Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

no_hypocrisy

(54,610 posts)
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 04:20 AM Aug 2025

You can't help but notice that HAMAS hasn't shown up to protect Gazans

who are being shot and bombed while trying to get food to prevent starving to death.

HAMAS is in it for HAMAS, not Gazans.

137 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You can't help but notice that HAMAS hasn't shown up to protect Gazans (Original Post) no_hypocrisy Aug 2025 OP
It's infuriating to be fighting an enemy that never shows itself Walleye Aug 2025 #1
Hamas hardly matters now. Warmonger Netanyahu has made it clear he's... brush Aug 2025 #56
Sad, but true, and now he has a bloodthirsty partner in the president of our country Walleye Aug 2025 #66
Like Hamas can stand up to 14,000 MK-84 2,000 lb bombs womanofthehills Aug 2025 #85
Fuck grok and musk fujiyamasan Aug 2025 #88
A 3rd of all Americans are on Twitter - over 100 million Americans are on Twitter & 52 million of them are Dems womanofthehills Aug 2025 #91
I don't give a fuck fujiyamasan Aug 2025 #92
According to the NYT, it's Izz al-Din al-Haddad. ancianita Aug 2025 #2
"HAMA'S premise for war both accepted and approved of the fact that civilians would be sacrificed in horrific numbers. betsuni Aug 2025 #3
I started to reach that conclusion more than a year ago. Martin Eden Aug 2025 #24
Malcolm Nance has no proof that was the plan.... ShadesOfBlue Aug 2025 #47
What do you think Hamas was trying to accomplish with its comradebillyboy Aug 2025 #58
FYI...Malcom Nance is a member of DU. sheshe2 Aug 2025 #75
He's a public figure and his presence on DU is largely symbolic. Crunchy Frog Aug 2025 #84
Legitimate is one thing, however... sheshe2 Aug 2025 #86
It's not unusual to talk about media figures in that way. And he's only posted 5 or 6 times, so Crunchy Frog Aug 2025 #96
He's a Libertarian JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #101
Five or six times and a Star Member of DU. sheshe2 Aug 2025 #128
Malcom Nance is a Member of DU.. Profile Cha Aug 2025 #76
One of their leaders announced soon after Oct 7 mcar Aug 2025 #50
Yes, clearly praising high death toll as a "welcome sacrifice" and do nothing to protect them or stop the war. betsuni Aug 2025 #57
It's one of the things that has bothered me since that horrific attack mcar Aug 2025 #59
Yes... amazing, but not amazing. (Simply ignored by a predictable many.) Oopsie Daisy Aug 2025 #69
Babies were not beheaded or put in microwave ovens womanofthehills Aug 2025 #93
And Israel took the bait. Crunchy Frog Aug 2025 #97
Well, Hamas is a vile terrorist regime that should be wiped out to its last member. Orrex Aug 2025 #4
Sadly... GiqueCee Aug 2025 #5
I believe this all began 80 yrs ago womanofthehills Aug 2025 #95
I see what you did here. Lol!! N/T AloeVera Aug 2025 #112
Before Oct 7, IDF was busy killing Palestinian children womanofthehills Aug 2025 #135
Make up your minds Johnny2X2X Aug 2025 #6
Both can be true depending on the circumstances EdmondDantes_ Aug 2025 #9
Why do you believe there were "operational bases under hospitals and schools"? AloeVera Aug 2025 #12
There's this from when Biden was president EdmondDantes_ Aug 2025 #14
Obviously that intelligence data was not validated by after-the-fact facts on the ground. AloeVera Aug 2025 #32
You say obviously, I say citation needed EdmondDantes_ Aug 2025 #33
Israel did lie. It lied about the advanced, multi-story, well-equipped "Command and Control Centre" it touted. AloeVera Aug 2025 #43
So I provided evidence of non-Israeli sources and that's not enough EdmondDantes_ Aug 2025 #79
Intelligence is not evidence and neither is a 10+year old questionable article with low journalistic standards. AloeVera Aug 2025 #87
Oh the irony! Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #98
Why are you denying the existence of operational bases and other military assets under hospitals and schools? Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #17
They also claim that Israel had a "starvation plan" in place in October 2023. lapucelle Aug 2025 #28
That's crazy JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #36
Hamas is desperate. The Arab League very publicly turned its back last week lapucelle Aug 2025 #41
I'll ask you too. writerJT Aug 2025 #81
I hope you realize how batshit incredulous your analogy is. Hamas would never get anywhere near a Tel Aviv hospital Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #90
Just as I thought. writerJT Aug 2025 #94
Considering the merits of your post, what else did you expect? Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #100
The Argument just doesn't make sense JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #104
It wasn't even an argument. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #106
That person is just very good at writerJT Aug 2025 #109
That's kind of harsh don't you think? JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #110
The "human shield" argument is BS. writerJT Aug 2025 #80
If that were to happen JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #99
Nope. writerJT Aug 2025 #105
Disagree JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #107
We know who is doing the writerJT Aug 2025 #108
Excuse me JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #111
A simple adherence to the laws of war would have been ample defense of civilians. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #16
Then why have they not JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #102
Probably in part because Netanyahu would continue murdering civilians regardless Orrex Aug 2025 #137
And yet Israel continues the slaughter of Gazans indusurb Aug 2025 #7
And yet, Hamas doesn't give a shit about Gazan civilians. Never did. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #18
Hamas is like our KKK of our South. multigraincracker Aug 2025 #78
Hamas is partly made up of fathers whose children and wife's were murdered by Israel. womanofthehills Aug 2025 #126
I have 2 friends that are Christian Palestinians multigraincracker Aug 2025 #129
So, you are saying that the Israelis are bombing and shooting Gazan civilians and not Hamas. Intractable Aug 2025 #8
Not at all. The propblem is that their PRESENCE among civilians endangers them. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #19
No not at all. Dead innocent Gazans clearly due to Israel's aggression. Intractable Aug 2025 #35
If one is in denial of Hamas aggression when they invaded Israel, Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #37
I deny no such things about Hamas. To say so is foolishness. Intractable Aug 2025 #39
How did the discussion shift from "Israel to "Jews"? lapucelle Aug 2025 #42
Good question mcar Aug 2025 #52
I know how... Oopsie Daisy Aug 2025 #60
The masks are off. lapucelle Aug 2025 #65
Yes, you quite literallt denied such thing. Read the header of your post 35. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #51
I think you don't know what the hell you are talking about and are trying to split hairs over language. Intractable Aug 2025 #67
I am tired of repeating that ad hominem attacks are against DU terms of service. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #68
You are at odds with Hamas then JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #113
We are all at odds with Hamas. Shame on you for thinking I think otherwise. Intractable Aug 2025 #114
That's really JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #115
How dare you think I side with Hamas! Piss off. Intractable Aug 2025 #117
I didn't say that JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #118
Post removed Post removed Aug 2025 #119
Wow JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #120
That's the smartest, most appropriate thing you've said here. Intractable Aug 2025 #121
Wow JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #122
Perhaps you'll grow out of it. Intractable Aug 2025 #123
Wow JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #124
You're wrong.. JAG is a well Respected, long time member of DU, Cha Aug 2025 #130
+1 leftstreet Aug 2025 #61
Yes, Hamas is nowhere to be found while the IDF is shooting innocent people seeking food Prairie Gates Aug 2025 #10
The problem is that Hamas is to be found only among civilians. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #20
Yahoo is a war criminal too! GreenWave Aug 2025 #64
How little we've heard about Hamas, and anything, at all, they've actually done to help Palestinians dlk Aug 2025 #11
Are you suggesting that Hamas -- whatever is left of it -- Martin Eden Aug 2025 #13
No, Hamas - whatever is left of it - can release the hostages and disarm. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #22
Perhaps Martin Eden Aug 2025 #26
That's a whole different issue. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #29
On the contrary, it's inextricable Martin Eden Aug 2025 #30
In this context, the Netanyahu government is immaterial. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #34
Long term goals can be loosely defined as desired outcomes, but plans are more immediate Martin Eden Aug 2025 #49
"Zionist ethos" is entirely ideological, and it doesn't identify land parcels except in very general terms. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #70
The 2-state solution as a negotiated settlement is glaringly impractical Martin Eden Aug 2025 #73
The answer to your question is yes. We have a precedent. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #74
Netanyahu himself has said the hostages are not his top priority . . . markpkessinger Aug 2025 #116
I don't excoriate on demand. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #125
That is obvious enough . . . markpkessinger Aug 2025 #134
Do you expect me to gratuitously excoriate whoever you decide I should excoriate on demand? Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #136
There is only one entity that has the power to end the war IMMEDIATELY and UNILATERALLY: HAMAS lapucelle Aug 2025 #31
It has been the power of Israel... ShadesOfBlue Aug 2025 #45
You don't even have the date right. lapucelle Aug 2025 #53
They could immediately stop the war. betsuni Aug 2025 #63
I feel like this is almost universally understood. Oneironaut Aug 2025 #15
It is not pointless. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #23
Unfortunately I don't think that it is EdmondDantes_ Aug 2025 #25
You mean "freedom fighters". nt LexVegas Aug 2025 #21
"...Gazans who are being shot and bombed while trying to get food to prevent starving to death." J_William_Ryan Aug 2025 #27
It is what Hamas is actively doing. Beastly Boy Aug 2025 #38
It's Netanyahu Blue Full Moon Aug 2025 #40
If Hamas isn't anywhere to be found... ShadesOfBlue Aug 2025 #44
Why would they? They're accelerationists willing to torch Gaza to weaken Israel 0rganism Aug 2025 #46
Neither is the IDF or UN. Ping Tung Aug 2025 #48
The Gaza strip is occupied by several brutal forces ... TomWilm Aug 2025 #54
I couldn't help but notice that they shouldn't have to. n/t Uncle Joe Aug 2025 #55
Ok... purr-rat beauty Aug 2025 #62
This message was self-deleted by its author Rob H. Aug 2025 #71
You can't help but notice that just 8% of Democrats support Israel's military campaign in Gaza Rob H. Aug 2025 #72
Quite the post! AloeVera Aug 2025 #89
The U.S. hasn't shown up to protect the Gazans. It funds their abuse. LuvLoogie Aug 2025 #77
I think that's pretty obvious to most people here. Crunchy Frog Aug 2025 #82
The IDF shows up to slaughter civilians. denbot Aug 2025 #83
Hamas is suicidal IronLionZion Aug 2025 #103
They're not suicidal, they're martyrcidal. LeftInTX Aug 2025 #127
They want to die. They knew this would be the response after their horrible attack. IronLionZion Aug 2025 #131
But they aren't killing themselves. LeftInTX Aug 2025 #132
Never expected Hamas to protect people in GAZA Justice Aug 2025 #133
 

