pardon, kick it over the rubber stamp SCOTUS.

The SC has no accountability anyways (not that Trump has much), but people are less likely to hold the republicans accountable in the midterms based on a SC ruling, rather than an action by Trump.

We have seen that the SC is willing to rubber stamp most of his agenda, and don’t tell me the RW justices don’t have a back channel (more likely a direct channel) to the WH.

The other molesters are out walking around!

That's not directed at you sheshe, just our ridiculous media

the heinous crimes of sexual predators, murder, mass shootings, other crimes as gruesome, there some be some safeguards put in place to ensure that additional measures are undertaken before a convicted predator, murderer, etc. is let loose again into our society.

Jan6ers to that list!

They gave her an excuse for SCOTUS.

Past examples show they can go pretty low.

I have no answer to that.

YES

Why would they stop now? This is probably the price that was negotiated for her silence.

Last September, the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' three judges upheld her conviction and sentence. I doubt the USSC will even hear her appeal. It seems so unlikely, that her brother send the 50th birthday book to the WSJ, as a "hint" to the felon that if he fails to either reduce her sentence or pardon her, there is more to come. Note that the administration's reaction was to have the felon's lawyer, disguised as #2 at the DOJ, set up the meetings with her to talk shop. It is worth noting that he is a good friend of her attorney.

That being said, there is a split in the circuits on the underlying legal question, which greatly increases the chances the Court will grant the petition for cert. That doesn't mean, however, that she wins. It means the case will be scheduled for briefing and argument in the fall and that a decision, whenever it comes down, could go either way.

if and when you see barricades and/or fencing going up around the SC building, you'll know what's coming.

Asking for a disbelieving nation.

However, Ginnie wears the pants in that family. She is the boss! I honestly think she would cut off his 'appendage' if he did.

But possibly.

This could be the plot of one of those films where everyone is out to get each other before they squeal.

this isn't some BS girlfriend excuse.

They WILL release her, plus she will sue for MILLIONS!! (and win)

Thomas and Kavenaugh already know the procedure.

A scapegoat is someone who is blamed for the wrongdoings, mistakes, or faults of others.

Maxwell was convicted of having assisted, facilitated, and participated in Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minor girls by, among other things, helping Epstein to recruit, groom, and ultimately abuse victims known to her to be under the age of 18 -- as young as 14 years old when they were groomed and abused by her and Epstein. The evidence established that she not only procured under age victims -- children -- for Epstein to abuse, she herself at times participated in the sexual activity.

USG certainly doesn't stand behind it all the time, ask Red Cloud:

"They made us many promises, more than I can remember, but they kept but one. They promised to take our land, and they took it."

The legal question presented involves a split in how different circuits apply non-prosecution agreements. If the Court grants the petition, all it means is the the case will be set for briefing and argument in the fall and that a decision, whenever it comes, could go either way: they could agree with those appeals court precedents that hold such an agreement only is binding in the district where it is entered -- and Maxwell loses --or they could agree with those appeals court precedents that hold such an agreement is binding on all districts -- and Maxwell then wins.

BS!!!!!
FCKU, GM!!!!