General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDue process? Apparently not in Texas.
Texas could soon execute a man before his appeal is heard and set a dangerous national precedent
Advocates say Robert Roberson was wrongfully convicted. Texas AG demands the death penalty anyway
By Austin Sarat
Published June 29, 2025 9:00AM (EDT)
(Salon) In death penalty cases, the legal system is put to its sternest test. It needs to treat people fairly, even those people accused of doing horrible things. All too often, it fails.
Robert Roberson knows this that all too well. More than two decades ago, he was convicted of murdering his chronically ill two-year-old daughter Nikki. Crucial to that conviction was expert testimony on so-called shaken baby syndrome.
Since then, Roberson has been on death row. But scientific discoveries, along with new evidence, have cast significant doubt on his conviction. Nonetheless, if its left to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who recently made an unprecedented intervention in the case, Roberson could be dead by the time his appeal is heard. And what Paxton wants to do could affect how death penalty cases are handled in other states that practice capital punishment.
Since Robersons conviction in 2003, shaken baby syndrome has been discredited, and medical experts have determined [Nikki] died from severe viral and bacterial pneumonia that doctors failed to diagnose, not from abuse ...............(more)
https://www.salon.com/2025/06/29/texas-could-soon-execute-a-man-before-his-appeal-is-heard-and-set-a-dangerous-national-precedent/
walkingman
(10,350 posts)as Texas US Senator. I will never understand the attraction to people like this.
eppur_se_muova
(40,989 posts)A long time back -- I think Scalia was involved.
John1956PA
(4,823 posts). . . who was subsequently exonerated by DNA evidence.
The defendant was a man of color. He was released from prison after DNA evidence established he was not the perpetrator.
In speeches before conservative groups, Scalia was making the man's conviction (which he was ultimately found not to have committed) into a clarion call to speed up executions. Scalia toned it down after DNA evidence exonerated the man. Not long after, Scalia died in bed in a friend's home in Texas.
dalton99a
(92,127 posts)Justice Scalia Says Executing The Innocent Doesn't Violate The Constitution
By Corey Adwar
Sep 4, 2014, 4:00 PM CT
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2014/09/henry-lee-mccollum-cleared-by-dna-evidence-in-north-carolina-after-spending-30-years-on-death-row.html
A Horrifying Miscarriage of Justice in North Carolina
How many times was Justice Antonin Scalia wrong about Henry Lee McCollum and the death penalty?
By Dahlia Lithwick
Sept 03, 2014 5:37 PM
Disaffected
(6,161 posts)Someone who loses a child (or a spouse) in tragic circumstances , is then convicted of murder and is at the mercy of the Texas justice system.
multigraincracker
(36,989 posts)wrong and an innocent person is put to death.
To help make sure that doesnt happen, if new evidence is later found, the jury, judge and prosecutor should be put to death for killing an innocent person. Sounds fair to me and fewer innocent people would die.