brush

(61,033 posts)
56. Hamas hardly matters now. Warmonger Netanyahu has made it clear he's...
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 01:47 PM
Aug 2025

Last edited Wed Aug 6, 2025, 01:52 AM - Edit history (2)

going to continue the killing, starvation and ethnic cleansing in Gaza until all the Gazans are gone and the hostages are freed. Hamas will stay in their tunnels and unfortunately, probably take the hostages with them when the IDF forces finally clear those tunnels.

It's ugly and going to get uglier. Israel's international reputation for the new Nakba will suffer for decades.

womanofthehills

(10,771 posts)
85. Like Hamas can stand up to 14,000 MK-84 2,000 lb bombs
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 09:35 PM
Aug 2025

Grok

“The United States has sent significant quantities of bombs to Israel, particularly since the onset of the Gaza conflict on October 7, 2023. According to available information, the U.S. has transferred at least 14,000 MK-84 2,000-pound bombs and 6,500 500-pound bombs, among other munitions, between October 2023 and June 2024. This equates to:[](https://www.reuters.com/world/us-has-sent-israel-thousands-2000-pound-bombs-since-oct-7-2024-06-28/)[](https://aoav.org.uk/2024/us-has-sent-israel-14000-two-thousand-pound-bombs-since-october/)

- **14,000 × 2,000-pound bombs** = **28,000,000 pounds**
- **6,500 × 500-pound bombs** = **3,250,000 pounds**

Additionally, other munitions like 1,000 bunker-buster bombs, 3,000 Hellfire missiles, and 2,600 small-diameter bombs have been supplied, but their specific weights are less consistently documented. The total weight of these bombs alone is **31,250,000 pounds**. [](https://www.reuters.com/world/us-has-sent-israel-thousands-2000-pound-bombs-since-oct-7-2024-06-28/)

Precise figures for all munitions are hard to verify due to limited public disclosure, as the U.S. provides less detailed reporting on aid to Israel compared to other countries like Ukraine. If you need a breakdown of other munitions or more recent data, I can search for additional information. Would you like me to do that?[](https://www.reuters.com/world/us-has-sent-israel-thousands-2000-pound-bombs-since-oct-7-2024-06-28/)[](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/08/world/middleeast/us-israel-weapons.html)

womanofthehills

(10,771 posts)
91. A 3rd of all Americans are on Twitter - over 100 million Americans are on Twitter & 52 million of them are Dems
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:44 PM
Aug 2025

Including most of our government reps. If the info doesn’t suit you ..,,,

fujiyamasan

(1,449 posts)
92. I don't give a fuck
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:52 PM
Aug 2025

Fuck Musk. And stop fucking defending his shitty products.

Especially his little Nazi inspired chat bot.

betsuni

(28,904 posts)
3. "HAMA'S premise for war both accepted and approved of the fact that civilians would be sacrificed in horrific numbers.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 06:02 AM
Aug 2025

It was also an integral part of the war plan to use their dead bodies as a strategic weapon against Israel."

"The October 7 battle strategy for HAMAS was, 'When we kill Jewish babies, they will come to kill Palestinian babies. Either way, we win.'"

Malcolm Nance

Martin Eden

(15,459 posts)
24. I started to reach that conclusion more than a year ago.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 09:45 AM
Aug 2025

Hamas had to know the response from Israel would have horrendous consequences for Palestinian civilians in Gaza. A big part of their strategy was Israel losing international support as people were horrified at the mass slaughter and suffering of civilians, women, children.

This in no way exonerates the Israeli government for the deliberate carnage. I'm tempted to say Netanyahu is playing right into the hands of Hamas, but the long term goal of that terrorist organization -- the destruction of the Jewish state -- is a hopeless cause.

Using their own people as sacrificial pawns indicates that indulging their hatred in a fruitless goal they can't let go of supercedes the well being and future of the Palestinian people.

The October 7 atrocity convinced the Israeli hardliners that ethnic cleansing was necessary in their own long term goal of a Greater Israel encompassing all the Promised Land.

This is a generational struggle set in the context of a history encompassing millenia. Long term goals far exceed the lifetimes of today's actors, further intensified by religious zealotry and control of Jerusalem, the Holy City over which Crusades were fought.

I make no predictions, except the violence will likely continue for the forseeable future.

Jerusalem should be an international city of peace and brotherhood, given that it is so integral to three monotheistic religions worshipping the same God.

And the United States of America should be that shining city on a hill built on the idea that all human beings regardless of race or religion have equal rights -- an idea if, truly put into practice, would provide an example and the best hope for the future of human civilization.

When I was young, I had such optimism. Now in my late 60's my heart still believes in the idea, but my eyes see not progress but regression into the ancient racial and religious us versus them hatreds. All this as we continue to poison this precious Earth which sustains life itself.

