumed to be non-partisan... appmanga Jun 2025 #2
Oh Thank You! Traitor & all his Cha Jun 2025 #3
Thank god. Scrivener7 Jun 2025 #4
Senate parliamentarian rejects GOP's attempt to limit courts' contempt powers LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2025 #5
Also - Senate Official Rejects Food Aid Cuts Proposed by Republicans in Megabill cliffside Jun 2025 #6

Cha

(316,891 posts)
1. This sounds Good.. but I don't
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 07:58 PM
Jun 2025

understand.. is The Senate parliamentarian a gop?

It would break the Rule and Not be Constitution but magas don't care.

TY!

appmanga

(1,382 posts)
2. The Parliamentarian is presumed to be non-partisan...
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 08:10 PM
Jun 2025

...and ignoring her would essentially break the Senate as a good faith institution because they will have killed the umpire.

Cha

(316,891 posts)
3. Oh Thank You! Traitor & all his
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 08:19 PM
Jun 2025

little traitors must be APOCALYPTIC at Elizabeth MacDonough.. Our Heroine!

LetMyPeopleVote

(175,025 posts)
5. Senate parliamentarian rejects GOP's attempt to limit courts' contempt powers
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 11:25 PM
Jun 2025

This provision was clearly not permitted under the Byrd rule. trump and Johnson will NOT be able to use reconciliation to limit the power of the courts to enjoin trump's illegal actions.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5363225-senate-parliamentarian-rules-out-contempt-provision/

The Senate parliamentarian has ruled against a controversial provision in the Senate Republicans’ megabill that would have made it significantly more difficult for courts to enforce contempt findings against the Trump administration.

The parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, ruled that limiting courts’ ability to hold Trump officials in contempt violated the Senate’s rules governing what can be passed with a simple-majority vote on the budget reconciliation fast track.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) hailed the parliamentarian’s decision as a major victory.

“Senate Republicans tried to write Donald Trump’s contempt for the courts into law — gutting judicial enforcement, defying the Constitution and bulldozing the very rule of law that forms our democracy,” Schumer said in a statement responding to the development.

“But Senate Democrats stopped them cold. We successfully fought for rule of law and struck out this reckless and downright un-American provision,” he said.

The provision, tucked into the thousand-page bill House Republicans passed in May, would have required anyone suing the federal government to pay a bond before a court would be allowed to use its contempt power to enforce injunctions and other rulings.


cliffside

(1,582 posts)
6. Also - Senate Official Rejects Food Aid Cuts Proposed by Republicans in Megabill
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 11:49 PM
Jun 2025
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/21/us/politics/senate-snap-food-stamps.html?unlocked_article_code=1.RE8.5Ptg.wbhhaZl69wTa&smid=url-share


"A top Senate official on Friday night rejected a bid by Republicans to slash federal food aid payments as part of their sweeping legislation carrying President Trump’s domestic agenda, sending party leaders scrambling to find another way to help offset the massive cost of the bill...

... Elizabeth MacDonough, the parliamentarian, ruled that the SNAP measure, which would push some of the costs of nutrition assistance onto the states, did not. That sent Republicans back to the drawing board to find another strategy for covering tens of billions of dollars of the bill’s cost...

... The ruling was just one piece of a broader review the parliamentarian is conducting of the Republican-written legislation. She was expected to work through the weekend evaluating the measure and instructing Republicans to strip out any provision she deems out of order. Should they fail to do so, Democrats could challenge the bill on the floor, forcing Republicans to muster 60 votes to advance it, which would effectively kill it since Democrats are solidly opposed..."
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senate parliamentarian re...