General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI received this email from the SSA as well. It is a complete lie. Social Security income is still taxed -- the Big, Ugly
I got the email from SS also. Odd, as they usually do not send out this kind of message.
Yeap, I also received it.
— Sergio Peirano (@sergiopeirano.bsky.social) 2025-07-04T11:58:27.875Z
The SSA should not engage in cheerleading certain policies, or expressing political views in general.
Its job is to efficiently manage the funds they are entrusted providing on-time, high quality service to SS recipients.
Sadly, this email is a red flag.
Jon Cooper
@joncooper-us.bsky.social
· 1h
I received this email from the SSA as well. It is a complete lie. Social Security income is still taxed the Big, Ugly Bill did NOTHING to change that.
Welcome to 1984, folks.
I received this email from the SSA as well. It is a complete lie. Social Security income is still taxed â the Big, Ugly Bill did NOTHING to change that.
— Jon Cooper (@joncooper-us.bsky.social) 2025-07-04T11:11:58.130Z
Welcome to 1984, folks.
Abnredleg
(1,245 posts)on all income so many on SS will be paying little to no tax on their income. Yes, there are still taxes on SS, but many will have to pay no taxes so the impact is the same as if there was a tax cut.
This deduction expires in four years.
Silent Type
(12,412 posts)RandomNumbers
(19,070 posts)and it is a deduction to taxable income, not a tax credit. (not that you suggested differently, just to re-iterate the point.)
WaPo ( I know ...) has a good article about it. Summary - it is BAD policy. Not mentioned in the article, it is a potential political minefield for Democrats in future elections (assuming future elections happen).
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/07/02/senior-deduction-trump-social-security/
Emphasis added.
Under current law, most taxpayers claim the standard deduction of $15,000 (or $30,000 for couples) to reduce their tax liability, though the GOP tax bill would increase those amounts slightly. Additionally, seniors already qualify for an additional deduction of $2,000 (or $3,600 for couples).
The Senate bill would create a third category that gives seniors an additional $6,000 (or $12,000) off their taxable income, provided they are below a certain income threshold. Seniors earning more than $75,000 per year ($150,000 for couples) would start to see a smaller deduction, which gradually diminishes and then disappears for those earning more than $175,000 ($250,000 for couples).
...
... in 2022, the median income for seniors was roughly $30,000, according to federal data, which is similar to the existing standard deduction. That means roughly half of Americans aged 65 or older would not benefit from the new Trump provision ...
...
This is going to be a meaningful tax cut that will help seniors in the upper-middle class, said Marc Goldwein, senior vice president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan organization. While it may be pitched as going to low-income seniors, low-income seniors dont pay taxes already.
LymphocyteLover
(9,382 posts)Lovie777
(21,785 posts)shithole and the Republican party and the propaganda that follows.
Isn't that one the the deadly sins? Mike Johnson?
Danmel
(5,687 posts)Propaganda state.