We have the intelligence for tremendous industrial and technological advancements, but lack the wisdom to use it in the best way for our long term survival.

I am reminded of a lyric from Epitaph by King Crimson:

Knowledge is a deadly friend
If no one sets the rules
The fate of all mankind I see
Is in the hands of fools

ShadesOfBlue

(101 posts)
47. Malcolm Nance has no proof that was the plan....
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 12:52 PM
Aug 2025

he only conjured out of his Zionist brain. People like Nance and Hal Sparks go all nuts in the head to do mental gymnastics used to deflect criticism of Israel. It’s pathetic.

sheshe2

(96,703 posts)
75. FYI...Malcom Nance is a member of DU.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 07:27 PM
Aug 2025

We do not attack other members of this board by saying,

"People like Nance and Hal Sparks go all nuts in the head to do mental gymnastics used to deflect criticism of Israel. It’s pathetic."

Profile:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=378780

Crunchy Frog

(28,220 posts)
84. He's a public figure and his presence on DU is largely symbolic.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 09:24 PM
Aug 2025

I hugely admire what he's done in Ukraine. His positions on Israel not so much.

As a public figure I think it's legitimate to criticize him here.

Crunchy Frog

(28,220 posts)
96. It's not unusual to talk about media figures in that way. And he's only posted 5 or 6 times, so
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 02:03 AM
Aug 2025

how is the average poster supposed to even know that he's a member?

Boy, I sure hope that Bill Maher never joins DU, as that would certainly put a damper on many discussions here.

I really think that if someone is a public figure, and is being talked about as a public figure, that it shouldn't make a difference if they happen to have a DU membership. JMHO.

sheshe2

(96,703 posts)
128. Five or six times and a Star Member of DU.
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 02:55 PM
Aug 2025

Which makes him a member of our community and should be treated as such. We all have disagreements, but they can be talked about without insults.

He has also been reading here for years.

how is the average poster supposed to even know that he's a member?


That is why I told the poster that he was a member, now he knows!

mcar

(45,829 posts)
50. One of their leaders announced soon after Oct 7
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 01:05 PM
Aug 2025

That he wanted innocent Palestinians to die.

Amazing that everyone seems to have forgotten about Hamas in this whole mess.

betsuni

(28,904 posts)
57. Yes, clearly praising high death toll as a "welcome sacrifice" and do nothing to protect them or stop the war.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 02:06 PM
Aug 2025

Described as a death cult. Yet the news coverage I've seen shows Hamas videos and quotes Hamas as if they aren't death cult terrorists who'd torture rape and shoot you in the face without even thinking about it.

mcar

(45,829 posts)
59. It's one of the things that has bothered me since that horrific attack
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 02:20 PM
Aug 2025

MSM always quoting Hamas-backed sources for their information. They've often had to correct it later but who pays attention to that?

And haven't there been several cases of "journalists" on the ground who've turned out to be with Hamas?

womanofthehills

(10,771 posts)
93. Babies were not beheaded or put in microwave ovens
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 12:27 AM
Aug 2025

It’s all horrible - Baby Mila in Israel and the retaliation of 400 Gaza newborn deaths and 953 babies under one yrs old. (Almost 5000 under 5 yrs old.

Lies, lies, lies -. “According to Times of Israel and Haaretz one baby under one was killed Oct 7 - Mila Cohen who was ten months old. She and her dad
were killed by bullets coming thru a safe room door. Her mother got hit but lived and her two little brothers were not hit. The other baby was a baby they tried to save who was in the womb of a wounded mother. Groc listed Times of Israel & Haaretz as sources.

According to Haaretz & Times of Israel by Grok or just search both newspapers

“The Times of Israel, citing Hebrew media, reported that among the 764 civilian victims, there were two infants, 12 children under 10 (including Mila Cohen), 36 civilians aged 10–19, and 25 elderly people over 80. A Bedouin woman, shot in the abdomen while pregnant, lost her unborn child despite medical efforts.”

“Haaretz also clarified misinformation, debunking exaggerated claims such as babies being hung on clotheslines or groups of children being slaughtered and mutilated, stating that such reports were false. They emphasized that while atrocities occurred, including desecration of corpses and beheadings, specific claims about mass child killings were inaccurate.”

The Gaza Health Ministry has documented over 18,500 children killed in Gaza between October 7, 2023, and July 31, 2025, with names, ages, and other identifying details included in their records. This includes 4,741 babies under 5 years old, with the first 100 pages of a 386-page document listing these infants. Additionally, 953 babies under one year and 400 newborns are among the documented deaths. These figures are based on hospital and morgue records, vetted family reports, and reliable media, though the actual toll may be higher due to unidentified or missing individuals.[](https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2025/israel-gaza-war-children-death-toll/)

Orrex

(66,825 posts)
4. Well, Hamas is a vile terrorist regime that should be wiped out to its last member.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 06:14 AM
Aug 2025

Even if they had the means to protect Gazans from Netanyahu's years-long campaign of deliberate civilian murder, it's hardly clear that they would do so.

GiqueCee

(3,671 posts)
5. Sadly...
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 06:25 AM
Aug 2025

... Netanyahu is seeing to it that there will be a bumper crop of replacement fighters. He's murdering hungry 10-year-olds struggling to carry a little food home to his mother. He is a psychotic monster.

womanofthehills

(10,771 posts)
95. I believe this all began 80 yrs ago
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 12:44 AM
Aug 2025

When Zionists carried out massacres in Palestine. We also see every day on our phones the atrocities in the West Bank.

As of June 2025, there are 10,400 Palestinians in Israeli prisons- 440 are children according to Addameer. We see how emaciatecd Palestine doctors are if and when released from Israeli prisons. We have also viewed the prison rape videos on our phones.

womanofthehills

(10,771 posts)
135. Before Oct 7, IDF was busy killing Palestinian children
Fri Aug 8, 2025, 05:12 PM
Aug 2025

UN ...Israel forces kill 11 Palestinian children in first three months of 2019

Israeli occupation forces killed 11 Palestinian children in the first quarter of 2019, reported human rights NGO Defence for Children International – Palestine (DCIP).
The fatalities include two children shot dead during Great Return March protests on 30 March, as well as a volunteer medic killed in Bethlehem last week.”
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20190404-israel-forces-kill-11-palestinian-children-in-first-three-months-of-2019/

Johnny2X2X

(23,872 posts)
6. Make up your minds
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 06:28 AM
Aug 2025

Are they not showing up to defend them or are they showing up to use them as human shields?

Hamas is no longer a viable fighting force in Gaza and haven’t been for a long time. They can’t defend anything.

EdmondDantes_

(1,563 posts)
9. Both can be true depending on the circumstances
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 06:35 AM
Aug 2025

As you note, Hamas isn't currently capable of doing anything, but they definitely used human shields in the past putting their operational bases under hospitals and schools.

Obviously doesn't excuse Israel from responsibility in terms of shooting people trying to get the meager aid they allow or the plan to remove Palestinians from Gaza so Israel can have it.

AloeVera

(4,087 posts)
12. Why do you believe there were "operational bases under hospitals and schools"?
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 07:16 AM
Aug 2025

Other than the sad and empty laundry room under Al-Shifa that was a joke?

Israel has provided no credible evidence for that claim used as a pretext to destroy entire hospitals and schools.

Even had that spurious claim been grounded in reality, which it was not, Israel still would have been in violation of international law for BOMBING hospitals, wantonly and deliberately - manually - destroying equipment and depriving Palestinians of medical care.

Imagine - just imagine - being a Palestinian horrifically wounded, needing amputations etc without proper equipment and medicine. It's the height of cruelty to destroy hospitals in a place where you are also killing and maiming civilian every day.

Human shields?? No. And btw under what law are human shields permitted to be slaughtered? Perversion and manipulation of international law to justify killing of civilians and destroy their infrastructure and homes, in aid of ethnic cleansing - that's what it has always amounted to.

