General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Netanyahu Prolonged the War in Gaza to Stay in Power
Six months into the war in the Gaza Strip, Benjamin Netanyahu was preparing to bring it to a halt. Negotiations were underway for an extended cease-fire with Hamas, and he was ready to agree to a compromise. He had dispatched an envoy to convey Israels new position to the Egyptian mediators. Now, at a meeting at the Ministry of Defense in Tel Aviv, he needed to get his cabinet onboard. He had kept the plan off the meetings written agenda. The idea was to reveal it suddenly, preventing resistant ministers from coordinating their response.
It was April 2024, long before Netanyahu mounted his political comeback. The proposal on the table would have paused the Gaza war for at least six weeks. It would have created a window for negotiations with Hamas over a permanent truce. More than 30 hostages captured by Hamas at the start of the war would have been released within weeks. Still more would have been freed if the truce was extended. And the devastation of Gaza, where roughly two million people were trying to survive daily attacks, would have come to a halt.
Ending the war would then have raised the chances of a landmark peace deal with Saudi Arabia, the Arab worlds most powerful country. For months, the Saudi leadership had secretly signaled its willingness to accelerate peace talks with Israel as long as the war in Gaza stopped. The normalization of ties between the Saudi and Israeli governments, an achievement that had eluded every Israeli leader since the states founding in 1948, would have secured Israels status in the region as well as Netanyahus long-term legacy.
But for Netanyahu, a truce also came with personal risk. As prime minister, he led a fragile coalition that depended on the support of far-right ministers who wanted to occupy Gaza, not withdraw from it. They sought a long war that would ultimately enable Israel to re-establish Jewish settlements in Gaza. If a cease-fire came too soon, these ministers might decide to collapse the ruling coalition. That would prompt early elections that polls showed Netanyahu would lose. Out of office, Netanyahu was vulnerable. Since 2020, he had been standing trial for corruption; the charges, which he denied, mostly related to granting favors to businessmen in exchange for gifts and favorable media coverage. Shorn of power, Netanyahu would lose the ability to force out the attorney general who oversaw his prosecution as indeed his government would later attempt to do.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/11/magazine/benjamin-netanyahu-gaza-war.html
https://archive.ph/li5sQ (Open source version).
What kind of person kills and starves tens of thousands of people to preserve his political standing?
It was 5:44 p.m., according to minutes of the meeting. At that moment, the prime minister was forced to choose between the chance of a truce and his political survival and Netanyahu opted for survival. There was no cease-fire plan, he promised Smotrich. No, no, theres no such thing, he said. And as the cabinet discussion moved on, Netanyahu quietly leaned over to his security advisers and whispered what must have by then become obvious to them: Dont present the plan.
karynnj
(60,791 posts)Much of the timeline discussed has been in media like HAARETZ for over a year.
I wonder if this will have any impact on people arguing that all opposition to Israel's actions is antisemitic.
iemanja
(57,417 posts)They turn to insults because there is no substantive defense for what Israel is doing.
BuddhaGirl
(3,698 posts)There have been other heinous and obvious examples of the unjustifiable attacks on Gazans that any human being with a shred of compassion would condemn. Yet, still, those attacks are defended.
Truly mind-boggling and pathetic.
Bettie
(19,296 posts)now in order not to have his supporters here scream "Antisemitism!".
Netanyahu is Trump with a different accent.
speak easy
(12,595 posts)War criminal POS.
Response to iemanja (Reply #4)
cliffside This message was self-deleted by its author.
uponit7771
(93,491 posts)David__77
(24,508 posts)cliffside
(1,582 posts)Response to iemanja (Original post)
cliffside This message was self-deleted by its author.
cliffside
(1,582 posts)AloeVera
(4,000 posts)cliffside
(1,582 posts)after my new reply so I asked at this link.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/125628939
Question about GD threads and replies ....
I just responded to two GD threads, one cycled to the top of GD and the other did not.
Any ideas as to why, what am I missing?
Learn something new everyday
AloeVera
(4,000 posts)Then 50, 75 etc. I believe.
Does that answer your question?
cliffside
(1,582 posts)tested it with an LBN thread I posted back in June with only 1 reply and it cycled back to the top of LBN.
Think that is the correct answer.
"5. Not sure what EarlG will say, but my understanding is that as long as a thread hasn't slipped off page 30
Reply to cliffside (Reply #4)
Tue Jul 22, 2025, 10:31 PM
of the board in each forum, replies will kick it back to the top of the board.
It can be only days before a thread drops off page 30 in GD, but a very long time in less active forums.
Each time a thread is kicked back to the top of the board, it can again slide as far as the bottom of page 30 and still be kicked. How old the OP is doesn't matter. It's all about how old the previous reply was and whether that had been recent enough to keep it on the board.
Threads pinned to the top of a board will get new replies indefinitely, if they're not locked.
Anyway, that's how every board I've run worked, and how DU seems to work."
My reply ...
6. Think that might be the answer, just kicked an old post of mine in LBN from early June ...
Reply to highplainsdem (Reply #5)
Tue Jul 22, 2025, 11:00 PM
and it went to the top of the forum ... page 30 of GD is from July 14th.
When you look at the bottom page of a forum with the the page numbers it only goes to 30, then "archives."
Mystery solved, thought I might need new glasses.
Thank you!