Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWith new power, Trump will move immediately to lay off federal workers
Supreme Court allows Trump administration to move forward with large-scale staff cutshttps://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/07/09/trump-wins-broad-authority-to-lay-off-federal-workers-without-congress/84520149007/

President Donald Trump has seized the authority to lay off federal workers and reorganize the federal government in a way that critics say no president has been able to do in more than 100 years. The power, which the Supreme Court gave temporarily in a July 8 order, puts at risk thousands of federal jobs across the country at agencies that collect taxes, provide health care to veterans, and help administer retirement benefits.
Labor unions say the cuts fly in the face of established law and decades of tradition, but a senior White House official told USA the layoffs are legal, and the administration intends toimmediately reduce the size of government. While the court did not rule on the underlying question of Trump's ability to enact widespread job cuts, the justices said they were likely to affirm that power.
A final decision in favor of the president will continue a trend in which the executive branch increases its power in relation to Congress and the courts − making Trump and future presidents more powerful than theyve been in generations. The American Federation of Government Employees, a labor union that partnered with outside groups and local governments to sue the Trump administration, said the high court "has dealt a serious blow to our democracy and puts services that the American people rely on in grave jeopardy."
Trump, Musk and a California judge
Elon Musk displays a chainsaw given to him by Argentine President Javier Milei during the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) outside Washington, D.C., on Feb. 20, 2025.
Trump began the mass layoffs, called a reduction in force, when he signed an executive order Feb. 11 flanked by then-aide Elon Musk. The order called on agencies to begin a monthslong process to reduce the ranks of government to the extent applicable by law. AFGE, the largest federal labor union, joined with other unions, nonprofit organizations and local governments on April 28 to sue the Trump administration, saying that it needed Congress approval for mass layoffs.
snip
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
With new power, Trump will move immediately to lay off federal workers (Original Post)
Celerity
Jul 2025
OP
Igel
(37,383 posts)1. There's a big caveat in one of the quotes.
While the court did not rule on the underlying question of Trump's ability to enact widespread job cuts, the justices said they were likely to affirm that power.
However, the required assumption is a good-faith interpretation of the EO and derivative texts, that the cuts would be "consistent with applicable law."
If the plans promulgated and implemented aren't consistent with applicable law, then it's a completely different set of facts and circumstances and likely conclusions.
The ruling was narrow and needs that bit of explanation.
Think that assumption is likely misguided, but it needs to be made ("due process" and all--like it or not, same law for everybody). That just just means a truly trivial case was decided and and the real battle will be enjoined in the coming weeks. (But the judge may have gotten a minor point by just delaying everything for a while--the delay before any trial means later appeal means later appeal. Win time if nothing else, right?)