AloeVera

(4,087 posts)
32. Obviously that intelligence data was not validated by after-the-fact facts on the ground.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 10:32 AM
Aug 2025

I also wonder what/who was the source of that intelligence. Did the US have its own intelligence on the ground in Gaza, as Israel does?

As for the ynet article, it doesn't pass the lowest bar of journalistic standards. I had seen it before and was quite amused by it.

The destruction of hospitals based on claims never proven has been widely condemned. The point remains: there is neither law nor concensus for the level of destruction nor for the suffering of patients and staff.

Even John Kirby, in the article you linked to, said this:

Kirby underscored that Hamas' actions in the hospitals did not lessen Israel's responsibility to protect civilians, but acknowledged that it made Israel's efforts to root out Hamas more complicated.
"To be clear, we do not support striking a hospital from the air. We do not want to see a firefight in a hospital where innocent people, helpless people, sick people are simply trying to get the medical care they deserve," he said.
"We have been clear on multiple occasions - Hamas actions do not lessen Israel's responsibilities to protect civilians in Gaza, and this is something we're going to continue to have an active conversation with our counterparts about," he added.


Completely ignored, of course.

EdmondDantes_

(1,563 posts)
33. You say obviously, I say citation needed
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:04 AM
Aug 2025

You still haven't demonstrated anything to support your contention that it's all just the lying Israelis.

AloeVera

(4,087 posts)
43. Israel did lie. It lied about the advanced, multi-story, well-equipped "Command and Control Centre" it touted.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 12:21 PM
Aug 2025

Nothing remotely resembling that was found under Al-Shifa.

Further, Israel has not provided one shred of evidence that the disused laundry room and toilet were used by Hamas.

Nor has it provided any evidence of command and control centres at any other hospital it destroyed.

Before attacking hospitals, indisputable, verified evidence is needed. That is lacking. Perhaps if Israel allowed UN-mandated independentent investigations. But, like independent investigations of October 7th, it has not allowed that.

So what you are asking for has been made impossible by Israel. Though there are plenty of sources, NGOs, etc out there questioning Israel's veracity on this. You can find them yourself.

Further:
"...in the exceptional circumstances when medical personnel, ambulances, and hospitals lose their special protection because they fulfil the strict criteria to be considered military objectives, any attack on them must still comply with the fundamental principles of distinction, proportionality and precautions in attack. Failure to respect any of these principles constitutes a breach of international humanitarian law.

If you have seen any pictures of what Israel did to Al-Shifa or the other hospitals, you cannot argue that Israel applied any of those principles. The IDF went hog-wild with the destruction. It was part of the systematic destruction of Gaza to ethnically cleanse the strip. It led to awful human suffering, still going on today, and it is unforgivable because it was deliberately planned and then lied about.

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/10/un-commission-finds-war-crimes-and-crimes-against-humanity-israeli-attacks

EdmondDantes_

(1,563 posts)
79. So I provided evidence of non-Israeli sources and that's not enough
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 08:38 PM
Aug 2025

Then you admit you can't prove your assertion, and then you pivot to complaining about Israel's war crimes as if that's a defense or somehow means that Hamas doesn't also commit war crimes.

Both sides can in fact suck in a war.

AloeVera

(4,087 posts)
87. Intelligence is not evidence and neither is a 10+year old questionable article with low journalistic standards.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:23 PM
Aug 2025

If Hamas committed a war crime as accused, they need to be charged and held accountable. For that to occur, Israel must present indisputable, independently verified evidence of their use of hospitals and schools. It has not done so.

If Israel committed fraud in its PR campaign, both before and after raiding and destroying Al Shifa and other hospitals, then it needs to be charged and held accountable also. For the war crime of the destruction of the hospital system as a tool of war (and ethnic cleansing).

I repeat: Israel has not presented convincing, indisputable evidence - the bar required before attacking a hospital - has not acceded to investigation by independent parties, and has entirely destroyed the Strip's hospital and medical system based on flimsy evidence. This resulted in heinous human suffering that persists to this day. I hope that it is held to account.

No one can definitively debunk Israel's claims using direct evidence - as Israel won't accede to independent investigations and won't let in foreign journalists to work independently. However, there is a plethora of information and analysis that points to these claims being false. The pattern of deceit and lies is quite consistent.

Simply put, Israel has no credibility left. It lies and then lies some more. Sometimes it forgets it already lied or forgets the details of its previous lie, and that's when it gets caught.

It definitely lied about the hospitals. Here's some evidence of that - there's tons more, but as I said you could do your own research - if you are so inclined.

The Washington Post analyzed the publicly released material by Israel, along with satellite imagery and other publicly available material, and concluded that the rooms that were connected to a tunnel network showed "no immediate evidence of military use by Hamas", and that each of the buildings that the IDF spokesman Daniel Hagari had identified as being "directly involved" in Hamas's military activity did not appear to be connected to any tunnel network, and that there had been no evidence released that showed that a tunnel network could be accessed by any part of the hospital.[77] Following the second offensive against al-Shifa which took place the following March, an Israeli colonel told the Washington Post that Hamas operatives had been working in offices and wards above ground in recent months, and that the use of tunnels had been less important.[78]

On January 2, 2024, U.S. intelligence confirmed its belief that Hamas used the Al-Shifa Hospital as a command center and to hold Israeli hostages, mentioning in an assessment that Hamas “used the al-Shifa hospital complex and sites beneath it to house command infrastructure, exercise certain command and control activities, store some weapons, and hold at least a few hostages.”[79][80][55] However, news reports the next day said that both Israeli and US statements are not considered as conclusive proof of Hamas use of al-Shifa.[81][82]

On February 12, 2024, classified Israeli intelligence documents, obtained and reviewed by The New York Times suggested Hamas did store weapons and took cover at the hospital, using tunnels 213 meters long, twice the size previously known. The tunnels included bunkers, living areas, and computer and communications rooms, and established documents showed that Hamas masked its activities using the hospital. The Times also verified that the tunnel was under the surgery center. The article confirms that "The Israeli military, however, has struggled to prove that Hamas maintained a command-and-control center under the facility. Critics of the Israeli military say the evidence does not support its early claims, noting that it had distributed material before the raid showing five underground complexes and also had said the tunnel network could be reached from wards inside a hospital building."[83]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alleged_military_use_of_al-Shifa_hospital

The Washington Post analyzed the publicly released material by Israel, along with satellite imagery and other publicly available material, and concluded that the rooms that were connected to a tunnel network did not show any immediate evidence of being used by Hamas, and that each of the buildings that the IDF spokesman Daniel Hagari had identified as being "directly involved" in Hamas's military activity did not appear to be connected to any tunnel network, and that there had been no evidence released that showed that a tunnel network could be accessed from within the hospital's wards.[41] The France 24 Observer analysis team was "unable to verify Israeli claims that the passage leads to a larger network of tunnels."[148]

On 21 December, The Washington Post published an analysis concluding that the hospital buildings in question were not actually connected to the tunnels.[41] On 2 January 2024 newly declassified documents by the United States showed that its spy agencies continued to express confidence that the hospital had been used as a command and control centre, while providing no visual evidence.[42] The next day Israel announced that it had dismantled a tunnel beneath the hospital.[43] News reports the following day said both the Israeli and US statements are not considered as conclusive proof of Hamas use of al-Shifa.[44][45]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shifa_Hospital_siege

And then there is this interesting site, detailing Israel's pattern of dishonest claims relating to the hospital attacks. I hope you read the whole thing.

