Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaddow Blog-Trump's history with the Fifth Amendment still isn't doing his allies any favors
After Joe Biden's former physician took the Fifth, James Comer said that suggested "criminal liability. Would he apply that standard to Donald Trump, too?
Trumpâs history with the Fifth Amendment still isnât doing his allies any favors
— Joan (@belleofliberty.bsky.social) 2025-07-12T06:12:12.955Z
flip.it/7tHvXK
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-history-fifth-amendment-still-isnt-allies-favors-rcna218333
Believe it or not, congressional Republicans are still investigating Joe Biden evidently, the former president continues to be old including a House Oversight Committee interview this week with the Democrats former White House physician.
As The Associated Press reported, the doctor, whod been subpoenaed to appear, chose not to answer GOP lawmakers questions.
......Around this time three years ago, for example, as New York Attorney General Letitia James office continued its investigation into the Trump Organizations fraudulent business practices, the Republican indicated in advance that hed assert his Fifth Amendment privileges, invoking his right against self-incrimination. As NBC News reported soon after, he did exactly that a great many times.
He wasnt alone. In fact, as regular readers might recall, other Trump allies did the same thing: Folks like John Eastman, Mike Flynn and Jeffrey Clark, among others, reportedly took the Fifth in an unrelated cases in some instances, roughly 100 times.
So, does Comer genuinely believe, You plead the Fifth usually when you have criminal liability? If so, how does he explain Trumps decision to plead the Fifth more than 400 times a few years ago?
As The Associated Press reported, the doctor, whod been subpoenaed to appear, chose not to answer GOP lawmakers questions.
Dr. Kevin OConnor invoked his rights under the Fifth Amendment during a closed-door interview with the House Oversight Committee, his attorney and lawmakers said. ... David Schertler, one of OConnors lawyers, said the doctor had no choice but to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights in testimony before the committee. Schertler cited both OConnors responsibilities to protect patient privacy as a doctor and the Justice Departments ongoing investigation into Bidens use of the autopen.
......Around this time three years ago, for example, as New York Attorney General Letitia James office continued its investigation into the Trump Organizations fraudulent business practices, the Republican indicated in advance that hed assert his Fifth Amendment privileges, invoking his right against self-incrimination. As NBC News reported soon after, he did exactly that a great many times.
The deposition lasted four hours, and the only question the former president answered was about his name, Trump attorney Ron Fischetti told NBC News. A source with knowledge of the deposition said Trump took the Fifth more than 440 times.
He wasnt alone. In fact, as regular readers might recall, other Trump allies did the same thing: Folks like John Eastman, Mike Flynn and Jeffrey Clark, among others, reportedly took the Fifth in an unrelated cases in some instances, roughly 100 times.
So, does Comer genuinely believe, You plead the Fifth usually when you have criminal liability? If so, how does he explain Trumps decision to plead the Fifth more than 400 times a few years ago?
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maddow Blog-Trump's history with the Fifth Amendment still isn't doing his allies any favors (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Jul 2025
OP
sheshe2
(95,884 posts)1. There is a huge difference here.
Doctor/Patient is privileged information.
Once a doctor-patient relationship arises, the doctors duty of confidentiality applies to any communications, records, opinions, or knowledge related to that relationship. This means that confidentiality not only applies to things you might tell your doctor but also covers any conclusions, theories, or opinions that your doctor might form in connection with your medical treatment.
The confidentiality of patient communications is not limited to conversations between patient and doctor. Confidentiality covers any statements or communications between a patient and other professional staff at the doctors office. Your medical records (e.g., medical history, doctors notes, diagnostics testing, lab reports, and the like) are also expressly covered by doctor-patient confidentiality.
Confidential information and records include:
Any patient treatment-related information (including names) related to appointments, exams, assessments, medical procedures, referrals, diagnoses, or treatment options discussed with the patient
Doctors conclusions, opinions, or assessments related to the patient
Medical records of any type, including medical history, lab tests, x-rays, and other diagnostic imaging studies
Any communications between the patient and doctor or the doctors office staff members.
Prescription details and medication history provided by or recommended to the patient
The confidentiality of patient communications is not limited to conversations between patient and doctor. Confidentiality covers any statements or communications between a patient and other professional staff at the doctors office. Your medical records (e.g., medical history, doctors notes, diagnostics testing, lab reports, and the like) are also expressly covered by doctor-patient confidentiality.
Confidential information and records include:
Any patient treatment-related information (including names) related to appointments, exams, assessments, medical procedures, referrals, diagnoses, or treatment options discussed with the patient
Doctors conclusions, opinions, or assessments related to the patient
Medical records of any type, including medical history, lab tests, x-rays, and other diagnostic imaging studies
Any communications between the patient and doctor or the doctors office staff members.
Prescription details and medication history provided by or recommended to the patient
https://www.millerandzois.com/blog/doctor-patient-confidentiality/
trump is just covering his fat ass and would incriminate himself if he answered.