General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPoliticusUSA - 16 moderate House Republicans wrote to Speaker Mike Johnson and Majority Leader John Thune and said they
https://www.politicususa.com/p/the-big-beautiful-bill-is-in-major?publication_id=3373725&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=3aksq&utm_medium=email16 moderate House Republicans wrote to Speaker Mike Johnson and Majority Leader John Thune and said they are willing to vote against the Big Beautiful Bill due to Medicaid cuts.
A group of 16 House Republicans led by more moderate Rep. David Valadao sent a letter to Thune and Speaker Mike Johnson on Tuesday suggesting they are prepared to vote against the legislation that comes out of the Senate if it includes a cut to the Medicaid provider tax.
The House members also say theyre concerned about the rushed implementation timelines, penalties for expansion states, changes to the community engagement requirements for adults with dependents, and cuts to emergency Medicaid funding.
Protecting Medicaid is essential for the vulnerable constituents we were elected to represent. Therefore, we cannot support a final bill that threatens access to coverage or jeopardizes the stability of our hospitals and providers, the members wrote.
The list of Representatives who signed this bill reads like whos who of endangered 2026 House Republicans including Valadao, Rob Bresnahan, Young Kim, Mike Lawler, Juan Ciscomani, Chuck Edwards, Andrew Garbarino, Jen Kiggans, Jeff Van Drew, Dan Newhouse, Rob Wittman, Mariannette Miller-Meeks, Don Bacon, Zach Nunn, Nicole Malliotakis and Jeff Hurd.
(Email)
Lovie777
(21,744 posts)Doodley
(11,629 posts)Good for them! Only 16 say they don't want their constituents to suffer or die unneccessarily. The rest are scum.
Bettie
(19,279 posts)they will all do as they are told and vote for it.
Volaris
(11,394 posts)'Now, hold on there. I get it, it's all fun and games until it's OUR ASS on the line in an election.' ...
Tribetime
(7,056 posts)And getting reelected not about saving medicaid
OnDoutside
(20,860 posts)Bluestocking
(508 posts)They are just posturing but at the end of the day they will all vote in lockstep because that is what their oligarch owners require them to do. There is no such thing as a moderate republican.
SCantiGOP
(14,664 posts)So they may be faced with choosing a primary challenge or being the underdog in the general election.
msongs
(73,079 posts)ms liberty
(10,964 posts)bucolic_frolic
(54,032 posts)In other words BBB might be harmful to their re-election chances. Not that other parts of the bill are bad, or that it creates too much debt, or that trickle down doesn't work, mind you, but that it's harmful to them.
A leopard never changes its spots.
MadameButterfly
(3,745 posts)is some benefit to poor and working people.
And being able to see their own self-interest can't be taken for granted for Republicans, who tend to vote against it.
newdeal2
(4,775 posts)Why not threaten to call a vote to topple him? Seems more effective if you wanted to derail this whole process.
Jmb 4 Harris-Walz
(1,106 posts)medicaid cuts. Theres got to be more than the 16 who were willing to put their names to this message to Thune and Johnson.
MadameButterfly
(3,745 posts)Do we have any R Senators taking this stand?
Jmb 4 Harris-Walz
(1,106 posts)Wiz Imp
(8,950 posts)and there's supposedly others (Moran, Schmitt). But they haven't gone so far as that group from the House yet as far as threatening to not vote for the bill.
https://accountable.us/more-republican-senators-admit-the-truth-billionaire-tax-cuts-would-kill-healthcare-for-their-constituents/
Rebl2
(17,398 posts)Hawley is against the cuts to Medicaid. He has said so several times this year.
Volaris
(11,394 posts)applegrove
(130,258 posts)Jmb 4 Harris-Walz
(1,106 posts)republianmushroom
(22,122 posts)FBaggins
(28,625 posts)617Blue
(2,189 posts)Picaro
(2,333 posts)Shows the impact of gerrymandering. Only 16 out of how many are truly under threat of losing their seats?
JT45242
(3,831 posts)Miller Meeks is a disgusting piece of filth from my part of Iowa who has been running afs how she proudly supports Trump's agenda against the Democrats. Not really a moderate.
I'll believe an actual no vote when she makes one.
She is too scared to hold a town hall. So why all of a sudden grow a conscience.
ms liberty
(10,964 posts)Or outright become Democrats. Senators could do it too, wouldn't that be a hoot and a kick in the balls to the Orange Man
MadameButterfly
(3,745 posts)and they won't get re-elected as Democrats.
No party support as independents.
No, they are stuck.
frogstar0
(218 posts)There are no moderate republicans in the house. There are spineless grifters who are terrified of the voters in their district. Who want to at least flame that they tried .. but we know they will fold in the rend.
AverageOldGuy
(3,341 posts)Hes a useless back-bencher, 17 years in Congress from a safe Republican district except now Democrats from all over his district have been pounding the shit out him in letters to editors, calls to his office, and attacks on him for not holding town halls and it may be having some effect.
sakabatou
(45,769 posts)MagickMuffin
(18,070 posts)Perhaps this is just a public gesture to show their constituents how much they are fightin for em.
I just hope that they are serious and not playing games.
Martin68
(27,052 posts)understand that it is important to publicize every act of resistance against Trump? We all need to hear about this.
MagickMuffin
(18,070 posts)If its me, then perhaps it is you who needs to wake up. Not understanding your rudeness to me.
Martin68
(27,052 posts)Not very adult of me, I know. But that's how I felt.
MagickMuffin
(18,070 posts)And not just the subject line.
I believe that the letter could be a ruse to hoodwink their constituents. There I wrote it again for you.
And I know what is at stake here so take your anger elsewhere. I dont need your mansplaining.
Good day, Ive said my piece.
Martin68
(27,052 posts)I just wondered if you ever considered that they can both write a letter to publicize their stance AND vote NO. You sound like a real know-it-all. You might be right, but you also might be wrong. There is room for two opinion without being nasty.
MagickMuffin
(18,070 posts)You started this rudeness. I was merely stating a comment and you took it upon yourself to state it was a rude comment.
Take your rudeness and nastiness and . . . .
Martin68
(27,052 posts)druidity33
(6,869 posts)they are sure to disappoint. It will pass by one vote and the most vulnerable 2 Rs will vote no...
Martin68
(27,052 posts)Johonny
(25,444 posts)Which is awful. This is the endless oligarchy bill.