The Israeli military claimed that an extensive tunnel network at Al-Shifa hospital had been used as Hamas’ headquarters and that ‘entrances [to the tunnel] are located in various departments of the hospital, including the admissions department, putting all patients at risk’. The Israeli military spokesperson also claimed that ‘Hamas also has an entrance to those terror tunnels from inside the hospital wards — meaning from different places of the hospital you can go into an underground tunnel’. Reporting indicates that the tunnel does not provide access to the hospital wards and as we have shown above, and that its actual size and reach is inconsistent with the illustrations the Israeli military published alongside these claims. Our findings also indicate that the computer-generated graphics alleging an extensive tunnel network beneath Al-Shifa are nothing like the Israeli military’s own claims about the tunnel footprint on 22 November. We also found that their 27 October claim (which accompanied the computer-generated graphics) that a ‘command and control centre’ existed beneath Al-Shifa contradicts the claims they subsequently made and evidence they presented on 20 November.

snip

The Israeli military claimed that an extensive tunnel network at Al-Shifa hospital had been used as Hamas’ headquarters and that ‘entrances [to the tunnel] are located in various departments of the hospital, including the admissions department, putting all patients at risk’. The Israeli military spokesperson also claimed that ‘Hamas also has an entrance to those terror tunnels from inside the hospital wards — meaning from different places of the hospital you can go into an underground tunnel’. Reporting indicates that the tunnel does not provide access to the hospital wards and as we have shown above, and that its actual size and reach is inconsistent with the illustrations the Israeli military published alongside these claims. Our findings also indicate that the computer-generated graphics alleging an extensive tunnel network beneath Al-Shifa are nothing like the Israeli military’s own claims about the tunnel footprint on 22 November. We also found that their 27 October claim (which accompanied the computer-generated graphics) that a ‘command and control centre’ existed beneath Al-Shifa contradicts the claims they subsequently made and evidence they presented on 20 November.


https://forensic-architecture.org/investigation/assessment-israeli-material-icj-jan-2024

Why do you call attention drawn to Israel's misuse of international law - using one part of the law to achieve its ends but ignoring another, equally important part that, if applied, would have prevented the destruction of Israel's hospitals - a "pivot"? Just a rhetorical question.
 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
98. Oh the irony!
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 08:00 AM
Aug 2025

Please bookmark your post and use it as reference before you feel compelled to accuse anyone of war crimes.

That alone should significantly free up your daily schedule.

BTW, just FYI: media reports questioning how conclusive the available evidence might be do not in themselves constitute evidence or prove the available evidence to be false.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
17. Why are you denying the existence of operational bases and other military assets under hospitals and schools?
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 08:45 AM
Aug 2025

And what international laws are you talking about? Certainly not this one:

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
....
Article 8Article 8-(2,3)
War crimes
....
2. For the purpose of this Statute, “war crimes” means:
....
(b)(xxiii) Utilizing the presence of a civilian or other protected person to
render certain points, areas or military forces immune from military
operations;
https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/2024-05/Rome-Statute-eng.pdf

Human shields are not permitted. Period. Don't try to spin it.

lapucelle

(20,966 posts)
41. Hamas is desperate. The Arab League very publicly turned its back last week
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 12:11 PM
Aug 2025

when it condemned the October 7 attack and called on Hamas to release the hostages, disarm, and surrender.

Since then Hamas has released photos and videos of the hostages (who they are starving and torturing daily) in the hope of stoking outrage against Israel. Hamas also went over the heads of Egyptian and Jordanian officials to try to stoke anger against those countries for participating in the "starvation plan" by not providing enough aid. Even the Red Cross and WHO are finally making some noise about the condition of the hostages and Hamas's myriad war crimes against the hostages and the people of Gaza.

So the latest, and possibly most desperate piece of Hamas propaganda is that Israel already had a "starvation plan" in place in October 2023, either before or shortly after Hamas invaded Israel to carry out its protracted rape-torture-murder spree on October 7.



----------------------------------------------------

https://www.timesofisrael.com/in-1st-entire-arab-league-condemns-oct-7-urges-hamas-to-disarm-at-2-state-solution-confab/
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hk4lbnyulg
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crr2dwn7q40o

writerJT

(467 posts)
81. I'll ask you too.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 08:44 PM
Aug 2025

If Hamas took over a hospital in Tel Aviv, full of Israeli citizens, would Israel still use the “human shield” argument to bomb the living fuck out of Israeli citizens simply because, oh well, they just had to get Hamas?

No, they wouldn’t. Israel, and every single person who supports this nonsense, is perfectly fine bombing Palestinian civilians. It’s that simple. And that is support for genocide, support for the current holocaust carried out by Israel.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
90. I hope you realize how batshit incredulous your analogy is. Hamas would never get anywhere near a Tel Aviv hospital
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:39 PM
Aug 2025

But suppose a handful of them gets past border security, travels undetected half way through the country by public transportation, passes metal detectors and armed security guards inside the hospital and casually walks into a sprawling hospital grounds full of Israelis who greet them as liberators. Let's then suppose that the hospital staff takes orders from them and facilitates their presence in the hospital. Let's then suppose that a platoon of heavily armed Hamas militants miraculously springs out of the ground and secures the perimeter of the hospital so Israeli special forces are prevented from entering it.

Even if we suppose all this absurdity, the human shield argument would not apply. Hamas would still be committing a terrorist act rather than a military operation. A situation to which Article 19 of the Fourth Geneva Convention would not apply. In the event of terrorist takeover, the hospital continues to exclusively perform acts within their humanitarian duties, and therefore retains its protective status. Therefore, international law says that the hospital may not be attacked.

If, on the other hand, we drop all the contrived inanities, you will have to show me at least one instance in which Israel bombed the living fuck out of a Gazan hospital without first ordering its evacuation before I can take your heap of over the top presumptions halfass seriously .

writerJT

(467 posts)
94. Just as I thought.
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 12:28 AM
Aug 2025

Bunch of words. Said nothing.

You can try to muddy the waters as much as you want if it makes you feel better about supporting genocide and ethnic cleansing. I think most people here see through your bullshit.

You seem a bit angry. Is that a side effect of supporting a holocaust?

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
100. Considering the merits of your post, what else did you expect?
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 08:21 AM
Aug 2025

Are you expecting a reasoned and measured reply to a preposterous proposition? Please! Get a grip.

JustAnotherGen

(37,798 posts)
104. The Argument just doesn't make sense
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 08:38 AM
Aug 2025

Seriously BB -

if Hamas has control of a hospital in Tel Aviv - then that means they have killed every single Israeli and the would be bombing themselves - the State of Hamas in the Middle East.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
106. It wasn't even an argument.
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 08:55 AM
Aug 2025

There was no legitimate argument presented. The purpose of this nonsensical tirade was not to argue, but to gratuitously throw random accusations around, irrespective of the replies.

JustAnotherGen

(37,798 posts)
110. That's kind of harsh don't you think?
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 11:19 AM
Aug 2025

I usually reserve that kind of language for white supremacists. Beastly Boy is most definitely NOT a w.s.

writerJT

(467 posts)
80. The "human shield" argument is BS.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 08:43 PM
Aug 2025

If Hamas took over a hospital in Tel Aviv, full of Israeli citizens, would Israel still use the “human shield” argument to bomb the living fuck out of Israeli citizens simply because, oh well, they just had to get Hamas?

No, they wouldn’t. Israel, and every single person who supports this nonsense, is perfectly fine bombing Palestinian civilians. It’s that simple. And that is support for genocide, support for the current holocaust carried out by Israel.

JustAnotherGen

(37,798 posts)
99. If that were to happen
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 08:00 AM
Aug 2025

That means they've killed every Israeli and now have complete control of Israel.

Israel wouldn't be able to bomb them - because Israel would be gone.

writerJT

(467 posts)
105. Nope.
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 08:46 AM
Aug 2025

Was “everyone in Israel” killed when the Savoy Hotel in Tel Aviv was taken over and hostages were taken, just to use one example?

Hospital. Hotel. School. Take any example. Israel would NEVER call the people being held “human shields” and they would never bomb the site. They simply want to exterminate Palestinians. That’s their genocidal goal.

JustAnotherGen

(37,798 posts)
107. Disagree
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 09:22 AM
Aug 2025

Because Hamas very existence is the elimination of every single Jewish Person on earth. The Savoy was a PLO act of terrorism in 1975.

Hamas is a blood thirsty terrorist organization - they wouldn't make the same mistakes the PLO made.

Question - did Hamas act like blood thirsty demonic murders on October 7th -

Or are we completely ignoring that now?

We might not see them the same way. My raping murderous Demonic Entities might very well be your Freedom Fighters.

And if we are that far apart in perception - then we have nothing further to discuss. Agree to Disagree?

BTW - I consider white supremacists in America to be raping, murderous Demonic Entities with Krasnov as head demon in charge. It's because of ACTIONS not WHO they are that makes me call them Demonic Entities.

writerJT

(467 posts)
108. We know who is doing the
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 10:55 AM
Aug 2025

eliminating now. Hence the dissembling here. And all the excuse making for this holocaust.

I won’t “agree to disagree.”

But I also won’t continue to talk with a supporter of ethnic cleansing.





JustAnotherGen

(37,798 posts)
111. Excuse me
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 11:22 AM
Aug 2025

Did you just accuse me of being a Hutu, Nazi, etc. etc.

But I also won’t continue to talk with a supporter of ethnic cleansing.


That's kind of harsh. Anyways - I'm in Dubrovnik now.
 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
16. A simple adherence to the laws of war would have been ample defense of civilians.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 08:25 AM
Aug 2025

All they needed to do is separate themselves and their military assets from civilians. They can still do it, but they refuse.

And if they wanted the war to end, they would have released the hostages long ago.

It's not a matter of making up anyone's mind.

JustAnotherGen

(37,798 posts)
102. Then why have they not
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 08:28 AM
Aug 2025

waved the white flag?

Someone has to be in charge there. Who is it? And why haven't they sat down with a mediator and Israel's Trump to hash out a peace plan?

Orrex

(66,825 posts)
137. Probably in part because Netanyahu would continue murdering civilians regardless
Fri Aug 8, 2025, 10:49 PM
Aug 2025

I also suspect that Hamas isn't the organized, hierarchical structure that IDF propaganda makes it out to be.

And since, as a vile terrorist regime, Hamas doesn't concern itself with the well-being of Palestinians, they have no incentive to surrender. Netanyahu knows this, and yet he choose to continue his years-long campaign of deliberate civilian murder, all while his apologists continue to blame Hamas for Bibi's actions.

indusurb

(312 posts)
7. And yet Israel continues the slaughter of Gazans
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 06:32 AM
Aug 2025

So much for the notion of just being in it to eliminate Hamas, now it's outright genocide.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
18. And yet, Hamas doesn't give a shit about Gazan civilians. Never did.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 08:47 AM
Aug 2025

And that is the subject of the OP, isn't it?

womanofthehills

(10,771 posts)
126. Hamas is partly made up of fathers whose children and wife's were murdered by Israel.
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 01:45 PM
Aug 2025

Now that American doctors say they have lots of kids with gun shot wounds to their heads, chest and genitalia- if you were a dad and this happened to your kid, or your kid is an amputee, burnt or blind - you might just join Hamas.

multigraincracker

(37,218 posts)
129. I have 2 friends that are Christian Palestinians
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 03:09 PM
Aug 2025

Both of their families were attacked and had their small olive groves taken by Israeli Settlers that were defended by the IDF. One saw his uncle shot dead by the IDF. These are Christians not Muslim. They both hate Israel. I’m sure there are Christian’s in Gaza too.

Intractable

(1,773 posts)
8. So, you are saying that the Israelis are bombing and shooting Gazan civilians and not Hamas.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 06:33 AM
Aug 2025

I agree.

It makes the Israeli military as evil as Hamas.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
19. Not at all. The propblem is that their PRESENCE among civilians endangers them.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 08:52 AM
Aug 2025

Hamas can protect Gazan civilians by getting the fuck away from them.

That simple.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
37. If one is in denial of Hamas aggression when they invaded Israel,
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:44 AM
Aug 2025

If one is in denial of Hamas killing, raping and mutilating over 1,000 Israelis in their homes,

If one is in denial of Hamas kidnapping over 200 hostages, taking them across international borders into Gaza,

If one is in denial of a long list of Hamas leaders bragging about causing the "martyrdom" of Gazan civilians as their core military objective,

If one is in denial of the existence of the rules of war and international law,

then sure, one is in denial.

Intractable

(1,773 posts)
39. I deny no such things about Hamas. To say so is foolishness.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:52 AM
Aug 2025

But you deny that Netanyahu plans to take their land by force.

And that's more foolishness on your part.

Israel has clearly shown they can be as cruel as Hamas.

Obviously, in your eyes, Israel can do no wrong. Perhaps you think Jews are "the chosen ones" and others are not.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
51. Yes, you quite literallt denied such thing. Read the header of your post 35.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 01:06 PM
Aug 2025

"Not at all. Dead innocent Gazans clearly due to Israel's aggression".

That was in response to my post titled "Not at all. The problem is that their [Hamas] PRESENCE among civilians endangers them."

It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to see that "not at all" is a denial, and it is a denial of the fact that Hamas presence among civilians is responsible for endangering their lives.

This is a direct denial of at least one "such thing" I posted, namely "Hamas leaders bragging about causing the "martyrdom" of Gazan civilians as their core military objective"


Now it's your turn: where did you see me comment on Netanyahu's plans? Or that Israel can do no wrong? Or that the Jews are the "chosen ones"?

I don't think "obviously" means what you think it means.

Intractable

(1,773 posts)
67. I think you don't know what the hell you are talking about and are trying to split hairs over language.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 04:13 PM
Aug 2025

"Obviously" you are confused and pointlessly angry. I see that in a lot of your posts.

You support the war, but not Netanyahoo. That's bull.

That there are some Hamas members among the population is no excuse to wage a starvation campaign against them all. Many Gazans are innocent victims of Hamas.

In Hebrew school I was taught that we are God's (scuze me, G_d's chosen people) and Israel is our homeland.

I lived among the orthodox whose philosophy was Israel first, America second. They all voted for GW Bush solely because they believed Republicans were stronger on Israel. They also staunchly believe that the Earth is a mere 6000 years old, that women's bodies are inherently dirty, and that Noah's arc was real. The Hasidim I knew looked down on the mere orthodox, who looked further down on the more secular Jews.

Netanyahoo frequently makes references to Jewish history and destiny to justify the stealing of land.

I believe in Israel's right to exist, but only within its current borders. Not one parcel beyond.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
68. I am tired of repeating that ad hominem attacks are against DU terms of service.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 04:23 PM
Aug 2025

And, if your description of your childhood is in any way accurate, I am truly sorry about the way you remember it.

Good bye.

JustAnotherGen

(37,798 posts)
113. You are at odds with Hamas then
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 11:57 AM
Aug 2025
https://web.archive.org/web/20170510123932/http://hamas.ps/en/post/678/

The position toward Occupation and Political Solutions:

18. The following are considered null and void: the Balfour Declaration, the British Mandate Document, the UN Palestine Partition Resolution, and whatever resolutions and measures that derive from them or are similar to them. The establishment of “Israel” is entirely illegal and contravenes the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people and goes against their will and the will of the Ummah; it is also in violation of human rights that are guaranteed by international conventions, foremost among them is the right to self-determination.


20. Hamas believes that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea. However, without compromising its rejection of the Zionist entity and without relinquishing any Palestinian rights, Hamas considers the establishment of a fully sovereign and independent Palestinian state, with Jerusalem as its capital along the lines of the 4th of June 1967, with the return of the refugees and the displaced to their homes from which they were expelled, to be a formula of national consensus.


What do you think can be done to get Hamas to give up these insane ideas? Because it's in their charter - and they refuse to operate in good faith.

I truly believe this 'war' never ends. It never ends.

Intractable

(1,773 posts)
114. We are all at odds with Hamas. Shame on you for thinking I think otherwise.
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 12:03 PM
Aug 2025

I supposed you just felt a need to post, right?

Go have a nice day, somewhere else.

JustAnotherGen

(37,798 posts)
115. That's really
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 12:09 PM
Aug 2025

Harsh.

Israel is at war with Hamas - and Hamas charter states that Israel is not allowed to exist.

Way over the top.

JustAnotherGen

(37,798 posts)
118. I didn't say that
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 12:13 PM
Aug 2025

I said that you were at odds with the Hamas belief that Israel should exist at all.

Piss off equates to Fuck Off.

That's literally a personal attack.

Response to JustAnotherGen (Reply #118)

Intractable

(1,773 posts)
123. Perhaps you'll grow out of it.
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 12:44 PM
Aug 2025

I said something was "smartest," which does not in those words logically imply that you are "stupid."

But, have at it as they say.

dlk

(13,203 posts)
11. How little we've heard about Hamas, and anything, at all, they've actually done to help Palestinians
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 07:11 AM
Aug 2025

Other than spreading hatred, death and destruction, why do they exist?

Martin Eden

(15,459 posts)
13. Are you suggesting that Hamas -- whatever is left of it --
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 08:12 AM
Aug 2025

Can overpower the IDF to ensure it can't kill Gazan civilians trying to obtain food?

The only thing I can think of is for Hamas to release the remaining hostages -- which they should have done a long time ago.

Then we will see if the starvation and slaughter continues.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
22. No, Hamas - whatever is left of it - can release the hostages and disarm.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 09:02 AM
Aug 2025

And that will insure the cessation of active military operations by Israel.

Martin Eden

(15,459 posts)
26. Perhaps
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 09:55 AM
Aug 2025

Regardless, the I think the long term goal is a Greater Israel encompassing all the Promised Land. The Netanyahu government likely believes ethnic cleansing is necessary to achieve that goal.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
29. That's a whole different issue.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 10:07 AM
Aug 2025

In this respect, Gaza is not, and has never been, part of the Promised Land.

What is far more likely is that the long term goal is to have the hostages released and Hamas disarmed, incendiary statements by the idiots in Netanyahu's government notwithstanding.

Martin Eden

(15,459 posts)
30. On the contrary, it's inextricable
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 10:15 AM
Aug 2025

Long term goals in this conflict are generational, in the context of millenia. The current war, like most crises, presents both danger and opportunity.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
34. In this context, the Netanyahu government is immaterial.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:28 AM
Aug 2025

Historically, long term outcomes are opportunistic rather than planned.

If, on the other hand, you are referring to the formation of conceptions that define a culture or a nation, the Netanyahu government is engaged in subverting these conceptions: it is neither religious nor Zionist. They are not religious because they disregard the established religious dogma that prohibits Jews from setting foot on the holy grounds where the Temple stood, and it is not Zionist because Gaza never figured into the Zionist ethos.

Martin Eden

(15,459 posts)
49. Long term goals can be loosely defined as desired outcomes, but plans are more immediate
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 12:55 PM
Aug 2025

I don't know what is meant by the "Zionist ethos" but it sounds more ideological than a reference to specific parcels of land within the area of the Jewish state.

As for religion, I don't think the Jewish faith can ever be fully divorced from the Jewish state, especially one that needs support from religious fundamentalists. Whether the actions of their government betrays tenets of the faith is pretty much irrelevant in this context, and not unusual in the exercise of power by any nation-state supported by a large contingent of religionists. One need look no farther than the US government with its Evangelical base of support, and a major Party that mostly subscribes to the notion that America is a "Christian" nation not only in concept but in enforced policy.

Getting back to the current conflict, Netanyahu seemed very much on board with Trump’s plan to remove the Palestinian population from Gaza (which, as with all TFG's grandiose plans, must be taken with several grains of salt).

Whatever Zionists may have intended 80 years ago for the eventual boundaries of their nation state, I think the actions of today's government is in keeping of the Never Again ethos applied to the Oct 7 atrocity. It is not unreasonable to conclude that long term security and 2 million Palestinians in Gaza are incompatable.

The 2-state solution is dead, when facts on the ground are considered. Jewish settlements in the West Bank have been expanding for decades, and hardcore settlers have used the current war as a license for attacks.

As I said before, a crisis presents both danger and opportunity, and I think the latter is observable.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
70. "Zionist ethos" is entirely ideological, and it doesn't identify land parcels except in very general terms.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 05:17 PM
Aug 2025

The ethos is based on a single fundamental concept: the creation and sustenance of a sanctuary for all Jews facing persecution elsewhere in the world. It was the UN (speaking of opportunistic outcomes) and subsequent treaties that eventually identified the territorial boundaries of this sanctuary which became the State of Israel.

The relationship between the parcels of land and the Jewish faith, on the other hand, is rooted in the concept of "holy land". It had endured for millenia outside of the existence of a sovereign state, and the identifiable parcels of land it aspires to are the ones described in the Torah and promised by God to the twelve tribes of Israel that Moses led out of Egypt. It roughly corresponds to the current center and north of Israel, and Judea and Samaria, which is roughly the land of the occupied territories and the south of Galillee. It is almost entirely about the land and not the state. In fact, there are religious sects that actively advocate the dissolution of the State of Israel.

I firmly believe that a two state solution is inevitable, not for ideological or religious reasons, but for practical ones. A single state containing all of mandatory Palestine is bound to be so volatile and unstable, it will inevitably fracture into two or more states. The dynamics between three or more states are potentially even more volatile than that. The mini-civil war between Fatah and Hamas in 2007 amply illustrated this eventuality. Any one-state or three-state solutions are bound, by the virtue of inter-state dynamics, to eventually, likely following much turmoil, stabilize into two separate states. The only question I have is whether the resulting two states will exist in the perpetual state of confrontation or will find ways to cooperate for mutual benefit. The current moves towards the Abraham accords as a working model for cooperation promises the latter.

Martin Eden

(15,459 posts)
73. The 2-state solution as a negotiated settlement is glaringly impractical
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 05:47 PM
Aug 2025

Can ANY Israeli government remove by force West Bank settlers, some of whom have lived in their communities for generations?

I'm pretty sure attempting that would be political suicide, as would withdrawing all government security from West Bank settlements -- leaving them to the tender mercies as residents in a sovereign Palestenian state.

I suppose it's possible sometime in an unforseeable future that factional civil wars could redraw boundaries into two or more states, but in this nuclear age with extreme discrepancies in military power, I doubt the patterns of the past will be repeated. Power is no longer based on the number of soldiers trained to wield swords and bows.

And yes, I understand Zionism. The Holocaust demonstrated that the Jewish people will never find long term security as residents, or even citizens, as a minority in foreign lands. Combined with the promised Holy Land, and International support, the nation state of Israel was born.

As was the modern conflict with Palestinians who lived there. Some Jews already resided there, but the mass migration to form the Jewish State dramatically changed whatever equilibrium may have existed.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
74. The answer to your question is yes. We have a precedent.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 05:56 PM
Aug 2025

Ariel Sharon, the Likud prime minister, forcibly removed 25,000 settlers from Gaza when Israel disengaged in 2005.

And a 2 state solution as negotiated settlement, even though it is oreferable to other option, was nit exactly what I was talking about. It is the regional (and probably global) dynamics that make a two-state solution inevitable, regardless of how it begins or what twisted (and bloody) paths it might take.

markpkessinger

(8,887 posts)
116. Netanyahu himself has said the hostages are not his top priority . . .
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 12:09 PM
Aug 2025

. . .yet I don't see you excoriating him. I wonder why?

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
125. I don't excoriate on demand.
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 01:36 PM
Aug 2025

Especially when it has no relevance to what I am posting.

But my record on Netanyahu is crystal clear: I consider him a traitor to his country and his people, and he is getting too much attention that he doesn't deserve. Seeing his name mentioned in the headlines multiple times per day makes me puke.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
136. Do you expect me to gratuitously excoriate whoever you decide I should excoriate on demand?
Fri Aug 8, 2025, 07:32 PM
Aug 2025

That would be absurd. Of course I will not do it out of context. I will not suddenly bring up Idi Amin when the subject is Mao Zedong. Isn't that self-evident?

I made an exception in your case to put an end to your idle speculations about my opinion of Netanyahu. If you wish to keep engaging in fantastic speculations any further, that doesn't create in me a sense of obligation.

Whatever tickles your fancy.

lapucelle

(20,966 posts)
31. There is only one entity that has the power to end the war IMMEDIATELY and UNILATERALLY: HAMAS
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 10:25 AM
Aug 2025
And HAMAS has held that power from Day 1.

As long as folks are running around spreading conspiracy theories that the whole war against Hamas was really a long con to implement a "starvation plan" against Gazans, it's imperative to remind everyone that Hamas can IMMEDIATELY and UNILATERALLY end this war today, just as sure as they could have IMMEDIATELY and UNILATERALLY ended this war in any of the previous 668 days since Hamas started it by invading Israel and conducting a protracted rape-torture-murder spree on October 7.


ShadesOfBlue

(101 posts)
45. It has been the power of Israel...
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 12:47 PM
Aug 2025

to show restraint and some basic humanity. But that is in short supply in that country. So instead its apologists utter the same nonsense. They act as if the conflict started on October. 6th, avoiding the fact that Palestinians have been living in an apartheid state for decades, which led to the formation of Hamas in the first place. And they pretend as if the acts of October 6th justifies a response that has been a hundred times worse in terms of destruction and loss of human life.

betsuni

(28,904 posts)
63. They could immediately stop the war.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 02:39 PM
Aug 2025

Just as Republicans could immediately stop Trump.

Kamala Harris didn't stop another country's war, Democrats don't have the power to stop Trump. Blame "Genocide Joe" and "Killer Kamala" and not the terrorists, blame Democrats and not Republicans.

Oneironaut

(6,253 posts)
15. I feel like this is almost universally understood.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 08:23 AM
Aug 2025

Hamas criticism is generally absent from the current discourse because it’s pointless, imo. It’s like criticizing the Nazis - everybody knows they're bad already, and, it’s just preaching to the choir.

There are small segments of people who support Hamas, but, they tend to be very young and/or not particularly intelligent.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
23. It is not pointless.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 09:05 AM
Aug 2025

It is imperative to condemn Hamas every single day that they hold hostages and violate international law.

Every single day, by everyone.

Silence breeds complacency.

EdmondDantes_

(1,563 posts)
25. Unfortunately I don't think that it is
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 09:52 AM
Aug 2025

When you've got people chanting from the river to the sea, those people are supporting Hamas and their desire to get rid of Israel. We need to be honest about Hamas and what the Netanhayu government is doing (and that seemingly much of the Israeli population wants it).

J_William_Ryan

(3,419 posts)
27. "...Gazans who are being shot and bombed while trying to get food to prevent starving to death."
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 09:59 AM
Aug 2025

Shot and bombed by Israel, not Hamas; starved by Israel, not Hamas.

What Hamas might fail to do doesn’t justify Israeli genocide of Palestinians.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
38. It is what Hamas is actively doing.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:50 AM
Aug 2025

Their presence among civilians is a conscious, deliberate, premeditated act. And it's a war crime.

ShadesOfBlue

(101 posts)
44. If Hamas isn't anywhere to be found...
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 12:40 PM
Aug 2025

it just make Israeli soldiers killing those Palestinians who are in search of food even more repugnant and demonic.

0rganism

(25,536 posts)
46. Why would they? They're accelerationists willing to torch Gaza to weaken Israel
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 12:48 PM
Aug 2025

Looks like they've succeeded, with the help of bloodthirsty Bibi and expansionist Israelis. Frankly the causus belli provided by the Oct. 7 atrocities was pretty damn irresistible.

In retrospect, it's been quite obvious. The destruction of Gaza's underdeveloped infrastructure is in its final stages now, and in a few months the Gazan population will be relocated or exterminated. Within a year, Trump and Bibi will be laying out plans for their "Mediterranean Riviera" mega golf resort complex.

Meanwhile, this round of ethnic cleansing will further solidify Israel's status as a pariah state, and further endanger Jews worldwide.

Ping Tung

(4,257 posts)
48. Neither is the IDF or UN.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 12:52 PM
Aug 2025

It seems the IDF is determined to either starve or murder the Palestinians in Gaza.

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.
Friedrich Nietzsche

TomWilm

(1,956 posts)
54. The Gaza strip is occupied by several brutal forces ...
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 01:31 PM
Aug 2025

... one of them is now lead by Netanyahu, the other main power is Hamas - initially supported by Israel mainly to sabotage life and elections in the Gaza strip. Israel operates by their military arm, the Israel Defense Forces. For Hamas it is their Qassam Brigades.

Hamas has never gotten a majority in an election, and the last one was in 2006. As the inhabitants only kind of government, Hamas gained some popularity through a functioning social welfare program, though also steeped in corruption and religious control.

Also the Hamas controlled Palestinian Civil Police Force had a relatively good reputation, even friendly cooperating with the Israeli police, when tension were lower. During the latest conflict IDF has been accused of systematically killing off that police force - making it impossible for Hamas to help with the delivering of aid, and preventing the theft by armed gangs.

The best way to protect Gazans being shot and bombed while trying to get food would be stopping the IDF attacking them. Maybe if the US stopped arming Israel, could that be a good beginning?

Response to no_hypocrisy (Original post)

Rob H.

(5,805 posts)
72. You can't help but notice that just 8% of Democrats support Israel's military campaign in Gaza
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 05:22 PM
Aug 2025

and they all seem to have decided DU is where they're going to make it everyone's problem.

LuvLoogie

(8,658 posts)
77. The U.S. hasn't shown up to protect the Gazans. It funds their abuse.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 08:26 PM
Aug 2025

Last edited Wed Aug 6, 2025, 08:13 AM - Edit history (1)

Maybe, MAYBE, a few of our leaders are embarrassed enough to meekly raise an objection.

Fuck HAMAS. The IDF and Netanyahu can't hide behind HAMAS' skirts any longer. Neither can we. It's pathetic.

Crunchy Frog

(28,220 posts)
82. I think that's pretty obvious to most people here.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 09:10 PM
Aug 2025

They're getting exactly what they want, and they don't care about Palestinian civilians.

Why do people act like that justifies Israel's policies?

IronLionZion

(51,024 posts)
103. Hamas is suicidal
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 08:36 AM
Aug 2025

they want to die and don't give a F who else dies around them too.

Other Gazans didn't make that choice. Israel knows it. DUers know it. Why should they pay for what Hamas did?

LeftInTX

(34,031 posts)
132. But they aren't killing themselves.
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 05:19 PM
Aug 2025

They're fighting and getting killed by IDF. Then, they are called martyrs.
It's a form of "holy war" for them.

Justice

(7,249 posts)
133. Never expected Hamas to protect people in GAZA
Wed Aug 6, 2025, 05:37 PM
Aug 2025

Didn’t expect Bibi to alienate them either.

Expected more pressure on those that house and protect Hamas leadership and/or fund Hamas.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You can't help but notice...